Effects of botulinum toxin type A on the treatment of dry eye disease and tear cytokines

Is Botulinum toxin A effective in treating dry eye disease? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Dry eye disease (DED) is a complex condition characterized by tear film instability, inflammation, and neurosensory abnormalities. The efficacy of Botulinum toxin A (BTX-A) in treating DED is unknown. A systematic search was conducted across PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase databases for studies published until December 2024. Inclusion criteria encompassed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-RCTs examining BTX-A's effects on DED, with TBUT, Schirmer test scores, tear meniscus height (TMH), and OSDI as primary outcomes. Data were synthesized using fixed and random-effects models, accounting for heterogeneity. Fourteen studies (total n = 634 patients) were included. This meta-analysis evaluates the effectiveness of BTX-A in improving outcomes for DED. In 10 studies with 513 participants, BTX-A significantly improved TBUT by 1.79 s (95% CI: 1.48 to 2.10, p < 0.00001), Schirmer test scores by 3.72 mm (95% CI: 3.50 to 3.95, p < 0.00001), and OSDI scores by -7.51 (95% CI: -10.76 to -4.26, p < 0.00001). TMH increased by 0.10 mm (95% CI: 0.08 to 0.11, p < 0.00001). This meta-analysis demonstrates that BTX-A effectively improves clinical outcomes in DED. Post-treatment, TBUT increased by 1.79 s, Schirmer test scores improved by 3.72 mm, OSDI scores decreased by -7.51 points, and TMH increased by 0.10 mm, reflecting enhanced tear stability, production, and symptom relief. These findings support the use of BTX-A in clinical practice as a promising treatment for DED.

The effect of botulinum toxin A on dry eye disease and syndromes

Several innovative treatment modalities for dry eye disease have emerged over the past decade. This systematic review aims to explore botulinum toxin A as a novel treatment modality for dry eye symptoms. PubMed, Cochrane Library, Medline (Ovid), and SCOPUS databases were searched with medical subject headings (MeSH). MeSH terms 'Dry eye' and 'Botulinum Toxin A' were used in combination with one or more of the following phrases 'Disease Management', 'Therapy', or 'prevention'. Following the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses, these studies were evaluated by two independent reviewers for inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria. Subsequently, the included studies were evaluated via Oxford centre for evidence-based medicine level of evidence and the risk of biases were assessed by using the Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews. The subjective and objective measurements of dry eye from the included studies were summarised. Consistent measurements of interest were analysed through the review mananager software. The objective outcome measures were Schirmer's test and tear break-up time, while ocular surface disease index was the subjective measure. Eighteen studies were included, where number of eyes for each assessment ranged from 131 to 241 in the final analysis. The tear break-up time was increased after botulinum toxin A injection, by a standardised mean difference (SSMD) of 1.33 (95% CI 1.12 to 1.54, p < 0.01). Schirmer's test findings were improved by a SSMD of 0.69 (95% CI 0.45 to 0.93, p < 0.01). An improvement in the widely used dry eye questionnaire, Ocular surface disease index, was noted in the scores with a SSMD of -8.72 (95% CI -10.77 to -6.67, p < 0.01). Botulinum toxin A injection has the potential to be a useful treatment for dry eye symptoms. Different methods and locations of botulinum toxin A injections may alter the dry eye treatment response.

Botulinum toxin effects on biochemical biomarkers related to inflammation-associated head and neck chronic conditions: a systematic review of clinical research

Botulinum toxin type A (BoNT) has emerged as a potential alternative to conventional therapies to many debilitating chronic diseases characterised by inflammatory states. However, the biological rationale remains ambiguous. Our review aimed to systematically assessed which biochemical biomarkers have been reported in clinical research to evaluate BoNT analgesic and mood-lifting effects in head and neck chronic conditions related to inflammation. We searched databases and registries between inception and September 29, 2023. Of the nine included studies, there were concerns about risk of bias for six studies. The leading biomarker with five studies was the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), followed by serotonin with two studies. Oxidative stress biomarkers were only reported in one study. Several important players in inflammatory processes and different immune cell classes have been evaluated in four studies. There was only one trial measuring changes in beta Tubulin and SNAP-25, and another study evaluating cutaneous neuropeptide substance-P. After BoNT, a significant effect was reported in six studies, including decrease in plasma levels of CGRP in chronic migraine and trigeminal neuralgia; serotonin decrease when collected from human tears in refractory intractable dry eye disease and increase in peripheral blood platelets in painful cervical dystonia associated to depression and anxiety; decrease in plasma concentration of markers of oxidative damage to proteins and increase in biomarkers for antioxidant power; decrease in expression of gene sets involved in inflammatory pathways and immune cells classes in the periosteum and metalloproteinase-9 molecule in the tears. BoNT seems to affect some biomarkers present in chronic inflammatory conditions. However, the certainty evidence found was very low to moderate. This study is registered on PROSPERO (CRD42023432131).

Epidemiology and Risk Factors of Dry Eye Disease: Considerations for Clinical Management

Dry eye disease is a multifactorial condition characterised by tear film instability, hyperosmolarity and ocular surface inflammation. Understanding the epidemiology of dry eye disease and recognising both modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors can assist eye care practitioners in assessing, treating, and managing patients with the condition. This review considers current knowledge surrounding its incidence and prevalence, as well as associated demographic, systemic, ocular, and iatrogenic, and lifestyle-related modifiable risk factors. Population-based prevalence estimates vary according to the diagnostic criteria used to define dry eye disease, as well as severity and demographic characteristics of the population. Considering recent data and variable population demographics, conservative prevalence estimates suggest that 10-20% of the population over 40 years of age report moderate to severe symptoms and/or seek treatment for dry eye disease. Individuals with specific non-modifiable demographic risk factors may be at increased risk of developing dry eye disease. Advanced age, female sex and East Asian ethnicity have been identified as key non-modifiable demographic features predisposing individuals to dry eye disease. Systemic conditions that have been associated with an increased risk of dry eye disease include migraine, Sjögren syndrome, connective tissue disorders, mental health disorders, diabetes mellitus and androgen deficiency. Medications that may contribute to this risk include antidepressants, antihistamines, and hormone replacement therapy. Ocular and iatrogenic risk factors of dry eye disease include blepharitis, Demodex infestation, ocular surgery, blink completeness, contact lens wear, and topical ophthalmic medications. A range of modifiable lifestyle factors that can increase the risk of dry eye disease have also been identified, including low humidity environments, digital screen use, quality of sleep, diet, and eye cosmetic wear. Dry eye is a common disease affecting millions globally. Increasing knowledge regarding its associated risk factors can better prepare the eye care practitioner to successfully manage patients with this ocular surface disease.

Real-World Large Sample Assessment of Drug-related Dry Eye Risk: Based on the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System Database

PURPOSE AND DESIGN

This study aimed to evaluate the risk of drug-related dry eye using real-world data, underscoring the significance of tracing pharmacological etiology for distinct clinical types of dry eye.

METHODS

Analyzing adverse event reports in the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) from January 2004 to September 2023, we employed disproportionality analysis and the Bayesian confidence propagation neural network algorithm. The analysis involved categorizing drugs causing dry eye, assessing risk levels, and conducting segmental assessments based on the time of onset of drug-related dry eye adverse reactions.

RESULTS

In the FAERS database, adverse reactions related to dry eye were linked to 1160 drugs. Disproportionality analysis identified 33 drugs with significant risk, notably in ophthalmic (brimonidine, bimatoprost), oncology (tisotumab vedotin, erdafitinib), and other medications (isotretinoin, oxymetazoline). The top three drugs with the highest risk of drug-related dry eye are isotretinoin (Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN) = 6.88), tisotumab vedotin (BCPNN = 6.88), and brimonidine (BCPNN = 6.77). Among different categories of drugs, respiratory medications have the shortest mean onset time for drug-related dry eye, averaging 50.99 days. The prevalence skewed towards females (69.9 %), particularly in menopausal and elderly individuals (45-70 years old, mean age 54.7 ± 18.2). Reports of drug-related dry eye adverse reactions showed an annual increase.

CONCLUSION

Informed clinical decision-making is crucial for preventing drug-related dry eye. Assessing the risk of dry eyes associated with both local and systemic medications helps optimize treatment and provide necessary cautionary information.

Surgical Procedures in the Treatment of Dry Eye Disease

Dry eye disease (DED) is a multifactorial disease affecting 5% to 50% in different populations. The most severe cases of DED are often caused by aqueous deficient dry eye disease (ADDE) due to lacrimal gland (LG) hypofunction. Many patients with severe ADDE do not experience adequate symptom relief from topical treatment, severely reducing their quality of life. The focus of this review is to describe the surgical interventions presently being used or investigated when topical treatment with eye drops is insufficient. The conventional surgical approach is to proceed to punctal occlusion or partial or total tarsorrhaphy. However, novel surgical procedures have been reported to have higher efficacy and patient satisfaction than conventional treatments. These procedures include amniotic membrane transplantation, transposition or transplantation of the salivary glands, and cell-based injections into the LG, each with strengths and weaknesses. Further development of these treatment modalities might prove pivotal in treating dry eye patients in the future.

Update on Dry Eye Disease Treatment: Evidence From Randomized Controlled Trials

ABSTRACT

Although the ultimate goal of dry eye disease (DED) management is to restore the ocular surface and tear film homeostasis and address any accompanying symptoms, addressing this is not an easy task. Despite the wide range of current treatment modalities targeting multiple aspects of DED, the available DED management literature is quite heterogeneous, rendering evaluation or comparison of treatment outcomes hard or almost impossible. There is still a shortage of well-designed, large-scale, nonsponsored, randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating long-term safety and efficacy of many targeted therapies individually or used in combination, in the treatment of identified subgroups of patients with DED. This review focuses on the treatment modalities in DED management and aims to reveal the current evidence available as deduced from the outcomes of RCTs.

TFOS Lifestyle: Impact of elective medications and procedures on the ocular surface

The word "elective" refers to medications and procedures undertaken by choice or with a lower grade of prioritization. Patients usually use elective medications or undergo elective procedures to treat pathologic conditions or for cosmetic enhancement, impacting their lifestyle positively and, thus, improving their quality of life. However, those interventions can affect the homeostasis of the tear film and ocular surface. Consequently, they generate signs and symptoms that could impair the patient's quality of life. This report describes the impact of elective topical and systemic medications and procedures on the ocular surface and the underlying mechanisms. Moreover, elective procedures performed for ocular diseases, cosmetic enhancement, and non-ophthalmic interventions, such as radiotherapy and bariatric surgery, are discussed. The report also evaluates significant anatomical and biological consequences of non-urgent interventions to the ocular surface, such as neuropathic and neurotrophic keratopathies. Besides that, it provides an overview of the prophylaxis and management of pathological conditions resulting from the studied interventions and suggests areas for future research. The report also contains a systematic review investigating the quality of life among people who have undergone small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE). Overall, SMILE refractive surgery seems to cause more vision disturbances than LASIK in the first month post-surgery, but less dry eye symptoms in long-term follow up.

TFOS Lifestyle: Impact of cosmetics on the ocular surface

In this report the use of eye cosmetic products and procedures and how this represents a lifestyle challenge that may exacerbate or promote the development of ocular surface and adnexal disease is discussed. Multiple aspects of eye cosmetics are addressed, including their history and market value, psychological and social impacts, possible problems associated with cosmetic ingredients, products, and procedures, and regulations for eye cosmetic use. In addition, a systematic review that critically appraises randomized controlled trial evidence concerning the ocular effects of eyelash growth products is included. The findings of this systematic review highlight the evidence gaps and indicate future directions for research to focus on ocular surface outcomes associated with eyelash growth products.

Botulinum Neurotoxin Type a Injection Combined with Absorbable Punctal Plug Insertion: An Effective Therapy for Blepharospasm Patients with Dry Eye

Blepharospasm patients often have dry eye manifestations. Botulinum neurotoxin type A (BoNT-A) injection has been the main management for blepharospasm and absorbable punctal plug (APP) insertion is shown to be effective in the treatment of dry eye. However, there have been no studies investigating the combined treatment of BoNT-A and APP in blepharospasm patients with dry eye. In this retrospective study, 17 blepharospasm patients with dry eye treated by BoNT-A injection and 12 receiving BoNT-A plus APP treatment were enrolled. The efficacy was evaluated according to the Jankovic rating scale, Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI), fluorescein staining (FL), fluorescein tear break-up time (FBUT) and Schirmer I test (SIT). Both BoNT-A and BoNT-A+APP treatment effectively reduced the functional impairment of blepharospasm. At baseline, all the patients had high OSDI scores (BoNT-A group: 82.48 ± 7.37, BoNT-A+APP group: 78.82 ± 4.60, p = 0.112), but relatively low degrees of FL (BoNT-A group: 3.18 ± 1.01, BoNT-A+APP group: 3.50 ± 1.24, p = 0.466), FBUT (BoNT-A group: 1.71 ± 0.77, BoNT-A+APP group: 2.17 ± 0.58, p = 0.077) and SIT (BoNT-A group: 2.53 ± 0.99, BoNT-A+APP group: 3.17 ± 1.23, p = 0.153). After treatment, OSDI, FL, FBUT and SIT were all obviously restored in the two groups. When comparing the changing rates, only OSDI (BoNT-A group: -52.23% ± 15.57%, BoNT-A+APP group: -61.84% ± 9.10%, p = 0.047) and FL (BoNT-A group: -22.55% ± 25.98%, BoNT-A+APP group: -41.94% ± 14.46%, p = 0.016) showed significant differences between the two groups. This study suggests that OSDI is not applicable in the diagnosis of dry eye among blepharospasm patients. For blepharospasm patients with severe dry eye symptoms, especially those with fluorescein staining in the cornea, the combined treatment of BoNT-A and APP is more effective than using BoNT-A alone.

Placebo administration for dry eye disease: a level I evidence based systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

The efficacy of various common treatment options for dry eye disease (DED) has been investigated against placebo. However, the potential beneficial effect of placebo in the management of DED is still unclear.

Aim

This meta-analysis investigated the impact of placebo administration in DED in Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI), Schirmer I test (SIT), tear breakup time (TBUT), corneal staining, and complications.

Method

This meta-analysis and systematic review was conducted according to the 2020 PRISMA guidelines. In March 2022, Pubmed, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Embase were accessed. All the randomised clinical trials which investigated any active treatment against a placebo control group were considered. The following data were extracted at baseline and at last follow-up: Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI), tear breakup time test (TBUT), Schirmer I test (SIT), corneal staining.

Results

Data from 56 studies (12,205 patients) were retrieved. Placebo administration is not effective in improving TBUT (P = 0.3), OSDI (P = 0.2), SIT (P = 0.1) and corneal staining (P = 0.1) from baseline to last follow-up. Active treatment led to a higher TBUT and SIT compared to placebo administration (P < 0.0001). The active treatment resulted in a lower OSDI compared to placebo administration (P = 0.0005). Five studies reported data on the corneal staining. No difference was found between placebo administration and active treatment (P = 0.8).

Conclusion

Placebo administration does not impact symptoms of DED and can be successfully employed to evaluate the efficacy of active treatments.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11096-022-01439-y.

Complications and Adverse Effects of Periocular Aesthetic Treatments

The popularity and variety of temporary and permanent periocular aesthetic treatments has increased over the past decade. Patients frequently present to eye clinics with ocular complications and side effects following these treatments, their severity ranging from ocular irritation from dry eyes to visual loss from vascular occlusion. A careful, thorough history is essential, as many patients may not associate aesthetic procedures with ocular complications, and some may be embarrassed to disclose this information. All ophthalmologists should understand the potential ocular sequelae of these treatments and be able to initiate treatment in sight-threatening cases. Wesummarises the current literature on ophthalmic complications of the most common periocular aesthetic treatments.

Botulinum Toxin A Injection for the Treatment of Intractable Dry Eye Disease

Background and Objectives: To evaluate the clinical efficacy of periocular botulinum toxin A (BTA) injection in patients with intractable dry eye disease (DED). Materials and Methods: Medical records of patients with intractable DED who underwent periocular BTA injection from December 2019 to March 2020 were reviewed retrospectively. Patients were injected with 2.5 units of BTA in the medial part of the lower eyelids. The clinical data collected included age, sex, ocular surface disease index (OSDI) score, tear film break up time (TBUT), Schirmer test results, tear osmolarity (I-PEN), and tear meniscus height (TMH) measured by anterior segment optical coherence tomography. All subjective and objective data were collected before treatment and at 1 month after treatment. Results: Twenty-eight consecutive patients were eligible for chart review and analysis. Significant improvements in OSDI, tear osmolarity, and TMH were observed at 1 month after periorbital BTA injection. At the baseline and 1-month follow-up examinations, OSDI scores were 62.22 ± 21.30 and 47.98 ± 17.23, respectively (p < 0.001). TMH increased significantly after treatment (82.25 ± 40.50 at baseline vs. 138.02 ± 66.62 1-month after treatment; p < 0.001). Tear osmolarity using I-PEN showed a significant decrease after treatment (320.82 ± 24.66 at baseline vs. 302.75 ± 22.33 at 1 month after treatment; p < 0.001). No significant differences were found in TBUT or Schirmer test results before and after BTA injection. Conclusions: BTA injection into the medial part of the eyelid improves dry eye symptoms, the amount of tear retention, and tear osmolarity. Based on the objective parameters of the tear condition, this study supports the idea of BTA use as a potential treatment option for patients with intractable DED.