The Objective Assessment of Cough Frequency in Bronchiectasis

Psychometric Validation and Determination of the Minimal Clinically Important Difference for the Bronchiectasis Health Questionnaire in Adults with Bronchiectasis

Rationale: The Bronchiectasis Health Questionnaire (BHQ) is a concise, self-administered, and disease-specific instrument for measuring health-related quality of life in bronchiectasis. Objectives: We sought to investigate the psychometric properties of a simplified Mandarin BHQ and determine the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) as a reliable clinical endpoint for assessing the efficacy of bronchiectasis treatments. Methods: A longitudinal, randomized controlled trial cohort of 357 patients treated with tobramycin inhalation solution or saline inhalation for Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection and a cross-sectional observational cohort of 436 patients with bronchiectasis were analyzed. Psychometric analyses encompassed convergent validity, known-groups validity, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and responsiveness. Both anchor-based and distribution-based approaches were utilized to calculate the MCID for therapeutic response. Results: There were significant positive correlations between scores on the BHQ and those on the Quality of Life-Bronchiectasis Respiratory Symptom Scale, with correlation coefficients of 0.698 in the trial cohort and 0.567 in the clinical cohort (both Ps < 0.0001). Known-groups validity indicated significant differences in BHQ scores stratified by baseline Bronchiectasis Severity Index. BHQ scores correlated modestly with both forced expiratory volume in 1 second percent predicted and exacerbation frequency within the previous year. In the trial cohort, the BHQ demonstrated excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.893) and test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.853). An 8-point improvement in scores on the Quality of Life-Bronchiectasis Respiratory Symptom Scale corresponded to a mean increase of 5.49 points in BHQ scores after 4-week treatment. The MCID for BHQ was consistently 3 points. Conclusions: The BHQ (MCID: 3 points) represents a clinically meaningful tool for evaluating therapeutic intervention outcomes and patient-centered outcomes in patients with bronchiectasis.

Cough monitoring systems in adults with chronic respiratory diseases: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

The role of objective cough monitoring systems for assessments in adults with chronic respiratory diseases (CRDs) is unclear. This systematic review aimed to synthesise current literature on frequency of use and characteristics of these systems.

METHODS

MEDLINE, Embase and CENTRAL were systematically searched to identify relevant literature evaluating cough in adults with CRDs using objective cough monitoring systems. The primary outcomes were utility and characteristics of the systems, with the secondary outcome being usability.

RESULTS

We identified 54 primary studies (4909 patients, with 3364 having idiopathic chronic cough). Included studies were generally of low risk of bias. Objective monitoring systems identified were VitaloJAK (n=19 studies), Leicester Cough Monitor (LCM, n=18), LEOSound (n=2), PulmoTrack (n=2), Hull Automated Cough Counter (HACC, n=1), LifeShirt (n=1), and unnamed devices (n=11). There was limited assessment against manual counting, with low-to-moderate correlation to patient-reported outcome measures for VitaloJAK (p<0.05), LCM (r=0.43-0.78) and unnamed devices (r=0.38-0.40). Test-retest consistency was evaluated in two studies, showing favourable results. There was at least moderate effect size of longitudinal measurement changes to various treatments for VitaloJAK (nine out of 16), LCM (two out of eight), HACC (n=1), LCM and HACC (n=1), PulmoTrack (n=1) and unnamed devices (n=3).

CONCLUSIONS

Few studies evaluated the agreement of objective cough monitoring systems against manual counting. Most studies were conducted in patients with idiopathic chronic cough, with the VitaloJAK and LCM being were the most evaluated objective cough monitoring systems. Further evaluation of objective cough monitoring systems is needed for research and clinic application.

Epidemiology and Prognostic Significance of Cough in Fibrotic Interstitial Lung Disease

Rationale: Cough is a key symptom in patients with fibrotic interstitial lung disease (ILD). Objectives: This study evaluated the prevalence, longitudinal change, associations, and prognostic significance of cough severity in patients with fibrotic ILD. Methods: We included consecutive patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and non-IPF fibrotic ILD who completed the 100-mm Cough Severity Visual Analog Scale from the prospective multicenter Canadian Registry for Pulmonary Fibrosis. Baseline cough severity and associations with patient demographics and clinical factors were determined. Relationships between baseline cough severity and health outcomes were evaluated. Measurements and Main Results: Patients with IPF (n = 1,061) had higher median baseline cough severity than those with non-IPF fibrotic ILD (n = 2,825) (24 vs. 20 mm; P < 0.001), with worse cough associated with gastroesophageal reflux disease for both cohorts. Worse cough severity was independently associated with worse health-related quality of life at baseline, larger annualized decline in DlCO, development of disease progression, and reduced transplant-free survival in both IPF and non-IPF fibrotic ILD cohorts. The IPF cohort (2.2 mm; 95% confidence interval, 1.6-2.9 mm) had larger annualized increments in cough severity than the non-IPF fibrotic ILD cohort (1.1 mm; 95% confidence interval, 0.8-1.4 mm; P = 0.004). There was no difference in worsening cough over time comparing those receiving and not receiving ILD-targeted therapy or with and without lung function decline. Conclusions: Cough is common in patients with IPF and non-IPF fibrotic ILD, with increasing cough severity over time irrespective of ILD-targeted therapy. Patient-reported cough severity has prognostic implications on health-related quality of life, disease progression, and survival in fibrotic ILD.

Patient-managed interventions for adults with bronchiectasis: evidence, challenges and prospects

Bronchiectasis is a chronic lung condition which is characterised by recurrent chest infections, chronic sputum production and cough, and limited exercise tolerance. While bronchiectasis may be caused by various aetiologies, these features are shared by most patients with bronchiectasis regardless of the cause. This review consolidates the existing evidence on patient-managed interventions for adults with bronchiectasis, while also outlining areas for future research. Airway clearance techniques and hyperosmolar agents are key components of the bronchiectasis management and consistently recommended for clinical implementation. Questions around their prescription, such as optimal sequence of delivery, are still to be answered. Pulmonary rehabilitation and exercise are also recommended for patients with bronchiectasis. Relatively strong evidence underpins this recommendation during a clinically stable stage of the disease, although the role of pulmonary rehabilitation following an exacerbation is still unclear. Additionally, self-management programmes feature prominently in bronchiectasis treatment, yet the lack of consensus regarding their definition and outcomes presents hurdles to establishing a cohesive evidence base. Moreover, cough, a cardinal symptom of bronchiectasis, warrants closer examination. Although managing cough in bronchiectasis may initially appear risky, further research is necessary to ascertain whether strategies employed in other respiratory conditions can be safely and effectively adapted to bronchiectasis, particularly through identifying patient responder populations and criteria where cough may not enhance airway clearance efficacy and its control is needed. Overall, there is a growing recognition of the importance of patient-managed interventions in the bronchiectasis management. Efforts to improve research methodologies and increase research funding are needed to further advance our understanding of these interventions, and their role in optimising patient care and outcomes.

[Highlights 57th SEPAR Congress]

The Spanish Society of Pneumology and Thoracic Surgery (SEPAR) has held its 57th Congress in Valencia from 6 to 8 of June 2024. The SEPAR Congress is the leading meeting for the entire respiratory scientific community, which allows learning about the main scientific advances in this area and provides the ideal situation to create and strengthen ties. This year, under the title "Respiratory Health for everybody", the SEPAR Congress stressed the importance of raising awareness about the importance of caring for and protecting our respiratory system. In this review, we offer a summary of some notable issues addressed in six selected areas of interest: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), asthma, interstitial lung diseases (ILDs), pulmonary vascular diseases, sleep and breathing disorders and respiratory physiotherapy.

Cough in chronic lung disease: a state of the art review

Chronic cough (CC; ≥8 weeks in duration) is a common and burdensome feature of respiratory diseases. The understanding of cough has progressed significantly in recent years, albeit largely in refractory (unexplained) chronic cough (RCC) in the absence of other respiratory conditions. The prevalence of CC in respiratory diseases is poorly described, but estimates have been reported: asthma (8-58%), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD; 10-74%), bronchiectasis (82-98%), interstitial lung disease (ILD; 50-89%) and sarcoidosis (3-64%). CC in respiratory conditions generally predicts impaired health status and more severe disease. It is associated with increased symptom burden and disease severity in asthma, COPD, bronchiectasis and ILD, higher exacerbation frequency in asthma and bronchiectasis, and increased mortality and lung transplantation in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Physiologically, heightened cough reflex sensitivity (CRS) has been reported and postulated to be mechanistic in isolated RCC. Cough reflex hypersensitivity (CRH) has also been reported in asthma, COPD, bronchiectasis, ILD and sarcoidosis. Unlike recent advances in isolated RCC, there are limited studies and understanding of central cough neuropathways in other respiratory conditions. Of note, dysfunctional central voluntary cough suppression neuropathways and physiology were observed in isolation in RCC; cough suppression is preserved in COPD. Understanding in the mechanism of RCC cannot be simply extrapolated to other respiratory conditions. The restricted understanding of cough mechanisms in these conditions has limited cough-specific therapeutic options in this context. There is currently an unmet need to expand our understanding of cough in chronic respiratory conditions, both in order to improve the quality of life of patients, and to improve knowledge of cough in general. This review aims to describe the prevalence, impact, pathophysiology and management of CC in asthma, COPD, bronchiectasis, ILD and sarcoidosis.

Chronic cough-the limitation and advances in assessment techniques

Accurate and consistent assessments of cough are essential to advance the understanding of the mechanisms of cough and individualised the management of patients. Considerable progress has been made in this work. Here we reviewed the currently available tools for subjectively and objectively measuring both cough sensitivity and severity. We also provided some opinions on the new techniques and future directions. The simple and practical Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), the Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ), and the Cough Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (CQLQ) are the most widely used self-reported questionnaires for evaluating and quantifying cough severity. The Hull Airway Reflux Questionnaire (HARQ) is a tool to elucidate the constellation of symptoms underlying the diagnosis of chronic cough. Chemical excitation tests are widely used to explore the pathophysiological mechanisms of the cough reflex, such as capsaicin, citric acid and adenosine triphosphate (ATP) challenge test. Cough frequency is an ideal primary endpoint for clinical research, but the application of cough counters has been limited in clinical practice by the high cost and reliance on aural validation. The ongoing development of cough detection technology for smartphone apps and wearable devices will hopefully simplify cough counting, thus transitioning it from niche research to a widely available clinical application.

A novel automatic cough frequency monitoring system combining a triaxial accelerometer and a stretchable strain sensor

Objective evaluations of cough frequency are considered important for assessing the clinical state of patients with respiratory diseases. However, cough monitors with audio recordings are rarely used in clinical settings. Issues regarding privacy and background noise with audio recordings are barriers to the wide use of these monitors; to solve these problems, we developed a novel automatic cough frequency monitoring system combining a triaxial accelerator and a stretchable strain sensor. Eleven healthy adult volunteers and 10 adult patients with cough were enrolled. The participants wore two devices for 30 min for the cough measurements. An accelerator was attached to the epigastric region, and a stretchable strain sensor was worn around their neck. When the subjects coughed, these devices displayed specific waveforms. The data from all the participants were categorized into a training dataset and a test dataset. Using a variational autoencoder, a machine learning algorithm with deep learning, the components of the test dataset were automatically judged as being a “cough unit” or “non-cough unit”. The sensitivity and specificity in detecting coughs were 92% and 96%, respectively. Our cough monitoring system has the potential to be widely used in clinical settings without any concerns regarding privacy or background noise.

The present and future of cough counting tools

The widespread use of cough counting tools has, to date, been limited by a reliance on human input to determine cough frequency. However, over the last two decades advances in digital technology and audio capture have reduced this dependence. As a result, cough frequency is increasingly recognised as a measurable parameter of respiratory disease. Cough frequency is now the gold standard primary endpoint for trials of new treatments for chronic cough, has been investigated as a marker of infectiousness in tuberculosis (TB), and used to demonstrate recovery in exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This review discusses the principles of automatic cough detection and summarises key currently and recently used cough counting technology in clinical research. It additionally makes some predictions on future directions in the field based on recent developments. It seems likely that newer approaches to signal processing, the adoption of techniques from automatic speech recognition, and the widespread ownership of mobile devices will help drive forward the development of real-time fully automated ambulatory cough frequency monitoring over the coming years. These changes should allow cough counting systems to transition from their current status as a niche research tool in chronic cough to a much more widely applicable method for assessing, investigating and understanding respiratory disease.

Measuring airway clearance outcomes in bronchiectasis: a review

While airway clearance techniques (ACTs) are recommended for individuals with bronchiectasis, many trials have demonstrated inconsistent benefits or failed to reach their primary outcome. This review determined the most common clinical and patient-reported outcome measures used to evaluate the efficacy of ACTs in bronchiectasis. A literature search of five databases using relevant keywords and filtering for studies published in English, up until the end of August 2019, was completed. Studies included randomised controlled trials, using crossover or any other trial design, and abstracts. Studies were included where the control was placebo, no intervention, standard care, usual care or an active comparator. Adults with bronchiectasis not related to cystic fibrosis were included. Extracted data comprised study authors, design, duration, intervention, outcome measures and results. The search identified 27 published studies and one abstract. The most common clinical outcome measures were sputum volume (n=23), lung function (n=17) and pulse oximetry (n=9). The most common patient-reported outcomes were health-related quality of life (measured with St George's Respiratory Questionnaire, n=4), cough-related quality of life (measured with Leicester Cough Questionnaire, n=4) and dyspnoea (measured with Borg/modified Borg scale, n=8). Sputum volume, lung function, dyspnoea and health- and cough-related quality of life appear to be the most common clinical and patient-reported measures of airway clearance treatment efficacy.

A Review on Cough Augmentation Techniques: Assisted Inspiration, Assisted Expiration and Their Combination

Cough is an important mechanism of airway clearance. In patients who present weak and ineffective cough, augmentation techniques aim to assist or simulate the maneuver. These techniques target different phases of the cough cycle, mainly the inspiratory and expiratory phases, through assisted inspiration, assisted expiration and their combination. They include the manual hyperinflation, ventilator hyperinflation, glossopharyngeal breathing, manually assisted cough and mechanical insufflator-exsufflator, each applied individually or in different combinations. The aim of this review is to investigate the effectiveness and safety of cough augmentation techniques. Findings support that all commonly used techniques can theoretically improve airway clearance, as they generate higher cough peak flows compared to unassisted cough. Still, the studies assessing cough augmentation present considerable limitations and the direct comparison of different techniques is challenging. Current evidence indicate that cough peak flow shows higher increase with the combination of assisted inspiration and expiration, and improvement is greater in patients with lower unassisted values. Associated adverse events are infrequent.

Clinical Characteristics of Cough Frequency Patterns in Patients with and without Asthma

BACKGROUND

Cough is a frequent symptom of asthma. Cough frequency (CoFr) monitoring devices are now available to objectively measure cough counts and offer a novel endpoint to assess asthma. However, little is known about CoFr in asthma.

OBJECTIVE

The aims were, first, to determine whether unique features of CoFr exist in asthmatic and nonasthmatic patients and, secondly, to evaluate relationships between CoFr and pathophysiological parameters of asthma.

METHODS

In the current study, 73 asthmatic and 63 nonasthmatic patients suffering from persistent cough were enrolled. At study entry, the Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ health status), cough visual analog scale (VAS), Leicester Cough Monitor (LCM), fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) measurements, and spirometry were performed. In asthmatic patients, the bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) test was conducted if applicable. In 28 asthmatic and 17 nonasthmatic patients, LCQ, VAS, and LCM were examined before and after treatment.

RESULTS

CoFr during nighttime (asleep) was significantly higher in asthmatic patients than in nonasthmatic patients. Twenty-four-hour CoFr significantly decreased after appropriate treatment and was correlated with changes in VAS and LCQ in all patients. The improvement in cough in asthmatic patients was greater during nighttime than during daytime (awake). CoFr in asthmatic patients was significantly correlated with BHR, but not with FeNO.

CONCLUSIONS

In asthmatic patients, nocturnal CoFr can be associated with BHR, was significantly higher before treatment, but improved more after treatment compared with nonasthmatic patients. Monitoring nocturnal CoFr may provide unique and valuable information on making an early prediction of therapeutic effects in asthma.

Bronchiectasis and cough: An old relationship in need of renewed attention

Bronchiectasis is an increasingly recognised respiratory condition with limited therapeutic options and a complex spectrum of clinical manifestations that invariably includes chronic cough. As the primary presentation of bronchiectasis in most cases, chronic cough and its mechanistic underpinnings are of central importance but remain poorly understood in this setting. Bronchiectasis is also increasingly identified as an underlying cause of chronic cough highlighting the interrelationship between the two conditions that share overlapping clinical features. Several therapeutic approaches have illustrated positive effects on bronchiectasis-associated cough, however, more focused treatment of heterogeneous cough subtypes may yield better outcomes for patients. A current challenge is the identification of bronchiectasis and cough endophenotypes that may allow improved patient stratification and more targeted therapeutic matching of the right treatment to the right patient. Here we discuss the complex disease phenotypes of bronchiectasis and their interrelationship with cough while considering current and emerging treatment options. We discuss some key cough promoters in bronchiectasis including infection, allergy and immune dysfunction.

Bronchiectasis insanity: Doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results?

Bronchiectasis is an increasingly common disease with a significant impact on quality of life and morbidity of affected patients. It is also a very heterogeneous disease with numerous different underlying etiologies and presentations. Most treatments for bronchiectasis are based on low-quality evidence; consequently, no treatments have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration or the European Medicines Agency for the treatment of bronchiectasis. The last several years have seen numerous clinical trials in which the investigational agent, thought to hold great promise, did not demonstrate a clinically or statistically significant benefit. This commentary will review the likely reasons for these disappointing results and a potential approach that may have a greater likelihood of defining evidence-based treatment for bronchiectasis.

Cough in pulmonary tuberculosis: Existing knowledge and general insights

Cough is a prominent symptom of pulmonary tuberculosis (TB), one of the oldest and most prevalent infectious diseases. Coughing probably has a pivotal role in transmission of the causative organism Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Despite this, little research to date has addressed this subject. Current knowledge of the mechanisms of cough in TB and how exactly coughing patterns predict infectiousness is scant, but this is changing. This overview summarises the existing evidence for the infectiousness of cough in TB, clinical correlates, and possible causes of cough in TB. Potential unique characteristics of cough in the disease are discussed, as is treatment and the subjective awareness of coughing in the disease.

Impact of Hypertonic Saline Solutions on Sputum Expectoration and Their Safety Profile in Patients with Bronchiectasis: A Randomized Crossover Trial

BACKGROUND

The role of hyaluronic acid plus hypertonic saline (HA+HS) as a mucoactive treatment in patients with bronchiectasis is still unknown. This study evaluated whether HA+HS solution enhances similar sputum quantity with better safety profile than HS alone in patients with bronchiectasis.

METHODS

In this double-blind randomized crossover trial, three solutions (7% HS; 0.1% HA +7%HS; and 0.9% isotonic saline, IS) were compared in outpatients with bronchiectasis and chronic sputum expectoration. Participants inhaled each solution across four consecutive sessions. All sessions, except on session 3, also included 30 minutes of airway clearance technique. A 7-day washout period was applied. Sputum weight was collected during the sessions (primary outcome) as well as during a 24-hour follow-up. The Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) and lung function were measured before/after each treatment arm. Safety was assessed by the monitoring of adverse events (AEs).

RESULTS

Twenty-eight patients with bronchiectasis (mean age of 64.0 (17.9) and FEV₁% 60.9 (24.6) of predicted) were recruited. HS and HA+HS promoted similar expectoration during sessions, both being greater than IS [median difference HS vs. IS 3.7 g (95% CI 0.5-6.9); HA+HS vs. IS 3.2 g (95%CI 0.5-5.9)]. Sputum expectorated exclusively during the ACT period was similar across all treatment arms [HS vs. IS -0.3 g (95% CI -1.7 to 0.9); HA+HS vs. IS 0.0 g (95% CI -1.3 to 1.4); HS vs. HA+HS 0.0 g (95% CI -1.2 to 0.4)]. Sputum collected over the 24-hour follow-up tended to be lower for HS and HA+HS compared with IS [HS vs. IS -1.7 g (95% CI -4.2 to 0.0); HA+HS vs. IS -1.1 g (95%CI -3.6 to 0.7)]. No differences in LCQ or lung function were observed. Most severe AEs were reported using HS.

CONCLUSION

HS and HA+HS were more effective on sputum expectoration than IS in patients with bronchiectasis, reporting HA+HS better safety profile than HS.