Paclitaxel plus carboplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy. A prospective clinical and electrophysiological study in patients suffering from solid malignancies

The impact of single nucleotide polymorphisms on return-to-work after taxane-based chemotherapy in breast cancer

PURPOSE

Breast cancer treatment is associated with adverse effects, which may delay return-to-work. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) may influence the risk and severity of treatment toxicities, which in turn could delay return-to-work. We examined the association of 26 SNPs with return-to-work in premenopausal women with breast cancer.

METHODS

Using Danish registries, we identified premenopausal women diagnosed with non-distant metastatic breast cancer during 2007‒2011, assigned adjuvant combination chemotherapy including cyclophosphamide and docetaxel. We genotyped 26 SNPs in 20 genes (ABCB1, ABCC2, ABCG2, CYP1A1, CYP1B1, CYP3A, CYP3A4, CYP3A5, GSTP1, SLCO1B1, SLCO1B3, ARHGEF10, EPHA4, EPHA5, EPHA6, EPHA8, ERCC1, ERCC2, FGD4 and TRPV1) using TaqMan assays. We computed the cumulative incidence of return-to-work (defined as 4 consecutive weeks of work) up to 10 years after surgery, treating death and retirement as competing events and fitted cause-specific Cox regression models to estimate crude hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of return-to-work. We also examined stable labor market attachment (defined as 12 consecutive weeks of work).

RESULTS

We included 1,964 women. No associations were found for 25 SNPs. The cumulative incidence of return-to-work varied by CYP3A5 rs776746 genotype. From 6 months to 10 years after surgery, return-to-work increased from 25 to 94% in wildtypes (n = 1600), from 17 to 94% in heterozygotes (n = 249), and from 7 to 82% in homozygotes (n = 15). The HR showed delayed return-to-work in CYP3A5 rs776746 homozygotes throughout follow-up (0.48, 95% CI 0.26, 0.86), compared with wildtypes. Estimates were similar for stable labor market attachment.

CONCLUSION

Overall, the SNPs examined in the study did not influence return-to-work or stable labor market attachment after breast cancer in premenopausal women. Our findings did suggest that the outcomes were delayed in homozygote carriers of CYP3A5 rs776746, though the number of homozygotes was low.

Serum neurofilament levels correlate with electrodiagnostic evidence of axonal loss in paclitaxel-induced peripheral neurotoxicity

INTRODUCTION

Paclitaxel-induced peripheral neurotoxicity (PIPN) typically manifests as a predominantly sensory axonopathy. Nerve conduction studies (NCS) represent the gold standard method to quantify axonal impairment in PIPN. Serum neurofilament light chain (sNfL) levels are emerging biomarkers for quantifying axonal damage in peripheral neuropathies. To date, the association between NCS abnormalities and sNfL levels during paclitaxel-based chemotherapy has not been specifically addressed.

METHODS

We prospectively conducted longitudinal measurement of sNfL levels in 27 chemotherapy-naïve breast cancer patients and correlated conventional NCS recordings with sNfL in 22 of them, before (T0) and after (T1) 12 cycles of weekly paclitaxel-based therapy.

RESULTS

PIPN was diagnosed in 24/27 patients (88%) after completion of the 12-week paclitaxel-based chemotherapy regimen. Serum NfL levels (pg/mL) were significantly higher at T1 compared to T0 (T0: 18.50 ± 12.88 vs T1: 255.80 ± 194.16; p < 0.001). The increase of sNfL levels at T1 significantly correlated with the decrease or abolishment of amplitudes recorded from the sural nerve (r = 0.620; p = 0.0035), sensory radial (r = 0.613; p = 0.005), sensory ulnar (r = 0.630; p = 0.005), and peroneal motor (r = 0.568; p = 0.024) nerves.

CONCLUSION

sNfL levels proportionally increase during chemotherapy administration and significantly correlate with NCS axonal abnormalities in patients with PIPN. A multimodal testing approach employing both sNfL and NCS might improve the PIPN diagnostic accuracy.

Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy: Epidemiology, Pathomechanisms and Treatment

PURPOSE

This review provides an update on the current clinical, epidemiological and pathophysiological evidence alongside the diagnostic, prevention and treatment approach to chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN).

FINDINGS

The incidence of cancer and long-term survival after treatment is increasing. CIPN affects sensory, motor and autonomic nerves and is one of the most common adverse events caused by chemotherapeutic agents, which in severe cases leads to dose reduction or treatment cessation, with increased mortality. The primary classes of chemotherapeutic agents associated with CIPN are platinum-based drugs, taxanes, vinca alkaloids, bortezomib and thalidomide. Platinum agents are the most neurotoxic, with oxaliplatin causing the highest prevalence of CIPN. CIPN can progress from acute to chronic, may deteriorate even after treatment cessation (a phenomenon known as coasting) or only partially attenuate. Different chemotherapeutic agents share both similarities and key differences in pathophysiology and clinical presentation. The diagnosis of CIPN relies heavily on identifying symptoms, with limited objective diagnostic approaches targeting the class of affected nerve fibres. Studies have consistently failed to identify at-risk cohorts, and there are no proven strategies or interventions to prevent or limit the development of CIPN. Furthermore, multiple treatments developed to relieve symptoms and to modify the underlying disease in CIPN have failed.

IMPLICATIONS

The increasing prevalence of CIPN demands an objective approach to identify at-risk patients in order to prevent or limit progression and effectively alleviate the symptoms associated with CIPN. An evidence base for novel targets and both pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments is beginning to emerge and has been recognised recently in publications by the American Society of Clinical Oncology and analgesic trial design expert groups such as ACTTION.

Implications of Instituting an Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Pathway in Patients Receiving Chemotherapy in Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Neuropathy is a common side effect of chemotherapeutic agents. Manifestations of chemotherapy-induced neuropathy can present in a myriad of fashions, ranging from numbness, tingling, and pain to motor weakness and autonomic dysfunction.1 Given the nature of breast reconstruction, a significant portion of the patients have a history of chemotherapy exposure; its effect on postoperative pain management has not been previously explored.

METHODS

This study is a retrospective review of patients who underwent deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction performed by the two senior authors from January of 2016 to September of 2019. The patients were separated into two groups, before and after enhanced recovery after surgery. The primary outcome observed was postoperative opioid consumption, measured as oral morphine equivalents; p values were obtained through univariate linear regression.

RESULTS

In total, 256 patients were analyzed, of which 113 had chemotherapy exposure. The difference between opioid consumption in patients in the pre-enhanced recovery after surgery group without and with chemotherapy exposure was statistically significant (211.5 mg versus 278.5 mg; p = 0.0279). There was no difference between opioid consumption with regard to chemotherapy history in the enhanced recovery after surgery group (137.4 mg versus 133.0 mg; p = 0.7251).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with chemotherapy exposure required more opioids to be comfortable. It is unknown whether this difference is secondary to increased pain or less effectiveness of opioids. Further research is necessary to assess whether there are better ways to address pain postoperatively in patients with chemotherapy exposure.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, III.

Taxane-induced peripheral neuropathy: differences in patient report and objective assessment

PURPOSE

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a dose-limiting side-effect of neurotoxic cancer treatment impacting on long-term quality of life. Symptoms include numbness, tingling, and pain, affecting the distal extremities. However, patients often report symptoms discrepant from the expected symmetrical distribution and the degree of concurrence with objective assessment remains ill-defined. This study aimed to investigate severity and symmetry of neuropathy symptoms to enable comparison of objective measures and patient report.

METHODS

Forty-five taxane-treated patients (F = 43, 66 ± 1.5 years, 19 months post-treatment) completed bilateral neuropathy assessments via clinical examination, sensory nerve conduction studies (NCS), and patient questionnaires. The laterality index (LI) was calculated as a ratio of smaller to larger side-to-side differences.

RESULTS

Neuropathy was reported by 89% of the cohort. On clinical examination, 83% had ≥ 2 abnormalities, with 38-35% having upper or lower limb sensory amplitudes below normative range. Thirty-five percent indicated side-to-side symptom asymmetry; however, there was no significant asymmetry evident on clinical examination (LI Asym = .60 ± .10, Sym = .76 ± .05, NS) and no difference in side-to-side NCS (median LI:Asym = .69 ± .06, Sym = .81 ± .04, NS; Sural LI:Asym = .80 ± .04, Sym = .81 ± .04, NS). Accordingly, there was no statistical association between patient-reported and objective assessment of side-to-side asymmetry, suggesting discordance between patient experience and objective assessment. Similarly, discrepancies in symptom severity between hands and feet were reported by 32% of the cohort. However, patients reporting differences in symptom severity between the hands and feet were just as likely to present with comparable assessments as to demonstrate objective discrepancies.

CONCLUSIONS

Discrepancies may exist between the patient experience of CIPN and objective assessments. Understanding these discrepancies may help to elucidate underlying mechanisms and better inform treatment strategies.

Impact of physical exercise in cancer survivors during and after antineoplastic treatments

Cancer patients experience symptoms and adverse effects of treatments that may last even after the end of treatments. Exercise is a safe, non-pharmacological and cost-effective therapy that can provide several health benefits in cancer patient and survivors, reducing cancer symptoms and cancer treatment side effects. The purpose of this review is to describe how the physical exercise is capable to reduce cancer symptoms and cancer treatment side effects. We realized a pragmatic classification of symptoms, dividing them into physical, psychological and psycho-physical aspects. For each symptom we discuss causes, therapies, we analyse the effects of physical exercise and we summarize the most effective type of exercise to reduce the symptoms. This review also points out what are the difficulties that patients and survivors face during the practice of physical activity and provides some solutions to overcome these barriers. Related to each specific cancer, it emerges that type, frequency and intensity of physical exercise could be prescribed and supervised as a therapeutic program, like it occurs for the type, dose and duration of a drug treatment.

Neurophysiological and clinical outcomes in chemotherapy-induced neuropathy in cancer

Chemotherapy induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a significant toxicity of cancer treatment, with the potential to affect long-term function and quality of life in cancer survivors. There remains a lack of consensus around optimal assessment techniques. While current approaches to CIPN assessment are focused on clinical grading scales, it is becoming increasingly evident that a more comprehensive multimodal assessment package is necessary to accurately characterise the impact of CIPN as well as gauge the utility of neuroprotective mechanisms. Neurophysiological techniques provide objective biomarkers and may enable early detection of toxicity while patient reported outcomes are necessary to determine the significance of symptoms to individual patients. In addition to providing an objective assessment, clinical neurophysiological techniques provide important insights into the contributory pathophysiological mechanisms of CIPN with different chemotherapy agents. There is a paucity of implementation of these techniques in the clinical trial setting. The present Review aims to facilitate the use of neurophysiological studies as part of comprehensive assessment packages for the monitoring of CIPN by summarising current understanding of neurophysiological changes that underlie the development of neuropathy, clinical presentations and patient reported outcomes as well as advantages and limitations of current techniques for the neurophysiological assessment of CIPN.

Evaluating the impact of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy symptoms (CIPN-sx) on perceived ability to work in breast cancer survivors during the first year post-treatment

Purpose

To describe the impact of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy symptoms (CIPN-sx) on breast cancer survivors’ (BCS) perceived ability to work post-treatment.

Methods

The sample included 22 chemotherapy-treated (Ctx+) and 22 chemotherapy-naïve (Ctx−) female BCS. Data was collected at the following three time points: baseline (post-surgery, pre-chemotherapy), 1 month (1 M) post-chemotherapy, and approximately 1 year (1 Y) later. The presence, frequency, number, and severity of CIPN-sx were self-reported using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group–Neurotoxicity questionnaire (FACT/GOG-Ntx) version 4, a validated 11-item CIPN measure. Perceived ability to work was measured using an item from the Functional Well-Being subscale of the FACT/GOG-Ntx.

Results

At 1 Y, more than 50 % of Ctx+ reported discomfort, numbness, or tingling in their hands or feet; weakness; or difficulty feeling small objects. The presence, number, and severity of these symptoms were correlated with being less able to work for Ctx+ at 1 M but not 1 Y. Results of a regression analysis using CIPN-sx to predict work ability found that models combining (1) hand numbness and trouble feeling small objects, (2) trouble buttoning buttons and trouble feeling small objects, (3) foot numbness and foot pain, (4) foot numbness and trouble walking, and (5) trouble hearing and hand pain each predicted survivors who were “not at all” able to work at 1 M.

Conclusions

Unresolved CIPN-sx may play a role in challenges working for BCS post-treatment. These findings highlight the need for research to explore the impact that CIPN-sx have on BCS’ ability to work, as well as the development of interventions to improve work function in BCS with CIPN-sx.

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: Current status and progress

As there are increasing numbers of cancer survivors, more attention is being paid to the long term unwanted effects patients may experience as a result of their treatment and the impact these side effects can have on their quality of life. Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is one of the most common long-term toxicities from chemotherapy. In this review we will briefly review the clinical presentation, evaluation and management of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy, with a focus on CIPN related to platinum and taxane agents. We will then discuss current clinical models of peripheral neuropathy and ongoing research to better understand CIPN and develop potential treatment options.

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy in adults: a comprehensive update of the literature

Commonly used chemotherapeutic agents in oncology/hematology practice, causing toxic peripheral neuropathy, include taxanes, platinum compounds, vinca alkaloids, proteasome inhibitors, and antiangiogenic/immunomodulatory agents. This review paper intends to put together and discuss the spectrum of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) characteristics so as to highlight areas of future research to pursue on the topic. Current knowledge shows that the pathogenesis of CIPN still remains elusive, mostly because there are several sites of involvement in the peripheral nervous system. In any case, it is acknowledged that the dorsal root ganglia of the primary sensory neurons are the most common neural targets of CIPN. Both the incidence and severity of CIPN are clinically under- and misreported, and it has been demonstrated that scoring CIPN with common toxicity scales is associated with significant inter-observer variability. Only a proportion of chemotherapy-treated patients develop treatment-emergent and persistent CIPN, and to date it has been impossible to predict high-and low-risk subjects even within groups who receive the same drug regimen. This issue has recently been investigated in the context of pharmacogenetic analyses, but these studies have not implemented a proper methodological approach and their results are inconsistent and not really clinically relevant. As such, a stringent approach has to be implemented to validate that information. Another open issue is that, at present, there is insufficient evidence to support the use of any of the already tested chemoprotective agents to prevent or limit CIPN. The results of comprehensive interventions, including clinical, neurophysiological, and pharmacogenetic approaches, are expected to produce a consistent advantage for both doctors and patients and thus allow the registration and analysis of reliable data on the true characteristics of CIPN, eventually leading to potential preventive and therapeutic interventions.

Discovering cytokines as targets for chemotherapy-induced painful peripheral neuropathy

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN), a dose-limiting neurotoxic effect of chemotherapy, is the most common reason for early cessation of cancer treatment. This can result in an increased risk of recurrence and decreased survival rate. Inflammatory cascade activation, proinflammatory cytokine upregulation, and neuro-immune communication pathways play essential roles in the initiation and progression of CIPN. Most notably, TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, and CCL2 are involved in neuropathic pain. Further elucidation of the role of these cytokines could lead to their development and use as biomarkers for predicting the onset of painful peripheral neuropathy and early axonal damage. In this review, we provide evidence for the involvement of cytokines in CIPN, the possible underlying mechanisms, and their use as potential therapeutic targets and biomarkers to prevent and improve the painful peripheral neuropathy related to chemotherapeutic agents.

Chemotherapy-induced neuropathy

OPINION STATEMENT

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neurotoxicity (CIPN) is one of the most severe and unpredictable side effects of modern anticancer treatment. In recent years, a clear understanding of the importance of an integrated approach to CIPN has become evident, and efforts are increasing to better characterize its features and to identify more accurate methods to report and grade its occurrence. The clinically relevant impact of CIPN on cancer patients has been known for a long time, but knowledge of its pathogenetic aspects is still very limited. This incomplete knowledge is one of the major limitations in identifying targets for evidence-based neuroprotective strategies. Nevertheless, several studies have been devoted to the prevention or at least the effective treatment of symptoms secondary to peripheral nerve damage and to the early identification of patients at high risk of developing severe CIPN. Unfortunately, none of these studies has been successful and the optimal management of CIPN patients is still an unmet clinical need. Therefore, the modification of chemotherapy is currently the only available approach to limit the severity of neuropathy in the vast majority of patients. The indications for treatment modification are not universally accepted and they can differ among the various drugs. Generally, treatment modification should be considered as soon as symptoms and signs impair the daily life activities of the patient, but the possibility of a delayed worsening of CIPN after treatment withdrawal ("coasting") should always be considered, and delay of modification decisions should be avoided.

Peripheral neuropathy with microtubule-targeting agents: occurrence and management approach

Microtubule-targeting agents (MTAs), which include vinca alkaloids, taxanes, and the recently introduced epothilone, ixabepilone, are widely used chemotherapeutic agents for treatment of patients with cancer. MTAs interfere with the normal structure and function of microtubules, leading to cell-cycle arrest and tumor cell death. Microtubule function is critical to normal neuronal function, thus MTA therapy is commonly associated with some form of neuropathy. There is poor agreement between tools for clinical assessment of MTA-associated peripheral neuropathy, and standardization of grading scales is needed to reduce variability. For a majority of patients, MTA-associated neuropathy is mild to moderate in intensity and reversible, but it can be severe and resolve incompletely. The incidence and severity of MTA-associated neuropathy is drug, dose, and schedule dependent. The first-generation vinca alkaloids (eg, vincristine) are associated with severe mixed sensory and motor neuropathy, whereas the newer vinca alkaloids (eg, vinorelbine, vinflunine) induce a milder sensory neuropathy. Taxane-associated sensory neuropathy occurs more often with standard (polyoxyethylated castor oil-based) and albumin-bound paclitaxel than with docetaxel. The incidence and presentation of peripheral neuropathy with ixabepilone, alone or in combination with capecitabine, are similar to that with taxanes. Management of neuropathy may involve reducing or delaying the MTA dose, or in severe persistent or disabling cases discontinuing treatment. Reversal of neuropathy after dosage intervention appears to be more rapid with ixabepilone than with other MTAs.

Long-term glutamate supplementation failed to protect against peripheral neurotoxicity of paclitaxel

Toxic peripheral neuropathy is still a significant limiting factor for chemotherapy with paclitaxel (PAC), although glutamate and its closely related amino acid glutamine were claimed to ameliorate PAC neurotoxicity. This pilot trial aimed to evaluate the role of glutamate supplementation for preventing PAC-induced peripheral neuropathy in a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded clinical and electro-diagnostic study. Forty-three ovarian cancer patients were available for analysis following six cycles of the same PAC-containing regimen: 23 had been supplemented by glutamate all along the treatment period, at a daily dose of three times 500 mg (group G), and 20 had received a placebo (group P). Patients were evaluated by neurological examinations, questionnaires and sensory-motor nerve conduction studies. There was no significant difference in the frequency of signs or symptoms between the two groups although neurotoxicity symptoms presented mostly with lower scores of severity in group G. However, this difference reached statistical significance only with regard to reported pain sensation (P = 0.011). Also the frequency of abnormal electro-diagnostic findings showed similarity between the two groups (G: 7/23 = 30.4%; P: 6/20 = 30%). This pilot study leads to the conclusion that glutamate supplementation at the chosen regimen fails to protect against peripheral neurotoxicity of PAC.

Peripheral nerve damage associated with administration of taxanes in patients with cancer

Peripheral neuropathy is a well recognized toxicity of taxanes, usually resulting to dose modification and changes in the treatment plan. Taxanes produce a symmetric, axonal predominantly sensory distal neuropathy with less prominent motor involvement. A "dying back" process starting from distal nerve endings followed by effects on Schwann cells, neuronal body or axonal transport changes and a disturbed cytoplasmatic flow in the affected neurons is the most widely accepted mechanism of taxanes neurotoxicity. The incidence of taxanes-induced peripheral neuropathy is related to causal factors, such as single dose per course and cumulative dose and risk factors including treatment schedule, prior or concomitant administration of platinum compounds or vinca alcaloids, age and pre-existing peripheral neuropathy of other causes. The most reliable method to assess taxanes neurotoxicity is by clinical examination combined with electrophysiological evaluation. There is currently no effective symptomatic treatment for paclitaxel-associated pain, myalgias and arthralgias. Tricyclic antidepressants and anticonvulsants have been used as symptomatic treatment of neurotoxicity with some measure of success. Therefore, new approaches for prophylaxis against taxanes-induced peripheral neuropathy are needed. Several neuroprotective agents including, thiols, neurotrophic factors, and antioxidants hold promise for their ability to prevent neurotoxicity resulting from taxanes exposure. However, further confirmatory trials are warranted on this important clinical topic. This review critically looks at the pathogenesis, incidence, risk factors, diagnosis, characteristics and management of taxanes-induced peripheral neuropathy. We also highlight areas of future research.

Discordance of clinical symptoms and electrophysiologic findings in taxane plus platinum-induced neuropathy

Paclitaxel combined with carboplatin is currently accepted as the first-line treatment for ovarian carcinoma, frequently associated with neuropathy. Due to its frequent association with neuropathy, combination of docetaxel and carboplatin has been suggested as an alternative. A 47-year-old woman developed paresthesia after the first cycle of paclitaxel/carboplatin for ovarian cancer. Her nerve conduction study (NCS) showed only sural neuropathy after completion of six cycles, which returned to normal in 6 months. She had fewer neuropathy symptoms when treatment was changed to docetaxel/carboplatin for recurrent cancer. NCS revealed generalized sensory neuropathy following docetaxel/carboplatin treatment, which normalized after 12 months. Our observation indicated that there is a disparity between clinical symptoms and electrophysiologic examination in taxane-induced neuropathy. Although docetaxel was tolerated well by the patient, evidence of generalized sensory neuropathy was present in NCS.