1
|
Moreno A, Castillo-Bustamante M, Prieto JA. Balancing Act: A Comprehensive Review of Vestibular Evaluation in Cochlear Implants. Cureus 2024; 16:e55261. [PMID: 38425330 PMCID: PMC10903968 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.55261] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/29/2024] [Indexed: 03/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Cochlear implantation, a transformative intervention for individuals with profound hearing loss, has evolved significantly over the years. However, its impact on the vestibular system, responsible for balance and spatial orientation, remains a subject of ongoing research and clinical consideration. This narrative review highlights key aspects of vestibular evaluation in patients undergoing cochlear implantation. Preoperative vestibular assessment is crucial to establish baseline vestibular function and identify any pre-existing balance issues. Various tests, including caloric, rotational chair, vestibular-evoked myogenic potential, and video head impulse tests, play a vital role in evaluating vestibular function. The goal is to assess the risk of vestibular disturbances arising from the surgery, guide surgical planning, and detect pre-existing alterations that could be totally or partially compensated. While some patients experience minimal vestibular disruptions, others may encounter transient or persistent balance issues following cochlear implant surgery. Postoperative vestibular testing allows for the early detection of such disturbances, enabling timely interventions like vestibular rehabilitation and evaluating changes produced due to surgical complications or changes in the patient's prior conditions. Challenges in vestibular evaluation include individual variability in patient responses, the proximity of the cochlea to the vestibular system, and the need to tailor testing protocols to individual needs. Further research is essential to refine testing protocols, minimize vestibular disturbances, and improve outcomes for cochlear implant candidates. A multidisciplinary approach involving otolaryngologists, audiologists, and physical therapists is integral to comprehensive patient care in this context. In conclusion, vestibular evaluation in patients undergoing cochlear implantation is critical for optimizing surgical planning, managing postoperative issues, and enhancing the overall quality of life for individuals embarking on the journey of restored hearing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Moreno
- Otology, Hospital Militar Nueva Granada, Bogotá, COL
| | - Melissa Castillo-Bustamante
- Otoneurology, Centro de Vértigo y Mareo, Mexico City, MEX
- School of Medicine, Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana, Medellín, COL
| | - Jose A Prieto
- Otology, Hospital Militar Nueva Granada, Bogotá, COL
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Deng J, Zhu Q, Zhang K, Xie D, Wu W. Vestibular function in children with cochlear implant: Impact and evaluation. Front Neurol 2022; 13:938751. [PMID: 36090862 PMCID: PMC9449973 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.938751] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2022] [Accepted: 08/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Over the last 30 years, cochlear implant (CI) has been dedicated to improving the rehabilitation of hearing impairments. However, CI has shown potential detrimental effects on vestibular function. For children, due to atypical symptoms and difficulty in cooperating with vestibular function tests, systematic and objective assessments of vestibular function with CI have been conducted sparsely. This review focuses on the impact of vestibular function in children with CI and summarized the evaluation of vestibular function in children. In addition, some recommended strategies are summarized and proposed.
Collapse
|
3
|
Skarżyńska MB, Król B, Gos E, Skarżyński PH. Preservation of hearing in partial deafness patients who received two different regimes of corticosteroid therapy following cochlear implantation: one-year observations. BRAZ J PHARM SCI 2022. [DOI: 10.1590/s2175-97902022e20358] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/19/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Magdalena Beata Skarżyńska
- Center of Hearing and Speech MEDINCUS, Poland; Institute of Sensory Organs, Poland; Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Poland
| | - Bartłomej Król
- World Hearing Center, Poland; Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Poland
| | - Elżbieta Gos
- World Hearing Center, Poland; Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Poland
| | - Piotr Henryk Skarżyński
- Center of Hearing and Speech MEDINCUS, Poland; Institute of Sensory Organs, Poland; World Hearing Center, Poland; Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Poland; Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Poland; Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Poland; Medical University of Warsaw, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Weinmann C, Baumann U, Leinung M, Stöver T, Helbig S. Vertigo Associated With Cochlear Implant Surgery: Correlation With Vertigo Diagnostic Result, Electrode Carrier, and Insertion Angle. Front Neurol 2021; 12:663386. [PMID: 34177768 PMCID: PMC8226011 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2021.663386] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2021] [Accepted: 05/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: Vertigo is a common side effect of cochlear implant (CI) treatment. This prospective study examines the incidence of postoperative vertigo over time and aims to analyze influencing factors such as electrode design and insertion angle (IA). Study Design and Setting: This is a prospective study which has been conducted at a tertiary referral center (academic hospital). Patients: A total of 29 adults were enrolled and received a unilateral CI using one of six different electrode carriers, which were categorized into "structure-preserving" (I), "potentially structure-preserving" (II), and "not structure-preserving" (III). Intervention: Subjective vertigo was assessed by questionnaires at five different time-points before up to 6 months after surgery. The participants were divided into four groups depending on the time of the presence of vertigo before and after surgery. Preoperatively and at 6 months postoperatively, a comprehensive vertigo diagnosis consisting of Romberg test, Unterberger test, subjective visual vertical, optokinetic test, video head impulse test, and caloric irrigation test was performed. In addition, the IA was determined, and the patients were divided in two groups (<430°; ≥430°). Main Outcome Measures: The incidence of vertigo after CI surgery (group 1) was reported, as well as the correlation of subjective vertigo with electrode array categories (I-III) and IA. Results: Among the participants, 45.8% experienced new vertigo after implantation. Based on the questionnaire data, a vestibular origin was suspected in 72.7%. The results did not show a significant correlation with subjective vertigo for any of the performed tests. In group 1 with postoperative vertigo, 18% of patients showed conspicuous results in a quantitative analysis of caloric irrigation test despite the fact that the category I or II electrodes were implanted, which are suitable for structure preservation. Average IA was 404° for the overall group and 409° for group 1. There was no statistically significant correlation between IA and perceived vertigo. Conclusions: Though vertigo after CI surgery seems to be a common complication, the test battery used here could not objectify the symptoms. Further studies should clarify whether this is due to the multifactorial cause of vertigo or to the lack of sensitivity of the tests currently in use. The proof of reduced probability for vertigo when using atraumatic electrode carrier was not successful, nor was the proof of a negative influence of the insertion depth.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte Weinmann
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Uwe Baumann
- Department of Audiological Acoustics, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Martin Leinung
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Timo Stöver
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Silke Helbig
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Tsukada K, Usami SI. Vestibular Preservation After Cochlear Implantation Using the Round Window Approach. Front Neurol 2021; 12:656592. [PMID: 33986720 PMCID: PMC8110830 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2021.656592] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2021] [Accepted: 03/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The development of less traumatic surgical techniques, such as the round window approach (RWA), as well as the use of flexible electrodes and post-operative steroid administration have enabled the preservation of residual hearing after cochlear implantation (CI) surgery. However, consideration must still be given to the complications that can accompany CI. One such potential complication is the impairment of vestibular function with resulting vertigo symptoms. The aim of our current study was to examine the changes in vestibular function after implantation in patients who received CI using less traumatic surgery, particularly the RWA technique. Methods: Sixty-six patients who received CI in our center were examined by caloric testing, cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential (cVEMP) and ocular VEMP (oVEMP) before or after implantation, or both, to obtain data on semicircular canal, saccular and utricular function, respectively. Less traumatic CI surgery was performed by the use of the RWA and insertion of flexible electrodes such as MED-EL FLEX soft, FLEX 28, and FLEX 24 (Innsbruck, Austria). Results: Caloric response and the asymmetry ratio of cVEMP and oVEMP were examined before and after implantation using less traumatic surgical techniques. Compared with before implantation, 93.9, 82.4, and 92.5% of the patients showed preserved vestibular function after implantation based on caloric testing, cVEMP and oVEMP results, respectively. We also examined the results for vestibular function by a comparison of the 66 patients using the RWA and flexible electrodes, and 17 patients who underwent cochleostomy and insertion of conventional or hard electrodes. We measured responses using caloric testing, cVEMP and oVEMP in patients after CI. There were no differences in the frequencies of abnormal caloric and oVEMP results in the implanted ears between the RWA and cochleostomy. On the other hand, the frequency of abnormal cVEMP responses in the implanted ears in the patients who received implantation by cochleostomy was significantly higher than that in the patients undergoing surgery using the RWA. Conclusion: Patients receiving CI using less traumatic surgical techniques such as RWA and flexible electrodes have reduced risk of damage to vestibular function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keita Tsukada
- Department of Otolaryngology, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan
| | - Shin-Ichi Usami
- Department of Otolaryngology, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan.,Department of Hearing Implant Sciences, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Li H, Schart-Moren N, Rajan G, Shaw J, Rohani SA, Atturo F, Ladak HM, Rask-Andersen H, Agrawal S. Vestibular Organ and Cochlear Implantation-A Synchrotron and Micro-CT Study. Front Neurol 2021; 12:663722. [PMID: 33897611 PMCID: PMC8058461 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2021.663722] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2021] [Accepted: 03/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Reports vary on the incidence of vestibular dysfunction and dizziness in patients following cochlear implantation (CI). Disequilibrium may be caused by surgery at the cochlear base, leading to functional disturbances of the vestibular receptors and endolymphatic duct system (EDS) which are located nearby. Here, we analyzed the three-dimensional (3D) anatomy of this region, aiming to optimize surgical approaches to limit damage to the vestibular organ. Material and Methods: A total of 22 fresh-frozen human temporal bones underwent synchrotron radiation phase-contrast imaging (SR-PCI). One temporal bone underwent micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) after fixation and staining with Lugol's iodine solution (I2KI) to increase tissue contrast. We used volume-rendering software to create 3D reconstructions and tissue segmentation that allowed precise assessment of anatomical relationships and topography. Macerated human ears belonging to the Uppsala collection were also used. Drilling and insertion of CI electrodes was performed with metric analyses of different trajectories. Results and Conclusions: SR-PCI and micro-CT imaging demonstrated the complex 3D anatomy of the basal region of the human cochlea, vestibular apparatus, and EDS. Drilling of a cochleostomy may disturb vestibular organ function by injuring the endolymphatic space and disrupting fluid barriers. The saccule is at particular risk due to its proximity to the surgical area and may explain immediate and long-term post-operative vertigo. Round window insertion may be less traumatic to the inner ear, however it may affect the vestibular receptors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hao Li
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Nadine Schart-Moren
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
- Section of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Gunesh Rajan
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, Division of Surgery, Medical School, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Jeremy Shaw
- Centre for Microscopy, Characterization and Analysis, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Seyed Alireza Rohani
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Francesca Atturo
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Sapienza, Rome, Italy
| | - Hanif M. Ladak
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Western University, London, ON, Canada
- Department of Medical Biophysics and Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Helge Rask-Andersen
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Sumit Agrawal
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Western University, London, ON, Canada
- Department of Medical Biophysics and Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Barbara M, Talamonti R, Benincasa A, Tarentini S, Filippi C, Covelli E, Monini S. Early Assessment of Vestibular Function after Unilateral Cochlear Implant Surgery. Audiol Neurootol 2019; 25:50-59. [DOI: 10.1159/000502252] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2019] [Accepted: 07/19/2019] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Cochlear implantation (CI) has been reported to negatively affect vestibular function. The study of vestibular function has variably been conducted using different types of diagnostic tools. The combined use of modern, rapidly performing diagnostic tools could prove useful for standardization of the evaluation protocol. Methods: In a group of 28 subjects undergoing CI, the video head impulse test (vHIT), the cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (cVEMP) and the short form of the Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) questionnaire were investigated preoperatively and postoperatively (implant on and off) in both the implanted and the contralateral, nonimplanted ear. All surgeries were performed with a round window approach (RWA), except for 3 otosclerosis cases in which the extended RWA (eRWA) was used. Results: The vHIT of the lateral semicircular canal showed preoperative vestibular involvement in nearly 50% of the cases, while the 3 canals were contemporarily affected in only 14% of the cases. In all the hypofunctional subjects, cVEMP were absent. A low VOR gain in all of the investigated superior semicircular canals was found in 4 subjects (14%). In those subjects (21.7%) in whom cVEMP were preoperatively present and normal on the operated side, the absence of a response was postoperatively recorded. Discussion/Conclusion: The vestibular protocol applied in this study was found to be appropriate for distinguishing between the CI-operated ear and the nonoperated ear. In this regard, cVEMP was found to be more sensitive than vHIT for revealing a vestibular sufferance after CI, though without statistical significance. Finally, the use of RWA surgery apparently did not reduce the occurrence of signs of vestibular impairment.
Collapse
|