Lysine-urethane-based tissue adhesion for mastectomy-an approach to reducing the seroma rate?

Seroma formation after mastectomy: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of different flap fixation techniques

Flap fixation is the most promising solution to prevent seroma formation after mastectomy. In this systematic review with network meta-analysis (NMA), three different techniques were compared. The NMA included 25 articles, comprising 3423 patients, and revealed that sutures are superior to tissue glue in preventing clinically significant seroma. In addition, running sutures seemed to be superior to interrupted sutures. An RCT comparing these suture techniques seems necessary, given the quality and nature of existing literature.

Using Drain-Free Flap Fixation Techniques Versus Traditional Wound Closure With Drain Placement to Prevent Seroma Formation and Its Complications in Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Mastectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

During the past decade, there has been some controversy related to using flap fixation techniques instead of conventional wound closure methods and drain placement during mastectomy procedures. The purpose of our study was to address this controversy using a systematic review and meta-analysis of current published literature. Nineteen studies met our inclusion criteria. Our sample population consisted of 2,956 participants divided into two groups. The study group (SG) consisted of 1,418 individuals and the control group (CG) consisted of 1,538 participants. We found there was a significant reduction in the incidence of seroma formation (odds ratio [OR] = 0.35; 95% confidence interval, CI [0.3, 0.42]; p < .000) and surgical site infection (OR = 0.65; 95% CI [0.48, 0.88]; p = .006) in the SG compared with the CG. The length of hospital stay was also significantly reduced in the SG (0.59 days; 95% CI [0.73, 0.46]; χ 2 [6, N = 502] = 52.88; p < .000) compared with the CG. The results of our study show that using a flap fixation technique after mastectomy can decrease the patient's risk for seroma formation and surgical site infection while reducing their length of hospital stay. Further studies with longer follow-up periods are warranted to evaluate long-term complications associated with using a flap fixation technique compared with using conventional wound closure techniques and drain placement.

Comparison of Flap Fixation to Its Bed and Conventional Wound Closure with Drainage in Preventing Seroma Formation Following Mastectomy for Breast Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Seroma formation is a common complication following mastectomy. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to evaluate the impact of flap fixation techniques that omit drainage versus conventional closed drainage on seroma formation and related complications after mastectomy.

METHODS

Clinical studies of flap fixation techniques versus the conventional closure technique in patients undergoing mastectomy with or without axillary clearance were retrieved from the PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases. Papers were eligible for inclusion if the outcome was described in terms of seroma formation. Studies older than 20 years, animal studies and studies involving patients undergoing direct breast reconstruction were excluded.

RESULTS

Four randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and four cohort studies were included in our examination. Compared with the conventional drainage group, the flap fixation group had a similar incidence of seroma formation (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.30-1.93, p = 0.57).

CONCLUSION

Based on current evidence, mechanical flap fixation can replace conventional drainage without increasing seroma formation after mastectomy. Further well-designed RCTs are warranted to evaluate the effects of flap fixation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .