Adventitial sheathotomy for decompression of recent onset branch retinal vein occlusion

The Efficacy of Intravitreal Triamcinolone Acetonide on Macular Edema in Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effectiveness of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide as primary treatment of macular edema in branch retinal vein occlusion.

METHODS

Fifteen eyes of 15 patients with macular edema due to branch retinal vein occlusion (Group 1) who received 8 mg/0.2 ml of intravitreal triamcinolone injection as primary treatment were retrospectively evaluated. The control group (Group 2) consisted of 19 eyes of 19 patients who had received laser treatment for macular edema. The main outcome measures included best-corrected visual acuity, intraocular pressure, and macular edema map values of Heidelberg Retinal Tomograph II.

RESULTS

In Group 1, mean visual acuity improved significantly from a mean logMAR (logarithm of minimal angle of resolution) value of 0.98+/-0.19 at baseline to a maximum of 0.24+/-0.24 during a mean follow-up time of 6.3 months. In the control group, the mean baseline log-MAR visual acuity before laser treatment was 1.02+/-0.22, and it was 0.50+/-0.28 at 6-month examinations. Mean improvement in visual acuity at 1-, 3-, and 6-month examinations was significantly higher in Group 1 when compared with the control group (for each, p<0.001). The mean edema map value of Group 1 significantly decreased by 40% at 6-month examinations when compared with preinjection value (p<0.001). In Group 1, mean increase in intraocular pressure elevation was 19.8% at the 1-month, 26.9% at 3-month, and 5.7% at 6-month visits, but intraocular pressures were under control with topical antiglaucomatous medications.

CONCLUSIONS

Intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection may be a new and promising approach as initial therapy for macular edema due to branch retinal vein occlusion.

Comparative Study of Vitrectomy with and without Vein Decompression for Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion: A Pilot Study

Purpose

To report the clinical outcomes in patients undergoing pars plana vitrectomy with and without vein decompression for treatment of branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO).

METHODS

Thirty-five eyes with macular edema and visual acuity worse than 20/100 secondary to BRVO were prospectively evaluated. Vitrectomy with posterior hyaloid removal and vein decompression at the arteriovenous crossing was performed on 15 eyes (Group 1); consecutively, the same technique without vein decompression was performed on 20 eyes (Group 2). Primary outcome was visual acuity and secondary outcomes were resolution of macular edema and development of neovascularization.

Results

No differences were found between groups in either patient age (p=0.566) or preoperative visual acuity (p=0.505). No differences were found in visual acuity at 3 (p=0.651), 6 (p =0.697), 9 (p =0.763), 12 (p=0.881), or 18 (p=0.748) months. Mean time for macular edema resolution and visual acuity improvement was 9 months in both groups, with a mean improvement of 3.5 ± 2.35 lines in Group 1 and 3.2 ± 2.97 lines in Group 2. No eyes in either group developed new vessels.

CONCLUSIONS

Results suggest that vitrectomy with posterior hyaloid removal without vein decompression can resolve macular edema, improve vision, and prevent development of new vessels in BRVO.

Matched control study of visual outcomes after arteriovenous sheathotomy for branch retinal vein occlusion

Background

The purpose of this study was to evaluate visual outcomes of arteriovenous sheathotomy for macular edema due to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO).

Methods

The medical records of 45 eyes from 45 patients who had undergone vitrectomy surgery with arteriovenous sheathotomy for BRVO were studied. Forty-five eyes of 45 patients with a BRVO but without intervention were studied as the control group. The best-corrected visual acuity and central macular thickness were compared between the two groups at baseline and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively.

Results

Improvement of best-corrected visual acuity was 0.42 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) units in the sheathotomy group and 0.22 logMAR units in the control group (P=0.007). The mean postoperative central macular thickness was significantly thinner in the sheathotomy group at 1 month (P=0.01), but not at 3, 6, and 12 months (P=0.75, P=0.81, and P=0.46, respectively). Improvement of best-corrected visual acuity at 12 months was significantly correlated with baseline best-corrected visual acuity, age, duration of symptoms, and sheathotomy (P<0.05).

Conclusion

Arteriovenous sheathotomy for BRVO improves best-corrected visual acuity significantly more than the natural course of the BRVO disease process.

Branch retinal vein occlusion: treatment modalities: an update of the literature

BACKGROUND

Retinal vein occlusion is the second most common retinal vascular disorder after diabetic retinopathy and is considered to be an important cause of visual loss. In this review, our purpose is to update the literature about the treatment alternatives for branch retinal vein occlusion.

METHODS

Eligible papers were identified by a comprehensive literature search of PubMed, using the terms "branch retinal vein occlusion," "therapy," "intervention," "treatment," "vitrectomy," "sheathotomy," "laser," "anti-VEGF," "pegaptanib," "bevacizumab," "ranibizumab," "triamcinolone," "dexamethasone," "corticosteroids," "non-steroids," "diclofenac," "hemodilution," "fibrinolysis," "tPA," and "BRVO." Additional papers were also selected from reference lists of papers identified by the electronic database search.

RESULTS

Treatment modalities were analyzed.

CONCLUSIONS

There are several treatment modalities for branch retinal vein occlusion and specifically for its complications, such as macular edema, vitreous hemorrhage, retinal neovascularization, and retinal detachment, including anti-aggregative therapy and fibrinolysis, isovolemic hemodilution, vitrectomy with or without sheathotomy, peripheral scatter and macular grid retinal laser therapy, non-steroid agents, intravitreal steroids, and intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factors (anti-VEGFs).

Retinal vein occlusion: beyond the acute event

Retinal vein occlusion is a major cause of vision loss. We provide an overview of the clinical features, pathogenesis, natural history, and management of both branch retinal vein occlusion and central retinal vein occlusion. Several recent multicenter randomized clinical trials have been completed which have changed the approach to this disorder. Management of retinal vein occlusions can be directed at the underlying etiology or the resulting sequelae. Options include surgical intervention, laser photocoagulation, intravitreal pharmacotherapy, and sustained drug delivery devices.

Arteriovenous crossing sheathotomy versus intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection for treatment of macular edema associated with branch retinal vein occlusion

PURPOSE

To compare the functional and anatomical outcomes of arteriovenous (AV) sheathotomy and intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (IVTA) injection in the treatment of macular edema associated with branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO).

METHODS

Forty eyes of 40 patients with macular edema secondary to BRVO were randomized into two treatment groups. A total of 20 patients received AV sheathotomy (sheathotomy group), and the second group of 20 patients was treated with IVTA (IVTA group). Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity (VA) score, total macular volume measured, and foveal thickness by 3rd generation optical coherence tomography (OCT3) were evaluated as main outcome measurements.

RESULTS

The average changes in ETDRS scores, total macular volumes, and foveal thicknesses compared to baseline values, were significant 3 months and 6 months after treatment in both groups (P < 0.05, paired t-test), but only the IVTA group showed significant improvements 1 month after treatment. The between-group differences in average ETDRS score, total macular volume, and foveal thickness changes were significantly better at 1 month after treatment in the ITVA group (P = 0.026, P < 0.001, P = 0.001, respectively, Student's t-test), at which time IVTA patients had better vision and anatomical outcomes than did those in the sheathotomy group.

CONCLUSIONS

After either AV sheathotomy or IVTA treatment, patients with macular edema secondary to BRVO showed similar functional and anatomical outcomes 6 months later. When the cost and the risks of vitreoretinal surgery are considered, IVTA treatment may be a better treatment option, as the drug yields better short-term outcomes.

Sheathotomy in complicated cases of branch retinal vein occlusion

PURPOSE

To report the clinical experience and results of using a microsurgical technique to decompress the arteriovenous connection in complicated branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) combined with haemorrhage, oedema and ischaemia.

METHODS

We carried out a retrospective, non-randomized, interventional case study of the surgical sheathotomy decompression procedure. We enrolled 12 patients (seven women, five men; median age 64 years) with BRVO and decreased visual acuity (VA) caused by haemorrhage, oedema and ischaemia. The mean duration of thrombosis was 7 months (2-15 months). The patients were examined for pre- and postoperative best corrected VA (BCVA), intraocular pressure (IOP) and fundus photography. Ten patients were examined with fluorescein angiography and eight with ocular coherence tomography (OCT). Postoperative progression of cataract was recorded, as were other complications. The mean follow-up time was 20 months (8-39 months).

RESULTS

Best corrected VA had improved in nine patients, was unchanged in one patient and had deteriorated in two patients at the last follow-up. Noted complications were venous haemorrhage at surgery in five patients, retinal detachment in one patient and progression of cataract in four patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Microsurgical treatment with sheathotomy of BRVO is a technically feasible procedure with few complications. Postoperative increased reperfusion could explain the resolution of macular haemorrhage, oedema and ischaemia, and may improve visual function in patients with this common vascular eye disease.

Branch retinal vein occlusion: pathogenesis, visual prognosis, and treatment modalities

In branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO), abnormal arteriovenous crossing with vein compression, degenerative changes of the vessel wall and abnormal hematological factors constitute the primary mechanism of vessel occlusion. In general, BRVO has a good prognosis: 50-60% of eyes are reported to have a final visual acuity (VA) of 20/40 or better even without treatment. One important prognostic factor for final VA appears to be the initial VA. Grid laser photocoagulation is an established treatment for macular edema in a particular group of patients with BRVO, while promising results for this condition are shown by intravitreal application of steroids or new vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors. Vitrectomy with or without arteriovenous sheathotomy combined with removal of the internal limiting membrane may improve vision in eyes with macular edema which are unresponsive to or ineligible for laser treatment.

Arteriovenous sheathotomy for persistent macular edema in branch retinal vein occlusion

Purpose

To evaluate the efficacy of arteriovenous (AV) sheathotomy with internal limiting membrane peeling for persistent or recurrent macular edema after intravitreal triamcinolone injection and/or laser photocoagulation in branch retinal vein occlusion.

Methods

Twenty-two eyes with branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) with recurrent macular edema underwent vitrectomy with AV sheathotomy and internal limiting membrane peeling. All eyes had previous intravitreal triamcinolone injection and/or laser photocoagulation for macular edema. The best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), fluorescein angiography and optical coherence tomography (OCT) before and after surgery were compared.

Results

The mean preoperative BCVA (log MAR) were 0.79±0.29 and postoperative BCVA (log MAR) at 3 months was 0.57±0.33. And improvement of visual acuity ≥2 lines was observed in 10 eyes (45%). The mean preoperative fovea thickness measured by OCT was 595.22±76.83 µm (510-737 µm) and postoperative fovea thickness was 217.60±47.33 µm (164-285 µm).

Conclusions

Vitrectomy with AV sheathotomy can be one treatment option for the patients with recurrent macular edema in BRVO.

Long-term outcomes of vitrectomy with or without arteriovenous sheathotomy in branch retinal vein occlusion

PURPOSE

To evaluate the long-term effect of vitrectomy with or without arteriovenous sheathotomy for macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO).

METHODS

The study was a prospective, randomized, comparative, interventional case series of 36 patients (36 eyes) who underwent pars plana vitrectomy with or without arteriovenous sheathotomy for macular edema due to BRVO of <or=8 weeks' duration of symptoms. Eighteen eyes with arteriovenous sheathotomy (sheathotomy group) were compared with 18 eyes without sheathotomy (vitrectomy group). Main outcomes measures were best-corrected visual acuity and central foveal thickness as evaluated by optical coherence tomography.

RESULTS

Baseline demographic characteristics of the groups were similar. Postoperative follow-up period ranged from 12 months to 45 months (31 months). Median best-corrected visual acuity significantly improved from 0.4 at baseline to 1.0 at the final visit in both groups, and there was no significant difference in best-corrected visual acuity at any postoperative period between the groups. Of 16 patients with duration of symptoms of <4 weeks, those with arteriovenous sheathotomy had a tendency toward better visual outcomes than those without arteriovenous sheathotomy (P = 0.064). The central foveal thickness also significantly decreased after surgery in both groups, but the differences were not significant for the two groups at each time point. No patients had severe intraoperative and/or postoperative complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that vitrectomy with or without arteriovenous sheathotomy may improve the long-term functional and tomographic outcomes for patients with macular edema secondary to BRVO. Although additional arteriovenous sheathotomy did not lead to a distinct functional benefit in this series, early surgical intervention may result in better visual outcomes.

Preoperative visual acuity as a prognostic indicator for laser treatment of macular edema due to branch retinal vein occlusion

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

To determine the visual outcome of laser treatments for macular edema due to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) in patients with a preoperative visual acuity (VA) of 20/200 or worse compared to patients with a preoperative VA of better than 20/200.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Records of 88 patients with macular edema secondary to BRVO undergoing laser treatment from 1984 to 2003 were reviewed. Mean VA was measured before and after each treatment and after the final treatment.

RESULTS

All patients received between one and five laser treatments. Preoperative VA was better than 20/200 in 56 patients (group 1) and 20/200 or worse in 32 patients (group 2). Patients in group 1 had a mean improvement of 0.48 lines and 57% had a final VA of 20/40 or better. Patients in group 2 had a mean improvement of 1.69 lines and 20% had a final VA of 20/40 or better.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with poor VA (20/200 or worse) secondary to macular edema due to BRVO responded positively to laser treatment. The level of preoperative VA can be a useful predictor of visual outcome. These patients should consider laser treatment before alternative, more aggressive approaches.

Arteriovenous adventitial sheathotomy for branch retinal vein occlusion: report of a case with longterm follow-up

PURPOSE

To report the longterm follow-up of a case of branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) treated with vitrectomy and adventitial sheathotomy.

METHODS

A three-port vitrectomy was performed in a 55-year-old man with symptoms of BRVO of about 3 months' duration. After a core vitrectomy, the adventitial sheath of the affected arteriovenous crossing was dissected so that the anterior surface of the arteriole was freely exposed.

RESULTS

On the second postoperative day, visual acuity (VA) in the affected left eye had increased from preoperative 0.3 to 0.6. Within 6 months the fundus had almost normalized and vision improved to 1.0. Cataract surgery was performed about 2 years after the vitrectomy. At a follow-up 4 years and 11 months after the sheathotomy, VA was 1.0 and no signs of recurrence were seen.

CONCLUSIONS

Adventitial sheathotomy may improve vision in selected cases of BRVO. Further studies are necessary to determine the role of sheathotomy in the management of cases with BRVO.

Evaluation of arteriovenous crossing sheathotomy for decompression of branch retinal vein occlusion

PURPOSE

To report the effects of arteriovenous adventitial sheathotomy on anatomical and functional improvements in patients with macular oedema due to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO).

METHODS

Pars plana vitrectomy and arteriovenous sheathotomy was performed on 11 patients with BRVO who had vision loss due to macular oedema. Ten patients with macular oedema due to BRVO and who have been treated with grid laser photocoagulation were included in the control group. The measurement of visual acuity with ETDRS chart was taken preoperatively and at 1, 3, 6, and 9 months follow-up in the study group and at 1, 3, 6, and 9 months after grid laser in the control group.

RESULTS

The mean preoperative logMAR visual acuity was 0.84+/-0.3 in the surgical group and 1.06+/-0.4 in the control group. The postoperative mean logMAR visual acuity was 0.41+/-0.2, 0.40+/-0.2, 0.40+/-0.3, and 0.36+/-0.3 at 1, 3, 6, and 9 months follow-up, respectively. In the control group the postlaser mean logMAR visual acuity was 0.92+/-0.3, 0.87+/-0.4, 0.85+/-0.3, and 0.82+/-0.3 at 1, 3, 6, and 9 months follow-up, respectively. The improvements of visual acuity in both groups were statistically significant when compared to pretreatment (P=0.003 and P=0.007 at 9 months in the study and control group, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Arteriovenous sheathotomy for decompression of BRVO in patients who have vision loss due to macular oedema was safe and effective for anatomical and functional improvement and resulted in significantly better visual outcomes than a matched control group of laser-treated eyes.

The management of retinal vein occlusion: is interventional ophthalmology the way forward?

Retinal vein occlusions (RVO) are the second commonest sight threatening vascular disorder. Despite its frequency treatments for RVO are unsatisfactory and include several that have not been tested by large, well designed, prospective, randomised controlled trials. There is also the lack of long term follow up in many of the available small uncontrolled studies, and the timings of interventions are haphazard. This review aims to evaluate the current knowledge relating to the pathogenesis, suggested treatments for the different types of RVO, and their complications. Isovolaemic haemodilution is of limited benefit and should be avoided in patients with concurrent cardiovascular, renal, or pulmonary morbidity. Evidence to date does not support any therapeutic benefit from radial optic neurotomy, optic nerve decompression, or arteriovenous crossing sheathotomy on its own. Vitrectomy combined with intravenous thrombolysis may offer promise for central RVO. Similarly, vitrectomy combined with arteriovenous sheathotomy intravenous tissue plasminogen activator may offer benefits for branch RVO. RVOs occur at significantly high frequency to allow future prospective randomised controlled studies to be conducted to evaluate the role of different therapeutic modalities singly or in combination.

Arterio-venous dissection after isovolaemic haemodilution in branch retinal vein occlusion: a non-randomised prospective study

PURPOSE

The rationale for this pilot study was to add arterio-venous dissection (AVD) after unsuccessful medical treatment in a well-defined group of patients with branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO).

METHODS

In this prospective, interventional case series 35 consecutive patients with a visual acuity (VA) of 0.4 (logMar) or worse were scheduled for surgery within the first 3 months of the onset of BRVO. The study endpoint was VA 1 year after AVD. Secondary study endpoints were: correlation of VA and successful vessel dissection; complication rate; and number of additional surgical procedures within the first year of AVD.

RESULTS

Preoperative VA (logMar) was 0.82+/-0.05 (range 0.2-1.6). VA 6 weeks postoperatively was 0.54+/-0.06 (range 0-1.6), 3 months postoperatively 0.61+/-0.07 (0-1.56), 6 months postoperatively 0.74+/-0.08 (range 0-2) and 12 months postoperatively 0.55+/-0.07 (range 0.1-1.5). VA improved 1 year after AVD (p=0.0004). An improvement in VA did not depend on successful separation of the artery and the vein. Four patients had a retinal detachment, 19 patients needed cataract surgery within the first year of AVD. A total of 24 additional surgical procedures were needed.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with BRVO may profit from AVD compared with a historical control group. Visual improvement was found irrespective of the successful dissection of vessels. The cataract formation rate and additional surgery was a shortcoming of the AVD procedure.

Transvitreal limited arteriovenous-crossing manipulation without vitrectomy for complicated branch retinal vein occlusion using 25-gauge instrumentation

PURPOSE

To evaluate a new technique, 25-gauge transvitreal limited arteriovenous-crossing manipulation without vitrectomy (LAM), for the treatment of branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) complicated by macular hemorrhage and/or macular edema recalcitrant to grid laser photocoagulation.

METHODS

Twelve eyes of 12 patients underwent LAM for BRVO performed by a single surgeon (M.S.H.) using the 25-gauge nitinol flexible-extendable blunt pick. The presence or absence of intraoperative reperfusion visualization, pre- and postoperative visual acuity, macular thickness as measured by optical coherence tomography, intraocular pressure, and lens status were evaluated.

RESULTS

Restoration of blood flow was noted in all patients and was based on intraoperative reestablishment of a red column of erythrocytes through the previously closed vessel. Mean visual acuity improved from 20/200 (logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution [LogMAR] +/- SD, 1.00 +/- 0.32) preoperatively to 20/70 (LogMAR +/- SD, 0.56 +/- 0.28) (P = 0.0003) at the final visit. Eleven (92%) of 12 eyes had >or=2 lines of visual improvement. Five eyes (45%) had final visual acuity of 20/50 or better. Mean macular thickness +/- SD improved from 401.0 +/- 73.2 to 178.7 +/- 19.6 microm (P < 0.0001) at the final visit. No statistically significant difference was noted in cataract progression or intraocular pressure. Mean follow-up +/- SD was 49.9 +/- 19.6 weeks. All patients were observed for at least 12 weeks.

CONCLUSION

LAM may achieve outcomes comparable with those of arteriovenous adventitial sheathotomy for complicated BRVO.

Effect of arteriovenous sheathotomy on retinal blood flow and macular edema in patients with branch retinal vein occlusion

PURPOSE

To determine the effect of arteriovenous sheathotomy on retinal blood flow (RBF) in eyes with branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO).

DESIGN

Interventional case series.

METHODS

Seven eyes of 7 patients with BRVO underwent sheathotomy and were followed for more than 6 months.

RESULTS

At 1 week postoperatively, the RBF in the affected vessels was significantly improved from 14.1 +/- 5.7 to 27.3 +/- 11.3 pixel(2)/sec (P < 0.01), and the foveal thickness (FT) was significantly reduced from 536 +/- 84 to 366 +/- 134 microm (P = 0.03). However, the RBF was reduced again to 11.7 +/- 7.7 pixel(2)/sec at 1 month postoperatively, and the FT was increased to 424 +/- 184 microm.

CONCLUSIONS

Arteriovenous sheathotomy led to a transient improvement of the RBF and was effective in reducing macular edema. It is not clear whether the transient effect of sheathotomy affects the long-term visual acuity and macular edema.

Multiple laser treatments for macular edema attributable to branch retinal vein occlusion

PURPOSE

To report the visual outcome of multiple laser treatments for macular edema attributable to branch retinal vein occlusions (BRVO) and to determine if any prognostic factors exist for improvement.

DESIGN

Retrospective chart review.

METHODS

A private practice with four vitreoretinal surgeons performed laser treatments on 88 eyes of 88 patients with macular edema secondary to BRVO from 1984 to 2003. Mean preoperative and postoperative visual acuities were collected after each laser treatment. Final visual acuities were also documented.

RESULTS

All 88 patients received at least one laser treatment, and 46 patients of the initial 88 underwent multiple treatments. Overall, forty-one (46.6%) of the total 88 patients improved by 2 or more lines, whereas 33 patients (37.5%) were within 1 line of the preoperative vision, and 14 patients (15.9%) worsened by 2 or more lines. The mean final visual improvement was 0.92 lines for all 88 patients. The group of patients that responded favorably to the first laser treatment (n = 37) showed an overall improvement of 3.5 lines. However, patients who responded poorly to the first laser treatment resulted in an overall worsening of vision by 0.96 lines.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study found that multiple laser treatments can improve visual acuity and resolve macular edema and that each additional laser treatment gives a patient a modest chance of visual improvement. A positive or stable visual response to first laser treatment portends a favorable prognosis with subsequent laser treatments.

Angiographic findings in arteriovenous dissection (sheathotomy) for decompression of branch retinal vein occlusion

BACKGROUND

Arteriovenous dissection (sheathotomy) is a new therapeutic option in patients with branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) and macular involvement. We present an angiographic follow-up of 22 patients who underwent arteriovenous dissection (AVD).

METHODS

Twenty-two patients (15 women; mean age 68.7+/-8.0 years) were examined preoperatively and 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after AVD. For assessment of retinal hemodynamics, arteriovenous passage time (AVP) of the affected and unaffected branches at first (AVPe) and at maximal (AVPmax) venous filling were measured. Changes in the foveal avascular zone (FAZ) were calculated to determine foveal structural changes. Visual acuity was assessed as functional parameter.

RESULTS

The early AVP (AVPe) of the affected branch increased from 4.4+/-0.8 s preoperatively to 4.9+/-0.6 s 6 weeks after surgery and decreased to 2.7+/-0.4 s 1 year after surgery (p=0.05). When compared to the unaffected control branch, AVPe was significantly increased in the affected branch preoperatively (4.5+/-0.8 s versus 1.5+/-0.2 s, p<0.01), 6 weeks (4.9+/-0.6 s versus 2.1+/-0.3 s, p<0.01), 3 months (2.7+/-0.4 s versus 1.5+/-0.2 s, p<0.01), and 6 months (3.1+/-0.4 s versus 2.2+/-0.3 s, p=0.02) after AVD. After 1 year, AVPe no longer differed between the affected and the control branch (2.7+/-0.4 s versus 2.6+/- 0.3 s). AVPmax was significantly increased in the affected branch preoperatively (11.8+/-0.8 s versus 7.7+/-1.0 s, p<0.05). The AVPmax in the affected branch with the exception of 3 months after surgery (10.2+/-1.1 s, p<0.01) was no longer elevated when compared to preoperative values. The area of the FAZ did not change significantly but showed a trend for enlargement.

CONCLUSION

AVD for decompression of BRVO leads to a significant decrease of AVP and may ameliorate retinal perfusion in the affected branch.

Vitrectomy with or without arteriovenous adventitial sheathotomy for macular edema associated with branch retinal vein occlusion

PURPOSE

compare the results of vitrectomy with or without arteriovenous (AV) crossing sheathotomy for macular edema associated with branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO).

DESIGN

Interventional case series.

METHODS

A retrospective study of 36 eyes with BRVO-associated macular edema. Twenty eyes underwent AV sheathotomy (AS group), and 16 eyes underwent posterior vitreous detachment (PVD group). Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), fluorescein angiography (FA), and optical coherence tomography to determine foveal thickness were conducted preoperatively and at 12 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

The mean postoperative BCVAs were significantly better in both the AS and the PVD group (P = .008 and P = .001, respectively). Foveal thickness decreased significantly 1 month after surgery in both groups (P = .002 and P = .007) and continued to decrease up to 12 months. The postoperative mean BCVA and improvement of BCVA and foveal thickness were not significantly different for the two groups at any postoperative period. Postoperative FA showed reperfusion of the occluded vein in 10 eyes in the AS group and 2 eyes in the PVD group, and formation of shunt vessels at the AV crossing site or around the macular region in all of the other eyes of both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Both AV sheathotomy and simple PVD significantly reduced macular edema associated with BRVO. However, there was no significant difference in the improvement of macular function following either procedure. Postoperative improvement of retinal circulation by either reperfusion of the occluded vein or collateral vessel formation was found. This accounted for functional and morphologic improvements.

MANAGEMENT OF MACULAR EDEMA IN BRANCH RETINAL VEIN OCCLUSION WITH SHEATHOTOMY AND RECOMBINANT TISSUE PLASMINOGEN ACTIVATOR

PURPOSE

The common adventitial sheath that surrounds the retinal venule and arteriole at the crossing site plays a crucial role in branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO). The purpose of this study was to report the surgical recanalization of the occluded vein using a bimanual technique and recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) and its effect on final visual acuity.

METHODS

Arteriovenous sheathotomy was performed, using a bimanual technique, followed by fluid-air exchange and injection of 25 mg of recombinant tPA over the area of the occluded vein.

RESULTS

Intraoperative sectioning of the common arteriovenous sheath was achieved in all 40 patients. Thrombus release was observed in 11 cases (27.5%) and was correlated with early surgery (P < 0.001) and better final visual recovery (P < 0.06). Optical coherence tomography showed macular thickness that decreased by greater than 40% in 31 patients (77.5%) compared with preoperatively, and correlated to postoperative visual acuity (P < 0.001). The mean visual acuity increased from 20/100 to 20/40, with 70% of patients gaining three or more lines of visual acuity (Pearson 0.378, P = 0.016).

CONCLUSION

Surgical venous decompression and injection of recombinant tPA may effectively manage macular edema secondary to BRVO, thus improving anatomic and visual outcome. Early surgical intervention may obtain maximum final visual recovery.

Management of branch retinal vein occlusion with vitrectomy and arteriovenous adventitial sheathotomy, the possible role of surgical posterior vitreous detachment

BACKGROUND

To analyze the results of vitrectomy and adventitial sheathotomy in the management of branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO). This is a nonrandomized interventional case series.

METHODS

Patients with BRVO with progressive decrease in visual acuity underwent surgery and were prospectively evaluated in two centers. Surgical procedure included a 3-port pars plana vitrectomy, removal of the internal limiting membrane and arteriovenous crossing sheathotomy. Clinical evaluation consisted of best-corrected visual acuity, fluorescein angiography and optical coherence tomography.

RESULTS

Thirteen eyes were analyzed consecutively. An improvement in visual acuity of two ETDRS lines or more was observed in nine eyes (69%). The mean gain was 1.9 ETDRS lines. The absence of previous posterior vitreous detachment (PVD), poor initial visual acuity and the presence of retinal ischemia were correlated to the improvement in vision (P=0.014, P=0.002 and P=0.052, respectively). Eyes with initial PVD had a mean loss postoperatively of -5.7 lines, but eyes without PVD experienced a gain of 4.2 lines (P<0.001). Macular edema decreased significantly (preoperative thickness: 714 micro m, postoperative thickness: 353 micro m, P=0.04), whereas the aspect of the vein at the crossing and the non-perfused area remained unchanged.

CONCLUSION

Vitrectomy with sheathotomy seems to be of benefit in the management of BRVO, particularly in eyes with no previous PVD, and the main postoperative feature was the decrease in macular edema. The surgical detachment of posterior hyaloid could be as important (or more) as the sheathotomy itself. Further studies are needed to define the most efficient surgical management of BRVO.

The effect of arteriovenous sheathotomy on cystoid macular oedema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion

BACKGROUND

Arteriovenous (AV) sheathotomy, a potential treatment for branch retinal vein occlusion (BVO), surgically separates retinal vessels at an AV crossing. Relief of the aetiological obstruction, with resolution of cystoid macular oedema (CMO), may result in improved visual acuity.

METHODS

A retrospective review of consecutive cases of AV sheathotomy for BVO was undertaken. Eyes were categorised as having resolution (group 1), reduction (group 2), or persistence (group 3) of CMO. Intergroup comparisons were made with regard to preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative parameters. Preoperative and postoperative visual acuities were compared within each group.

RESULTS

Of the 27 eyes identified, eight (29.6%) had resolution, 14 (51.8%) had reduction, and five (18.6%) had persistence of CMO. Median preoperative visual acuity was similar in all groups (1.0, 1.0, 1.3, respectively; p = 0.29). Overall median follow up was 12.0 months (Q1 = 12.0, Q2 = 22.5). Eyes in group 1 had significantly better median postoperative visual acuity than eyes in groups 2 and 3 (0.6, 1.0, 2.0 respectively; p = 0.01). A significantly higher proportion of eyes in group 1 had visual acuity improvement compared with eyes in the other groups (87.5% v 35.7% and 20.0%; p = 0.03). Median postoperative visual acuity was significantly better than median preoperative visual acuity in group 1 eyes only (p = 0.02). A higher percentage of group 1 eyes had evidence of postoperative retinal perfusion (83.0% v 21.43% and 40.0%; p = 0.16). Postoperative retinal detachment occurred in three eyes (11.1%).

CONCLUSION

Complete resolution of CMO after AV sheathotomy occurred in one third of patients, and postoperative vision improved significantly in this group. However, in the majority of cases, despite an improvement in CMO, there was no improvement in vision after AV sheathotomy.