Reasons to withhold intra-arterial thrombolysis in clinical practice

Visible Thrombolysis Acceleration of a Nanomachine Powered by Light-Driving F0F1-ATPase Motor

We report on thrombolysis acceleration of a nanomachine powered by light-driving δ-subunit-free F0F1-ATPase motor. It is composed of a mechanical device, locating device, energy storage device, and propeller. The rotory δ-subunit-free F0F1-ATPase motor acts as a mechanical device, which was obtained by reconstructing an original chromatophore extracted from Rhodospirillum rubrum. We found that the bioactivity of the F0F1-ATPase motor improved greatly after reconstruction. The zeta potential of the nanomachine is about -23.4 mV. Cytotoxicity induced by the nanomachine was measured using cell counting kit (CCK)-8 assay. The A549 cells incubated with different fractional concentrations of the nanomachine within 48 h did not show obvious cytotoxicity. The locating device helps the nanomachine bind to the thrombi. Energy was easily stored by exposing the nanomachine to 600-nm-wavelength irradiation, which promoted activity of the motor. The rotation of the long propeller accelerated thrombolysis of a blood clot in vitro in the presence of urokinase (UK). This result was based on visual inspection and confirmed by a series of tests.

Implementation of a patient selection protocol for intra-arterial therapy increases treatment rates in patients with acute ischemic stroke

BACKGROUND

Strategies for patient selection for intra-arterial therapy (IAT) in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) are highly variable. The degree of protocol adoption and treatment rates associated with implementation of a service-wide patient selection IAT protocol were assessed.

METHODS

All patients with AIS prospectively recorded in our stroke database from January 2007 to June 2009 were reviewed. The IAT patient selection protocol was implemented in March 2008. Patients were defined as likely to benefit (LTB) from IAT if they had brain imaging completed within 6 h from last known well time, NIH Stroke Scale score ≥ 8, infarct volume ≤ 100 ml and evidence of proximal artery occlusion.

RESULTS

Of 1348 subjects identified, 118 (8.7%) met the criteria for LTB and 62 (52%) underwent IAT. There was a significant increase in rates of IAT among LTB patients after protocol implementation (61% vs 40%, p<0.02). In LTB patients, factors associated with IAT were stroke duration (OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.6 to 0.9 per hour), arrival within later calendar months during study period (OR 1.1, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.2 per month), intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (OR 0.6, 95% CI 0.4 to 0.9) and age (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.02 per year). After multivariable adjustment, only stroke duration (OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.5 to 0.8 per hour) remained an independent predictor of IAT.

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients with AIS did not meet our criteria for LTB and only 52% of those defined as LTB received IAT. Protocol adoption increased the use of IAT over time; however, further exploration of factors associated with the reasons for non-treatment and the impact of IAT on outcomes is necessary.

Outcome of stroke with mild or rapidly improving symptoms

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Acute ischemic stroke with mild or rapidly improving symptoms is expected to result in good functional outcome, whether treated or not. Therefore, thrombolysis with its potential risks does not seem to be justified in such patients. However, recent studies indicate that the outcome is not invariably benign.

METHODS

We analyzed clinical and radiological data of patients with stroke who presented within 6 hours of stroke onset and did not receive thrombolysis because of mild or rapidly improving symptoms. Univariate and logistic regression analyses were performed to define predictors of clinical outcome.

RESULTS

One hundred sixty-two consecutive patients (110 men and 52 women) aged 63+/-13 years were included. The median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score on admission was 2 (range, 1 to 14). All patients presented within 6 hours of symptom onset. After 3 months, modified Rankin Scale score was < or =1 in 122 patients (75%), indicating a favorable outcome. Thirty-eight patients (23.5%) had an unfavorable outcome (modified Rankin Scale 2 to 5) and 2 patients (1.3%) had died. Baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score > or =10 points increased the odds of unfavorable outcome or death 16.9-fold (95% CI: 1.8 to 159.5; P<0.013), and proximal vessel occlusion increased the odds 7.13-fold (95% CI: 1.1 to 45.5; P<0.038).

CONCLUSIONS

Seventy-five percent of patients with mild or rapidly improving symptoms will have a favorable outcome after 3 months. Therefore, a decision against thrombolysis seems to be justified in the majority of patients. However, selected patients, especially those with proximal vessel occlusions and baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores >/=10 points, might derive a benefit from thrombolysis.