Insight into the long-term psychological impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic

The Effects of General Mental Health Symptomatology, COVID Anxiety, and Sociodemographic Factors on Pandemic-Induced Negative and Positive Trauma Effects: A Polish Survey from the Late Stages of the Pandemic

Background/Objectives: COVID-19, caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, emerged in late 2019 and rapidly became a global pandemic, affecting over 200 countries. The pandemic has had profound impacts on global health, the economy, and mental health, leading to increased anxiety and more cases of posttraumatic stress disorder in the general population. This study aimed to evaluate the factors influencing the long-term psychological effects, both positive and negative, seen in the late stages of the COVID-19 pandemic in Poland (starting in the second half of 2021). It combined specific COVID-19 anxiety factors with a broader general mental health assessment to identify significant associations. Methods: Data were collected from 416 participants through paper-based and online questionnaires, with 235 valid responses gathered in total. This study utilized the Coronavirus Anxiety Scale; General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-28); and, to study Positive Trauma Effects (PTEs) and Negative Trauma Effects (NTEs), the Changes in Outlook Questionnaire. Data analysis was performed using the R language and a Generalized Additive Model analysis was also performed. Results: The study found generally low levels of COVID-19 anxiety and mental distress among participants. Significant predictors of NTEs included COVID-19 anxiety and general mental health status, which explained 47% of the variance. PTEs were significantly associated with gender, with women experiencing higher PTE levels relative to men. Conclusions: The findings indicate that combining specific ailment anxiety measurements with general mental health assessments enhances our ability to predict Negative Trauma Effects. Addressing mental health symptomatology and well-being during mass health crises is crucial to mitigate long-lasting psychological damage.

Mental health variables affecting Quality of Life (QOL) among healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic in Jazan City, Saudi Arabia

Background

Health workers directly involved in the diagnosis, treatment, and care of patients with COVID-19 are at risk of developing mental health symptoms.

Objective

The study aimed to assess the quality of life (QoL) of healthcare workers at Prince Mohammed bin Nasser Tertiary Hospital in Jazan during the COVID-19 pandemic, with a focus on the relationship between QoL and stress, anxiety, and depression. Pandemic.

Methods

This was a cross-sectional study conducted among healthcare workers at Prince Mohammed bin Nasser Hospital in the Jazan. The study included a sample of 352 healthcare workers. Data was collected through a self-administered questionnaire pertaining to sociodemographic characteristics and the 21-item Depression Anxiety Stress Scale questionnaire, SF-36, for QoL. Descriptive statistics, frequencies, and percentages were used. A chi-squared test was performed to compare categorical data. A one-way ANOVA was performed to compare the effect of disorder variables on QoL. Multiple linear regression analyses were carried out to discern the differences between the different groups of participants in QoL measures.

Results

Our results showed a poor QoL among those with a chronic disease (p = 0.002), who worked in the COVID-19 department (p = 0.030) and those who experienced the death of relatives or friends due to COVID-19 (p = 0.003).

Conclusion

Healthcare workers, particularly those with chronic diseases or who had lost relatives to COVID-19, exhibited significantly lower QoL levels, especially those working directly in COVID-19 departments.

The Improvement of Xerostomia and Reduction of Anxiety Score in a Patient with Generalized Anxiety Disorder and Recalcitrant Geographic Tongue: A Case Report and Literature Review

Introduction

The incidence of post-pandemic psychiatric disorders has increased globally in recent decades. Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) is one of the psychiatric disorders that are partially associated with emotional factors. It can affect the quantity and quality of saliva, present as xerostomia, and trigger the emergence of the geographic tongue (GT).

Purpose

This case report aims to discuss the management of xerostomia and geographic tongue in a patient with GAD.

Case

A 26-year-old male patient complained of dry and sore mouth for one month after taking medication from the psychiatry department, was diagnosed with GAD, and had already consumed the antidepressant sertraline. Extraoral examination showed dry and exfoliative lips. Intraoral examination showed white plaque with depapilation on the dorsal tongue, frothy saliva, buccal mucosa and dorsal tongue sticking to the dental mirror. The unstimulated salivary flow rate was <0.2 mL/min (sialometry method). The Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale-21 (DASS-21) questionnaire was used to estimate the psychological condition and showed an extremely severe level of anxiety (score = 13). The established oral diagnoses were GT with mild xerostomia and exfoliative cheilitis.

Case Management

For two months, patients received hyaluronic acid gel and mouthwash, as well as a non-pharmacological approach to healthy lifestyle counseling. There was an improvement in xerostomia, and the GT became asymptomatic, with a reduction of DASS score in this patient.

Conclusion

Improved psychological conditions will improve xerostomia, but the clinical appearance of the geographic tongue is more difficult to eliminate.

COVID-19 Recovery and Cardiovascular Health: The Interplay Between Fetuin-A and Blood Pressure

INTRODUCTION

COVID-19 has been shown to impair cardiovascular function, and further studies have proven that this effect can be long-term on several cardiovascular biomarkers. Fetuin-A, a multifunctional protein involved in calcification and inflammation, has emerged as an important biomarker in this process. This study investigates the relationship between recovery from COVID-19, cardiovascular health, and concentrations of fetuin-A in patients with high blood pressure.

METHODS

Seventy-nine men and 36 women were admitted to the Nasiriyah Heart Center in Iraq between March and August 2023, with ages ranging from 5 to 93 years. Clinical data were collected on admission along with blood samples, and serum levels of fetuin-A were measured using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The results were analyzed using Python libraries Pandas and SciPy to perform independent sample t-tests to determine mean levels of fetuin-A in various patient subgroups. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

The study showed that patients who had survived COVID-19 had significantly higher levels of fetuin-A compared to healthy controls, with a mean concentration of 103.64 mg/L versus 19.199 mg/L (p < 0.001). Additionally, it was found that patients with high blood pressure had increased levels of fetuin-A compared to those without high blood pressure, with a mean concentration of 109.01 mg/L versus 95.88 mg/L (p = 0.025). These results suggest that COVID-19 may alter the usual relationship between blood pressure and cardiovascular biomarkers.

CONCLUSION

This study emphasizes the complex interaction between recovery from COVID-19 and cardiovascular health, primarily through the levels of fetuin-A. The increase in fetuin-A among hypertensive patients suggests that COVID-19 may enhance cardiovascular risk, highlighting the need for stricter monitoring and tailored treatment strategies. Further studies are needed to elucidate the underlying mechanisms, which will help develop effective clinical guidelines for managing cardiovascular health in COVID-19 survivors.

Parental Mental Health, Gender, and Lifestyle Effects on Post-Pandemic Child and Adolescent Psychosocial Problems: A Cross-Sectional Survey in Northern Italy

BACKGROUND

The exacerbation of psychosocial problems among children and adolescents during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic necessitates an assessment of the long-term mental health impact of pandemic interventions. Focusing on both pandemic-related factors and demographic variables, such as gender and daily habits, an analysis was conducted to understand how these elements continue to affect young populations in the post-pandemic era.

METHODS

In April 2023, a comprehensive online survey was administered to families in South Tyrol, Italy, with children aged 7-19 years, to ensure age and gender representation. The survey included parent ratings and adolescent (11-19 years) self-reports using standardized instruments to measure the symptoms of mental health problems (Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire, SDQ), anxiety (Screen for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders, SCARED), and depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-2, PHQ-2). Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and unadjusted odds ratios (ORs).

RESULTS

Of the 4525 valid responses, 1831 were self-reported by adolescents. Notable gender differences in mental health outcomes were identified, along with significant demographic predictors, such as age, single parenthood, parental mental health problems, and immigrant background. Negative effects were associated with reduced family climate and increased screen time, whereas physical activity showed beneficial effects. Proxy reports overestimated adolescents' mental health problems, whereas self-reports tended to underestimate them.

CONCLUSIONS

Persistent mental health problems and gender disparities highlight the need for a public health approach. This should include accessible support services, resilience building, targeted support for vulnerable families and gender-specific interventions.

Evaluation of psychological distress, burnout and structural empowerment status of healthcare workers during the outbreak of coronavirus disease (COVID-19): a cross-sectional questionnaire-based study

BACKGROUND

In light of several recent studies, there is evidence that the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has caused various mental health concerns in the general population, as well as among healthcare workers (HCWs). The main aim of this study was to assess the psychological distress, burnout and structural empowerment status of HCWs during the COVID-19 outbreak, and to evaluate its predictors.

METHODS

This multi-center, cross-sectional web-based questionnaire survey was conducted on HCWs during the outbreak of COVID-19 from August 2020 to January 2021. HCWs working in hospitals from 48 different countries were invited to participate in an online anonymous survey that investigated sociodemographic data, psychological distress, burnout and structural empowerment (SE) based on Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale 21 (DASS-21), Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) and Conditions for work effectiveness questionnaire (CWEQ_II), respectively. Predictors of the total scores of DASS-21, MBI and CWEQ-II were assessed using unadjusted and adjusted binary logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Out of the 1030 HCWs enrolled in this survey, all completed the sociodemographic section (response rate 100%) A total of 730 (70.9%) HCWs completed the DASS-21 questionnaire, 852 (82.6%) completed the MBI questionnaire, and 712 (69.1%) completed the CWEQ-II questionnaire. The results indicate that 360 out of 730 responders (49.3%) reported severe or extremely severe levels of stress, anxiety, and depression. Additionally, 422 out of 851 responders (49.6%) reported a high level of burnout, while 268 out of 712 responders (37.6%) reported a high level of structural empowerment based on the DASS-21, MBI, and CWEQ-II scales, respectively. In addition, the analysis showed that HCWs working in the COVID-19 areas experienced significantly higher symptoms of severe stress, anxiety, depression and higher levels of burnout compared to those working in other areas. The results also revealed that direct work with COVID-19 patients, lower work experience, and high workload during the outbreak of COVID-19 increase the risks of negative psychological consequences.

CONCLUSION

Health professionals had high levels of burnout and psychological symptoms during the COVID-19 emergency. Monitoring and timely treatment of these conditions is needed.