Functional outcomes following endoscopic laser cricopharyngeal myotomy with mucosal repair

Swallowing Outcomes in 7 Patients Following Endoscopic Cricopharyngeal Myotomy With Primary Closure

Cricopharyngeal spasm and pharyngeal pouch can result in severe dysphagia symptoms that can have a significant impact on a patient's quality of life. Several surgical interventions have been demonstrated including balloon dilatation, botox injection, and open and endoscopic cricopharyngeal myotomy. The aim of this case series is to describe our technique for endoscopic cricopharyngeal myotomy and compare pre- and postoperative swallowing outcomes using objective swallowing questionnaires in a small series of patients. Seven patients diagnosed with cricopharyngeal spasm or grade 1 pharyngeal pouch on barium swallow were prospectively observed. MD Anderson Dysphagia inventory (MDADI) and Dysphagia handicap index (DHI) were given to patients before and after their operation. All patients underwent the same surgical technique with the cricopharyngeal bar divided and the defect closed with dissolvable sutures. Mean inpatient stay was 7 days (range 1-8) and mean time to resumption of soft diet was 4 (range 1-7) days. All patients resumed oral diet before discharge. MDADI scores showed improvement across all domains, however only the emotional score achieved statistical significance (P = .04). Dysphagia handicap index scores showed a statistically significant improvement across functional, emotional, and total domains. Postoperative chest infection treated with oral antibiotics occurred in 3 patients (43%) and no other complications were documented. In conclusion, endoscopic cricopharyngeal myotomy with primary sutured endoscopic closure can result in a significant benefit to patient's swallowing symptoms, emotional well-being, and quality of life.

Swallowing outcomes after cricopharyngeal myotomy: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

No practice guidelines have been established for swallowing outcomes after cricopharyngeal myotomy (CPM). The purpose of this systematic review was to summarize evidence for swallowing outcomes in patients undergoing CPM to treat symptomatic cricopharyngeal dysfunction, in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) protocol.

METHODS

Swallowing outcomes examined included penetration/aspiration ratings, manometric measures, patient-rated dysphagia scales, clinician-rated dysphagia scales, diet level, and weight.

RESULTS

Three databases were queried for studies published between January 1995 and July 2015, resulting in a total of 122 full-text eligible records. Studies were screened and reviewed, culminating in 10 studies meeting inclusion criteria. Critical appraisal of study design, swallowing outcomes measures, and statistical analysis were summarized.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review revealed insufficient evidence for guiding clinical practice. Future investigations should use validated patient-rated and clinician-rated instruments as well as detailed high-resolution manometry measures to optimally capture postoperative swallowing outcomes.

Open vs. endoscopic cricopharyngeal myotomy; Is there a difference?

INTRODUCTION

The upper esophageal sphincter (UES) is composed largely of the cricopharyngeus muscle (CP) and acts as the gatekeeper to the esophagus. There are multiple methods of treating UES dysfunction, but myotomy has been shown to be the most definitive means. We aim to evaluate the difference between open and endoscopic CP myotomy (CPM).

METHODS

A retrospective review of all patients undergoing endoscopic and open CPM was undertaken. We recorded demographic, clinical, operative, hospital, and postoperative data for both groups from January 2010-March 2015. The endoscopic and open CPM groups were directly compared.

RESULTS

Our cohort consisted of 38 open and 41 endoscopic CPM patients. There were 22 males and 16 females in the open group and 9 males and 32 females in the endoscopic group. The primary diagnosis for both groups was cricopharyngeal hyperfunction. We found a significant improvement in surgical time and symptomatic outcomes in the endoscopic group (p=0.008 and p=0.010). There was no difference in UES preop pressure, hospital stay, complication rate, time to oral intake, or length of follow-up between cohorts.

CONCLUSION

Endoscopic CPM is a safe and effective alternative to the open approach. Patients undergoing endoscopic CPM have shorter operative times and improved outcomes when compared to the open approach.

Management of isolated cricopharyngeal dysfunction: systematic review

OBJECTIVE

A systematic review was performed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of different therapeutic interventions available for the management of isolated cricopharyngeal dysfunction.

METHODS

Studies were identified using the following databases: Ovid (Medline, Embase), the Cochrane Library, PubMed and Google Scholar. An initial search identified 339 articles. All titles and abstracts were reviewed. Fifty-six relevant articles were inspected in more detail; of these, 47 were included in the qualitative analysis.

RESULTS

No relevant randomised trials were found. A range of case series were used to perform a qualitative analysis. Botulinum toxin A injection and cricopharyngeal dilatation were associated with a higher risk of recurrence, but appear to be more suitable in elderly and co-morbid patients. In those patients requiring formal myotomy, endoscopic approaches appear to be as effective but less morbid when compared with classical open surgery.

CONCLUSION

There is good evidence for the safety and efficacy of the different therapeutic options for isolated cricopharyngeal dysfunction. However, further studies are required to compare the efficacy of the various treatment modalities.