Work-related allergy in medical doctors: atopy, exposure to domestic animals, eczema induced by common chemicals and membership of the surgical profession as potential risk factors

Difference between hand and forearm transepidermal water loss and skin pH as an improved method to biomonitor occupational hand eczema: our findings in healthcare workers

The aim of this cross-sectional field study was to establish the condition of hand and forearm skin barrier among dentists and physicians and how it may be associated with personal and work-related factors. The study consisted of an occupational questionnaire, clinical examination of skin on hands, and transepidermal water loss (TEWL) and pH measurements on hands and forearms. The participants were divided in the following groups (N=37 each, N=148 in total): physicians, medical surgeons, dentists, and dental surgeons. We calculated the difference between hand and forearm TEWL and pH (ΔTEWL and ΔpH, respectively) and divided it by the forearm values (ΔTEWL% and ΔpH%, respectively). There was a clear trend of increasing median ΔTEWL%, starting from physicians with non-surgical specialisation (56 %) to medical surgeons (65 %), dentists (104 %), and dental surgeons (108 %), with the latter two groups showing particularly worrisome signs of work-related skin barrier impairment, since they had double the TEWL on hands than on forearms. Although less prominent, the same worsening trend was noted for skin pH, with dental surgeons having on average a 0.3 points higher skin pH on hands than on forearms. These findings were mainly associated with prolonged glove use and male sex. Our findings also suggest that comparing TEWL and pH between hands and forearms can better establish occupational skin barrier impairment on hands.

Evaluation of Skin Barrier Condition Among Physicians and Dentists

Background: Physicians and dentists are at risk for chronic hand eczema, but their skin barrier condition has rarely been investigated before. Objective: To objectively assess the skin barrier condition among physicians and dentists. Methods: This cross-sectional epidemiological study included an occupational questionnaire, medical examination of hand skin, skin transepidermal water loss (TEWL), and pH measurements, analyzed in 5 groups (N = 37 in each): physicians-nonsurgeons, physicians-surgeons, dentists-nonsurgeons, dentists-surgeons, and control group (unexposed workers). Results: Critical skin condition (TEWL >30 g/[m2·h]) was found in 14% of control workers, 14% physicians nonsurgeons, 22% physicians surgeons, 27% dentists nonsurgeons, and 43% dentists surgeons. The latter had the worst stratum corneum condition indicated by a TEWL median of 25.80 g/(m2·h) (interquartile range [IQR] 19.24-34.31). Hand skin pH was highest among dentists with nonsurgical specializations, with a median of 5.33 (IQR 5.15-5.60), where 38% of them had pH >5.5. Male sex (P < 0.001) and glove use for >1 h/day (P = 0.009) were associated with elevated hand TEWL values, whereas female sex (P < 0.001) and glove use for >4 h/day with elevated pH values (P < 0.001). Conclusions: Prolonged glove usage and dental profession, especially surgical work, significantly affect the skin barrier condition. This study was the first to objectively determine skin barrier condition among dentists and physicians.

Occupational Respiratory Allergic Diseases in Healthcare Workers

Healthcare workers (HCWs) are exposed to a range of high and low molecular weight agents that are allergic sensitizers or irritants including cleaners and disinfectants, natural rubber latex, and various medications. Studies have shown that exposed HCWs are at risk for work-related rhinitis and asthma (WRA). Work-related rhinitis may precede development of WRA and should be considered as an early marker of WRA. Avoidance of causative exposures through control strategies such as elimination, substitution, engineering controls, and process modification is the preferred primary prevention strategy for preventing development of work-related allergic diseases. There is limited evidence for the effectiveness of respirators in preventing occupational asthma. If sensitizer-induced WRA is diagnosed, it is important to avoid further exposure to the causative agent, preferably by more rigorous application of exposure control strategies to the workplace. This review focuses on allergic occupational respiratory diseases in HCWs.

Declining rates of tobacco use in the Japanese medical profession, 1965-2009

Background

Although there has been a downward trend in smoking rates among medical doctors in recent years, rates have been higher among Japanese doctors when compared internationally.

Methods

We extensively reviewed all published English- and Japanese-language articles that reported the smoking rates of Japanese doctors.

Results

A total of 36 articles were examined, most of which had been conducted as postal surveys, usually by a national, prefectural, or local medical association. Sample sizes ranged from 17 to 11 773, and response rates ranged from 33% to 91%. National surveys conducted between 1965 and 2009 suggest that there has been a statistically significant (P < 0.0001) decline in smoking rates among Japanese doctors (from around 68% to 16% among males and from 19% to 5% among females).

Conclusions

Overall, the published data reveal a significant decline in smoking rates among Japanese doctors since 1965, especially among men. Although less than one-fifth of Japanese male doctors now smoke, more work needs to be done in tobacco control to help further reduce the burden of smoking, especially in medical schools.