Comparison of nitric oxide production and motion characteristics after 3-layer percoll and IxaPrep preparation methods of human sperm

LESS NO PRODUCTION AND BETTER MOTION PARAMETER IN HUMAN SPERM BY SWIM-UP PROCESSING

Fifteen semen specimens were obtained from men for semen analysis; each was divided into two aliquots for prepararation. The motile sperm recovery rate, percentage motility, and motion parameters were measured for each semen specimen (n = 15) before and after preparation with the use of the two methods, and cultured with different time courses (1 hr, 3 hr, and 6 hr). Nitric oxide (NO) was measured using the chemiluminscence method after centrifugation. Recovery rate of motile cell was significantly higher in direct swim-up method (69.5 +/- 42.4% versus 49.3 +/- 29.3%, p < 0.05). In motility, direct swim-up method in the different time courses was significantly better than IxaPrep method. (1 hr: 91.1 +/- 5.2% vs 65.6 +/- 16.4%, 3 hr: 87.2 +/- 7.9% vs 65.2 +/- 16.5%, 6 hr: 86.1 +/- 7.5% vs 60.8 +/- 17.6% and prewash: 61.6 +/- 16.2%, p < 0.05). In VAP and VSL, the sperm prepared by the above two methods all improved compared to pre-wash sperm (p < 0.05), but there was no statistical significance between the two methods. NO production in the direct swim-up group was significantly lower than IxaPrep group in the first hour of culture (0.09 +/- 0.09 uM vs 0.15 +/- 0.09 uM, p < 0.05). NO production increased as the culture time increased in swim-up group, but conversed in IxaPrep group. The lower level of NO produced in the swim-up group may suggest that better sperm quality achieved is due to the decreased NO production.

COMPARISON OF NITRIC OXIDE PRODUCTION MOTION CHARACTERISTICS OF SPERM AFTER CRYOPRESERVED IN THREE DIFFERENT PREPARATIONS

Three ml of semen collected from 20 volunteers were divided into three aliquots: a) semen cryopreserved for 48 hr then swim-up method; b) using swim-up method then cryopreserving for 48 h; and c) using 45%-90% two layers PureSperm to prepare sperm then cryopreserved for 48 h. Motility characteristics were evaluated before cryopreservation and after thawing. NO was measured using the chemiluminescence method after centrifugation. The recovery rate and motion parameters were the highest in the swim-up group. NO produced in the swim-up group was significantly lower than the PureSperm group, and the PureSperm group was lower than the semen treated with cryoprotectant group. Best semen quality was achieved due to the decreased NO production.

Sperm preparation for ART

The onset of clinical assisted reproduction, a quarter of a century ago, required the isolation of motile spermatozoa. As the indication of assisted reproduction shifted from mere gynaecological indications to andrological indications during the years, this urged andrological research to understand the physiology of male germ cell better and develop more sophisticated techniques to separate functional spermatozoa from those that are immotile, have poor morphology or are not capable to fertilize oocytes. Initially, starting from simple washing of spermatozoa, separation techniques, based on different principles like migration, filtration or density gradient centrifugation evolved. The most simple and cheapest is the conventional swim-up procedure. A more sophisticated and most gentle migration method is migration-sedimentation. However, its yield is relatively small and the technique is therefore normally only limited to ejaculates with a high number of motile spermatozoa. Recently, however, the method was also successfully used to isolate spermatozoa for intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). Sperm separation methods that yield a higher number of motile spermatozoa are glass wool filtration or density gradient centrifugation with different media. Since Percoll as a density medium was removed from the market in 1996 for clinical use in the human because of its risk of contamination with endotoxins, other media like IxaPrep, Nycodenz, SilSelect, PureSperm or Isolate were developed in order to replace Percoll. Today, an array of different methods is available and the selection depends on the quality of the ejaculates, which also includes production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) by spermatozoa and leukocytes. Ejaculates with ROS production should not be separated by means of conventional swim-up, as this can severely damage the spermatozoa. In order to protect the male germ cells from the influence of ROS and to stimulate their motility to increase the yield, a number of substances can be added to the ejaculate or the separation medium. Caffeine, pentoxifylline and 2-deoxyadenosine are substances that were used to stimulate motility. Recent approaches to stimulate spermatozoa include bicarbonate, metal chelators or platelet-activating factor (PAF). While the use of PAF already resulted in pregnancies in intrauterine insemination, the suitability of the other substances for the clinical use still needs to be tested. Finally, the isolation of functional spermatozoa from highly viscous ejaculates is a special challenge and can be performed enzymatically to liquefy the ejaculate. The older method, by which the ejaculate is forcefully aspirated through a narrow-gauge needle, should be abandoned as it can severely damage spermatozoa, thus resulting in immotile sperm.