Impact of DMEK on visual quality in patients with Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy

Comparison of Pre- and Post-DMEK Keratometry and Total Keratometry Values for IOL Power Calculations in Eyes Undergoing Triple DMEK

PURPOSE

To evaluate prediction accuracy of pre- and post-DMEK keratometry (K) and total keratometry (TK) values for IOL power calculations in Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) eyes undergoing DMEK with cataract surgery (triple DMEK).

METHODS

Retrospective cross-sectional multicenter study of 55 FECD eyes (44 patients) that underwent triple DMEK between 2019 and 2022 between two centers in USA and Europe. Swept-source optical coherence tomography biometry (IOLMaster 700) was used for pre- and post-DMEK measurements. K and TK values were used for power calculations with ten formulae (Barrett Universal II (BUII), Castrop, Cooke K6, EVO 2.0, Haigis, Hoffer Q, Hoffer QST, Holladay I, Kane, and SRK/T). Mean error, mean absolute error (MAE), standard deviation, and percentage of eyes within ±0.50/±1.00 diopters (D) were calculated. Studied formulae were additionally adjusted using a method published previously (IOLup1D Method), which increases the IOL power by 1D. While both eyes from the same patient were considered for descriptive statistics, we restricted to one eye per individual (44 eyes for statistical comparisons.

RESULTS

MAEs for all formulae were lower for post-DMEK K and TK than pre-DMEK K and TK by an average of 0.24 and 0.47 D, respectively. The lowest MAE was 0.49 D for Kane using post-DMEK TK, and the highest MAE was 1.05 D for BUII using pre-DMEK TK. Most IOLup1D formulae had lower MAEs than pre-DMEK K and TK formulae.

CONCLUSIONS

The IOLup1D Method should be used instead of pre-DMEK K and TK values for triple DMEK in FECD eyes. Using post-DMEK TK values for cataract surgery after DMEK provides better refractive accuracy than any of the three studied methods used for triple DMEK procedures.

Differences in Guttae Ultramorphology in Relation to Visual Function in Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the differences in guttae ultramorphology and their relation to visual function in eyes with Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD).

METHODS

Thirty FECD eyes without ocular comorbidities were included. Visual functional parameters (best-corrected visual acuity with high-contrast and low-contrast letters and contrast sensitivity/LogCS) and corneal morphology measured with Scheimpflug tomography (Pentacam) were assessed. The surgically removed Descemet membranes were examined by light and transmission electron microscopy.

RESULTS

Preoperative mean best-corrected visual acuity (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution) was 0.52 ± 0.18, LogCS 0.96 ± 0.21 and central corneal thickness 640 ± 55 μm. All eyes had signs of subclinical corneal edema in Scheimpflug tomography; clinically visible corneal edema was present in 40% of eyes. Histological findings included a posterior fibrillar zone (PFZ) in 10 specimens (33%) and abnormal collagen depositions in Descemet membranes in 14 specimens (47%). Guttae buried within the PFZ were present only in eyes with clinically visible edema (n = 4, 13%). There was no difference in visual function results and tomography parameters between eyes with and without PFZ or between protruding guttae and guttae embedded in a PFZ, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Guttae morphology and density were not correlated with visual functional parameters. Guttae buried in a PFZ occurred only in eyes with clinically manifest edema, and thereby, they are an ultramorphological sign for advanced FECD. Subclinical edema was present in all eyes and might be more relevant for quality of vision than guttae ultramorphology.

Preloaded DMEK With Endothelium Outward: A Multicenter Clinical Study Using DMEK Rapid Device

PURPOSE

The objective of this study is to validate Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) Rapid device for preloading DMEK grafts with endothelium outward.

METHODS

In this multicenter retrospective clinical study, DMEK tissues (n = 27) were peeled and preloaded (8.25 mm) in a DMEK Rapid device. The device was loaded in a container prefilled with the storage solution and shipped from a single center in Italy to 4 different centers located in Italy and the United Kingdom. Preloaded tissues were delivered by injecting the graft in the anterior chamber. Patients were monitored at days 1 and 15 and at months 1, 3, and 6, as well as at the last follow-up (9-12 months) postoperatively. Main outcome measures included rebubbling rate and graft failure, corrected distance visual acuity, endothelial cell loss (ECL), and central corneal thickness at all time points. A one-way analysis of variance test comparing day 1 with all later time points was followed with significance at P < 0.05.

RESULTS

The average recorded surgical time was 6 to 25 minutes with no immediate surgical complications. Rebubbling was observed in 7 of 26 cases with one graft failure within 15 days postoperatively. The mean corrected distance visual acuity at day 1 was 0.64 ± 0.49 logMAR, which improved to 0.18 ± 0.43 logMAR at the last follow-up. Endothelial cell density values showed a significant decrease at the last follow-up (1827 ± 565 cells/mm 2 ) ( P < 0.001) compared with the preoperative value (2503 ± 128 cells/mm 2 ), with an average endothelial cell loss of 27%. Central corneal thickness significantly dropped from 694 ± 157 μm at day 1 to 502 ± 42 μm at the last follow-up ( P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

DMEK Rapid device is quick, easy, and efficient for preloading and shipping DMEK grafts internationally in endothelium-outward orientation.

Standard vs total keratometry for intraocular lens power calculation in cataract surgery combined with DMEK

PURPOSE

To compare the prediction accuracy of standard keratometry (K) and total keratometry (TK) for intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation in eyes undergoing combined cataract surgery and Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (triple DMEK).

SETTING

Tertiary care academic referral center.

DESIGN

Retrospective case series.

METHODS

Review of 83 eyes (63 patients) that underwent triple DMEK between 2019 and 2021. Biometry measurements were obtained using a swept-source optical biometer (IOLMaster 700). 63 eyes were used for statistical analysis. Mean error, mean absolute error (MAE), SD, median absolute error, maximum absolute error, root mean squared prediction error, and the percentage of eyes within prediction errors of ±0.50 diopters (D) and ±1.00 D were calculated for 9 multivariate and third-generation formulas using K and TK values (Barrett Universal II, Yeo EVO 2.0, Cooke K6, Kane, Pearl-DGS, Haigis, Holladay 1, Hoffer Q, and SRK/T). Formulas were additionally tested by using the prediction for an IOL power 1 D below the IOL used (IOLup1D).

RESULTS

For all formulas, MAE was lower for K than for TK by an average of 0.21 D. The lowest MAE value observed was 0.67 D for "adjusted" SRK/T using K, and the highest MAE values observed were 1.24 D and 1.24 D for nonadjusted Hoffer Q and Haigis using TK, respectively. Overall, lower MAE values were observed for multivariate formulas and SRK/T.

CONCLUSIONS

In triple DMEK eyes, the prediction accuracy of K was higher than that of TK. The most accurate formulas were SRK/T and multivariate formulas using K with the IOLup1D adjustment.