Antagonist and partial agonist at the dopamine D2 receptors in drug-naïve and non-drug-naïve schizophrenia: a randomized, controlled trial

Association between treatment response and dose of blonanserin transdermal patch in patients with acute schizophrenia: A post hoc cluster analysis based on baseline psychiatric symptoms

AIM

To explore the optimal dose of blonanserin transdermal patch (BNS-P) based on baseline psychiatric symptomatic characteristics during acute schizophrenia.

METHODS

A post hoc cluster analysis was conducted using data from a 6-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of BNS-P (40 or 80 mg/day) in acute schizophrenia. We classified patients into three clusters based on baseline psychiatric symptoms. Efficacy was assessed using the change from baseline to week 6 in the PANSS total score. Safety was assessed by the incidence of adverse events.

RESULTS

Among 577 patients, three clusters were identified, characterized by severe psychiatric (Cluster-S; n = 122), predominant negative (Cluster-N; n = 191), and predominant positive (Cluster-P; n = 264) symptoms. In Cluster-P, both BNS-P 40 and 80 mg/day reduced PANSS total score significantly more than placebo (p = 0.036, effect size = 0.342; p < 0.001, effect size = 0.687, respectively). In Cluster-S and -N, only BNS-P 80 mg/day reduced PANSS total score significantly more than placebo (p = 0.045, effect size = 0.497; p = 0.034, effect size = 0.393, respectively). The effect size was greater at 80 mg/day than at 40 mg/day across all clusters. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were akathisia and skin-related adverse events in all clusters.

CONCLUSION

BNS-P exhibited a dose-dependent antipsychotic effect in all clusters, particularly highlighting its efficacy in patients with predominant positive symptoms, even at lower doses. These findings provide novel and valuable insights for determining BNS-P dose tailoring to individual symptomatic characteristics in real-world practice.

Efficacy and tolerability of aripiprazole versus D2 antagonists in the early course of schizophrenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Early intervention is essential for favorable long-term outcomes in schizophrenia. However, there is limited guidance in the scientific literature on how best to choose between dopamine D₂ receptor (D₂R) partial agonists and D₂R antagonists in early stages of schizophrenia. The aim of this meta-analysis was to directly compare D₂R partial agonists with D₂R antagonists for efficacy and tolerability, using randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that involved participants diagnosed with first-episode psychosis, schizophrenia, or related psychotic disorders with a duration of illness ≤5 years. Fourteen RCTs, involving 2494 patients, were included in the meta-analysis. Aripiprazole was the only identified D₂R partial agonist, and was not significantly different from pooled D₂R antagonists for overall symptom reduction or all-cause discontinuation. However, aripiprazole was more favorable than pooled D₂R antagonists for depressive symptoms, prolactin levels, and triglyceride levels. Specifically, aripiprazole was more favorable than paliperidone for triglyceride levels and more favorable than risperidone and olanzapine, but less favorable than ziprasidone, for weight gain. In addition, aripiprazole was less favorable for akathisia compared with second-generation D₂R antagonists, in particular olanzapine and quetiapine, and less favorable for discontinuation due to inefficacy than risperidone. Lastly, aripiprazole was more favorable than haloperidol for various efficacy and tolerability outcomes. In conclusion, aripiprazole’s efficacy did not differ substantially from D₂R antagonists in the early course of schizophrenia, whereas differential tolerability profiles were noted. More double-blind RCTs are required comparing the efficacy and tolerability of aripiprazole as well as other D₂R partial agonists with D₂R antagonists in early stages of schizophrenia.

Comparing the Effectiveness and Safety of the Addition of and Switching to Aripiprazole for Resolving Antipsychotic-Induced Hyperprolactinemia: A Multicenter, Open-Label, Prospective Study

OBJECTIVES

Hyperprolactinemia is an important but often overlooked adverse effect of antipsychotics. Several studies have shown that switching to or adding aripiprazole normalizes antipsychotic-induced hyperprolactinemia. However, no study has directly compared the effectiveness and safety of the 2 strategies.

METHODS

A total of 52 patients with antipsychotic-induced hyperprolactinemia were recruited. Aripiprazole was administered to patients with mild hyperprolactinemia (serum prolactin level < 50 ng/mL). Patients with severe hyperprolactinemia (serum prolactin level > 50 ng/mL) were randomized to an aripiprazole-addition group (adding aripiprazole to previous antipsychotics) or a switching group (switching previous antipsychotics to aripiprazole). Serum prolactin level, menstrual disturbances, sexual dysfunction, psychopathologies, and quality of life were measured at weeks 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8.

RESULTS

Both the addition and switching groups showed significantly reduced serum prolactin level and menstrual disturbances and improved sexual dysfunction. In patients with severe hyperprolactinemia, the numbers of patients with hyperprolactinemia and menstrual disturbance in the switching group were significantly lower than those in the addition group at week 8.

CONCLUSIONS

Both the addition and switching strategies were effective in resolving antipsychotic-induced hyperprolactinemia and hyperprolactinemia-related adverse events, including menstrual disturbances and sexual dysfunction. In addition, these findings suggest that switching to aripiprazole may be more effective than addition of aripiprazole for normalizing hyperprolactinemia and improving hyperprolactinemia-related adverse events in patients with schizophrenia.