Inhaled Treprostinil in Pulmonary Hypertension Associated with Lung Disease

Pulmonary hypertension in the setting of interstitial lung disease: Approach to management and treatment. A consensus statement from the Pulmonary Vascular Research Institute's Innovative Drug Development Initiative-Group 3 Pulmonary Hypertension

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) due to interstitial lung disease (ILD), a commonly encountered complication of fibrotic ILDs, is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Until recently, the studies of pulmonary vasodilator therapy in PH-ILD have been largely disappointing, with some even demonstrating the potential for harm. This paper is part of a series of Consensus Statements from the Pulmonary Vascular Research Institute's Innovative Drug Development Initiative for Group 3 Pulmonary Hypertension, with prior publications covering pathogenesis, prevalence, clinical features, phenotyping, clinical trials, and impact of PH-ILD. It offers a comprehensive review of and a holistic approach to treatment of PH-ILD, including the management of underlying interstitial lung diseases, importance of treating the comorbidities, emphasis on importance of exercise and palliation of dyspnea, and review of the most up-to-date guidelines for referral for potential lung transplant work up. It also summarizes the prior, ongoing, and possibly future studies in treatment of the vascular derangement of this morbid condition.

Pulmonary Vasodilator Therapy in Severe Pulmonary Hypertension Due to Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (Severe PH-COPD): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease-associated pulmonary hypertension (PH-COPD) results in a significant impact on symptoms, quality of life, and survival. There is scant and conflicting evidence about the use of pulmonary hypertension (PH) specific therapy in patients with PH-COPD. Study Design and Methods: PubMed, OVID, CINAHL, Cochrane, Embase, and Web of Science were searched using various MESH terms to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or observational studies investigating PH-specific therapies in patients with severe PH-COPD, defined by mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) of more than 35 mm Hg or pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) of more than 5 woods units on right heart catheterization. The primary outcome was a change in mPAP and PVR. Secondary outcomes were changes in six-minute walk distance (6MWD), changes in the brain-natriuretic peptide (BNP), New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class, oxygenation, and survival. Results: Thirteen studies satisfied the inclusion criteria, including a total of 328 patients with severe PH-COPD. Out of these, 308 patients received some type of specific therapy for PH. There was a significant reduction in mPAP (mean difference (MD) -3.68, 95% CI [-2.03, -5.32], p < 0.0001) and PVR (MD -1.40 Wood units, 95% CI [-1.97, -0.82], p < 0.00001). There was a significant increase in the cardiac index as well (MD 0.26 L/min/m2, 95% CI [0.14, 0.39], p < 0.0001). There were fewer patients who had NYHA class III/lV symptoms, with an odds ratio of 0.55 (95% CI [0.30, 1.01], p = 0.05). There was no significant difference in the 6MWD (12.62 m, 95% CI [-8.55, 33.79], p = 0.24), PaO2 (MD -2.20 mm Hg, 95% CI [-4.62, 0.22], p = 0.08), or BNP or NT-proBNP therapy (MD -0.15, 95% CI [-0.46, 0.17], p = 0.36). Conclusion: The use of PH-specific therapies in severe PH-COPD resulted in a significant reduction in mPAP and PVR and increased CI, with fewer patients remaining in NYHA functional class III/IV. However, no significant difference in the 6MWD, biomarkers of right ventricular dysfunction, or oxygenation was identified, demonstrating a lack of hypoxemia worsening with treatment. Further studies are needed to investigate the use of PH medications in patients with severe PH-COPD.

Recent advances in the management of pulmonary hypertension with interstitial lung disease

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is known to complicate various forms of interstitial lung disease (ILD), including idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, the interstitial pneumonias and chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis. Pathogenesis of PH-ILD remains incompletely understood, and probably has overlap with other forms of pre-capillary pulmonary hypertension. PH-ILD carries a poor prognosis, and is associated with increased oxygen requirements, and a decline in functional capacity and exercise tolerance. Despite most patients having mild-moderate pulmonary hypertension, more severe pulmonary hypertension and signs of right heart failure are observed in a subset of cases. Clinical suspicion and findings on pulmonary function, computed tomography and echocardiography are often the initial steps towards diagnosis. Definitive diagnosis is obtained by right heart catheterisation demonstrating pre-capillary pulmonary hypertension. Drugs approved for pulmonary arterial hypertension have been investigated in several randomised controlled trials in PH-ILD patients, leading to discouraging results until the recent INCREASE study. This review provides an overview of the current understanding, approach to diagnosis and recent advances in treatment.

Real-world use of inhaled treprostinil for lung disease-pulmonary hypertension: A protocol for patient evaluation and prescribing

Inhaled treprostinil was approved recently for interstitial lung disease-pulmonary hypertension; however, efficacy in "real-world" populations is not known. We designed a protocol and report our experience evaluating 10 patients referred for therapy. Misdiagnosis at presentation was common; ultimately, three patients (30%) were prescribed drug. This protocol offers an opportunity to standardize longitudinal assessment of inhaled treprostinil in clinical practice.

Group 3 Pulmonary Hypertension: A Review of Diagnostics and Clinical Trials

Group 3 pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a known sequelae of chronic lung disease. Diagnosis and classification can be challenging in the background of chronic lung disease and often requires expert interpretation of numerous diagnostic studies to ascertain the true nature of the PH. Stabilization of the underlying lung disease and adjunctive therapies such as oxygen remain the mainstays of therapy, as there are no Food and Drug Administration-approved therapies for group 3 PH. Referral to PH centers for individualized management and clinical trial enrollment is paramount.

Shifting gears: the search for group 3 pulmonary hypertension treatment

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Treatment options for Group 3 pulmonary hypertension, characterized as secondary to chronic hypoxia or lung disease, remain an elusive holy grail for physicians and patients alike. Despite increasing identification and investigation into this pulmonary vasculopathy group with the second-highest frequency and highest mortality, there are no therapeutic interventions that offer the significant improvements in morbidity and mortality comparable to those benefiting other pulmonary hypertension groups including pulmonary arterial hypertension. This review examines the data on available and emerging Group 3 pulmonary hypertension treatments.

RECENT FINDINGS

Pulmonary vasodilators have yielded equivocal results in this patient population, although recent evidence shows modestly improved outcomes with inhaled treprostinil in interstitial lung disease-associated pulmonary hypertension. With pulmonary vasodilators providing limited benefit, emerging data support the right ventricle as a potential treatment target in Group 3 pulmonary hypertension.

SUMMARY

Group 3 pulmonary hypertension is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Pulmonary vasodilators offer only limited haemodynamic and exertional benefits, and lung transplantation remains the only cure for this deadly disease. The right ventricle may provide a novel intervention target.

Clinical trials in group 3 pulmonary hypertension

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Despite worse outcomes associated with the development of pulmonary hypertension in chronic lung disease, there are no approved treatments for this population. The present review summarizes the recent clinical trials in World Symposium on Pulmonary Hypertension (WSPH) Group 3 pulmonary hypertension, with a particular focus on the study of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH)-targeted therapy.

RECENT FINDINGS

Multiple recent randomized controlled trials have studied a host of PAH-specific medications in the treatment of WSPH Group 3 pulmonary hypertension, including endothelin receptor antagonists, phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors, and prostacyclins. In pulmonary hypertension associated with chronic obstructive lung disease (PH-COPD) and with interstitial lung disease (PH-ILD), most trials have shown conflicting or negative results, although they have been limited by variable patient populations and small sample sizes. Recent large-scale trial data demonstrate that inhaled treprostinil is associated with improved outcomes in the PH-ILD population.

SUMMARY

Although most PAH medications have not shown consistent benefit in the WSPH Group 3 population, recent work suggests that inhaled treprostinil has an important role in the treatment of PH-ILD. Efforts are ongoing to evaluate the efficacy of other medications, identify optimal treatment candidates, and define clinically meaningful endpoints in WSPH Group 3 pulmonary hypertension.

Inhaled Treprostinil in Pulmonary Hypertension Due to Interstitial Lung Disease

BACKGROUND

No therapies are currently approved for the treatment of pulmonary hypertension in patients with interstitial lung disease. The safety and efficacy of inhaled treprostinil for patients with this condition are unclear.

METHODS

We enrolled patients with interstitial lung disease and pulmonary hypertension (documented by right heart catheterization) in a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 16-week trial. Patients were assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive inhaled treprostinil, administered by means of an ultrasonic, pulsed-delivery nebulizer in up to 12 breaths (total, 72 μg) four times daily, or placebo. The primary efficacy end point was the difference between the two groups in the change in peak 6-minute walk distance from baseline to week 16. Secondary end points included the change in N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) level at week 16 and the time to clinical worsening.

RESULTS

A total of 326 patients underwent randomization, with 163 assigned to inhaled treprostinil and 163 to placebo. Baseline characteristics were similar in the two groups. At week 16, the least-squares mean difference between the treprostinil group and the placebo group in the change from baseline in the 6-minute walk distance was 31.12 m (95% confidence interval [CI], 16.85 to 45.39; P<0.001). There was a reduction of 15% in NT-proBNP levels from baseline with inhaled treprostinil as compared with an increase of 46% with placebo (treatment ratio, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.47 to 0.72; P<0.001). Clinical worsening occurred in 37 patients (22.7%) in the treprostinil group as compared with 54 patients (33.1%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.40 to 0.92; P = 0.04 by the log-rank test). The most frequently reported adverse events were cough, headache, dyspnea, dizziness, nausea, fatigue, and diarrhea.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with pulmonary hypertension due to interstitial lung disease, inhaled treprostinil improved exercise capacity from baseline, assessed with the use of a 6-minute walk test, as compared with placebo. (Funded by United Therapeutics; INCREASE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02630316.).

Prescription Patterns for Pulmonary Vasodilators in the Treatment of Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With Chronic Lung Diseases: Insights From a Clinician Survey

Background: Pulmonary hypertension is a complication of chronic lung diseases (PH-CLD) associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Management guidelines for PH-CLD emphasize the treatment of the underlying lung disease, but the role of PH-targeted therapy remains controversial. We hypothesized that treatment approaches for PH-CLD would be variable across physicians depending on the type of CLD and the severity of PH. Methods and Results: Between May and July 2020, we conducted an online survey of PH experts asking for their preferred treatment approach in seven hypothetical cases of PH-CLD of varying severity. We assessed agreement amongst clinicians for initial therapy choice using Fleiss' kappa calculations. Over 90% of respondents agreed that they would treat cases of severe PH in the context of mild lung disease with some form of PH-targeted therapy. For cases of severe PH in the context of severe lung disease, over 70% of respondents agreed to use PH-targeted therapy. For mild PH and mild lung disease cases, <50% of respondents chose to start PH-specific therapy. There was overall poor agreement between respondents in the choice to use mono-, double or triple combination therapy with PH-specific agents in all cases. Conclusion: Although management guidelines discourage the routine use of PH-targeted therapies to treat PH-CLD patients, most physicians choose to treat patients with some form of PH-targeted therapy. The choice of therapy and treatment approach are variable and appear to be influenced by the severity of the PH and the underlying lung disease.

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and pulmonary hypertension: Heracles meets the Hydra

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a fatal lung disease where the additional presence of pulmonary hypertension (PH) reduces survival. In particular, the presence of coexistent pulmonary vascular disease in patients with advanced lung parenchymal disease results in worse outcomes than either diagnosis alone. This is true with respect to the natural histories of these diseases, outcomes with medical therapies, and even outcomes following lung transplantation. Consequently, there is a striking need for improved treatments for PH in the setting of IPF. In this review, we summarize existing therapies from the perspective of molecular mechanisms underlying lung fibrosis and vasoconstriction/vascular remodelling and discuss potential future targets for pharmacotherapy. LINKED ARTICLES: This article is part of a themed issue on Risk factors, comorbidities, and comedications in cardioprotection. To view the other articles in this section visit http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bph.v178.1/issuetoc.

Downregulation of PGI2 pathway in Pulmonary Hypertension Group-III patients

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a progressive and life-threating lung disorder characterized by elevated pulmonary artery pressure and vascular remodeling. PH is classified into five groups, and one of the most common and lethal forms, PH Group-III is defined as PH due to lung diseases and/or hypoxia. Due to the lack of studies in this group, PH-specific drug therapies including prostacyclin (PGI₂) analogues have not been approved or recommended for use in these patients. PGI₂ is synthesized by the PGI₂ synthase (PGIS) enzyme, and its production is determined by measuring its stable metabolite, 6-keto-PGF_1α. An impaired PGI₂ pathway has been observed in PH animal models and in PH Group-I patients; however, there are contradictory results. The aim of this study is to determine whether PH Group-III is associated with altered expression of PGIS and production of PGI₂ in humans. To explore this hypothesis, we measured PGIS expression (by western blot) and PGI₂ production (by ELISA) in a large variety of preparations from the pulmonary circulation including human pulmonary artery, pulmonary vein, distal lung tissue, pulmonary artery smooth muscle cells (hPASMC), and bronchi in PH Group-III (n = 35) and control patients (n = 32). Our results showed decreased PGIS expression and/or 6-keto-PGF_1α levels in human pulmonary artery, hPASMC, and distal lung tissue derived from PH Group-III patients. Moreover, the production of 6-keto-PGF_1α from hPASMC positively correlated with PGIS expression and was inversely correlated with mean pulmonary artery pressure. On the other hand, PH Group-III pulmonary veins and bronchi did not show altered PGI₂ production compared to controls. The deficit in PGIS expression and/or PGI₂ production observed in pulmonary artery and distal lung tissue in PH Group-III patients may have important implications in the pathogenesis and treatment of PH Group-III.

The Trouble With Group 3 Pulmonary Hypertension in Interstitial Lung Disease: Dilemmas in Diagnosis and the Conundrum of Treatment

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) due to interstitial lung disease (ILD; PH-ILD) can complicate a multitude of ILDs, including idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis, and nonspecific interstitial pneumonia. Development of PH-ILD is associated with increased need for supplemental oxygen, reduced mobility, and decreased survival. A high index of suspicion is required to make the diagnosis, given the substantial overlap in symptoms with those of ILD without PH. Severely reduced diffusing capacity or 6-min walk test distance, prominent exertional desaturation, and impaired heart rate recovery after exercise are all suggestive of the development of PH-ILD. Traditional transthoracic echocardiography is the most commonly used screening test for PH-ILD, but it lacks sensitivity and specificity. Newer echocardiographic tools involving 3-dimensional assessment of the right ventricle may have a role in both prognosis and the monitoring of patients with PH-ILD. Right-sided heart catheterization remains the gold standard for confirming a diagnosis of PH-ILD. Although there is little debate about the use of supplemental oxygen and diuretic therapy in the treatment of PH-ILD, treatment with pulmonary vasodilator therapy remains controversial. Although several studies have been terminated prematurely for harm, the recently completed INCREASE trial of inhaled treprostinil appears to validate the concept of treating PH-ILD with pulmonary vasodilators and, we hope, will serve as a foundation from which future studies can be developed.

Outcomes of lung disease-associated pulmonary hypertension and impact of elevated pulmonary vascular resistance

BACKGROUND

The clinical characteristics, hemodynamic changes and outcomes of lung disease-associated pulmonary hypertension (LD-PH) are poorly defined.

METHODS

A prospective cohort of PH patients undergoing initial hemodynamic assessment was collected, from which 51 patients with LD-PH were identified. Baseline characteristics and long-term survival were compared with 83 patients with idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension (iPAH).

RESULTS

Mean age (±standard deviation) of LD-PH patients was 64 ± 10 years, 30% were female and 78% were New York Heart Association class III-IV. The LD-PH group was older than the iPAH group (64 ± 10 vs 56 ± 18 years, respectively, P = 0.003) with a lower percentage of women (30% vs 70%, P = 0.007). LD-PH patients had smaller right ventricular sizes (P = 0.02) and less tricuspid regurgitation (P = 0.03) by echocardiogram, and lower mean pulmonary arterial pressures (mPAP) (P = 0.01) and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) (P = 0.001) at catheterization. Despite these findings, mortality was equally high in both groups (P = 0.16). 5-year survival was lower in patients with interstitial lung disease compared to those with obstructive pulmonary disease (P = 0.05). Among the LD-PH population, those with mild to moderately elevated mPAP and those with PVR <7 Wood units demonstrated significantly improved survival (P = 0.04 and P = 0.001, respectively). Vasoreactivity was not associated with improved survival (P = 0.64). A PVR ≥7 Wood units was associated with increased risk of mortality (hazard ratio (95% confidence interval), 3.59 (1.27-10.19), P = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite less severe PH and less right heart sequelae, LD-PH has an equally poor clinical outcome when compared to iPAH. A PVR ≥7 Wood units in LD-PH patients was associated with 3-fold higher mortality.