Lymph node yield and lymph node density for elective level II-IV neck dissections in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma patients

Defining a minimum nodal yield for neck dissection in mucosal head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Analysis of existing literature on lymph node yield (LNY) in neck dissection (ND) for head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC) used as a prognostic factor and an indication of treatment adequacy.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science databases were systematically searched from January 2010 to June 2023. Inclusion criteria encompassed studies on mucosal HNSCC patients undergoing ND with data on LNY and its association with survival outcomes. The quality assessment followed the REMARK guidelines.

RESULTS

Among 29 included studies, minimum LNY tresholds associated with improved survival outcomes ranged from 10 to 36.5 nodes. The heterogeneity in subsite involvement and cN0/cN + status constituted a challenge in establishing a consensus cutoff. The review highlights the need for standardized surgical techniques and pathological assessments to ensure data comparability.

CONCLUSIONS

LNY is a prognostic indicator and could reflect ND quality in HNSCC.

Lymph Node Yield/Ratio, Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio: Prognostic Factors in cN0 Laryngeal Carcinoma

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to investigate the role of lymph node yield (LNY), lymph node ratio (LNR), and neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) as prognostic factors, their impact on survival in patients with advanced laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC).

METHODS

This multicentric retrospective study included 195 patients with clinical N0 advanced laryngeal carcinoma who underwent total laryngectomy and/or total pharyngolaryngectomy over 5 years. The number of lymph nodes extracted (LNY) and the number of positive nodes were counted. The lymph node ratio "LNR" was calculated as follows: (positive nodes /LNY). Moreover, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) was calculated and documented for analysis.

RESULTS

The mean 5-years DFS and overall survival (OS) was 33 and 35 months. The following were statistically significant factors negatively associated with overall survival; LNR (p = 0.047), NLR > 7 (p = 0.05), preoperative tracheostomy (p = 0.016), infiltrated safety margin (p = 0.01), postoperative radiotherapy (p < 0.001), N stage (p = 0.019), and unilateral neck dissection (p = 0.03). On the other hand, DFS was negatively associated with LNR (p = 0.001), N stage (p = 0.001), and infiltration of the surgical margins (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

LNY and LNR are both linked to survival outcomes following neck dissection in patients with clinical N0, locally advanced laryngeal carcinoma, where higher LNY and lower LNR correlated with improved survival and could be easily incorporated into cancer staging systems to aid in the prognostic stratification of patients. Additionally, NLR could act as a cost-effective inflammatory biomarker predicting poor prognosis in LSCC.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III Laryngoscope, 2025.

Factors influencing lymph node yield in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: A scoping review

OBJECTIVES

In head and neck cancer surgery, several studies have demonstrated the prognostic significance of lymph node yield (LNY). To our knowledge, no review has evaluated both the contributing factors to LNY and its impact on survival outcomes across all head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) subsites.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A scoping review of LNY in HNSCC was conducted according to The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) framework to answer the following research questions: 1) Which surgeon, pathologist, and patient characteristics influence LNY? 2) Which anatomic subsites does LNY impact survival?

RESULTS

Surgeon experience and variation in pathology protocols and personnel can impact LNY. Extent of nodal dissection, advanced tumor characteristics, and treatment at an academic facility are associated with increased LNY. Patient characteristics such as age <40, male gender, and BMI > 30 are associated with increased LNY. In the oral cavity, LNY > 18 is an independent predictor of improved overall survival (OS), disease free survival (DFS), and disease-specific survival (DSS). In the oropharynx, published studies show mixed results with regards to the impact of LNY on OS, DFS, and DSS. LNY has not been associated with OS or DFS in the larynx, irrespective of nodal threshold.

CONCLUSIONS

Provider and patient characteristics may impact LNY. LNY ≥ 18 is associated with a survival benefit in the oral cavity and HNSCC overall. Further investigation of LNY particularly in prospective clinical trials is required prior to its adoption as a quality metric in HNSCC.

Positive lymph node ratio as a prognostic factor for gastric cancer patients: Is it going to supersede positive lymph node number in guidelines?

Gastric malignancies constitute the sixth most common cancer with regards to incidence and have the fifth most mortality rates. Extended lymph-node dissection is the surgical modality of choice while treating advanced stage gastric cancer. It is yet a topic of debate, whether or not the amount of positive lymph nodes after a pathological examination following the surgical intervention is of prognostic value. In this study, it is aimed to evaluate the prognostic significance of positive lymph nodes following the surgery. A total of 193 patients who underwent curative gastrectomy between January 2011 and December 2015 have been considered for a retrospective data collection. The cases with R1-R2 resections, palliative or emergent surgeries are excluded. Metastatic to total number of lymph nodes, corresponded a ratio which was analyzed in this survey and practiced as a predictive parameter of disease outcome. This survey includes 138 male (71.5%) and 55 female (28.5%) patients treated between 2011 and 2015 in our clinic. The survey follow-up duration of the cases range between 0, 2, and 72 months, corresponding an average of 23.24 ± 16.99 months. We calculated cutoff value of 0.09 with, sensitivity is 76.32% for positive to total number of lymph nodes ratio, whereas specivity applies for 64.10%, positive predictive value for 58% and negative predictive value for 80.6%. Positive lymph node ratio has a prognostic value in terms of predicting the prognosis of the patients with gastric adenocarcinoma following a curative gastrectomy. This might in long term contribute to the prognostic analysis of patients if integrated in the current staging system.

Role of Neck Dissection in Organ-Preservation for Glottic Squamous Cell Carcinoma

The surgical approach to the neck in laryngeal cancer depends on the tumor site and stage. Clinical practice guidelines recommend elective neck dissection in ≥ T2 N0 and all supraglottic cancers; however, there is no evidence supporting these recommendations. The objective is to evaluate the results of bilateral elective neck dissection in patients with glottic cancer who underwent supracricoid partial laryngectomy (SCPL) with cricohyoidoepiglottopexy (CHEP). Thirty-five patients diagnosed with ≥ T2 N0 laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC) in a single-center retrospective study. Right-sided neck dissections yielded 900 lymph nodes, none of which were positive for metastatic disease. Left-sided neck dissections yielded 949 lymph nodes, one of which was positive for malignancy. Prelaryngeal (Delphian) neck dissection was performed in all patients. Out of 50 lymph nodes removed; one was positive for malignancy. Median overall survival was 172 months, and the 60-month overall survival was 87.3%. The 60-month disease-specific survival was 97.1%. Bilateral neck dissection and Delphian node dissection showed a low rate of metastasis (2.8%). Radical neck dissection may thus represent overtreatment; however, this surgical procedure could be justified to prevent regional recurrences.

Prognostic value of lymph node density on cancer staging system for gastric cancer without distal metastasis: a population-based analysis of SEER database

Background

Accurate tumor staging is the cornerstone of tumor treatment. Current tumor staging system for gastric cancer (GC) is based on regional positive lymph nodes while ignoring the total number of examined lymph nodes. We aim to assess the prognostic value of lymph node density (LND), the ratio of positive nodes to the total number examined nodes, in GC without distal metastasis.

Methods

Clinical information of patients with histologically confirmed GC and without distal metastasis was identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 2010 and 2015. The X-Tile software was used to identify the ideal prognosis-related cutoff point for LND. The prognostic value of LND on cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) was assessed in Cox regression models. Subgroup analysis stratified by LND was performed on current lymph node staging system to further explore the interaction between LND and current lymph node staging system.

Results

A total of 4281 participants were identified from the SEER database for the final analysis. The optimal prognosis-related cutoff values of LND were calculated as 0.1 and 0.4, and LND was divided into three levels: LND1 (< 0.1), LND2 (> = 0.1, < 0.4), and LND3 (> = 0.4). LND3 was associated with worse CSS and OS in GC patients. Compared to patients with LND1, those with LND2 and LND3 had 2.43 (HR = 2.43, 95% CI 2.09–2.84, P < 0.001) and 4.69 (HR = 4.69, 95% CI 4.02–5.48, P < 0.001) folds increase in mortality in CSS, respectively. Similar results were found in the evaluation of OS in GC patients. Subgroup analysis stratified by LND also found that patients in the same current lymph node stage still had different prognosis due to the different LND levels after adjustment for other prognosis-related covariates (all P values < 0.001).

Conclusion

LND is an independent prognostic factor for GC without distal metastasis. In the current lymph node staging system, LND has potential value in further accurately classifying GC patients without distal metastasis.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12957-022-02795-9.

Prognostic importance of harvested lymph node number, metastatic lymph node number, and lymph node ratio in surgically managed laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma

Introduction

Lymph node metastasis is a well-known prognostic factor for laryngeal carcinoma. However, current nodal staging systems provide limited information regarding prognosis. Additional parameters should be considered to improve prognostic capacity.

Objectives

To assess the prognostic values of metastatic lymph node number, ipsilateral/contralateral harvested lymph nodes, and lymph node ratio in patients undergoing surgical treatment of laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma.

Methods

Seventy-four patients diagnosed with laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma primarily managed surgically were included in this study. The patients’ pathological and survival data were obtained from their medical records. The effects of harvested lymph nodes and lymph node ratio on disease-free survival, disease-specific survival, and overall survival were analyzed.

Results

Ipsilateral, contralateral, and bilateral evaluations of harvested lymph nodes showed no significant associations with prognosis. Lymph node ratio was significantly associated with overall survival when evaluated bilaterally. Metastatic lymph node number showed more suitable stratification than TNM classification.

Conclusions

Metastatic lymph node number and bilateral lymph node ratio parameters should be taken into consideration to improve the prognostic capacity of TNM.

Prognostic value of lymph node ratio in laryngeal and hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Several recent studies have indicated that the lymph node ratio (LNR) is an independent prognostic factor for laryngeal and hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LHSCC). The purpose of this paper is to assess the prognostic value of LNR and explore appropriate cutoff values by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Methods

Pubmed, Embase (via Ovid), and Cochrane library were systematically searched for studies on the prognostic value of LNR in LHSCC up to October 31, 2019. Then, Literature review, data extraction, and quality assessment of eligible studies were performed by two independent reviewers back-to-back. Lastly, Stata 14.0 software was hired to conduct a meta-analysis.

Results

A total of 445 articles were retrieved, and 13 studies published in English between 2013 and 2019 were included after the title/abstract and full-text screening. Among the 13 studies contributed to 4197 patients, seven studies were about hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (HPSCC), four studies about laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC), and the remaining two studies about LHSCC. The meta-analysis results showed that shorter overall survival (OS) (HR 1.49; 95%CI: 1.18 to 1.88), disease-specific survival (DSS) (HR 1.66; 95%CI: 1.32 to 2.07) and disease-free survival (DFS) (HR 2.04; 95%CI: 1.54 to 2.71) were significantly correlated with a higher LNR in a random-effect model. The cutoff values of eligible studies were varied from 0.03 to 0.14, and the lowest significant LNR was 0.044.

Conclusion

LNR is a valuable prognostic factor in the survival of LHSCC and may be used to improve the tumor staging systems, which, however, requires the solid support of more high-quality studies.