Forced Vital Capacity and Low Frequency Reactance Area Measurements Are Associated with Asthma Control and Exacerbations

Childhood severe asthma: relationship among asthma control scores, FeNO, spirometry and impulse oscillometry

INTRODUCTION

The evaluation of the asthmatic patient is usually based on clinical and functional parameters that do not necessarily evidence the degree of airway inflammation. The aim of this study was to analyze whether clinical scores (CS) correlate with spirometry (S), impulse oscillometry (IO) and FeNO, in severe asthmatic children.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A multicentric, prospective, cross-sectional study was conducted over a 12-month period. All SA patients (6-18 years old) followed-up in the Pulmonology Department were recruited. CS, FeNO measurements, IO and S were consecutively performed on the same day. Asthma control was ascertained using ACT and GINAq. A cut-off value of ≥ 25 parts per billion (ppb) was used to define airway inflammation.

RESULTS

Eighty-one patients were included. ACT: 75% (n 61) were controlled; GINAq: 44.5% (n 36) were controlled; 39.5% (n 32) were partly controlled, and 16% (n 13) were uncontrolled. FeNO had a median value of 24 ppb (IQR 14-41); FeNO ≥ 25 ppb was observed in 49% of patients (n 39). ROC AUC for FeNO vs. ACT was 0.71 (95%CI 0.57-0.86), PPV 0.47, NPV 0.87, SE 0.61, SP 0.80; FeNO vs. GINAq was ROC AUC 0.69 (95%CI 0.54-0.85), PPV 0.34, NPV 0.91, SE 0.62, SP 0.77; Youden cut-off FeNO > 39 ppb for both CS.

CONCLUSION

In severe asthmatic children, current symptoms control as evidenced by ACT and GINA correlates with low FeNO values. Clinical scores showed good correlation with airway inflammation.

Impulse oscillometry defined small airway dysfunction in asthmatic patients with normal spirometry: Prevalence, clinical associations, and impact on asthma control

BACKGROUND

The small-airway dysfunction (SAD), detected with impulse oscillometry (IOS) methods, has been recently better characterized in patients with asthma. However, little is known about SAD in asthmatic patients with normal spirometry (NS).

OBJECTIVE

In this study, we aimed to investigate, in an unselected sample of 321 patients with physician-diagnosed asthma and NS, prevalence, clinical characterization, and impact on asthma control of IOS-defined SAD. As a secondary objective of the study, we focused on comparing the difference between IOS- and spirometry-defined SAD.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with a previous diagnosis of asthma but normal spirometry at the moment of the enrollment were stratified by the presence of IOS-defined SAD (difference in resistance at 5 Hz and at 20 Hz [R5-R20] greater than 0.07 kPa x s x L-1). We have also assessed the presence of SAD defined by spirometry, according to FEF 25-75 < 65% of the predicted. Clinical and laboratory features were collected, and univariable and multivariable analyses were used to analyze cross-sectional associations between clinical variables and outcomes (SAD).

RESULTS

IOS-defined SAD was present in 54.1% of the cohort. In contrast, spirometry-defined SAD was present in only 10% of patients. Subjects with IOS-defined SAD showed less well-controlled asthma and a higher mean inhaled corticosteroid dosage use compared with subjects without SAD (both P < .001). Overweight (odds ratio [OR], 1.14; 95% CI, 1.05-1.23), exacerbation history (OR, 3.06; 95% CI, 1.34-6.97), asthma-related night awakenings (OR, 6.88; 95% CI, 2.13-22.23), exercise-induced asthma symptoms (OR, 33.5; 95% CI, 9.51-117.8), and controlled asthma (OR, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.06-0.84) were independently associated with SAD.

CONCLUSIONS

Asthmatic patients with IOS-defined SAD showed less well-controlled asthma, more severe exacerbations and higher mean inhaled corticosteroid dosage. We confirmed exercise-induced asthma, asthma-related night awakenings, exacerbation history, and overweight as independently associated with SAD, while showing well-controlled asthma as inversely associated. SAD may be overlooked by standard spirometry.

Clinical impact of obesity on oscillometry lung mechanics in adults with asthma

BACKGROUND

In the year 2035, projections have estimated that 5% of the Scottish population will be morbidly obese defined as a body mass index (BMI) greater than or equal to 40 kg/m2. Airway oscillometry is an effort-independent test akin to bronchial sonar which measures resistance and compliance.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of obesity on lung mechanics using oscillometry.

METHODS

Clinical data for 188 patients with respiratory physician-diagnosed moderate-to-severe asthma were retrospectively collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

Obesity (BMI 30-39.9 kg/m2) and morbid obesity (BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2) were associated with a significantly worse heterogeneity of peripheral resistance between 5 Hz and 20 Hz and peripheral compliance as low-frequency reactance at 5 Hz and area under the reactance curve, as compared with normal weight (BMI 18.5-24.9 kg/m2). Cluster analysis incorporating oscillometry identified a patient cohort who was older, obese, and female with combined impairment of spirometry and oscillometry coupled with more frequent severe exacerbations.

CONCLUSION

Obesity is associated with worse peripheral airway dysfunction in moderate-to-severe asthma, including a patient cluster who was older, obese, and female with more frequent exacerbations.

Oscillometry in severe asthma: the state of the art and future perspectives

INTRODUCTION

Approximately 3-10% of people with asthma have severe asthma (SA). Patients with SA have greater impairment in daily life and much higher costs. Even if asthma affects the entire bronchial tree, small airways have been recognized as the major site of airflow limitation. There are several tools for studying small airway dysfunction (SAD), but certainly the most interesting is oscillometry. Despite several studies, the clinical usefulness of oscillometry in asthma is still in question. This paper aims to provide evidence supporting the use of oscillometry to improve the management of SA in clinical practice.

AREAS COVERED

In the ATLANTIS study, SAD was strongly evident across all severity. Various tools are available for evaluation of SAD, and certainly an integrated use of these can provide complete and detailed information. However, the most suitable method is oscillometry, implemented for clinical routine by using either small pressure impulses or small pressure sinusoidal waves.

EXPERT OPINION

Oscillometry, despite its different technological implementations is the best tool for determining the impact of SAD on asthma and its control. Oscillometry will also be increasingly useful for choosing the appropriate drug, and there is ample room for a more widespread diffusion in clinical practice.

Small airway dysfunction in asthmatic patients treated with as-needed SABA monotherapy: A perfect storm

BACKGROUND

Short-acting beta agonist (SABA)-only treatment is associated with poor asthma control and adverse clinical outcomes. The importance of small airway dysfunction (SAD) is increasingly recognized in asthma, but less is known in patients using SABA-only therapy. We aimed to investigate the impact of SAD on asthma control in an unselected cohort of 60 adults with physician-diagnosed intermittent asthma treated with as-needed SABA monotherapy.

METHODS

All patients underwent standard spirometry and impulse oscillometry (IOS) at the first visit and were stratified by the presence of SAD defined by IOS (fall in resistance 5-20 Hz [R5-R20]>0.07 kPa × s*L^-1). Univariable and multivariable analyses were used to analyze cross-sectional relationships between clinical variables and SAD.

RESULTS

SAD was present in 73% of the cohort. Compared with patients without SAD, adults with SAD had a higher number of severe exacerbations (65.9% versus 25.0%, p < 0.05), higher use of annual SABA canisters (median (IQR), 3 (1.75-3) versus 1 (1-2), p < 0.001), and significantly less well-controlled asthma (11.7% versus 75.0%, p < 0.001). Spirometry parameters were similar between patients with IOS-defined SAD and those without SAD. The multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that exercise-induced bronchoconstriction symptoms (EIB, odds ratio [OR] 31.18; 95%CI:4.85-365.00) and night awakenings due to asthma (OR 30.30; 95%CI:2.61-1141.00) were independent predictors of SAD, with a high predictive power of the model incorporating these baseline predictors (AUC 0.92).

CONCLUSIONS

EIB and nocturnal symptoms are strong predictors of SAD in asthmatic patients using as-needed SABA-monotherapy, helping to distinguish subjects with SAD among patients with asthma when IOS cannot be performed.

Impaired Respiratory System Resistance and Reactance Are Associated With Bronchial Wall Thickening in Persistent Asthma

BACKGROUND

A recent study demonstrated a significant correlation between bronchial biopsy airway remodeling and quantitative computed tomography looking at bronchial wall thickness.

OBJECTIVE

To identify clinical associations with bronchial wall thickness in moderate to severe asthma.

METHODS

Ninety-two respiratory physician-diagnosed Global Initiative for Asthma-defined patients with moderate to severe asthma were included in this retrospective cohort study. Blinded to all clinical data, 2 senior thoracic radiologists independently measured airway lumen and total airway area at 4 different bronchopulmonary segments using high-resolution computed tomography imaging. We calculated adjusted odds ratios with regard to the association of bronchial wall thickness with spirometry, oscillometry, exacerbations, and nasal polyps.

RESULTS

The pooled analysis for all 4 bronchopulmonary segments showed that an area under reactance curve greater than or equal to 1.0 kPa/L, an R5-R20 ratio (resistance heterogeneity between 5 and 20 Hz divided by total resistance [R5]) of 25% or more, having 2 or more exacerbations per year, and presence of nasal polyposis exhibited adjusted odds ratios of 3.54 (95% CI, 1.22-10.32), 2.89 (95% CI, 1.03-8.05), 4.17 (95% CI, 1.25-13.90), and 9.85 (95% CI, 2.33-41.74), respectively, in their association with a wall area thickness of 50% or more. These translated into a respective 72%, 65%, 76%, and 90% increased likelihood for a wall area thickness of 50% or more.

CONCLUSIONS

Bronchial wall thickness is associated with peripheral airways resistance and reactance, severe exacerbations, and nasal polyposis in persistent asthma.

Daytime and Nighttime Visual Analog Scales May Be Useful in Assessing Asthma Control Levels Before and After Treatment

PURPOSE

Few questionnaires evaluate daytime and nighttime symptoms separately, although these assessments could contribute to the improvement of disease control levels and prevention of future risks in asthma. The purpose of this retrospective study was to investigate whether daytime and nighttime visual analog scales (VAS) are useful in measuring the perception of symptoms, assessing disease control levels, and evaluating the treatment effects in asthma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Self-reporting asthma control tests (ACT) before and after treatment are standardized tests used to determine disease control levels. A multiple regression analysis was performed to determine the correlation between daytime and nighttime VAS and the characteristics of patients before treatment, as well as the changes in VAS and lung functions and fractional exhaled nitrogen oxide after treatment in 55 treatment-naïve symptomatic adult patients with asthma.

RESULTS

Both daytime (r = -0.57, P < 0.0001) and nighttime (r = -0.46, P < 0.0001) VAS correlated well with ACT scores, and there was a correlation between daytime and nighttime VAS (r = 0.33, P = 0.0148) before treatment. In addition, the changes in daytime (r = -0.65, P < 0.0001) and nighttime (r = -0.44, P < 0.0001) VAS were significantly associated with changes in the ACT scores. The multiple regression analysis (β [95% confidence interval]) revealed that improvements in the daytime (-2.33 [-4.55 to -0.11], P = 0.0405) and nighttime (-3.09 [-6.25 to 0.07], P = 0.0505) VAS were associated with an increased forced vital capacity after treatment, although there was no correlation between the VAS and characteristics before treatment.

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrated that daytime and nighttime VAS were useful in assessing disease control levels and evaluating the treatment effects in asthma.

Monoclonal antibodies targeting small airways: a new perspective for biological therapies in severe asthma

Small airway dysfunction (SAD) in asthma is characterized by the inflammation and narrowing of airways with less of 2 mm in diameter between generations 8 and 23 of the bronchial tree. It is now widely accepted that small airways are involved in the pathogenesis of asthma and are a major determinant of airflow obstruction in this disease. 

In recent years, specialized tests have been developed, such as Impulse Oscillometry (IOS) and Multiple Breath Nitrogen Washout (MBNW) tests, which have been deemed more accurate in detecting SAD than conventional spirometry. Clinical studies show that SAD is associated with more severe bronchial hyperresponsiveness, worse asthma control, and a higher risk of exacerbations. Recent data from a large cohort study showed that the prevalence of SAD in asthma patients increases with asthma severity. Overall, SAD seems to represent a treatable trait, which makes it appealing for asthma control optimization and exacerbation rate reduction, especially in moderate-to-severe asthma.

Biologic agents are now available for the treatment of different severe asthma phenotypes and endotypes. However, the effect of these therapies on SAD remains poorly characterized. Literature showing that biologic agents can also favorably improve small airway function is accumulating. In particular, anti-IL5 agents (mepolizumab and benralizumab) seems to have a greater impact on SAD as compared to other biological agents, but direct comparisons in prospective randomized controlled trials are lacking.

In this mini-review article, we address the latest evidence on the effect of biological therapies on SAD in patients with severe asthma.

Impact of Biologic Therapy on the Small Airways Asthma Phenotype

The small airways dysfunction (SAD) asthma phenotype is characterised by narrowing of airways < 2 mm in diameter between generations 8 and 23 of the bronchial tree. Recently, this has become particularly relevant as measurements of small airways using airway oscillometry for example, are strong determinants of asthma control and exacerbations in moderate-to-severe asthma. The small airways can be assessed using spirometry as forced expiratory flow rate between 25 and 75% of forced vital capacity (FEF_25-75) and has been deemed more accurate in detecting small airways dysfunction than forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV₁). Oscillometry as the heterogeneity in resistance between 5 and 20 Hz (R5-R20), low frequency reactance at 5 Hz (X5) or area under the reactance curve between 5 Hz and the resonant frequency can also be used to assess the small airways. The small airways can also be assessed using the multiple breath nitrogen washout (MBNW) test giving rise to values including functional residual capacity, lung clearance index and ventilation distribution heterogeneity in the conducting (Scond) and the acinar (Sacin) airways. The ATLANTIS group showed that the prevalence of small airways disease in asthma defined on FEF_25-75, oscillometry and MBNW all increased with progressive GINA asthma disease stages. As opposed to topical inhaler therapy that might not adequately penetrate the small airways, it is perhaps more intuitive that systemic anti-inflammatory therapy with biologics targeting downstream cytokines and upstream epithelial anti-alarmins may offer a promising solution to SAD. Here we therefore aim to appraise the available evidence for the effect of anti-IgE, anti-IL5 (Rα), anti-IL4Rα, anti-TSLP and anti-IL33 biologics on small airways disease in patients with severe asthma.