Endoscopic subperichondrial transseptal transsphenoidal approach is safe and efficient for non-extended pituitary surgery

Delayed epistaxis after endoscopic transnasal pituitary tumor resection: clinical characteristics, risk factors, treatment and prevention

BACKGROUND

Delayed epistaxis after endoscopic transnasal pituitary tumor resection (ETPTR) is a critical complication, tending to cause aspiration or hemorrhagic shock. This study assessed clinical characteristics, risk factors, and provide treatment and prevention advice of this complication.

METHODS

This was a retrospective monocentric analysis of 862 patients who underwent ETPTR. Statistical analyses of clinical data revealed the incidence, sources and onset time of delayed epistaxis. Univariate analysis and binary logistic regression were used to identify risk factors.

RESULTS

The incidence of delayed epistaxis was 2.78% (24/862), with an average onset time of 20.71 ± 7.39 days. The bleeding sources were: posterior nasal septal artery branch of sphenopalatine artery (12/24), multiple inflammatory mucosae (8/24), sphenopalatine artery trunk (3/24) and sphenoid sinus bone (1/24). Univariate analysis and binary logistic regression analysis confirmed that hypertension, nasal septum deviation, chronic rhinosinusitis and growth hormone pituitary tumor subtype were independent risk factors for delayed epistaxis. Sex, age, history of diabetes, tumor size, tumor invasion and operation time were not associated with delayed epistaxis. All patients with delayed epistaxis were successfully managed through endoscopic transnasal hemostasis without recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Delayed epistaxis after ETPTR tends to have specific onset periods and risk factors. Prevention of these characteristics may reduce the occurrence of delayed epistaxis. Endoscopic transnasal hemostasis is recommended as the preferred treatment for delayed epistaxis.

Endoscopic 1½-transseptal approach for pituitary surgery

Background

We previously introduced the one-and-a-half (1½) nostril endoscopic transsphenoidal approach (OETA) to reduce the damage to the nasal structures. Here, we reported the modified approach which is called the endoscopic 1½-transseptal approach (EOTA) for pituitary surgery by combining the OETA and the microscopic transseptal approach to simplify intranasal procedures and protect nasal mucosa. In EOTA, we removed the sellar lesions in a corridor that is composed of the right submucosal space and the anterior left ½ nasal cavity.

Methods

We introduced EOTA with a detailed technical description and preliminary clinical outcomes. A total of 128 patients who underwent EOTA for pituitary surgery from July 2018 to September 2020 were reviewed for evaluation of the safety and efficacy of this approach.

Results

EOTA had a high gross total resection (GTR) rate and a 1ow complication rate. GTR was achieved in 106 (82.8%) patients, with 81.4% for pituitary adenomas and 93.3% for other non-adenomatous lesions. Post-operative complications included 3 patients (2.3%) with postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak, 3 patients (2.3%) with diabetes insipidus, 5 patients (3.9%) with anterior pituitary insufficiency and 2 patients (1.6%) with meningitis. In addition, EOTA simplified the intranasal procedures, which led to shortened operation time (67.8 minutes). The results of ASK nasal-12, the Lund-Kennedy score, and the odor identification test showed that patients who underwent EOTA recovered quickly after surgery and the nasal cavity returned to the preoperative condition both apparently and physiologically one month after surgery.

Conclusions

EOTA is a simple, safe and effective approach for pituitary lesions, which provides not only a sufficient surgical corridor for 2-surgeon/4- or 3-hands technique but also minimally invasive access to the sellar region.

Improved nasal recovery and intact olfactory function after a transseptal approach for endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal adenomectomy: A retrospective analysis

Objectives

Endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal adenomectomy (TSA) is the most frequently performed skull base surgery, and researchers have recently focused on preserving nasal function. The endoscopic transseptal approach is a promising procedure due to its reduced injury to the nasal mucosa; however, there are no studies comparing rhinological and neurosurgical outcomes concurrently with the standard endoscopic transnasal approach. Therefore, we conducted this study to investigate whether the transseptal approach could reduce nasal morbidities with comparable neurosurgical outcomes.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 25 patients who underwent endoscopic endonasal transseptal TSA for pituitary adenoma without encasement of internal carotid artery from January 2019 to December 2020. Another 25 patients who received transnasal approach from January 2017 to December 2018 were selected as controls. Patients with diseases affecting the nasal cavity/olfaction or usage of a nasoseptal flap were excluded for a better comparison of the two procedures. We collected data from radiological studies, endocrine studies, endoscopic evaluations, 22-item sinonasal outcome tests (SNOT-22) and Top International Biotech Smell Identification Test (TIBSIT) for comparison.

Results

Lower postoperative SNOT-22 and Lund-Kennedy endoscopic scores were observed in the transseptal group. The effect size of differences were classified as large effect (The absolute value of Cohen's d > 0.8). Nevertheless, the TIBSIT scores were not significantly different. The rates of gross total resection, recovery of hormonal abnormalities, and complications were not significantly different. After controlling possible confounding factors using multivariate analysis, the endoscopic transseptal approach remained an independent factor for lower SNOT-22 scores and Lund-Kennedy endoscopic scores.

Conclusions

The endoscopic transseptal approach provides improved recovery of nasal mucosa and intact olfaction without compromising neurosurgical outcomes.

Level of Evidence

2b.