Pattern of hearing loss following cochlear implantation

The impact of round window reinforcement on middle and inner ear mechanics with air and bone conduction stimulation

The round window (RW) membrane plays an important role in normal inner ear mechanics. Occlusion or reinforcement of the RW has been described in the context of congenital anomalies or after cochlear implantation and is applied as a surgical treatment for hyperacusis. Multiple lumped and finite element models predict a low-frequency hearing loss with air conduction of up to 20 dB after RW reinforcement and limited to no effect on hearing with bone conduction stimulation. Experimental verification of these results, however, remains limited. Here, we present an experimental study measuring the impact of RW reinforcement on the middle and inner ear mechanics with air and bone conduction stimulation. In a within-specimen repeated measures design with human cadaveric specimens (n = 6), we compared the intracochlear pressures in scala vestibuli (PSV) and scala tympani (PST) before and after RW reinforcement with soft tissue, cartilage, and bone cement. The differential pressure (PDIFF) across the basilar membrane - known to be closely related to the hearing sensation - was calculated as the complex difference between PSV and PST. With air conduction stimulation, both PSV and PSTincreased on average up to 22 dB at frequencies below 1500 Hz with larger effect sizes for PST compared to PSV. The PDIFF, in contrast, decreased up to 11 dB at frequencies between 700 and 800 Hz after reinforcement with bone cement. With bone conduction, the average within-specimen effects were less than 5 dB for either PSV, PST, or PDIFF. The inter-specimen variability with bone conduction, however, was considerably larger than with air conduction. This experimental study shows that RW reinforcement impacts air conduction stimulation at low frequencies. Bone conduction stimulation seems to be largely unaffected. From a clinical point of view, these results support the hypothesis that delayed loss of air conduction hearing after cochlear implantation could be partially explained by the impact of RW reinforcement.

[Practical instructions for recording vestibular evoked myogenic potentials]

Recording of vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (VEMPs) is a well-established method for functional diagnostics of the otolith organs. VEMPs are vestibular reflexes of the sacculus und utriculus to acoustic stimulation by air-conducted sound or bone-conducted vibration and are recorded by surface electrodes from the cervical (cVEMP) and ocular (oVEMP) muscles. The results of VEMP recordings are part of the neuro-otologic test battery and enable diagnosis of various vestibular disorders or differentiation between non-vestibular and peripheral vestibular vertigo. However, the methods for recording VEMPs vary substantially, although recording and stimulation parameters as well as methods of data analysis have a significant influence on the results. This article provides an overview of recommended parameters as well as practical instructions for the recording, analysis, and interpretation of VEMPs.

Objective vestibular function changes in children following cochlear implantation

BACKGROUND:

To date, systematically objective evaluations of vestibular function in children with cochlear implantation (CI) have been conducted sparsely, especially in children with large vestibular aqueduct syndrome (LVAS).

OBJECTIVE:

Our goal was to investigate the function of all five vestibular end-organs pre- and post-cochlear implantation in children with LVAS and normal CT.

METHODS:

In this retrospective cohort study, 34 children (age 4–17 years) with bilateral profound sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) undergoing unilateral CI were included. Participants included 18 (52.9%) children with LVAS. Objective modalities to evaluate vestibular function included the caloric test, cervical vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials (cVEMP), ocular vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials (oVEMP), and video head impulse test (vHIT). All measurements were performed before surgery and 9 months after surgery.

RESULTS:

Mean age at CI was 8.1±3.7 years. Caloric testing showed hypofunction in 38.2% of cases before implantation and in 50% after (p > 0.05). We found a significant increase of overall abnormality rate in cVEMP and oVEMP from pre- to post-CI (p < 0.05). In all three semicircular canals tested by vHIT, there were no statistically significant mean gain changes (p > 0.05). Higher deterioration rates in cVEMP (53.3%) and oVEMP (52.0%) after surgery were observed (p < 0.05). In children with LVAS, cVEMP revealed a higher deterioration rate than superior semicircular canal (SSC) and posterior semicircular canal (PSC) (p < 0.05). In children with normal CT, the deterioration rates in VEMPs were both higher than those in vHIT (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS:

In general, the otolith organs were the most affected peripheral vestibular sensors in children after cochlear implantation. The variations in otolith function influenced by CI were different between children with LVAS and normal CT. We recommend the use of this vestibular function test battery for children with cochlear implantation.

Bone conducted vibration is an effective stimulus for otolith testing in cochlear implant patients

BACKGROUND

Treatment with a cochlear implant (CI) poses the risk of inducing a behaviorally unmeasurable air-bone gap leading to false negative absence of cervical and ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (cVEMPs, oVEMPs) to air conducted sound (ACS).

OBJECTIVE

To investigate VEMP response rates to ACS and bone conducted vibration (BCV) in CI patients and the applicability of the B81 transducer for BCV stimulation.

METHODS

Prospective experimental study including unilateral CI patients, measuring cVEMPs and oVEMPs to ACS and to BCV, comparing response rates, signed asymmetry ratios, latencies, and amplitudes.

RESULTS

Data of 13 CI patients (mean age 44±12 years) were analyzed. For the CI side, oVEMP and cVEMP response rates were significantly higher for BCV (77%cVEMP, 62%oVEMP) compared to ACS (23%cVEMP, 8%oVEMP). For the contralateral side, no difference between response rates to ACS (85%cVEMP, 69%oVEMP) and BCV (85%cVEMP, 77%oVEMP) was observed. Substantially higher asymmetries were observed for ACS (-88±23%for cVEMPs, -96±11%for oVEMPs) compared to BCV (-12±45%for cVEMPs, 4±74%for oVEMPs).

CONCLUSIONS

BCV is an effective stimulus for VEMP testing in CI patients. The B81 is a feasible stimulator.

Effect of Cochlear Implantation on Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials and Wideband Acoustic Immittance

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to determine if absent air conduction stimuli vestibular evoked myogenic potential (VEMP) responses found in ears after cochlear implantation can be the result of alterations in peripheral auditory mechanics rather than vestibular loss. Peripheral mechanical changes were investigated by comparing the response rates of air and bone conduction VEMPs as well as by measuring and evaluating wideband acoustic immittance (WAI) responses in ears with cochlear implants and normal-hearing control ears. The hypothesis was that the presence of a cochlear implant can lead to an air-bone gap, causing absent air conduction stimuli VEMP responses, but present bone conduction vibration VEMP responses (indicating normal vestibular function), with changes in WAI as compared with ears with normal hearing. Further hypotheses were that subsets of ears with cochlear implants would (a) have present VEMP responses to both stimuli, indicating normal vestibular function and either normal or near-normal WAI, or (b) have absent VEMP responses to both stimuli, regardless of WAI, due to true vestibular loss.

DESIGN

Twenty-seven ears with cochlear implants (age range 7 to 31) and 10 ears with normal hearing (age range 7 to 31) were included in the study. All ears completed otoscopy, audiometric testing, 226 Hz tympanometry, WAI measures (absorbance), air conduction stimuli cervical and ocular VEMP testing through insert earphones, and bone conduction vibration cervical and ocular VEMP testing with a mini-shaker. Comparisons of VEMP responses to air and bone conduction stimuli, as well as absorbance responses between ears with normal hearing and ears with cochlear implants, were completed.

RESULTS

All ears with normal hearing demonstrated 100% present VEMP response rates for both stimuli. Ears with cochlear implants had higher response rates to bone conduction vibration compared with air conduction stimuli for both cervical and ocular VEMPs; however, this was only significant for ocular VEMPs. Ears with cochlear implants demonstrated reduced low-frequency absorbance (500 to 1200 Hz) as compared with ears with normal hearing. To further analyze absorbance, ears with cochlear implants were placed into subgroups based on their cervical and ocular VEMP response patterns. These groups were (1) present air conduction stimuli response, present bone conduction vibration response, (2) absent air conduction stimuli response, present bone conduction vibration response, and (3) absent air conduction stimuli response, absent bone conduction vibration response. For both cervical and ocular VEMPs, the group with absent air conduction stimuli responses and present bone conduction vibration responses demonstrated the largest decrease in low-frequency absorbance as compared with the ears with normal hearing.

CONCLUSIONS

Bone conduction VEMP response rates were increased compared with air-conduction VEMP response rates in ears with cochlear implants. Ears with cochlear implants also demonstrate changes in low-frequency absorbance consistent with a stiffer system. This effect was largest for ears that had absent air conduction but present bone conduction VEMPs. These findings suggest that this group, in particular, has a mechanical change that could lead to an air-bone gap, thus, abolishing the air conduction VEMP response due to an alteration in mechanics and not a true vestibular loss. Clinical considerations include using bone conduction vibration VEMPs and WAI for preoperative and postoperative testing in patients undergoing cochlear implantation.

Comparison of Hearing Preservation Outcomes Using Extended Versus Single-Dose Steroid Therapy in Cochlear Implantation

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to compare the hearing preservation outcomes of patients who received extended versus single-dose steroid therapy in cochlear implant surgery.

DESIGN

Case-control.

SETTING

Tertiary referral centers in Taiwan from April 2017 to 2019.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 70 patients aged 1 to 78 years old (mean = 18.04, standard deviation [SD] = 21.51) who received cochlear implantation via the round window approach were included in the study. Prospectively, 35 cases were enrolled for cochlear implantation with single-dose therapy. Thirty-five controls who underwent cochlear implantation with extended therapy were retrospectively enrolled after frequency matching.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The main outcome measure was the rate of hearing preservation. This was calculated based on the HEARRING Network formula and results were categorized as complete, partial, and minimal. Impedances served as secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in the complete hearing preservation rates between the extended and single-dose groups at 6 months postoperatively. Impedances were significantly lower in the extended group after 1 month and 6 months of follow up. When the complete and partial hearing preservation groups were compared, the size of round window opening and speed of insertion were found to be statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Both extended and single-dose therapies result in good hearing preservation in patients who undergo cochlear implantation. However, better impedances can be expected from patients who received extended therapy. A slower speed of insertion and a widely opened round window play a role in hearing preservation.

Changes in Wide-band Tympanometry Absorbance Following Cochlear Implantation

OBJECTIVE

Determine if changes in middle ear absorbance measured with wide-band tympanometry (WBT) occur following hearing-preservation cochlear implantation (CI). Such measures may provide insight into the mechanisms of acoustic hearing loss postimplantation.

STUDY DESIGN

Clinical capsule report.

SETTING

Tertiary academic referral center.

DESIGN

WBT absorbance was measured bilaterally during pre- and postoperative clinical office visits in five unilaterally-implanted cochlear implant recipients. Pre- and postoperative WBT measures were compared within each subject in the implanted and contralateral, unimplanted ears.

RESULTS

In general, WBT absorbance measurements show a broad spectral pattern including two or three distinct peaks measured over a frequency range of 226 to 8000 Hz. Grand average and linear mixed model comparisons between the pre- and postoperative WBT patterns show significantly reduced (p < 0.05) low-frequency absorbance in the implanted ears in the frequency region over 0.6 to 1.1 kHz, but not in the unimplanted ears. The maximum effect occurred at 1 kHz with absorbance decreasing from ∼0.8 to ∼0.5 after implantation. The limited data are consistent with expected relationships between WBT absorbance and air- and bone-conduction thresholds, assuming an increased air-bone gap reflects conductive hearing loss.

CONCLUSION

Cochlear implantation can result in reduction of low-frequency acoustic absorbance as measured by WBT. WBT may be a useful and sensitive tool for monitoring the mechanical status of the middle and inner ears following cochlear implantation.

Otoprotection to Implanted Cochlea Exposed to Noise Trauma With Dexamethasone Eluting Electrode

Cochlear implantation (CI) is now widely used to provide auditory rehabilitation to individuals having severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL). However, CI can lead to electrode insertion trauma (EIT) that can cause damage to sensory cells in the inner ear resulting in loss of residual hearing. Even with soft surgical techniques where there is minimal macroscopic damage, we can still observe the generation of molecular events that may initiate programmed cell death via various mechanisms such as oxidative stress, the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines, and activation of the caspase pathway. In addition, individuals with CI may be exposed to noise trauma (NT) due to occupation and leisure activities that may affect their hearing ability. Recently, there has been an increased interest in the auditory community to determine the efficacy of drug-eluting electrodes for the protection of residual hearing. The objective of this study is to determine the effect of NT on implanted cochlea as well as the otoprotective efficacy of dexamethasone eluting electrode to implanted cochlea exposed to NT in a guinea pig model of CI. Animals were divided into five groups: EIT with dexamethasone eluting electrode exposed to NT; EIT exposed to NT; NT only; EIT only and naïve animals (control group). The hearing thresholds were determined by auditory brainstem recordings (ABRs). The cochlea was harvested and analyzed for transcript levels of inflammation, apoptosis and fibrosis genes. We observed that threshold shifts were significantly higher in EIT, NT or EIT + NT groups compared to naive animals at all the tested frequencies. The dexamethasone eluting electrode led to a significant decrease in hearing threshold shifts in implanted animals exposed to NT. Proapoptotic tumor necrosis factor-α [TNF-α, TNF-α receptor 1a (TNFαR1a)] and pro-fibrotic transforming growth factor β1 (TGFβ) genes were more than two-fold up-regulated following EIT and EIT + NT compared to the control group. The use of dexamethasone releasing electrode significantly decreased the transcript levels of pro-apoptotic and pro-fibrotic genes. The dexamethasone releasing electrode has shown promising results for hearing protection in implanted animals exposed to NT. The results of this study suggest that dexamethasone releasing electrode holds great potential in developing effective treatment modalities for NT in the implanted cochlea.

Bilateral Cochlear Implants Using Two Electrode Lengths in Infants With Profound Deafness

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this investigation was to determine if a short electrode in one ear and standard electrode in the contralateral ear could be an option for infants with congenital profound deafness to theoretically preserve the structures of the inner ear. Similarities in performance between ears and compared with a control group of infants implanted with bilateral standard electrodes was evaluated.

STUDY DESIGN

Repeated-measure, single-subject experiment.

SETTING

University of Iowa-Department of Otolaryngology.

PARTICIPANTS

Nine infants with congenital profound bilateral sensorineural hearing loss.

INTERVENTION(S)

Short and standard implants.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Early speech perception test (ESP), children's vowel, phonetically balanced-kindergarten (PB-K) word test, and preschool language scales-3 (PLS-3).

RESULTS

ESP scores showed performance reaching a ceiling effect for the individual short and standard ears and bilaterally. The children's vowel and PB-K word results indicated significant (both p < 0.001) differences between the two ears. Bilateral comparisons to age-matched children with standard bilateral electrodes showed no significant differences (p = 0.321) in performance. Global language performance for six children demonstrated standard scores around 1 standard deviation (SD) of the mean. Two children showed scores below the mean, but can be attributed to inconsistent device usage. Averaged total language scores between groups showed no difference in performance (p = 0.293).

CONCLUSIONS

The combined use of a short electrode and standard electrode might provide an option for implantation with the goal of preserving the cochlear anatomy. However, further studies are needed to understand why some children have or do not have symmetric performance.

A Preliminary Investigation of the Air-Bone Gap: Changes in Intracochlear Sound Pressure With Air- and Bone-conducted Stimuli After Cochlear Implantation

HYPOTHESIS

A cochlear implant electrode within the cochlea contributes to the air-bone gap (ABG) component of postoperative changes in residual hearing after electrode insertion.

BACKGROUND

Preservation of residual hearing after cochlear implantation has gained importance as simultaneous electric-acoustic stimulation allows for improved speech outcomes. Postoperative loss of residual hearing has previously been attributed to sensorineural changes; however, presence of increased postoperative ABG remains unexplained and could result in part from altered cochlear mechanics. Here, we sought to investigate changes to these mechanics via intracochlear pressure measurements before and after electrode implantation to quantify the contribution to postoperative ABG.

METHODS

Human cadaveric heads were implanted with titanium fixtures for bone conduction transducers. Velocities of stapes capitulum and cochlear promontory between the two windows were measured using single-axis laser Doppler vibrometry and fiber-optic sensors measured intracochlear pressures in scala vestibuli and tympani for air- and bone-conducted stimuli before and after cochlear implant electrode insertion through the round window.

RESULTS

Intracochlear pressures revealed only slightly reduced responses to air-conducted stimuli consistent with previous literature. No significant changes were noted to bone-conducted stimuli after implantation. Velocities of the stapes capitulum and the cochlear promontory to both stimuli were stable after electrode placement.

CONCLUSION

Presence of a cochlear implant electrode causes alterations in intracochlear sound pressure levels to air, but not bone, conducted stimuli and helps to explain changes in residual hearing noted clinically. These results suggest the possibility of a cochlear conductive component to postoperative changes in hearing sensitivity.

An Objective Estimation of Air-Bone-Gap in Cochlear Implant Recipients with Residual Hearing Using Electrocochleography

Although, cochlear implants (CI) traditionally have been used to treat individuals with bilateral profound sensorineural hearing loss, a recent trend is to implant individuals with residual low-frequency hearing. Notably, many of these individuals demonstrate an air-bone gap (ABG) in low-frequency, pure-tone thresholds following implantation. An ABG is the difference between audiometric thresholds measured using air conduction (AC) and bone conduction (BC) stimulation. Although, behavioral AC thresholds are straightforward to assess, BC thresholds can be difficult to measure in individuals with severe-to-profound hearing loss because of vibrotactile responses to high-level, low-frequency stimulation and the potential contribution of hearing in the contralateral ear. Because of these technical barriers to measuring behavioral BC thresholds in implanted patients with residual hearing, it would be helpful to have an objective method for determining ABG. This study evaluated an innovative technique for measuring electrocochleographic (ECochG) responses using the cochlear microphonic (CM) response to assess AC and BC thresholds in implanted patients with residual hearing. Results showed high correlations between CM thresholds and behavioral audiograms for AC and BC conditions, thereby demonstrating the feasibility of using ECochG as an objective tool for quantifying ABG in CI recipients.

Intracochlear Pressure Transients During Cochlear Implant Electrode Insertion

HYPOTHESIS

Cochlear implant (CI) electrode insertion into the round window induces pressure transients in the cochlear fluid comparable to high-intensity sound transients.

BACKGROUND

Many patients receiving a CI have some remaining functional hearing at low frequencies; thus, devices and surgical techniques have been developed to use this residual hearing. To maintain functional acoustic hearing, it is important to retain function of any hair cells and auditory nerve fibers innervating the basilar membrane; however, in a subset of patients, residual low-frequency hearing is lost after CI insertion. Here, we test the hypothesis that transient intracochlear pressure spikes are generated during CI electrode insertion, which could cause damage and compromise residual hearing.

METHODS

Human cadaveric temporal bones were prepared with an extended facial recess. Pressures in the scala vestibuli and tympani were measured with fiber-optic pressure sensors inserted into the cochlea near the oval and round windows, whereas CI electrodes (five styles from two manufacturers) were inserted into the cochlea via a round window approach.

RESULTS

Pressures in the scala tympani tended to be larger in magnitude than pressures in the scala vestibuli, consistent with electrode insertion into the scala tympani. CI electrode insertion produced a range of pressure transients in the cochlea that could occur alone or as part of a train of spikes with equivalent peak sound pressure levels in excess of 170 dB sound pressure level. Instances of pressure transients varied with electrode styles.

CONCLUSION

Results suggest electrode design, insertion mechanism, and surgical technique affect the magnitude and rate of intracochlear pressure transients during CI electrode insertion. Pressure transients showed intensities similar to those elicited by high-level sounds and thus could cause damage to the basilar membrane and/or hair cells.

Cochlear Implant Electrode Effect on Sound Energy Transfer Within the Cochlea During Acoustic Stimulation

HYPOTHESIS

Cochlear implants (CIs) designed for hearing preservation will not alter mechanical properties of the middle and inner ears as measured by intracochlear pressure (P(IC)) and stapes velocity (Vstap).

BACKGROUND

CIs designed to provide combined electroacoustic stimulation are now available. To maintain functional acoustic hearing, it is important to know if a CI electrode can alter middle or inner ear mechanics because any alteration could contribute to elevated low-frequency thresholds in electroacoustic stimulation patients.

METHODS

Seven human cadaveric temporal bones were prepared, and pure-tone stimuli from 120 Hz to 10 kHz were presented at a range of intensities up to 110 dB sound pressure level. P(IC) in the scala vestibuli (P(SV)) and tympani (PST) were measured with fiber-optic pressure sensors concurrently with VStap using laser Doppler vibrometry. Five CI electrodes from two different manufacturers with varying dimensions were inserted via a round window approach at six different depths (16-25 mm).

RESULTS

The responses of P(IC) and VStap to acoustic stimulation were assessed as a function of stimulus frequency, normalized to sound pressure level in the external auditory canal, at baseline and electrode-inserted conditions. Responses measured with electrodes inserted were generally within approximately 5 dB of baseline, indicating little effect of CI electrode insertion on P(IC) and VStap. Overall, mean differences across conditions were small for all responses, and no substantial differences were consistently visible across electrode types.

CONCLUSION

Results suggest that the influence of a CI electrode on middle and inner ear mechanics is minimal despite variation in electrode lengths and configurations.

Hearing loss patterns after cochlear implantation via the round window in an animal model

PURPOSE

The mechanism and the type of hearing loss induced by cochlear implants are mostly unknown. Therefore, this study evaluated the impact and type of hearing loss induced by each stage of cochlear implantation surgery in an animal model.

STUDY DESIGN

Original basic research animal study.

SETTING

The study was conducted in a tertiary, university-affiliated medical center in accordance with the guidelines of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Cochlear implant electrode array was inserted via the round window membrane in 17 ears of 9 adult-size fat sand rats. In 7 ears of 5 additional animals round window incision only was performed, followed by patching with a small piece of periosteum (control). Hearing thresholds to air (AC) and bone conduction (BC), clicks, 1 kHz and 6 kHz tone bursts were measured by auditory brainstem evoked potential, before, during each stage of surgery and one week post-operatively. In addition, inner ear histology was performed.

RESULTS

The degree of hearing loss increased significantly from baseline throughout the stages of cochlear implantation surgery and up to one week after (p<0.0001). In both operated groups, the greatest deterioration was noted after round window incision. Overall, threshold shift to air-conduction clicks, reached 61 dB SPL and the bone conduction threshold deteriorated by 19 dB SPL only. Similar losses were found for 1-kHz and 6-kHz frequencies. The hearing loss was not associated with significant changes in inner ear histology.

CONCLUSIONS

Hearing loss following cochlear implantation in normal hearing animals is progressive and of mixed type, but mainly conductive. Changes in the inner-ear mechanism are most likely responsible for the conductive hearing loss.

Cochlear Implantation for Profound Hearing Loss After Multimodal Treatment for Neuroblastoma in Children

Objectives

Neuroblastoma (NBL) predominantly affects children under 5 years of age. Through multimodal therapy, including chemotherapy, radiotherapy, surgery, and peripheral blood stem cell transplantation, the survival rate in patients with NBL have improved while treatment-related complications have also increased. Treatment-related ototoxicity, mainly from cisplatin, can result in profound hearing loss requiring cochlear implantation (CI). We analyzed the effectiveness and hearing preservation of CI recipients who had treated with multimodal therapy due to NBL.

Methods

Patients who received multimodal therapy for NBL and subsequent CIs were enrolled. A detailed review of the perioperative hearing test, speech evaluation, and posttreatment complications was conducted. Speech performance was analyzed using the category of auditory performance (CAP) score and the postoperative hearing preservation of low frequencies was also compared. Patients who were candidates for electro-acoustic stimulation (EAS) used an EAS electrode for low frequency hearing preservation.

Results

Three patients were identified and all patients showed improvement of speech performance after CI. The average of CAP score improved from 4.3 preoperatively to 5.8 at 1 year postoperatively. Two patients who were fitted with the Flex electrode showed complete hearing preservation and the preserved hearing was maintained over 1 year. The one remaining patient was given the standard CI-512 electrode and showed partial hearing preservation.

Conclusion

Patients with profound hearing loss resulting from NBL multimodal therapy can be good candidates for CI, especially for EAS. A soft surgical technique as well as a specifically designed electrode should be applied to this specific population during the CI operation in order to preserve residual hearing and achieve better outcomes.