Dupilumab (Dupixent®) tends to be an effective therapy for uncontrolled severe chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: real data of a single-centered, retrospective single-arm longitudinal study from a university hospital in Germany

Effectiveness of dupilumab treatment against refractory eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis

Background

Eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis (ECRS) is a subgroup of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP), which is a disease characterized by eosinophilic infiltration of the sinonasal mucosa. Few studies that reported the effect of dupilumab on CRSwNP focused on a single phenotype of CRSwNP, such as ECRS.

Objectives

This study aimed to determine the effectiveness of dupilumab in ECRS with postoperative recurrence.

Methods

We retrospectively enrolled 107 patients and assessed the effectiveness of dupilumab by various clinical outcomes. We performed multivariable analysis on nasal polyp score (NPS) and computed tomography score and a meta-analysis of the effect of dupilumab on chronic rhinosinusitis regarding improvement in the NPS.

Results

At 12 months of dupilumab treatment, there were 65 patients (60.7%) in the excellent response group and 42 (39.3%) in the moderate response group. Nasal polyps had disappeared in 91 patients (85.9%) at 12 months, and there was improvement in all end points; 104 patients (97.2%) were able to eliminate systemic corticosteroid therapy. In the multivariate analysis, male sex was significantly associated with patients who did not show an improvement to 0 in the NPS and computed tomography score (odds ratios: 7.58 and 2.45; P = .01 and P = .04, respectively). The meta-analysis showed that dupilumab treatment resulted in a trend toward better improvement in the NPS (mean difference = -5.41) than previously reported results.

Conclusions

Dupilumab shows effectiveness in treating ECRS and could serve as an alternative therapeutic option to systemic corticosteroids. This effectiveness may be further enhanced by limiting the target population to recurrent ECRS.

Efficacy and Safety of Biologics for Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps: A Meta-Analysis of Real-World Evidence

Dupilumab, omalizumab, mepolizumab, and benralizumab have demonstrated good efficacy and safety in the treatment of severe uncontrolled chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) in phase 3 randomised controlled trials (RCTs). With recent regulatory approvals, there has been a surge in real-world studies (RWSs). This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to summarise the efficacy and safety of these four biologics in real-world settings. Primary outcomes were nasal polyp score and sino-nasal outcome test-22 score. Secondary outcomes included smell identification test score, loss of smell score, nasal congestion score, overall nasal symptom score, treatment response, and adverse events (AEs) prompting discontinuation. Efficacy outcomes at 4, 6, 12, and over 12 months were summarised, and meta-analyses of mean changes from baseline were conducted. Sixty-four RWSs involving 3921 patients were included. Significant improvements in clinical outcomes were observed at most follow-up time points, with dupilumab showing particularly notable effects. The efficacy observed in these RWSs was superior to that demonstrated in phase 3 RCTs. All biologics exhibited low discontinuation rates due to AEs. Overall, biologic treatments for CRSwNP in real-world settings demonstrate strong efficacy and good safety. However, the limitations in current RWSs highlight the need for long-term, high-quality multicentre prospective studies and comprehensive healthcare database analyses.

[Diagnosis and drug therapy of chronic rhinosinusitis]

Chronic rhinosinusitis is one of the most common chronic diseases of the upper respiratory tract and is associated with a significant reduction in quality of life. Precise diagnostic workup is therefore necessary to provide patients with adequate treatment. The introduction of biologics has opened up new options for the treatment of severely affected patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps in the sense of precision medicine that goes beyond the mere control of symptoms. This has been accompanied by a certain degree of standardization with regard to diagnostic procedures and the assessment of disease-specific quality of life. Against the background of the 2025 congress theme "Individualization vs. standardization in otorhinolaryngology," this paper examines and summarizes the diagnosis and drug therapy of chronic rhinosinusitis, with a focus on biologic therapy.

Biological therapy in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps

INTRODUCTION

Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) is a heterogeneous disease. High proportions of patients with CRSwNP characterized by type 2 inflammation fail to gain adequate control with conventional treatment. The application of biologics in clinics and assessments of novel biologics in clinical trials are blooming in expectations to fulfill the unmet medical needs of patients with CRSwNP with type 2 inflammation.

AREAS COVERED

After an extensive search of PubMed, Medline, and EMBASE for the most recent evidence, we thoroughly summarize current advances in biological therapies for treating patients with CRSwNP.

EXPERT OPINION

In recent years, biological therapy has been in the spotlight in clinical studies on CRSwNP. Biologics have proven to be efficacious in reducing nasal polyp size, alleviating CRSwNP-related symptoms, improving quality of life, and reducing the need for systemic corticosteroids or endoscopic sinus surgery for nasal polyps. The considerable efficacy and safety profile of biologics has offered patients with refractory CRSwNP another treatment option. However, some concerns remain to be addressed. Aspects such as the position of biological therapy in the management of CRSwNP, traits of patients suitable for certain biologics, etc. necessitate efforts to elucidate these unknowns in order to provide patients with tailored therapy.

Effect of Dupilumab in CRSwNP Sinonasal Outcomes from Real Life Studies: A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) is a debilitating inflammatory condition that significantly impacts quality of life. Despite treatment advances, recurrence is common, prompting the exploration of novel therapies such as monoclonal antibodies targeting the type 2 immune response, notably dupilumab. This research aims to evaluate the real-world evidence (RWE) of dupilumab in treating severe CRSwNP, comparing sinonasal outcomes to those observed in randomized clinical trials.

RECENT FINDINGS

Significant improvements were noted, with the average SNOT-22 score reduction being 37.2 points post-dupilumab treatment. The nasal polyp size (NPS) showed an average decrease of 3.6 points. The analysis highlighted the practical effectiveness of dupilumab, emphasizing its benefit over conventional therapies in reducing NPS and improving nasal symptoms. The findings advocate for the integration of dupilumab into standard treatment protocols for severe CRSwNP, providing a robust alternative that could potentially reduce the high recurrence rates associated with current management strategies. This study underscores the utility of RWE in assessing the effectiveness of new medical treatments, suggesting that dupilumab offers substantial real-world benefits for patients suffering from this challenging condition.

Real-world effectiveness of dupilumab in a European cohort of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CHRINOSOR)

BACKGROUND

Pivotal studies with dupilumab demonstrated clinically relevant improvements in nasal polyp score, symptom score, and quality-of-life score in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP).

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated the effectiveness of dupilumab in a large-scale CRSwNP cohort from 6 European tertiary-care centers.

METHODOLOGY

Nasal polyp score, Sinonasal Outcome Test 22 score, visual analog scale for total sinus symptoms, loss of smell, and nasal blockage, and Asthma Control Test (ACT) score were collected from hospital records and assessed at baseline and again at 24 and 52 weeks' treatment with dupilumab in CRSwNP patients. Treatment effectiveness was evaluated in relation to demographic and lifestyle factors, sinus surgery history, presence of comorbidities, and blood eosinophil counts (BEC). Treatment response was evaluated according to European Forum for Research and Education in Allergy and Airway Diseases (EUFOREA) 2021 criteria.

RESULTS

All patient outcomes improved at 24 and 52 weeks' treatment compared to baseline. Dupilumab showed effectiveness independent of age, sex, body mass index, smoking status, prior sinus surgery, presence of asthma, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-exacerbated respiratory disease, allergy, or baseline BEC. A total of 92.5% and 94.4% showed an improvement in at least 1 EUFOREA criterion at 24 and 52 weeks, respectively; 54.4% and 68.2% met all 4 of the more stringent EUFOREA criteria at 24 and 52 weeks, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Real-world evaluation of dupilumab effectiveness demonstrates a robust and sustained response in at least two thirds of patients at 52 weeks' treatment. Favorable treatment response was independent of the number of sinus surgery procedures, major comorbidities, or baseline systemic levels of type 2 inflammation.

Long-term effects of dupilumab on chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: A step towards clinical remission

Background and objectives

Clinical remission, defined as the absence of disease activity and symptoms, is an emerging goal in the management of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). This study aimed to evaluate the long-term effects of dupilumab on patients with CRSwNP, with or without asthma, and explore the potential for achieving clinical remission.

Methods

A two-year prospective study was conducted on 109 patients with CRSwNP, with or without asthma, who were eligible for dupilumab as an add-on therapy. Comprehensive assessments, including clinical, laboratory, and radiological evaluations, were performed before and after treatment. Clinical remission of CRSwNP was defined as 12 months of dupilumab treatment, no exacerbations requiring oral corticosteroids (OCS), no need for nasal sinus operation, no anosmia or hyposmia, a Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) score under 20, and a Lund-Mackay score (LMS) below 10. For those with comorbid asthma, clinical remission was defined as an asthma control test (ACT) score of 19 or higher, no asthma exacerbations, and no need for OCS.

Results

Dupilumab significantly improved CRSwNP outcomes in both groups, including SNOT-22 scores, nasal polyp size (LMS), and anosmia/hyposmia. Comorbid asthma was highly prevalent (79.8%), and patients with asthma had significantly larger nasal polyps, both before and after dupilumab therapy, despite similar symptom improvement. Higher fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) and blood eosinophil count (BEC) levels, along with anosmia/hyposmia, predicted larger polyp size. Dupilumab also significantly improved asthma outcomes, increasing forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) and decreasing FeNO. Clinical remission was achieved in 11% of patients, with a slightly lower rate in those with asthma (7.3%).

Conclusion

Dupilumab treatment can achieve clinical remission in CRSwNP. However, comorbid asthma appears to reduce the likelihood of remission and is associated with larger nasal polyps, even with similar symptom improvement. Asthma may independently influence polyp development, potentially impacting long-term outcomes in CRSwNP.

Real-World Evaluation of Dupilumab in the Long-Term Management of Eosinophilic Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps: A Focus on IL-4 and IL-13 Receptor Blockade

Background and Objectives: Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a complex inflammatory condition of the nasal passages that severely impairs quality of life. Type 2 CRS is characterized by eosinophilic inflammation, driven by cytokines like IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13. These cytokines are key to CRS pathogenesis and contribute to a heavy disease burden, especially with comorbidities. This study assessed dupilumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting IL-4 and IL-13 signaling, to evaluate its efficacy in reducing the disease burden in patients with CRS with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). Materials and Methods: The patients received subcutaneous dupilumab for 42 weeks. The outcomes included Nasal Polyp Score (NPS); Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22), Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores; total IgE; and olfactory function. Results: Significant improvements were observed across the NPS and SNOT-22, NRS, and VAS scores after 42 weeks. Their total IgE levels were reduced, though a transient increase in peripheral eosinophilia appeared at 16 weeks. The patients also reported substantial improvements in olfactory function and high satisfaction with the treatment, supporting dupilumab's potential in reducing both symptom severity and inflammation in CRSwNP. Conclusions: These results indicate that dupilumab may be an effective treatment for CRSwNP, offering significant symptom relief, improved olfactory function, and enhanced quality of life. High satisfaction levels suggest that dupilumab may provide therapeutic advantages over the conventional CRS treatments, though further studies are warranted to confirm its long-term benefits.

Efficacy of dupilumab on chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps and concomitant asthma in biologic-naive and biologic-pretreated patients

OBJECTIVES

Dupilumab, an anti-IL-4 receptor monoclonal antibody (mAb), was recently approved for the treatment of severe chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). The main objective of this study was to assess whether previous exposure to biological treatment affected the clinical outcomes in CRSwNP and asthma patients, treated with dupilumab over time. A collateral secondary objective was to analyse the effects over time of dupilumab in patients with and without aeroallergen sensitization.

METHODS

Single-centre retrospective observational study on severe CRSwNP patients treated with dupilumab. Nasal polyp score (NPS), visual analogue scale (VAS) symptom score, sinonasal outcome test (SNOT-22), aeroallergen sensitization, total serum IgE levels, and blood eosinophil counts were assessed at baseline and after 4, 6 and 12 months.

RESULTS

42 patients were included, 40 (95.2%) had asthma. Twenty-one (50%) patients received dupilumab without prior biological treatment (Group A: naive) and 50% switched to dupilumab from previous biological treatment (Group B: pre-treated). NPS, VAS symptoms, SNOT-22 improved significantly after 12 months treatment in both groups of patients (p < 0.001). After 12 months, VAS overall symptom score showed a significant reduction from 6 (IQR, 4.6-8.6) and 6 (IQR, 3.8-7.1) for Group A and Group B patients respectively, to 1.2 (IQR, 0.8-2.7) and 1.2 (IQR, 0.2-2.5); NPS from 6 (IQR, 4.0-7.0) and 5 (IQR, 3.5-6.0), respectively, to 1 (IQR, 0.0-2.0) and 0 (IQR, 0.0-3.0) and SNOT-22 from 64 (IQR, 56-78) and 71 (IQR, 47.5-76.0) respectively, to 5.5 (IQR, 4-21) and 6 (IQR, 4-15). IgE reduced from 57 to 22.1 and from 46.9 to 30.2 in Group A and Group B respectively (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Dupilumab improves symptom severity, polyp size, and health-related quality of life, regardless of the presence or absence of comorbid aeroallergen sensitization and previous administration of biologic therapy.

Real-world data show sustained therapeutic effects of dupilumab in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) over 3 years

BACKGROUND

Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) is a prevalent chronic inflammatory condition affecting the nose and paranasal sinuses, posing a significant socio-economic impact with substantial challenges in management. Biologics targeting type 2 inflammation such as dupilumab, have emerged as promising options. This study addresses a critical knowledge gap by comprehensively evaluating the 3-year impact of sustained dupilumab therapy in CRSwNP.

METHODS

A multicentric, retrospective collection of real-world data from five tertiary referral centers in Germany was conducted, enrolling 150 adult patients. The study investigated patient-reported outcomes, disease-specific indices and clinical measures, focusing on therapeutic response persistence, adverse events, and factors influencing treatment continuity.

RESULTS

Results indicate significant improvements in clinical parameters from baseline (n = 150) with sustained effectiveness after 36 months (n = 138) as indicated in mean score ± standard deviation. Dupilumab treatment significantly improved overall disease-related impairment (VAS score: 7.5 ± 2.5 to 1.6 ± 1.3) and rhinosinusitis symptoms (SNOT-22: 59.4 ± 19.4 to 18.0 ± 15.0). Nasal Polyp Scores (NPS) decreased (5.3 ± 1.8 to 0.7 ± 1.1), and olfactory function improved (3.2 ± 2.5 to 8.4 ± 2.8), with three out of four patients achieving normosmia or hyposmia after 36 months. An "Excellent" treatment response according to EUFOREA23 criteria was observed in 76.5% of patients after 36 months. Sixteen patients discontinued Dupilumab, 12 permanently. Adverse events totaled 69 in 48 patients, commonly self-limiting.

CONCLUSION

The study highlights the enduring effectiveness and lack of habituation to dupilumab after a sustained therapy of 3 years, providing valuable insights into its long-term therapeutic implications for CRSwNP patients.

Efficacy and safety of dupilumab in the treatment of CRSwNP in the real-life setting: a review of the literature

INTRODUCTION

The recent approval of Dupilumab has profoundly revolutionized the management of patients affected by severe and recalcitrant Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps (CRSwNP). However, a review that summarizes the results of real-life studies and compares them to phase 3 studies SINUS-24 and 52 is still lacking.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A search of all real-life studies published from 2019 to 2023 was performed. Patients characteristics at baseline and 6 and 12 months after starting Dupilumab were extracted and compared to those from phase 3 trials: age, sex, smoking habits, comorbid asthma and aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD), previous endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS), hematic eosinophils and total IgE, NasalAQ2 Polyps Score (NPS), smell, SNOT-22, adverse events (AEs), and response to treatment.

RESULTS

15 papers were included with an overall number of 1658 patients. A higher rate of comorbidities and previous ESS was found in patients from real-life studies. In addition, they had worse smell and SNOT-22 at baseline compared to patients from SINUS-24 and 52. Comorbid and post-ESS patients tended to have a faster NPS and SNOT-22 improvement, although the absolute values were not clinically relevant. A more extensive surgery and a number of ESS ≥ 2 were related to worse olfactory outcomes, probably due to iatrogenic damage. No correlation was found between hematic eosinophils and outcomes. AEs were reported by 12.4% of patients and 2.2% had to discontinue dupilumab. Weight gain was an emergent AE (0.8%), probably related to the restored sense of smell and taste. Non-responders were 3.5% and they were switched to systemic steroid, ESS, or another biologic.

CONCLUSION

Despite some differences in prescription criteria between countries, dupilumab was demonstrated to be effective even in the real-life scenario. However, emerging AEs and possible unknown long-term AEs of a likely lifelong therapy should be considered.

Efficacy of dupilumab in real-life settings: a STROBE study

BACKGROUND

Dupilumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting IL-4 and IL-13, has demonstrated its efficacy in several clinical trials. However, to date, real-life data remains limited.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of our study was to assess the real-life impact of dupilumab on patients with severe and uncontrolled chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) quality of life.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective, monocentric, observational, real-life study, conducted in accordance with the STROBE guidelines. The following parameters were collected before treatment and at 1, 4, and 12 months: Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22 (SNOT-22), nasal polyp score (NPS), Sniffin' Sticks-16 (SST-16), visual analog scale (VAS) for loss of smell, nasal congestion score (NCS), gustatory VAS, asthma control, oral corticosteroid usage, surgery rates, and occurrence of side effects.

RESULTS

The study included 47 patients. SNOT-22 scores decreased from 52.4 ± 24.3 to 12.7 ± 10.5 at 12 months (p < 0.001). NPS decreased from 6.15 ± 1.71 to 1.57 ± 1.40 at 12 months (p < 0.001). SST-16 scores increased from 1.6 ± 2.83 to 9.1 ± 5.4 at 12 months (p < 0.001). NCS decreased from 2.45 ± 0.72 to 0.38 ± 0.63 at 12 months (p < 0.001). Prior to treatment, 72.3% were using oral corticosteroids, compared to 17.0% at 12 months (p < 0.01). Two patients required additional surgery, and 17% reported completely uncontrolled asthma, compared to 0% at 12 months (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Our real-life results confirm the efficacy of Dupilumab in the treatment of severe and uncontrolled CRSwNP.

The value of biomarkers in the therapy of CRSwNP with biologicals-a long-term follow-up of dupilumab therapy

PURPOSE

Since its release, Dupilumab has shown great results in treating severe uncontrolled CRSwNP. However, there is a lack of real-world data beyond 12 months of follow-up, and it is not clear to what extent biomarkers are appropriate for monitoring and predicting the Dupilumab therapy success. Hence, this study aims to analyze biomarkers for monitoring therapy, predicting therapy success and assess the effect of Dupilumab in real-world settings.

METHODS

The follow-up was performed with 104 patients retrospectively up to 22 months, assessing SNOT-22, NPS, olfactometry, ACS, FEV-1, and blood biomarkers (total serum IgE, Eosinophils, ECP). Patients were divided into subgroups depending on their pretherapeutic biomarker levels and subsequent development was analyzed.

RESULTS

There was substantially improvement in all clinical parameters up to 1 year and then continuously up to month 22. Patients with initially elevated baseline blood eosinophil counts (> 0.5 billion/L) had a trend of better SNOT-22 development after 1 year (- 12.19 points, p = 0.03). The course of total serum IgE showed moderate correlation with almost all clinical variables obtained. Therapy was well tolerated with only mild and transient adverse events.

CONCLUSION

Dupilumab has considerably reduced symptoms and disease severity even beyond 1 year of treatment, supporting its role as targeted and effective treatment option for CRSwNP. Our data shows that total serum IgE is a promising biomarker for the monitoring during the treatment with Dupilumab. Elevated pre-therapeutic serum eosinophil counts may be a predictor of good subjective response to therapy. Larger cohorts and a long-term-follow-up over years are needed to further consolidate these findings.

What Questions Do Patients Ask About Biologic Therapies for Chronic Sinusitis With Nasal Polyps?

Objective: The objective of this study is to explore the questions commonly asked online about biologic therapies for use in treatment of chronic sinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) and the quality of the available content. Methods: Most common search terms were identified via Google Trends. People Also Ask (PAA) questions were identified and extracted with their associated website using an online data-scraping program [Search Engine Optimization (SEO) Minion, Keywords Everywhere]. Sources were evaluated using Flesch Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL) and Flesch Reading Ease (FRE, higher number = better) score for readability; Journal of American Medical Association (JAMA) Benchmark criteria for quality assessment (0-4, 4 = all criteria met). Results: A total of 143 unique PAA questions and unique websites were identified. Questions were organized into 3 categories: questions about biologic therapies overall (38.46%), about CRSwNP (37.76%), and about treatment options for CRSwNP (23.78%). Websites answering PAA questions were from commercial (60.14%), medical practice (13.99%), academic (13.29%), and government (12.59%) sources. FKGL scores found the average reading level to be at approximately a 12th grade level (SD = 3.297) alongside a low reading ease FRE score of 37.6 (SD = 16.77). Mean JAMA criteria scores were 0.9895 (SD = 0.848), indicating largely low-quality materials. Conclusion: Biologic therapies are a novel treatment option for CRSwNP, and participants are seeking more information about these treatments and disease state. Online resources regarding biologics should be presented at a lower reading level. Sources with evidence-based information are needed. Physicians should be aware of these limitations in online material and counsel accordingly by curating and directing patients to good sources.Level of Evidence: Step 4.

Biologic Therapies across Nasal Polyp Subtypes

Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis is a common inflammatory condition, with subtypes like aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease, allergic fungal rhinosinusitis, and central compartment atopic disease sharing a common type 2 inflammatory pathway. Respiratory biologic therapies have been developed that target type 2 inflammation. In this article, we discuss the use of respiratory biologic therapies for nasal polyposis in general, as well as within the various subtypes of nasal polyps. Further, we discuss future roles of novel biologic therapies targeting type 2 inflammation in nasal polyposis.

Residual nasal polyp tissue following dupilumab therapy is associated with periostin-associated fibrosis

PURPOSE

Dupilumab, an anti-interleukin-4 receptor alpha monoclonal antibody, is a new treatment for severe uncontrolled chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps. However, data on the effect of dupilumab on histological changes in nasal polyp tissue are lacking. We aimed to investigate the effect of dupilumab on real-life clinical conditions and nasal polyp tissues from patients with eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis (ECRS), which is a refractory subtype.

METHODS

We conducted an open-label, prospective, observational, single-centre study on 63 patients with refractory ECRS on the basis of the criteria of the Japanese Epidemiological Survey of Refractory Eosinophilic Chronic Rhinosinusitis Study. These patients had a history of surgery and received dupilumab for 24 weeks. Patient-reported sinonasal symptoms, T&T olfactometry and nasal polyp scores were prospectively evaluated. In 23 patients with residual nasal polyps following dupilumab treatment, changes in systemic and local periostin expression, and total collagen deposition in nasal polyp tissues were investigated before and after dupilumab administration.

RESULTS

Dupilumab rapidly improved sinonasal symptoms and reduced the nasal polyp score 24 weeks after initiation. 40 (63.5%) patients had resolution of nasal polyps, but the reduction was limited in the remaining 23 (36.5%) patients. Periostin expression in serum and nasal lavage fluid was decreased, whereas periostin and the total collagen deposition area in subepithelial tissues in residual nasal polyps were enhanced after dupilumab administration.

CONCLUSION

Dupilumab improves sinonasal symptoms and reduces the nasal polyp score in refractory ECRS. Periostin-associated tissue fibrosis may be involved in the differential effect of dupilumab on nasal polyp reduction.

Influence of Prior Endoscopic Sinus Surgery Extent on Dupilumab Effectiveness in CRSwNP Patients

BACKGROUND

Guidelines recommend that the vast majority of patients with severe uncontrolled chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) should have at least one endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) prior to starting biologics. Because ESS can be performed with a variable extension, the aim of this study would be to evaluate the association between surgical extensiveness, as measured by ACCESS score, and outcomes collected in patients treated with Dupilumab.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a multicentric retrospective study; patients affected by CRSwNP who were subjected to Dupilumab therapy and who underwent at least one ESS prior to Dupilumab initiation were included. ACCESS score was assigned to each patient's pre-Dupilumab CT scan. Subjective and objective parameters (SNOT-22, NPS, VAS scores, Sniffin' Sticks) were collected before and during the administration of therapy. Statistical correlations between ACCESS scores and clinical outcomes were investigated.

RESULTS

A total of 145 patients were included; mean time from last previous ESS was 68.6 months, and on average, patients were subjected to 2.2 surgeries. Many correlations with ACCESS scores were demonstrated: better NPS at all timepoints and subjective scores (30-days SNOT-22, VAS nasal obstruction, and rhinorrhea) were achieved in patients with low ACCESS score (more extensive ESS). On the other hand, significantly worse VAS loss of smell values were demonstrated in patients with lower ACCESS scores.

CONCLUSION

Dupilumab patients subjected to a prior extensive ESS may have reduced size of polyps and improved subjective indicators, together with a decreased chance to recover smell, when compared with patients who underwent a minimal excision.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 Laryngoscope, 134:1556-1563, 2024.

Multidimensional Impact of Dupilumab on Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps: A Complete Health Technology Assessment of Clinical, Economic, and Non-Clinical Domains

Chronic RhinoSinusitis with Nasal Polyps (CRSwNP) represents a condition mainly caused by the type 2 inflammation presence and marked by the existence of polyps within the nasal and paranasal sinuses. The standard of care includes intranasal steroids, additional burst of systemic steroids, if needed, and surgery. However, recurrence is common, especially among patients with comorbid type 2 inflammatory diseases. Recently, biological drugs, addressing the underlying cause of the disease, have been approved in Italy (dupilumab, omalizumab, and mepolizumab). A Health Technology Assessment was conducted to define multidimensional impact, assuming Italian NHS perspective and a 12-month time horizon. The EUnetHTA Core Model was deployed, using the following methods to analyze the domains: (i) literature evidence; (ii) administration of semi-structured questionnaires to 17 healthcare professionals; (iii) health economics tools to define the economic sustainability for the system. Evidence from NMA and ITC showed a more favorable safety profile and better efficacy for dupilumab compared with alternative biologics. All the analyses, synthesizing cost and efficacy measures, showed that dupilumab is the preferable alternative. Specifically, the cost per responder analysis for dupilumab, exhibiting a 67.0% response rate at Week 52, is notably economical at 14,209EUR per responder. This presents a more economical profile compared with the cost per responder for omalizumab (36.2% response rate) at 24,999EUR and mepolizumab (28.5% response rate) at 31,863EUR. These results underscore dupilumab's potential, not merely in terms of clinical outcomes, but also in terms of economic rationality, thereby solidifying its status as a valid and preferrable alternative in the management of CRSwNP, in the context of the Italian NHS.

Effectiveness of dupilumab versus endoscopic sinus surgery for the treatment of type-2 chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: a preliminary report

PURPOSE

Historically managed with intranasal corticosteroids (INCS) and endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS), type-2 Chronic RhinoSinusitis with Nasal Polyps (CRSwNP) treatment was revolutionized by the introduction of dupilumab but universally accepted guidelines are still lacking.

METHODS

Patients treated at our University Hospital for type-2 CRSwNP were enrolled. Demographic data were collected, as well as laboratory (eosinophils, total IgE), endoscopic [nasal polyps score (NPS), modified Lund-Kennedy score (mLKS)], radiological [Lund-Mackay score (LMS) at CT scan], SNOT-22, and olfactory [Sniffin' Sticks identification test (SSIT)] features. Patients were treated with dupilumab or ESS and re-evaluated after 3 and 12 months.

RESULTS

At 3 and 12 months, patients undergoing ESS achieved a higher reduction of NPS and mLKS, while patients receiving dupilumab experienced a higher improvement at SNOT-22 and SSIT with a greater positive variation in the prevalence of anosmia (- 57.7% vs - 42.9%) and normosmia (+ 37.8 vs + 28.5%). Mean mLKS and LMS were quite similar. Results were independent of clinical features known to contribute to CRSwNP severity, except for patients with ≥ 2 prior ESS who had a significantly lower smell improvement.

CONCLUSION

ESS and dupilumab were effective at reducing CRSwNP inflammatory burning. CRSwNP smell impairment cannot be attributed only to olfactory cleft obstruction and other mechanisms may be involved. Dupilumab acts systemically with poor correlation with NPS. As of today, dupilumab appears to be more suitable for elderly patients with anesthesiological contraindications and/or several previous surgeries, while ESS may represent the first-line choice in surgery-naive patients.

Prevalence of type 2 inflammatory signatures and efficacy of dupilumab in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps from two phase 3 clinical trials: SINUS-24 and SINUS-52

BACKGROUND

This post hoc analysis of the international SINUS-24/-52 trials (NCT02912468/NCT02898454) aimed to assess dupilumab efficacy in patients with severe chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) according to different definitions of type 2 inflammatory signature.

METHODS

Six definitions of type 2 inflammation were used: ≥150 eosinophils/μL or total immunoglobulin E (IgE) ≥100 IU/mL with a coexisting type 2 condition; ≥150 eosinophils/μL or total IgE ≥100 IU/mL; ≥150 eosinophils/μL; ≥250 eosinophils/μL or total IgE ≥100 IU/mL; coexisting asthma or ≥300 eosinophils/μL; presence of a coexisting type 2 condition. Odds ratios (ORs; dupilumab vs. placebo) for achieving clinically meaningful improvement (≥1 point) from baseline to week 24 (pooled SINUS-24/-52) and week 52 (SINUS-52) were calculated for nasal polyp score (NPS; range 0-8), nasal congestion/obstruction score (NC; 0-3), and loss of smell score (LoS; 0-3).

RESULTS

At baseline (n = 724), most patients displayed a type 2 inflammatory signature across definitions (64.2%-95.3%). At week 24, ORs for clinically meaningful improvement ranged from 11.9 to 14.9 for NPS across type 2 definitions, 6.5-9.6 for NC, and 12.2-17.8 for LoS (all p < 0.0001). OR ranges were similar or greater at week 52: 19.0-36.6, 7.6-12.1, and 9.2-33.5, respectively (all p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Most patients with CRSwNP in the SINUS study had type 2 inflammation. Dupilumab demonstrated robust efficacy across definitions of type 2 inflammation, consistent with its profile as an inhibitor of Interleukin-4 and Interleukin-13 signaling, key and central drivers of type 2 inflammation in CRSwNP.

KEY POINTS

This study assessed type 2 inflammation prevalence and dupilumab efficacy in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps according to algorithm-defined type 2 inflammation Dupilumab efficacy was similar across all type 2 definitions.

Adherence to Intranasal Steroids in Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyposis Prior to and during Biologic Therapy: A Neglected Matter

Adherence to treatment is essential in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP). Intranasal corticosteroids (INCS) are the first-line therapy, followed by systemic corticosteroids and surgery if needed. In cases of refractory disease, biologics are added to conventional treatment, making adherence to INCS crucial in assessing eligibility for these targeted therapies. The purpose of this review is to examine INCS adherence assessment and rate, before starting and during biologic therapy. We conducted a comprehensive literature review focusing on INCS adherence in CRSwNP treated with biologics, including randomized controlled trials and real-life studies. The search extended to studies on allergic and non-allergic rhinitis to provide broader insights into tools to assess the INCS adherence. The result was that adherence to INCS in CRSwNP is underexplored, with only a few studies addressing it directly. Various tools for adherence assessment have been identified, but none are universally accepted as standard. The review also highlights the complexity of factors influencing adherence rates. Effective CRSwNP management requires a paradigm shift to prioritize adherence in treatment guidelines and clinical practice. The review advocates for improved adherence assessment tools, a deeper understanding of influencing factors, and the integration of personalized medicine approaches, especially for biologic therapies.

Remission in Type 2 Inflammatory Diseases: Current Evidence, Unmet Needs, and Suggestions for Defining Remission in Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The development of biological therapies for type 2 inflammatory diseases raises the possibility of addressing remission in those dis-immune conditions. No consensus exists for a definition of remission in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). This review aims to critically evaluate the published data to provide the basis for defining remission in CRSwNP.

RECENT FINDINGS

The published evidence has yet to provide an unequivocal definition on remission in type 2 inflammatory diseases, in part reflecting differences in approaches to diagnosis and follow-up. A multidimensional evaluation is necessary when considering complete remission, including clinical, inflammatory, and histologic criteria, but how to combine or tailor the three perspectives according to disease severity at baseline or timing of assessment of treatment category is yet to reach consensus. We suggest defining remission starting from the approach taken in asthma and eosinophilic esophagitis, that is, including the resolution of symptoms and improvements in objective parameters of disease severity and/or inflammatory activity. Future studies and consensuses should provide validated criteria with cutoffs for the day-to-day definition of remission. The definition of remission in CRSwNP should include the following criteria, to be verified and maintained for a period of ≥ 12 months: absence of symptoms (nasal obstruction, loss of smell, rhinorrhea as the main ones); no impact of symptoms on quality of life; no need of surgery; no chronic or rescue medications (systemic corticosteroids or antibiotics); and recovery of smell function, possibly evaluated by objective test. Assessment of underlying inflammation should also be considered once accurate and feasible biomarkers are available in clinical practice.

Biologics for Chronic Rhinosinusitis-A Modern Option for Therapy

Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is an important ENT pathology which affects about 5-12% of the general population. The treatment of CRS can be pharmacological (nasal sprays, douches, systemic antibiotics and steroids), surgical (endoscopic sinus surgery) or immunological according to established algorithms. CRS was divided for many years into CRS with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) and CRS without nasal polyps (CRSsNP). New ways of classifying CRS by endotypes (presence of neutrophilia, eosinophilia, fibrosis, glandular hypertrophy and epithelial dysmorphisms) appeared after the most recent understandings of the pathophysiology of the disease. Other classifications divide CRS into primary and secondary forms, localized/diffuse types and anatomical presentation. A new type of treatment has been administered in the last years, biologics. For the moment, biologics are indicated just in the cases of the patients who have undergone ESS or have contraindications for surgery and have bilateral polyps and meet a minimum of three of the following criteria: the necessity for systemic therapies with oral or parenteral corticosteroids or contraindications to systemic steroids, significant loss of smell or impaired QoL score, comorbid asthma and type 2 inflammation. This article aims to present the most relevant studies which used the three types of biologics (anti-IgE, anti-IL5 and anti-IL4/IL3) and wishes to increase the awareness of this new type of treatment that can be used in some CRS cases.

Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyposis Treated With Dupilumab: Real-World Use and Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Biologic medications are increasingly incorporated into chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) management. However, little is known about prescribing patterns in real-world settings and how this relates to proposed international guidelines and outcomes.

OBJECTIVES

To characterize use patterns of dupilumab for CRSwNP better in relation to proposed guidelines and explore real-world outcomes.

METHODS

We used the TriNetX Web-based tool to identify patients who were prescribed dupilumab for CRSwNP. Patients prescribed dupilumab for a CRSwNP indication were included for analysis. Dupilumab initiation criteria were determined via the European Position Paper on Rhinosinusitis and Nasal Polyps 2020 (EPOS2020).

RESULTS

In total, 121 patients were identified who were prescribed dupilumab for a CRSwNP indication. Of these, 86 (71%) met EPOS2020 indications for biologic initiation and 35 (29%) did not. Overall, patients had significant improvements in the 22-item SinoNasal Outcome Test scores (mean improvement of 24.3 points) and nasal polyp scores (mean improvement of 1.0 point). However, 20 patients (30%) did not show meaningful improvement in the 22-item SinoNasal Outcome Test scores. Twenty-one patients (17%) failed a previous biologic attempt. Therapy was discontinued by six patients (5%) due to side effects, and by six (5%) owing to a lack of efficacy.

CONCLUSIONS

In our experience, patients prescribed dupilumab for CRSwNP frequently may not meet EPOS2020 Guidelines. Over 25% of those who do not meet criteria may not have CRSwNP. Overall, dupilumab use among well-selected patients appears to be safe and effective. Further real-world study of biologic use for CRSwNP will help improve its judicious use and identify populations who benefit most from biologic therapies.

Two-year results of tapered dupilumab for CRSwNP demonstrates enduring efficacy established in the first 6 months

BACKGROUND

Dupilumab is an anti-T2-inflammatory biological registered for chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) with nasal polyps (CRSwNP), indicated by integrated CRS-care pathways when optimal medico-surgical treatment yields insufficient CRS control. This study aims to evaluate long-term results with focus on established therapeutic efficacy while tapering dupilumab.

METHODS

Real-life, prospective observational cohort study in single tertiary referral center with add-on dupilumab as primary biological treatment in adult (≥18 years) biological-naïve CRSwNP patients per the European Position Paper on Rhinosinusitis and Nasal Polyps (EPOS)2020-indication with a 2-year follow-up. Tapering (increasing interdose interval) applied every 24 weeks, conditional to sufficient treatment response and CRS control.

RESULTS

Mean scores (s.d.) of all co-primary outcomes improved significantly from baseline ( 228) to the 48 ( 214) and 96-weeks ( 99) timepoints: Nasal Polyp Score (0-8) improved from 5,3 (1,9) to 1,4 (1,8) and 1,3 (1,7); SinoNasal Outcome Test (SNOT)-22 (0-110) improved from 53,6 (19,6) to 20,2 (15,4) and 21,2 (15,6); Sniffin'Sticks-12 identification test (0-12; 0-6 anosmia, 7-10 hyposmia, 11-12 normosmia) improved from 3,7 (2,4) to 7,7 (2,9) and 7,3 (3,04); Asthma Control Test (5-25; >19 indicating well-controlled asthma) improved from 18,5 (4,8) to 21,8 (3,8) and 21,4 (3,9). Tapering was feasible in 79,5% of the patients at the 24-weeks timepoint, and in 93,7% and 95,8% at the 48- and 96-weeks timepoints, respectively. One-way repeated-measures ANOVA demonstrated no significant alterations of individual co-primary outcome mean-scores from 24 weeks onward.

CONCLUSION

This first long-term real-life prospective observational cohort study shows high therapeutic efficacy of dupilumab for severe CRswNP in the first 2 years. Therapeutic efficacy is principally established within 24 weeks and endures while tapering dupilumab conditional to treatment response and CRS control.

Targeting IL-4 and IL-13 Receptors on Eosinophils in CRSwNP Patients: The Clinical Efficacy of Dupilumab

Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP) is an inflammatory disease linked to type 2 inflammation. Several biologics have demonstrated therapeutic potential for the treatment of this pathology in which IL-4, IL-5 and IL-13 represent the major cytokines involved in the control of eosinophilic respiratory inflammation. 25% of CRSwNP patients relapse after the use of oral glucocorticoids or after surgery and often require several surgeries during their lifetime. In our study we enrolled 14 patients, 11 male and 3 female. The inclusion criteria were: age ≥ 18 years; confirmed diagnosis of chronic rhinosinusitis with severe nasal polyposis; disease severity with NPS Nasal Polyposis Endoscopic Score total score ≥ 5 and/or SNOT-22 ≥ 50; previous treatment failure due to lack of efficacy or discontinuation of systemic corticosteroid therapy and/or non-response or recurrence following surgery. The results presented in this study showed the ability of Dupilumab to improve all the parameters analysed. In particular, statistically significant data were obtained for NPS, SNOT-22, NRS, and IgE in patients exposed to Dupilumab treatment for 24 weeks, highlighting the ability of Dupilumab to produce clinical benefit in CRWwNP patients. In light of these data, the administration of dupilumab every two weeks represents a valid clinical strategy that ENT specialists can adopt for the treatment of adults with inadequately controlled CRSwNP.

Real Life Observational Study of Treatment Success of Monoclonal Antibodies for Refractory Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps

Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) is a mainly type-2-driven inflammatory disease that is often refractory to medical and surgical treatment and characterized by a high rate of recurrence. Monoclonal antibodies have been approved for severe refractory CRSwNP. Randomized controlled trials (RCT) have shown significant improvement in objective and subjective parameters. The results of these RCTs cannot necessarily be transferred to daily routine. The purpose of this retrospective study is to evaluate the treatment effects of biologics in patients with CRSwNP in a real-life setting. Patients treated with one of the approved biologics since July 2020 with at least 6 months follow-up were included in the study. Changes in SNOT-22 and nasal polyp score (NPS), as well as subjective change in sense of smell, number of sinus surgeries prior to and during treatment, comorbidities, discontinuation or change of monoclonal antibody and adverse events were evaluated. Thirty-three patients were included in this study. The mean SNOT-22 score and NPS improved significantly. The subjective assessment of sense of smell showed an improvement in 81.8% of patients. The monoclonal antibody had to be changed in seven patients. No severe adverse events occurred during the initiation of the treatment and follow-up. Biologics can be a treatment option in patients with severe refractory CRSwNP, showing significant improvements in quality of life, symptoms and polyp scores in randomized controlled trials and clinical routine with rare complications. Further research is needed to evaluate possible biomarkers, interdose interval prolongation and long-term safety.

Real-world evidence for the effectiveness and safety of dupilumab in patients with CRSwNP after 1 year of therapy

Objectives

For nearly 3 years, the monoclonal antibody dupilumab has been approved in Germany for the treatment of patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). Although efficacy has been demonstrated in large double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials, few reports of real-world data on this therapy have been published to date.

Methods

Patients with an indication for treatment with dupilumab for CRSwNP were included in the study and followed up every 3 months for a period of 1 year. At the baseline visit, demographic data, medical history, comorbidities, nasal polyp score, disease-related quality of life (SNOT-22), nasal congestion, and sense of smell (VAS and Sniffiń Sticks test) were recorded. In addition, total blood eosinophil counts and serum total IgE were measured. During follow-up, all of the described parameters and possible adverse events were recorded.

Results

Eighty-one patients were enrolled in the study, of whom 68 patients were still receiving dupilumab after 1 year of follow-up. Eight patients discontinued therapy, with only 1 patient discontinuing due to severe side effects. The Polyp score decreased substantially during follow-up, and parameters for disease-related quality of life and sense of smell increased significantly. Total IgE levels decreased significantly, and eosinophils leveled off at baseline after an initial increase after three months of therapy. No clinical data could be identified to a priori predict a treatment response.

Conclusions

Dupilumab shows effectiveness and safety in the treatment of CRSwNP under real-world conditions. More research on systemic biomarkers and clinical parameters to predict treatment response is necessary.

Effectiveness and Safety Profile of Dupilumab in Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps: Real-Life Data in Tertiary Care

Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) is characterized by a type 2 pattern of inflammation resulting in the production of some cytokines. Dupilumab radically changes the treatment of CRSwNP, but, considering its recent approval, it may be useful to evaluate its safety profile in a real-world setting. This work aimed to prospectively highlight the effectiveness and safety profile of dupilumab in patients with CRSwNP enrolled in the Otorhinolaryngology Unit of the University Hospital of Messina. An observational cohort study was carried out considering all patients treated with dupilumab. A descriptive analysis was conducted reporting all demographic characteristics, endoscopic evaluations, and symptom conditions. A total of 66 patients were treated with dupilumab, but three patients were excluded due to a lack of adherence during the observational period. A statistically significant reduction in the Sino-Nasal Outcome Test 22 (SNOT-22) and nasal polyps score (NPS) was shown at the 6th and 12th months compared to baseline values (SNOT-22, -37 and -50, p < 0.001 for both comparisons; NPS, -3 and -4, p < 0.001 for both comparisons). During the follow-up, eight patients (12.7%) had a reaction at the site of injection, and seven (11.1%) had transient hypereosinophilia. Given the optimal treatment response and the minimal adverse effects observed, clinicians should consider dupilumab a safe and effective treatment. Further studies are necessary to better understand the long-term effects.