Influence of HLA Mismatching on Survival in Lung Transplantation

Development and validation of primary graft dysfunction predictive algorithm for lung transplant candidates

BACKGROUND

Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) is the leading cause of early morbidity and mortality after lung transplantation. Accurate prediction of PGD risk could inform donor approaches and perioperative care planning. We sought to develop a clinically useful, generalizable PGD prediction model to aid in transplant decision-making.

METHODS

We derived a predictive model in a prospective cohort study of subjects from 2012 to 2018, followed by a single-center external validation. We used regularized (lasso) logistic regression to evaluate the predictive ability of clinically available PGD predictors and developed a user interface for clinical application. Using decision curve analysis, we quantified the net benefit of the model across a range of PGD risk thresholds and assessed model calibration and discrimination.

RESULTS

The PGD predictive model included distance from donor hospital to recipient transplant center, recipient age, predicted total lung capacity, lung allocation score (LAS), body mass index, pulmonary artery mean pressure, sex, and indication for transplant; donor age, sex, mechanism of death, and donor smoking status; and interaction terms for LAS and donor distance. The interface allows for real-time assessment of PGD risk for any donor/recipient combination. The model offers decision-making net benefit in the PGD risk range of 10% to 75% in the derivation centers and 2% to 10% in the validation cohort, a range incorporating the incidence in that cohort.

CONCLUSION

We developed a clinically useful PGD predictive algorithm across a range of PGD risk thresholds to support transplant decision-making, posttransplant care, and enrich samples for PGD treatment trials.

DQA1 Eplet Mismatch Load As an Independent Risk Factor of CLAD After Lung Transplantation

Lung transplantation remains the treatment of choice for end-stage lung diseases, and recipient selection is currently based on clinical urgency, ABO compatibility, and donor size. The risk of allosensitization is classically based on HLA mismatch, but eplet mismatch load is increasingly seen to be important in long-term outcomes in solid organ transplantation. Chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) is relatively common and relevant, affecting almost 50% of patients 5 y after transplantation and being the first cause of death from the first year after transplantation. The overall class-II eplet mismatch load has been associated with CLAD development.

Methods

Based on clinical data, 240 lung transplant recipients were eligible for CLAD, and HLA and eplet mismatch was analyzed using the HLAMatchmaker 3.1 software.

Results

A total of 92 (38.3%) lung transplant recipients developed CLAD. The time free-of-CLAD was significantly decreased in patients with presence of DQA1 eplet mismatches (P = 0.015). Furthermore, when other previously described CLAD risk factors were studied in a multivariate analysis, the presence of DQA1 eplet mismatches was found to be independently associated with the early onset of CLAD.

Conclusions

The concept of epitope load has arisen as a new tool to better define donor-recipient immunologic compatibility. The presence of DQA1 eplet mismatches potentially would increase the likelihood of developing CLAD.

The impact of HLA-DR mismatch status on retransplant-free survival and bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome‒free survival among sensitized lung transplant recipients

INTRODUCTION

Donor‒recipient HLA-DR locus matching may be protective against bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) in lung transplant recipients. It is unknown whether this benefit is more significant among sensitized (calculated panel reactive antibodies (CPRAs) of >0%) and highly sensitized (CPRAs of ≥80%) recipients who may be at a higher risk for BOS.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of adults in the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients who underwent lung transplantation between May 5, 2005 and May 31, 2019. Retransplant-free survival and BOS-free survival were compared among recipients with 0 vs ≥1 DR mismatches, grouped according to sensitization.

RESULTS

Among all 20,355 included recipients, 0 DR mismatch status was associated with improved retransplant-free survival (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.74-0.93, p = 0.002) and BOS-free survival (HR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.77-0.96, p = 0.007). Among sensitized recipients, 0 DR mismatch status was also associated with improved retransplant-free survival (HR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.65-0.97, p = 0.02) and BOS-free survival (HR = 0.82, 95% CI = 0.67-1.00, p = 0.04). There was however no difference in retransplant-free or BOS-free survival between sensitized and non-sensitized recipients with 0 DR mismatches. Among highly sensitized recipients, 0 DR mismatch status was not associated with retransplant-free or BOS-free survival. Among sensitized and highly sensitized recipients, 0 DR mismatch status was not associated with reduced use of plasmapheresis or reduced biopsy-proven, treated acute cellular rejection compared with non-sensitized recipients.

CONCLUSIONS

HLA-DR matching is associated with a similar improvement in retransplant-free and BOS-free survival among non-sensitized and sensitized lung transplant recipients. DR matching does not confer a more substantial retransplant-free or BOS-free survival benefit to highly sensitized recipients than to non-sensitized recipients.

Review 1: Lung transplant-from donor selection to graft preparation

For various end-stage lung diseases, lung transplantation remains one of the only viable treatment options. While the demand for lung transplantation has steadily risen over the last few decades, the availability of donor grafts is limited, which have resulted in progressively longer waiting lists. In the early years of lung transplantation, only the 'ideal' donor grafts are considered for transplantation. Due to the donor shortages, there is ongoing discussion about the safe use of 'suboptimal' grafts to expand the donor pool. In this review, we will discuss the considerations around donor selection, donor-recipient matching, graft preparation and graft optimisation.

Increased Calculated Panel Reactive Antigen Is Associated With Increased Waitlist Time and Mortality in Lung Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Sensitized candidates with unacceptable antigens are a group that demands special attention in organ transplantation. Calculated panel reactive antigen (cPRA) is not used to modify allocation priorities in lung transplantation. The impact of cPRA on waiting list time and mortality is unknown.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of candidates for lung transplantation listed from May 2005 to 2018. Data from the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network/United Network for Organ Sharing STAR (Standard Analysis and Research) dataset was paired with additional unacceptable human leukocyte antigen (UA-HLA) data, which were used to calculate the listing cPRA. Candidates were stratified based on the lack of UA-HLAs or cPRA level for candidates with unacceptable antigens reported. Unadjusted competing risks and adjusted subdistribution hazard models were fit.

RESULTS

A total of 29,085 candidates met inclusion criteria for analysis. Of these, 23,562 (81%) with no UA-HLAs, 3472 (11.9%) with a cPRA less than 50, and 2051 with a cPRA greater than or equal to 50 (7.1%). On adjusted analysis, a cPRA greater than or equal to 50 was independently associated with increased waitlist mortality at 1 year (hazard ratio, 1.71; 95% confidence interval, 1.55-1.88; P < .001) and decreased rate of transplantation (71.9% vs 69.5% vs 44.4%; P < .001). Furthermore, patients with a cPRA greater than or equal to 50 had a longer waitlist time compared with a cPRA less than 50 and no UA-HLA candidates (mean 293.69 days vs 162.38 days and 143.26 days, respectively; P < .001). However, once transplanted, posttransplant survival among the cohorts was similar.

CONCLUSIONS

Further evaluation of organ allocation with consideration of a candidate's cPRA may be warranted in order to optimize equity in access to transplants.

Impact of human leukocyte antigen mismatch on lung transplant outcome

OBJECTIVES

Human leucocyte antigen (HLA) mismatch between donor and recipient has a differential impact on the outcome after transplant (Tx) among transplantable solid organs. Although the lung is considered a highly antigenic organ, the impact of HLA matching between the donor and the recipient has been shown to be heterogeneous on lung Tx outcome. To provide further evidence that HLA matching should be considered in the decision process prior to lung Tx, we evaluated the impact of donor/recipient HLA mismatch on the outcome after lung Tx at our institution.

METHODS

All patients who underwent lung Tx were analysed in this retrospective single-cohort study between 1994 and 2013 for HLA (-A, -B or -DR) matching between the donor and the recipient and their association with overall survival, the incidence of acute cellular rejection (ACR) and the development of chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD).

RESULTS

In total, 371 (197 men) patients were included. Of these, 117 patients had no HLA match (0/6), 143 had a 1/6 match, 77 had 2/6 matches, 28 had 3/6 matches and 6 had 4/6 matches. One hundred and twenty-two (33%) patients experienced at least 1 episode of ACR and 172 (46%) patients developed CLAD. Univariate analysis showed a significant correlation between HLA mismatch and the development of CLAD, whereas multivariate analysis revealed that the number of HLA matches (hazard ratio 0.76; P = 0.002), antibodies to cytomegalovirus in either donors or recipients (hazard ratio 1.52; P = 0.036) and donor age (hazard ratio 1.03; P < 0.001) were independent risk factors for the development of CLAD. On the other hand, HLA matches did not correlate with the incidence of ACR and with the overall survival rate.

CONCLUSIONS

The number of HLA mismatches between donors and recipients after lung Tx did not correlate with ACR or with the overall survival. In contrast, HLA mismatch correlated with the development of CLAD and should therefore be considered a risk factor.

Lung Injury and Loss of Regulatory T Cells Primes for Lung-Restricted Autoimmunity

Lung transplantation is a life-saving therapy for several end-stage lung diseases. However, lung allografts suffer from the lowest survival rate predominantly due to rejection. The pathogenesis of alloimmunity and its role in allograft rejection has been extensively studied and multiple approaches have been described to induce tolerance. However, in the context of lung transplantation, dysregulation of mechanisms, which maintain tolerance against self-antigens, can lead to lung-restricted autoimmunity, which has been recently identified to drive the immunopathogenesis of allograft rejection. Indeed, both preexisting as well as de novo lung-restricted autoimmunity can play a major role in the development of lung allograft rejection. The three most widely studied lung-restricted self-antigens include collagen type I, collagen type V, and k-alpha 1 tubulin. In this review, we discuss the role of lung-restricted autoimmunity in the development of both early as well as late lung allograft rejection and recent literature providing insight into the development of lung-restricted autoimmunity through the dysfunction of immune mechanisms which maintain peripheral tolerance.