Characterization and clinical management of abnormal cytology findings in pregnant women: a retrospective analysis

Navigating the challenge of high-grade cervical lesions (CIN3) in pregnancy: a near miss

In this case, a pregnant Indigenous woman presented with high-grade cervical lesions (high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL), cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 (CIN2-3) and was lost to follow-up for over 5 years, posing a unique management challenge. Despite higher regression rates in pregnant women, personalised care was crucial due to potential pregnancy-related intervention risks.This case underscores the complexities of managing high-grade cervical lesions in pregnancy and highlights the significant burden of cervical cancer within Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities. It emphasises the urgent need for equitable screening access, patient-centred care and culturally sensitive education among vulnerable populations.Of particular note is the case's uniqueness, with the patient's CIN3 diagnosis persisting for over 5 years and spanning three pregnancies without definitive management. Post partum, a subsequent LLETZ revealed extensive HSIL (CIN3) involving ectocervical and endocervical margins. Due to margin involvement, the patient now requires ongoing surveillance, with continued risk of being lost to follow-up due to the factors described.

Pregnancy-Related Precancerous Cervical Lesions: Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, Evolution, and Impact upon Gestation and Fertility

More common than cervical cancer, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) represents a precursor lesion of cervical carcinoma, being associated with HPV infection. Due to the bidirectional relationship between HPV and estrogen and progesterone in pregnancy, most of the published data claim that precancerous lesions remain stable or even regress during pregnancy, although several studies have indicated the tendency of HSILs to persist. It is considered that pregnancy-related cervical precancerous lesions undergo a postpartum regression, due to stimulatory effects of the immune microenvironment. Due to the rarity of publications on this subject, we aimed to offer a concise overview of and new insights into the current knowledge regarding the pathogenesis, diagnosis, and evolution of pregnancy-associated precancerous lesions, as well as their impact upon gestation and fertility.

Diagnosis and Management of Cervical Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions in Pregnancy and Postpartum

Perinatal care provides important health care opportunities for many individuals at risk for cervical cancer. Pregnancy does not alter cervical cancer screening regimens. ASCCP risk-based management has a colposcopy threshold of a 4% immediate risk of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 3 or cancer, but the actual risk can be considerably higher based on current and past screening results. Improving cervical cancer outcomes with diagnosis during pregnancy rather than postpartum and facilitating further evaluation and treatment postpartum for lesser lesions are the perinatal management goals. Although colposcopy indications are unchanged in pregnancy, some individuals with lower risk of CIN 2-3 and reliable access to postpartum evaluation may defer colposcopy until after delivery. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia diagnosed in pregnancy tends to be stable, with frequent regression postpartum, though this is not universal. Colposcopic inspection during pregnancy can be challenging. Although biopsies in pregnancy are subjectively associated with increased bleeding, they do not increase complications. Endocervical curettage and expedited treatment are unacceptable. Treatment of CIN 2-3 in pregnancy is not recommended. Excisional biopsies in pregnancy are reserved for suspicion of malignancy that cannot be confirmed by colposcopic biopsy and when excisional biopsy results would alter oncologic or pregnancy care. Surveillance of high-grade lesions in pregnancy uses human papillomavirus-based testing, cytology, and colposcopy, with biopsy of worsening lesions every 12-24 weeks from diagnosis until postpartum evaluation. Mode of delivery does not definitively affect persistence of CIN postpartum. Postpartum care may involve a full colposcopic evaluation or expedited excisional procedure if indicated.

Antenatal and postnatal cervical precancer screening to increase coverage: experience from Battor, Ghana

Background

Cervical precancer screening in low-resource settings is largely opportunistic with low coverage. Many women in these settings, where the burden of cervical cancer is highest, only visit health institutions when pregnant or after delivery. We explored screening during antenatal and postnatal visits aimed at increasing coverage.

Methods

Pregnant women (in any trimester) attending antenatal care (ANC) and women attending postnatal care (PNC; 6-10 weeks) clinics were screened at Catholic Hospital, Battor and at outreach clinics from February to August 2022 (08/02/2022 to 02/08/2022). At the same visit, cervical specimens were obtained for high-risk human papillomavirus (hr-HPV) DNA testing (with the Sansure MA-6000 PCR platform) followed by either visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) or mobile colposcopy with the enhanced visual assessment system.

Results

Two hundred and seventy and 107 women were screened in the antenatal and postnatal groups, respectively. The mean ages were 29.4 (SD, 5.4) in the ANC group and 28.6 (SD, 6.4) years in the PNC group. The overall hr-HPV prevalence rate was 25.5% (95% confidence interval (CI), 21.1-29.9) disaggregated as 26.7% (95% CI, 21.4-31.9) in the ANC group and 22.4% (95% CI, 14.5-30.3) in the PNC group (p = 0.3946). Overall, 58.9% of pregnant women (28.3% hr-HPV+) and 66.4% of postnatal women (22.5% hr-HPV+) only visited a health facility when pregnant or after delivery (at Child Welfare Clinics). The VIA 'positivity' rate for all screened women was 5.3% (95% CI, 3.1-7.6), disaggregated into 5.2% (95% CI, 2.5-7.8) in the ANC group and 5.7% (95% CI, 1.3-10.1) in the PNC group (p-value = 0.853).

Conclusion

A significant number of women in Ghana only visit a health facility during pregnancy or after delivery. ANC and PNC clinics would offer opportunities to increase coverage in cervical precancer screening in low-resource settings. Relying on community nurses ensures that such programs are readily integrated into routine care of women and no opportunity is missed.

Registry Study of the Working Group on Cervical Pathology and Colposcopy (AGCPC) on the Diagnostic Algorithm for the New Cervical Cancer Screening - Initial Data

Introduction

For the first time since 1971, new regulations were introduced for cervical cancer screening as an organized cancer screening guideline (oKFE-RL) starting 1 January 2020. From the age of 20, a cytological smear test is performed annually, and from the age of 35, so-called co-testing (cytology and test for high-risk HPVs) is performed every three years. In case of abnormalities, the algorithm is used as the basis for investigation. According to this diagnostic algorithm, even so-called low-risk groups receive early colposcopic evaluation. This approach has been heavily debated and serves as the basis for this registry study.

Methods

All patients who presented to the centers for a colposcopy as part of the diagnostic algorithm were included after signing an informed consent form. The following findings were obtained: Medical history, colposcopy, histology, and cytology findings, as well as possible therapies and their findings. The aim was to evaluate the frequency of the target lesions cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2+/CIN 3+ in the respective groups.

Result

A total of 4763 patients were enrolled in the study from July 2020 to October 2022. As a referral diagnosis, HPV persistence (HPV: human papillomavirus) with group I was determined in 23.9% (1139), HPV persistence with group II-a in 2.1% (100), II-p (ASC-US) in 11.2% (535), and II-g (AGC endocervical NOS) in 1.3% (64). III-p (ASC-H) and III-g (AGC endocervical favor neoplastic) were found in 9.4% (447) and 2.2% (107), respectively, IIID1 (LSIL) in 19% (906), IIID2 (HSIL, moderate dysplasia) in 18.9% (898), IVa-p (HSIL, severe dysplasia) in 10.7% (508), IVa-g (AIS) in 0.7% (31), IVb-p (HSIL with features suspicious for invasion) and IVb-g (AIS with features suspicious for invasion) in 0.3% (15), 0.1% (6), and 7 with suspected invasion V-p (squamous cell carcinoma)/V-g (endocervical adenocarcinoma) (0.1%). In the IVa-p group (HSIL, severe dysplasia), 67.7% had CIN 2+ and 56.5% had CIN 3+, adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS), and adenocarcinoma. If the histology of the excised tissue specifically based on the colposcope findings was also evaluated, CIN 2+ was found in 79.7% of cases, and CIN 3+ in 67.3% of cases. In IIID2 (HSIL, moderate dysplasia), CIN 2+ was detected in 50.9%, and CIN 3+/AIS in 28.3%. After evaluating patients who underwent surgery immediately, this increased to 53.0% for CIN 2+ and 29.3% for CIN 3+/AIS. In IIID1 (LSIL), CIN 2+ was detected in 27.4% and CIN 3+/AIS in 11.7%, and in II-p (ASC-US), CIN 2+ was detected in 23.4% and CIN 3+ and AIS in 10.8%, and in II-g (AGC endocervical NOS), CIN 2+ was detected in 34.4% and CIN 3+ in 23.4%. In the HPV persistence/II-a and I group, 21% showed CIN 2+, and 12.1% showed CIN 3+ and AIS, and 13% showed CIN 2+ and 5.9% showed CIN 3+ and AIS. In patients who were HPV-negative and had further diagnostics performed on the basis of cytologic smear alone, 27.9% had CIN 2+, and 14.1% had CIN 3 and AIS.

Discussion

In a synopsis of the present findings of our initial data of the registry study on the new cervical cancer screening, according to the organized early cancer screening guideline (oKFE-RL), we could show that the target lesion CIN 3+ and AIS is detected unexpectedly frequently in a not insignificant proportion, especially in the cytological low-risk group. Currently, we cannot answer whether this can reduce the incidence and mortality of cervical carcinoma, but this could be an initial indication of this and will be reviewed in further long-term evaluations.

The Fate of Cervical Dysplastic Lesions during Pregnancy and the Impact of the Delivery Mode: A Review

Cervical dysplasia, also referred to as cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) or squamous intraepithelial lesion (SIL), is the precursor lesion of cervical carcinoma. Therefore, its diagnosis is vital for early detection and inhibiting the development of cervical carcinogenesis. Human papillomavirus (HPV) is the most common aetiology of cervical cancer and this infection mainly affects young women of childbearing age, thus affecting pregnant women as well. It is essential to know how CIN progresses in pregnant patients because the management of pregnant and non-pregnant patients is different (considering the safety of both mother and child in pregnancy). This review intends to highlight the studies which have assessed the rates of progression of CIN diagnosed in pregnancy throughout the antenatal period and the impact of the mode of delivery on CIN outcomes. We searched PubMed/MEDLINE and Google Scholar databases for relevant articles. Many studies indicate that the rate of progression of these lesions is very slow during the tenure of pregnancy; many also report postpartum regression of these lesions. Thus, in most of these patients, management can be safely implemented in the postpartum period while just keeping them under observation in the antenatal period. However, patients with high-grade CIN have a higher chance of developing invasive cancer and, therefore, require careful monitoring. There is a dispute regarding the role of the mode of delivery in determining the fate of cervical dysplasia. While some studies supported vaginal births over caesarean sections, others did not find any difference between the two in defining the outcome of the dysplastic lesions.