1
|
Nalcı Baytaroğlu H, Gündüz AK, Mirzayev I, Özalp Ateş FS. Factors affecting eye conservation and metastasis in posterior uveal melanomas. Eur J Ophthalmol 2023; 33:2024-2033. [PMID: 36762394 DOI: 10.1177/11206721231155054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/11/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine the effect of patient and tumor features and different treatments on eye removal (enucleation or exenteration) and metastasis in posterior uveal melanoma (PUM). METHODS Retrospective analysis. Patient age (≤60 vs >60 years), sex (female vs male), visual acuity (VA, ≤20/40 vs >20/40), largest tumor basal diameter (LTBD), tumor thickness, tumor stage according to American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th edition, ciliary body involvement, distance to optic disc (OD)/fovea (≤3 mm vs >3 mm), OD involvement, and histopathology were evaluated. Primary treatment options were transpupillary thermotherapy, plaque radiotherapy, Cyberknife radiosurgery, exoresection, and eye removal. Risk factors for primary eye removal were determined using logistic regression test and those for secondary eye removal and metastasis with Cox regression analysis. RESULTS Of 387 cases, 153 (39.5%) underwent primary eye removal. Multivariable risk factors for primary eye removal included AJCC tumor stage (p = 0.001, OR:4.586; p < 0.001, OR:34.545; p < 0.001, OR:103.468 for stages T2, T3, and T4 vs stage T1, respectively), and VA≤20/40 (p = 0.014, OR:2.597). Multivariable risk factors for secondary eye removal were VA≤20/40 (p = 0.019, RR:2.817) and AJCC stage T3 vs T1 (p = 0.021, RR:2.666). Eye preservation rates in patients undergoing eye-conserving treatments were 80.3%, 69.6%, and 51.5% at 5, 10, and 15 years, respectively. Metastasis-free survival rates were 81.0%, 73.0%, and 56.7% at 5, 10, and 15 years, respectively. Multivariable risk factors for metastasis included eye removal as primary treatment (p = 0.005, RR:2.828) and mixed type histopathology (p < 0.001, RR:4.804). DISCUSSION Early diagnosis is crucial for both eye preservation and survival in PUM. Increasing AJCC tumor stage and lower VA were risk factors for eye removal in this study. Mixed type histopathology and primary eye removal were risk factors for metastasis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hilal Nalcı Baytaroğlu
- Ulucanlar Eye Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
- Department of Ophthalmology, Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Ahmet Kaan Gündüz
- Department of Ophthalmology, Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
- Private Eye Clinic, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Ibadulla Mirzayev
- Department of Ophthalmology, Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
- Çubuk State Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Banou L, Tsani Z, Arvanitogiannis K, Pavlaki M, Dastiridou A, Androudi S. Radiotherapy in Uveal Melanoma: A Review of Ocular Complications. Curr Oncol 2023; 30:6374-6396. [PMID: 37504330 PMCID: PMC10378371 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30070470] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2023] [Revised: 06/20/2023] [Accepted: 07/01/2023] [Indexed: 07/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Uveal melanoma represents the most prevalent form of primary malignant intraocular tumor in adults. Historically, enucleation was considered the gold-standard approach in the treatment of uveal melanoma. Currently, radiotherapy is the most commonly used therapy, aiming at a better quality of life. However, radiotherapy can result in several ocular complications, some of which may be vision-threatening. Radiation-induced dry eye, scleral necrosis, cataract, rubeosis iridis, neovascular glaucoma, radiation retinopathy, maculopathy, and optic neuropathy are the most common complications. This article aims to summarize the current literature regarding the ocular complications after radiotherapy, as well as their clinical features, risk factors, and management strategies. A thorough understanding of these issues is crucial for ophthalmologists and oncologists to provide optimal patient care, improve visual outcomes, and minimize long-term complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lamprini Banou
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Thessaly, 41110 Larissa, Greece
| | - Zoi Tsani
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Thessaly, 41110 Larissa, Greece
| | | | - Maria Pavlaki
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Thessaly, 41110 Larissa, Greece
| | - Anna Dastiridou
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Thessaly, 41110 Larissa, Greece
| | - Sofia Androudi
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Thessaly, 41110 Larissa, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zemba M, Dumitrescu OM, Gheorghe AG, Radu M, Ionescu MA, Vatafu A, Dinu V. Ocular Complications of Radiotherapy in Uveal Melanoma. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15020333. [PMID: 36672282 PMCID: PMC9856287 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15020333] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2022] [Revised: 12/30/2022] [Accepted: 01/03/2023] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Uveal melanoma is the most common primary malignant intraocular tumor in adults. Radiation therapy has replaced enucleation and is now the preferred treatment in most cases. Nonetheless, around 70% of patients develop radiation-related complications, some of which are vision-threatening. The objective of this review is to present the most important complications associated with radiotherapy in the treatment of uveal melanoma and their pathogenesis, incidence, risk factors, and available preventive and therapeutic measures. The most common complications are cataracts, with a reported incidence ranging from 4% to 69%, and radiation retinopathy, reported in 5-68% of cases. Radiation-related complications are responsible for approximately half of secondary enucleations, the leading cause being neovascular glaucoma. A poor visual outcome is mainly associated with the presence of radiation retinopathy and radiation optic neuropathy. Therapeutic options are available for the majority of complications with the notable exception of optic neuropathy. However, many studies report a final visual acuity of less than 20/200 in more than 60% of treated eyes. Reducing complication rates can be achieved by lowering the dose of radiation, with the use of eccentric, customized plaques and careful planning of the irradiation delivery in order to protect structures vital to vision and by associating radiation therapy with other methods with the aim of reducing tumor volume.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mihail Zemba
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Carol Davila”, 050474 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Otilia-Maria Dumitrescu
- Department of Ophthalmology, ‘Dr. Carol Davila’ Central Military Emergency University Hospital, 010825 Bucharest, Romania
- Correspondence:
| | - Alina Gabriela Gheorghe
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Carol Davila”, 050474 Bucharest, Romania
- Bucharest Emergency Eye Hospital, 030167 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Madalina Radu
- Department of Ophthalmology, ‘Dr. Carol Davila’ Central Military Emergency University Hospital, 010825 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Mihai Alexandru Ionescu
- Department of Ophthalmology, ‘Dr. Carol Davila’ Central Military Emergency University Hospital, 010825 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Andrei Vatafu
- Department of Ophthalmology, ‘Dr. Carol Davila’ Central Military Emergency University Hospital, 010825 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Valentin Dinu
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Carol Davila”, 050474 Bucharest, Romania
- Bucharest Emergency Eye Hospital, 030167 Bucharest, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Corradini S, Niyazi M, Verellen D, Valentini V, Walsh S, Grosu AL, Lauber K, Giaccia A, Unger K, Debus J, Pieters BR, Guckenberger M, Senan S, Budach W, Rad R, Mayerle J, Belka C. X-change symposium: status and future of modern radiation oncology-from technology to biology. Radiat Oncol 2021; 16:27. [PMID: 33541387 PMCID: PMC7863262 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-021-01758-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2020] [Accepted: 01/28/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Future radiation oncology encompasses a broad spectrum of topics ranging from modern clinical trial design to treatment and imaging technology and biology. In more detail, the application of hybrid MRI devices in modern image-guided radiotherapy; the emerging field of radiomics; the role of molecular imaging using positron emission tomography and its integration into clinical routine; radiation biology with its future perspectives, the role of molecular signatures in prognostic modelling; as well as special treatment modalities such as brachytherapy or proton beam therapy are areas of rapid development. More clinically, radiation oncology will certainly find an important role in the management of oligometastasis. The treatment spectrum will also be widened by the rational integration of modern systemic targeted or immune therapies into multimodal treatment strategies. All these developments will require a concise rethinking of clinical trial design. This article reviews the current status and the potential developments in the field of radiation oncology as discussed by a panel of European and international experts sharing their vision during the "X-Change" symposium, held in July 2019 in Munich (Germany).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefanie Corradini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
| | - Maximilian Niyazi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Dirk Verellen
- Department of Radiotherapy, Iridium Network, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Vincenzo Valentini
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Hematology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A.Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica S. Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Anca-L Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center, Medical Faculty, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Kirsten Lauber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Amato Giaccia
- Division of Radiation and Cancer Biology, Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, USA
| | - Kristian Unger
- Integrative Biology Group, Helmholtz Zentrum Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Bradley R Pieters
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Matthias Guckenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Suresh Senan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Wilfried Budach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Roland Rad
- Center for Translational Cancer Research (TranslaTUM), TU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Julia Mayerle
- Department of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital, LMU, Munich, Germany
| | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Li M, Liu Y, Meng Y, Zhu Y. AHNAK Nucleoprotein 2 Performs a Promoting Role in the Proliferation and Migration of Uveal Melanoma Cells. Cancer Biother Radiopharm 2019; 34:626-633. [PMID: 31621397 DOI: 10.1089/cbr.2019.2778] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
AHNAK nucleoprotein 2 (AHNAK2) is supposed to participate in calcium signaling and cytoarchitecture by directly interacting with some proteins. Recently, it was identified as a novel candidate oncogene in human tumors. The author's present study aimed to investigate the expression and biological function of AHNAK2 in uveal melanoma (UM). Based on microarray data of 63 UM patients that were downloaded from Gene Expression Omnibus database, the authors found that AHNAK2 expression is higher in UM primary tumor tissues from patients who developed metastases after enucleation than that in UM primary tumor tissues from patients without metastasis after enucleation. On the basis of the data obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas database, they found that high AHNAK2 expression is closely associated with shorter overall survival time in UM patients. From quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction analyses, they revealed that the mRNA expression level of AHNAK2 was significantly upregulated in M17 and SP6.5 cell lines compared with that in D78. Functionally, knockdown of AHNAK2 using small interfering RNA in M17 and SP6.5 cells dramatically suppressed cell proliferation, migratory and invasive abilities, as well as inhibited the activation of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) signaling pathway. Taken together, their results illustrated that AHNAK2 was upregulated in UM and plays a promoting role in the proliferation and migration of UM cells possibly via regulating PI3K signaling pathway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mengyun Li
- Department of Ophthalmology, Yidu Central Hospital of Weifang, Qingzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Yanchen Liu
- Department of Ophthalmology, Yidu Central Hospital of Weifang, Qingzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Yanling Meng
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Vascular Surgery, Yidu Central Hospital of Weifang, Qingzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Yan Zhu
- Department of Ophthalmology, The Affiliated Hospital of Weifang Medical University, Weifang, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Callaghan CM, Adams Q, Flynn RT, Wu X, Xu W, Kim Y. Systematic Review of Intensity-Modulated Brachytherapy (IMBT): Static and Dynamic Techniques. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2019; 105:206-221. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.04.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2018] [Revised: 03/27/2019] [Accepted: 04/11/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
|
7
|
Zehn Jahre multimodale Therapie uvealer Melanome an der Universitätsaugenklinik Innsbruck. SPEKTRUM DER AUGENHEILKUNDE 2019. [DOI: 10.1007/s00717-019-0422-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
|