Radiotherapy in late elderly (aged 75 or older) patients with paranasal sinus carcinoma: a single institution experience

Clinical T staging is superior to fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography for predicting local outcomes after intra-arterial infusion chemoradiotherapy for maxillary sinus squamous cell carcinoma

Concomitant intra-arterial infusion chemoradiotherapy (IA-CRT) has been used to treat locally advanced maxillary sinus squamous cell carcinoma (MSSCC) with positive outcomes. However, an optimal predictive prognostic factor for MSSCC treated with IA-CRT remains elusive. The aim of the present study was to assess the feasibility of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET), including volumetric parameters, to predict the prognosis of MSSCC treated with IA-CRT. Twenty-four patients with newly diagnosed MSSCC receiving FDG-PET imaging before IA-CRT treatment were analyzed in this retrospective study. All patients underwent radiotherapy with a total tumor dose of 60-66 Gy in a conventional fractionation schedule, using three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy or intensity-modulated radiation therapy. Radiotherapy was performed concurrently with concurrent intra-arterial infusion chemotherapy (cisplatin). The IA-CRT response rate was 83.33%. The 1- and 3-year survival rates were 81.30% and 64.34%, respectively. The 1- and 3-year local failure-free rates were 57.21% and 40.96%, respectively. Local failure was significantly associated with poor survival (P = 0.0152). Further, clinical T staging clearly stratified local control outcomes among patients with clinical T3 or less, T4a, and T4b (P = 0.0312). Moreover, patients with stage T4b showed a significantly poorer local control compared with T3 or less (P = 0.0103). However, FDG-PET parameters provided no significant predictive information regarding treatment outcome. To conclude, pretreatment T stage predicts local control by IA-CRT, which is associated with survival.

Utility of intraoral stents in external beam radiotherapy for head and neck cancer

AIM

This study aimed to assess the utility and stability of intraoral stent during intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT).

BACKGROUND

The benefits of intraoral stents in radiotherapy are unclear.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We analyzed 386 setup errors in 12 patients who received IMRT for head and neck cancers without intraoral stents (intraoral stent [-]) and 183 setup errors in 6 patients who received IMRT with intraoral stents (intraoral stent [+]). All patients were matched according to the immobilization method (masks and boards). Setup errors were measured as the distance from the initial setup based on the marking on the skin and mask to the corrected position based on bone matching on cone beam computed tomography.

RESULTS

The mean interfractional setup errors in the right-left, craniocaudal, anterior-posterior (AP), and three-dimensional (3D) directions were -0.33, 0.08, -0.25, and 2.75 mm in the intraoral stent (-) group and -0.37, 0.24, -0.63, and 2.42 mm in the intraoral stent (+) group, respectively (P = 0.50, 0.65, 0.01, and 0.02, respectively). The systematic errors for the same directions were 0.89, 1.46, 1.15, and 0.88 mm in the intraoral stent (-) group and 0.62, 1.69, 0.68, and 0.56 mm in the intraoral stents (+) group, respectively. The random errors were 1.43, 1.43, 1.44, and 1.22 mm in the intraoral stent (-) group and 1.06, 1.11, 1.05, and 0.92 mm in the intraoral stents (+) group, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Setup errors can be significantly reduced in the AP and 3D-directions by using intraoral stents.