A comparison of low versus high radioiodine administered activity in patients with low-risk differentiated thyroid cancer

Radioiodine (131I) treatment decision-making for low- and intermediate-risk differentiated thyroid cancer

Objective

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect and influencing factors of postsurgical radioactive iodine (RAI) therapy for patients with low- and intermediate-risk differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC).

Subjects and methods

A retrospective analysis of 423 low- and intermediaterisk DTC patients admitted to the Department of Nuclear Medicine, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital from January 2005 to December 2020 was performed. All patients were treated with surgery, had a postoperative pathological diagnosis, and were treated with RAI, including 89 males and 334 females. Recurrence risk stratification: 143 cases were low-risk, and 280 cases were intermediaterisk.

Results

The excellent response (ER) rate for low- and intermediate-risk were 93.7% and 78.2%, respectively (P < 0.05). There were significant differences in age, cumulative dose of [131I], and pretreatment stimulated-Tg (pre-Tg) levels between the low- and intermediate-risk groups (P < 0.05). There were significant differences in the cumulative dose of 131I and pre-Tg levels between ER and the non-ER group (P < 0.05). The area under the curve (AUC) values were 0.799 in the low-risk group, and 0.747 in the intermediate-risk group for the ROC curve by ER status of pre-Tg. The ER rate with RAI treatment decreased with an increase in pre-Tg levels.

Conclusion

Pre-Tg was an important factor for RAI treatment decision-making and prognostic evaluation and differed between low-risk and intermediate-risk DTC. Aggressive RAI therapy was recommended for low-risk DTC with pre-Tg ≥ 20.0 ng/mL and in intermediate-risk group with pre-Tg ≥ 10.0 ng/mL.

Personalized Dosimetry in the Context of Radioiodine Therapy for Differentiated Thyroid Cancer

The most frequent thyroid cancer is Differentiated Thyroid Cancer (DTC) representing more than 95% of cases. A suitable choice for the treatment of DTC is the systemic administration of 131-sodium or potassium iodide. It is an effective tool used for the irradiation of thyroid remnants, microscopic DTC, other nonresectable or incompletely resectable DTC, or all the cited purposes. Dosimetry represents a valid tool that permits a tailored therapy to be obtained, sparing healthy tissue and so minimizing potential damages to at-risk organs. Absorbed dose represents a reliable indicator of biological response due to its correlation to tissue irradiation effects. The present paper aims to focus attention on iodine therapy for DTC treatment and has developed due to the urgent need for standardization in procedures, since no unique approaches are available. This review aims to summarize new proposals for a dosimetry-based therapy and so explore new alternatives that could provide the possibility to achieve more tailored therapies, minimizing the possible side effects of radioiodine therapy for Differentiated Thyroid Cancer.

Long-Term Oncological Outcome Comparison between Intermediate- and High-Dose Radioactive Iodine Ablation in Patients with Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma: A Propensity Score Matching Study

BACKGROUND

Radioactive iodine (RAI) ablation is recommended for most patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC) after total thyroidectomy (TT). We aimed to compare long-term outcomes between intermediate-dose (100 mCi) and high-dose (150 mCi) RAI ablation therapy in patients with DTC using propensity score matching analysis.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of 1448 patients with DTC who underwent RAI ablation after TT. Propensity score matching was performed using the extent of operation, tumor size, extrathyroidal extension, multifocality, lymphatic invasion, vascular invasion, perineural invasion, number of positive lymph nodes (LNs), ATA risk stratification system, T stage, N stage, TNM stage, preoperative serum Tg and TgAb levels, and post-RAI serum Tg and TgAb levels.

RESULTS

Recurrence rates in the intermediate- and high-dose groups were 3.1% and 5.6%, respectively. After propensity score matching, LN ratio >0.22 (HR, 2.915; 95% CI, 1.228-6.918; p=0.015) and serum Tg >10 ng/mL after RAI (HR, 3.976; 95% CI, 1.839-8.595; p < 0.001) were significant predictors of recurrence. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed no significant difference in DFS before or after propensity score matching (p=0.074 and p=0.378, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Intermediate-dose RAI ablation for the adjuvant treatment of DTC is sufficient as compared to high-dose RAI ablation. Further prospective or multicenter studies should be conducted to clarify the prognosis of intermediate-dose RAI ablation.

New paradigms in the treatment of low-risk thyroid cancer

INTRODUCTION

Thyroid cancer is the most common endocrine malignancy. Multiple different staging systems have been introduced and used for differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC).

AREAS COVERED

In this literature review we provide an overview of the standard options for management of patients with low risk differentiated thyroid cancer.

EXPERT OPINION

Surgery is considered the first and most important step in managing DTC with goal to remove all the malignant foci in order to achieve cure and increase the survival with least chance of recurrence. Many studies have been conducted to determine the best surgical approaches and how aggressive surgeries should be in order to achieve the best outcomes regarding efficacy as well as safety. Radioactive iodine (RAI) therapy has also been a part of the treatment regimen and is used for different purposes with three main goals: post-surgical ablation, adjuvant therapy and persisted/recurrent disease treatment. Radiation therapy, on the other hand, is still not recommended to be used routinely in DTC because of the conflicting data of its benefit.

Efficacy of Low-Dose Radioiodine Ablation in Low- and Intermediate-Risk Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: A Retrospective Comparative Analysis

(1) Background-low-dose radioiodine ablation is an accepted strategy for the treatment of low- and intermediate-risk thyroid carcinomas, although there is no international consensus. The aim of this study is to describe the clinical experience with low-dose radioiodine ablation in patients with low- and intermediate-risk thyroid cancer compared to high-dose ablation. (2) Methods-174 patients with low- and intermediate-risk thyroid cancer, 90 treated with low-dose ablation and 84 treated with high-dose ablation, were included. The primary endpoint was response to treatment one year after ablation, defined by stimulated thyroglobulin, whole body scan and ultrasound imaging. (3) Results-an excellent response rate of 79.8% in the low-dose group and 85.7% in the high-dose group was observed (p = 0.049). Stimulated thyroglobulin at the moment of ablation (p = 0.032) and positive antithyroglobulin antibodies (p < 0.001) were independent predictive factors for nonexcellent response. Young age (p = 0.023), intermediate initial recurrence risk (p < 0.001) and low-dose ablation (p = 0.004) were independent predictive factors for recurrence. (4) Conclusion-low-dose ablation seemed to be less effective than high-dose ablation, especially in those patients with positive antithyroglobulin antibodies or higher stimulated thyroglobulin levels at the moment of ablation. Low dose was associated with higher recurrence rates, and lower age and intermediate initial recurrence risk were independent risk factors for recurrence in our sample.