The effects of levobupivacaine infiltration on post-tonsillectomy pain relief in adults: a single-blinded, randomized, and controlled clinical study

Systematic review and meta-analysis of pain management after tonsillectomy

Tonsillectomy is one of the most common operations. Tonsillectomy is also one of the most painful surgical procedures. However, there is still no satisfactory standard for postoperative pain management. Four databases (Cochrane Library, Ovid Technologies, PubMed, Web of Science) were searched for the period from 1908 to 2019. The systematic literature review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Data were pooled using random-effects and fixed-effects models. Randomized controlled trials, reviews and meta-analyses were included. Primary outcomes were quantitative pain intensity in the first 24 h after tonsillectomy and on days 1, 3, and 7 postoperatively. The search yielded 1594 publications, of which 111 publications with 7566 patients, both children and adults, could be included. Intraoperative medication with intravenous dexamethasone significantly reduced pain (mean difference [MD] -0.42; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.61- -0.24). Among the local anesthetics, only the preoperative injection of levobupivacaine into the tonsillar compartment was able to provide sufficient pain reduction up to three days after tonsillectomy (MD: -1.92; 95% CI: -2.73 - -1.11). Preoperative or intraoperative administration of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) significantly reduced pain (MD: -0.75; 95% CI: -0.87- -0.63). Steroids and NSAIDs are an important part of pain management after tonsillectomy.

Critical review on the efficacy and safety of levobupivacaine peritonsillar infiltration

Levobupivacaine is a long-acting local anesthetic that is both safe and non-toxic. However, few researchers have examined the efficacy and safety of peritonsillar injections of levobupivacaine for postoperative pain relief. The goal of this study was to assess current randomized controlled trials that employed this strategy. A literature review was conducted using databases such as DELPHIS, PUBMED, COCHRANE, and SCOPUS. A total of fifteen randomized controlled trials were found and thoroughly reviewed. There were no fatalities reported. One study reported a case of nausea and vomiting. In most of the studies, levobupivacaine with magnesium, epinephrine, dexamethasone hydrochloride, tramadol, or levobupivacaine alone were compared to a placebo. Four trials employed different combinations of levobupivacaine and other medicines to recruit adults. Most of the studies had a modest sample size. As a result, larger research with more representative populations should be conducted. Despite certain flaws in the trial design, our findings suggest that levobupivacaine is safe and effective at reducing postoperative pain.

PROSPECT guideline for tonsillectomy: systematic review and procedure-specific postoperative pain management recommendations

Tonsillectomy is one of the most frequently performed surgical procedures; however, pain management remains challenging. Procedure‐specific efficacy as well as specific risks of treatment options should guide selection of pain management protocols based on evidence and should optimise analgesia without harm. The aims of this systematic review were to evaluate the available literature and develop recommendations for optimal pain management after tonsillectomy. A systematic review utilising preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta‐analysis guidelines with procedure‐specific postoperative pain management (PROSPECT) methodology was undertaken. Randomised controlled trials published in the English language up to November 2019 assessing postoperative pain using analgesic, anaesthetic or surgical interventions were identified. Out of the 719 potentially eligible studies identified, 226 randomised controlled trials met the inclusion criteria, excluding the studies examining surgical techniques. Pre‐operative and intra‐operative interventions that improved postoperative pain were paracetamol; non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs; intravenous dexamethasone; ketamine (only assessed in children); gabapentinoids; dexmedetomidine; honey; and acupuncture. Inconsistent evidence was found for local anaesthetic infiltration; antibiotics; and magnesium sulphate. Limited evidence was found for clonidine. The analgesic regimen for tonsillectomy should include paracetamol; non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs; and intravenous dexamethasone, with opioids as rescue analgesics. Analgesic adjuncts such as intra‐operative and postoperative acupuncture as well as postoperative honey are also recommended. Ketamine (only for children); dexmedetomidine; or gabapentinoids may be considered when some of the first‐line analgesics are contra‐indicated. Further randomised controlled trials are required to define risk and combination of drugs most effective for postoperative pain relief after tonsillectomy.

#10-Year Challenge: Local anaesthetic for post-tonsillectomy pain: Update meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Adequate management of post-tonsillectomy pain is an important consideration in postoperative management after tonsillectomy. A 2008 meta-analysis showed that the use of local anaesthetic either by infiltration or topical application reduced postoperative pain.

OBJECTIVES

To review the current evidence for the use of local anaesthetic as a means of reducing post-tonsillectomy pain and compare current evidence to the previous meta-analysis 10 years ago.

METHOD

Systematic literature searches of MEDLINE [*"ANESTHETICS, LOCAL"/ AND *TONSILLECTOMY/], EMBASE [*"LOCAL ANESTHETIC AGENT"/ AND *TONSILLECTOMY/] and PubMed [(Tonsillectomy).ti,ab AND (Local Anaesthetic).ti,ab OR (Local Anesthetic).ti,ab]. A meta-analysis of randomised control trials assessing the use of local anaesthetic agents for post-tonsillectomy pain.

RESULTS

Twenty-three studies were included in the meta-analysis. Overall, local anaesthetic, applied topically or infiltrated, significantly reduces pain scores compared with controls at 4-6 hours [-0.65 (95% CI: -0.77; -0.53)]; 24 hours [-0.50 (95% CI: -0.66, -0.35)]; and 5-7 days [-0.78 (95% CI: -0.90, -0.65)] (standardised mean differences).

CONCLUSION

Current studies suggest that use of peri-operative local anaesthetic during tonsillectomy does improve postoperative pain outcomes. The limitations of the analysis are as follows: all studies are small, and a multi-centred larger trial is recommended to guarantee statistical reliability. There was no description of significant adverse side effects from local anaesthetic use.

A Randomized Single-Blinded Trial of Posttonsillectomy Liposomal Bupivacaine among Adult Patients

Objective

To determine whether liposomal bupivacaine (Exparel) is safe and effective in the management of posttonsillectomy pain among adult patients.

Study Design

A prospective single-blind randomized controlled trial.

Setting

An academic quaternary care center (Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota).

Subjects and Methods

From May 2015 to December 2016, 39 patients were randomized to receive oral pain medication and 8 mL of injected liposomal bupivacaine or oral pain medication alone for treatment of their posttonsillectomy pain. Visual analog scale pain intensity scores, oral pain medication usage, liquid oral intake, and complications were recorded for 2 weeks after the procedure.

Results

Thirty-nine patients were randomized, with 17 patients in the liposomal bupivacaine group and 22 in the control group. Fifteen patients in the liposomal bupivacaine group and 18 patients in the control group completed the study. Pain intensity score on postoperative day 1 ( P = .043) proved to be the only statistically significant result, with no difference noted in pain scores on postoperative days 2 to 14. There was no difference in pain medication usage, liquid oral intake, postoperative hemorrhage, or adverse events between groups.

Conclusions

The injection of liposomal bupivacaine in the posttonsillectomy wound bed demonstrates improved pain intensity scores for the first 24 hours after surgery with no adverse complications noted in comparison with patients who did not receive the injection. Given the limited pain reduction and increased cost, use of liposomal bupivacaine in adult tonsillectomy patients appears to have minimal indication for use.

The Efficacy of Levobupivacaine Hydrochloride-Dexamethasone Infiltration for Post-Tonsillectomy Pain in Adults

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of peritonsillar infiltration of a levobupivacaine hydrochloride and dexamethasone combination for post-tonsillectomy pain in adult patients.

METHODS

A total of 40 patients were included in this double-blind, randomized, and placebo-controlled study. The patients were equally randomized into 2 groups by means of sealed envelopes. The study group (SG) received peritonsillar levobupivacaine hydrochloride and dexamethasone infiltration and the control group (CG) received peritonsillar saline infiltration. Pain scores at the second, fourth, eighth, 12th, 16th, and 24th hours and the second to seventh days after operation were recorded by the patients in each group using a visual analog scale. Duration of surgery and the total amount of blood loss during the surgery were also recorded for each patient.

RESULTS

All pain scores in the SG were lower than those in the CG; however, the difference was significant at the second, 12th, and 16th hours, and the second and third day (P < 0.05). Postoperative morbidity parameters, including otalgia, nausea, vomiting, fever, halitosis, and bleeding were similar between the 2 groups. Total amount of analgesic consumption in the SG was significantly lower than in the CG on each day of the week after tonsillectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

Peritonsillar infiltration of a levobupivacaine hydrochloride and dexamethasone combination may provide pain reduction and decrease analgesic consumption in the postoperative period after adult tonsillectomy.

Preemptive Submucosal Infiltration with Ropivacaine for Uvulopalatopharyngoplasty

Objective

To evaluate the preemptive analgesic effect of submucosal infiltration of ropivacaine for uvulopalatopharyngoplasty.

Study Design

Randomized controlled trial.

Setting

Comprehensive clinical center and academic hospital.

Subjects and Methods

Fifty consecutive male patients scheduled for uvulopalatopharyngoplasty were divided randomly into group A and group B. In group A, 4 mL of 0.33% ropivacaine and normal saline with epinephrine was preincisionally injected under the mucosa on both sides of the tonsillar fossa, soft palate, and the lower part of palatoglossal arch, whereas the upper and middle parts of the palatoglossal arch and the upper part of the palatopharyngeal arch were infiltrated with 2 mL of the same mixture. In group B, an identical volume of normal saline with epinephrine was administered. In both groups, postoperative pain was initially controlled by intravenous morphine titration until patient-controlled analgesia with morphine could be used. Cumulative patient-controlled analgesic morphine consumption; visual analog scale scores at 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48 hours postoperatively at rest and during swallowing; and opioid-related adverse effects were recorded.

Results

The visual analog score was lower at rest during the 48-hour postoperative period and during swallowing within the first 12 hours for group A versus group B ( P < .05). Patients in group A required 44.1%, 38.2%, and 41.1% less morphine during the first 24 hours, 24 hours to 48 hours, and 48 hours postoperatively, respectively, and fewer patients experienced nausea, vomiting, and pruritus ( P < .05).

Conclusion

Preemptive submucosal infiltration with 0.33% ropivacaine effectively controlled pain after uvulopalato-pharyngoplasty.