A longitudinal study of finger systolic blood pressure and exposure to hand-transmitted vibration

Exposure-response relation for vibration-induced white finger: inferences from a published meta-analysis of population groups

PURPOSE

It is questioned whether the exposure-response relation for the onset of vibration-induced white finger (VWF) in ISO 5349-1:2001 needs to be revised based on the epidemiologic studies identified by Nilsson et al. (PLoS One https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0180795 , 2017), and whether the relation they derive improves the prediction of VWF in vibration-exposed populations.

METHODS

A pooled analysis has been performed using epidemiologic studies that complied with selection rules and reported a VWF prevalence of 10% or more, and exposure constructed according to the provisions of ISO 5349-1:2001. The lifetime exposures at 10% prevalence were calculated for various data sets using linear interpolation. They were then compared to both the model from the standard and that developed by Nilsson et al. RESULTS: Regression analyses reveal excluding extrapolation to adjust group prevalences to 10% produce models with 95-percentile confidence intervals that include the ISO exposure-response relation but not that in Nilsson et al. (2017). Different curve fits are obtained for studies involving daily exposure to single or multiple power tools and machines. Studies with similar exposure magnitudes and lifetime exposure durations but markedly different prevalences are observed to cluster.

CONCLUSIONS

A range of exposures and A(8)-values is predicted within which the onset of VWF is most likely to occur. The exposure-response relation in ISO 5349-1:2001, but not that proposed by Nilsson et al., falls within this range and provides a conservative estimate for the development of VWF. In addition, the analyses suggest that the method for evaluating vibration exposure contained in ISO 5349-1:2001 needs revision.

Raynaud's phenomenon in the occupational context

OBJECTIVE

To review articles that evaluated the prevalence of Raynaud's phenomenon of occupational origin.

METHODS

The search for articles was carried out in the Medline (via PubMed), Embase, Web of Science, Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO), and Latin America and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature (Lilacs) databases.

RESULTS

64 articles were obtained from the electronic search; 18 articles met the eligibility criteria. All studies discussed the exposure to vibrations in the upper limbs. In 6 of them, the thermal issue was directly or indirectly addressed. No studies have addressed exposure to vinyl chloride.

CONCLUSIO

In general, a higher prevalence of Raynaud's phenomenon was found among vibratory tool operators compared to non-exposed workers, with an increase in the number of cases the higher the level of vibration and the time of exposure. Cold is a triggering and aggravating factor of the Raynaud phenomenon and seems to play an important role in the emergence of vascular manifestations of the hand-arm vibration syndrome.

Health effects associated with occupational exposure to hand-arm or whole body vibration

Workers in a number of different occupational sectors are exposed to workplace vibration on a daily basis. This exposure may arise through the use of powered-hand tools or hand-transmitted vibration (HTV). Workers might also be exposed to whole body vibration (WBV) by driving delivery vehicles, earth moving equipment, or through use of tools that generate vibration at low dominant frequencies and high amplitudes, such as jackhammers. Occupational exposure to vibration has been associated with an increased risk of musculoskeletal pain in the back, neck, hands, shoulders, and hips. Occupational exposure may also contribute to the development of peripheral and cardiovascular disorders and gastrointestinal problems. In addition, there are more recent data suggesting that occupational exposure to vibration may enhance the risk of developing certain cancers. The aim of this review is to provide an assessment of the occupations where exposure to vibration is most prevalent, and a description of the adverse health effects associated with occupational exposure to vibration. This review will examine (1) various experimental methods used to measure and describe the characteristics of vibration generated by various tools and vehicles, (2) the etiology of vibration-induced disorders, and (3) how these data were employed to assess and improve intervention strategies and equipment that reduces the transmission of vibration to the body. Finally, there is a discussion of the research gaps that need to be investigated to further reduction in the incidence of vibration-induced illnesses and injuries.

Hand-arm vibration and the risk of vascular and neurological diseases-A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Increased occurrence of Raynaud’s phenomenon, neurosensory injury and carpal tunnel syndrome has been reported for more than 100 years in association with work with vibrating machines. The current risk prediction modelling (ISO-5349) for “Raynaud’s phenomenon” is based on a few studies published 70 to 40 years ago. There are no corresponding risk prediction models for neurosensory injury or carpal tunnel syndrome, nor any systematic reviews comprising a statistical synthesis (meta-analysis) of the evidence.

Objectives

Our aim was to provide a systematic review of the literature on the association between Raynaud’s phenomenon, neurosensory injuries and carpal tunnel syndrome and hand-arm vibration (HAV) exposure. Moreover the aim was to estimate the magnitude of such an association using meta-analysis.

Methods

This systematic review covers the scientific literature up to January 2016. The databases used for the literature search were PubMed and Science Direct. We found a total of 4,335 abstracts, which were read and whose validity was assessed according to pre-established criteria. 294 articles were examined in their entirety to determine whether each article met the inclusion criteria. The possible risk of bias was assessed for each article. 52 articles finally met the pre-established criteria for inclusion in the systematic review.

Results

The results show that workers who are exposed to HAV have an increased risk of vascular and neurological diseases compared to non-vibration exposed groups. The crude estimate of the risk increase is approximately 4–5 fold. The estimated effect size (odds ratio) is 6.9 for the studies of Raynaud’s phenomenon when including only the studies judged to have a low risk of bias. The corresponding risk of neurosensory injury is 7.4 and the equivalent of carpal tunnel syndrome is 2.9.

Conclusion

At equal exposures, neurosensory injury occurs with a 3-time factor shorter latency than Raynaud’s phenomenon. Which is why preventive measures should address this vibration health hazard with greater attention.

Effect of room temperature on tests for diagnosing vibration-induced white finger: finger rewarming times and finger systolic blood pressures

PURPOSE

This study investigates the effects of room temperature on two standard tests used to assist the diagnosis of vibration-induced white finger (VWF): finger rewarming times and finger systolic blood pressures.

METHODS

Twelve healthy males and twelve healthy females participated in four sessions to obtain either finger skin temperatures (FSTs) during cooling and rewarming of the hand or finger systolic blood pressures (FSBPs) after local cooling of the fingers to 15 and 10 °C. The measures were obtained with the room temperature at either 20 or 28 °C.

RESULTS

There were lower baseline finger skin temperatures, longer finger rewarming times, and lower finger systolic blood pressures with the room temperature at 20 than 28 °C. However, percentage reductions in FSBP at 15 and 10 °C relative to 30 °C (i.e. %FSBP) did not differ between the two room temperatures. Females had lower baseline FSTs, longer rewarming times, and lower FSBPs than males, but %FSBPs were similar in males and females.

CONCLUSIONS

Finger rewarming times after cold provocation are heavily influenced by room temperature and gender. For evaluating peripheral circulatory function using finger rewarming times, the room temperature must be strictly controlled, and a different diagnostic criterion is required for females. The calculation of percentage changes in finger systolic blood pressure at 15 and 10 °C relative to 30 °C reduces effects of both room temperature and gender, and the test may be used in conditions where the ±1 °C tolerance on room temperature required by the current standard cannot be achieved.

Assessment of two alternative standardised tests for the vascular component of the hand-arm vibration syndrome (HAVS)

Background

Vibration-induced white finger (VWF) is the vascular component of the hand–arm vibration syndrome (HAVS). Two tests have been standardised so as to assist the diagnosis of VWF: the measurement of finger rewarming times and the measurement of finger systolic blood pressures (FSBPs).

Objectives

This study investigates whether the two tests distinguish between fingers with and without symptoms of whiteness and compares individual results between the two test methods.

Methods

In 60 men reporting symptoms of the HAVS, the times for their fingers to rewarm by 4°C (after immersion in 15°C water for 5 min) and FSBPs at 30°C, 15°C and 10°C were measured on the same day.

Results

There were significant increases in finger rewarming times and significant reductions in FSBPs at both 15°C and 10°C in fingers reported to suffer blanching. The FSBPs had sensitivities and specificities >90%, whereas the finger rewarming test had a sensitivity of 77% and a specificity of 79%. Fingers having longer rewarming times had lower FSBPs at both temperatures.

Conclusions

The findings suggest that, when the test conditions are controlled according to the relevant standard, finger rewarming times and FSBPs can provide useful information for the diagnosis of VWF, although FSBPs are more sensitive and more specific.

The primary vascular dysregulation syndrome: implications for eye diseases

Vascular dysregulation refers to the regulation of blood flow that is not adapted to the needs of the respective tissue. We distinguish primary vascular dysregulation (PVD, formerly called vasospastic syndrome) and secondary vascular dysregulation (SVD). Subjects with PVD tend to have cold extremities, low blood pressure, reduced feeling of thirst, altered drug sensitivity, increased pain sensitivity, prolonged sleep onset time, altered gene expression in the lymphocytes, signs of oxidative stress, slightly increased endothelin-1 plasma level, low body mass index and often diffuse and fluctuating visual field defects. Coldness, emotional or mechanical stress and starving can provoke symptoms. Virtually all organs, particularly the eye, can be involved. In subjects with PVD, retinal vessels are stiffer and more irregular, and both neurovascular coupling and autoregulation capacity are reduced while retinal venous pressure is often increased. Subjects with PVD have increased risk for normal-tension glaucoma, optic nerve compartment syndrome, central serous choroidopathy, Susac syndrome, retinal artery and vein occlusions and anterior ischaemic neuropathy without atherosclerosis. Further characteristics are their weaker blood–brain and blood-retinal barriers and the higher prevalence of optic disc haemorrhages and activated astrocytes. Subjects with PVD tend to suffer more often from tinnitus, muscle cramps, migraine with aura and silent myocardial ischaemic and are at greater risk for altitude sickness. While the main cause of vascular dysregulation is vascular endotheliopathy, dysfunction of the autonomic nervous system is also involved. In contrast, SVD occurs in the context of other diseases such as multiple sclerosis, retrobulbar neuritis, rheumatoid arthritis, fibromyalgia and giant cell arteritis. Taking into consideration the high prevalence of PVD in the population and potentially linked pathologies, in the current article, the authors provide recommendations on how to effectively promote the field in order to create innovative diagnostic tools to predict the pathology and develop more efficient treatment approaches tailored to the person.

Hand-arm vibration syndrome: clinical characteristics, conventional electrophysiology and quantitative sensory testing

OBJECTIVE

Workers exposed to vibrating tools may develop hand-arm vibration syndrome (HAVS). We assessed the somatosensory phenotype using quantitative sensory testing (QST) in comparison to electrophysiology to characterize (1) the most sensitive QST parameter for detecting sensory loss, (2) the correlation of QST and electrophysiology, and (3) the frequency of a carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) in HAVS.

METHODS

QST, cold provocation tests, fine motor skills, and median nerve neurography were used. QST included thermal and mechanical detection and pain thresholds.

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients were examined (54 ± 11 years, 91% men) at the more affected hand compared to 16 matched controls. Vibration detection threshold was the most sensitive parameter to detect sensory loss that was more pronounced in the sensitivity range of Pacinian (150 Hz, x12) than Meissner's corpuscles (20 Hz, x3). QST (84% abnormal) was more sensitive to detect neural dysfunction than conventional electrophysiology (37% abnormal). Motor (34%) and sensory neurography (25%) were abnormal in HAVS. CTS frequency was not increased (9.4%).

CONCLUSION

Findings are consistent with a mechanically-induced, distally pronounced motor and sensory neuropathy independent of CTS.

SIGNIFICANCE

HAVS involves a neuropathy predominantly affecting large fibers with a sensory damage related to resonance frequencies of vibrating tools.

Specific features of vibration-induced disorders

AIM

Assessment of the specific clinical manifestations of hand-arm vibration syndrome (HAVS) or whole-body vibration syndrome (WBVS).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Seventy-six patients (34 with HAVS and 33 with WBVS) were examined analysing the data from their medical history, clinical examinations and autonomic nervous system study, capillaroscopy, distal Doppler ultrasound study, vibrotactile sense, roentgenography, and electromyography.

RESULTS

HAVS manifests mainly in the upper limbs as microcirculatory disturbances: RR 2.59; 95% CI (1.64-4.10), Raynaud's syndrome: RR 16.50; 95% CI (2.33-117.04), increased vascular resistance in the digital arteries of the hands: RR 9.71; 95% CI (3.28-28.75); distal autonomic neuropathy of the upper limbs: RR 15.04; 95% CI (3.91-57.88); sensory polyneuropathy predominantly of the upper limbs: RR 21.00; 95% CI (3.01-146.57); median neuropathy: RR 14.56; 95% CI (2.04-104.06); cervical spondylosis with/without osteochondrosis: RR 2.09; 95% CI (1.33-3.28). In patients with WBVS we observed predominantly degenerative changes of the lumbar spine segment: RR 2.49; 95% CI (1.55-3.99); lumbosacral radicular symptoms: RR 8.53; 95% CI (3.73-19.52).

CONCLUSION

Dose-dependant, microcirculatory, peripheral vascular, peripheral nerve and musculoskeletal disorders of the upper limbs were found in HAVS and musculoskeletal and peripheral nerve injuries of the spine and the lower limbs were found in WBVS.

Effects of temperature on reductions in finger blood flow induced by vibration

PURPOSE

To investigate how temperature influences changes in finger circulation induced by hand-transmitted vibration in healthy subjects, and the variability in individual response to both vibration and temperature.

METHODS

With two room temperatures (20 and 28°C), finger blood flow (FBF) and finger skin temperature (FST) were measured on the left middle fingers of 12 subjects at 1-min intervals during three successive 10-min periods. A 5-N static force was applied throughout the 30-min period, and sinusoidal 125-Hz vibration at 44 ms(-2) rms. (unweighted) was applied to the right hand during the second of the three 10-min periods.

RESULTS

Before exposure to vibration, both FBF and FST were greater with the higher room temperature. Finger blood flow in the left hand reduced during vibration of the right hand. The reduction in absolute FBF differed between the two room temperatures, but the percentage reduction in FBF relative to FBF before exposure to vibration was similar. After cessation of vibration, there was continued reduction in FBF with both room temperatures. Before and after vibration exposure, the FST was correlated with FBF and the FBF and FST at 20°C were correlated with the FBF and FST at 28°C.

CONCLUSIONS

Vibration of one hand can reduce finger blood flow and skin temperature on the unexposed hand, with the reduction dependent on temperature. The absolute reduction in FBF was greater with the higher room temperature, but the percentage reduction in FBF relative to FBF before vibration exposure was similar. Those with greater finger blood flow before vibration tend to have greater blood flow during vibration, and those with greater finger blood flow with one temperature tend to have greater blood flow with another temperature.