Age independent and position-dependent alterations in motor unit activity of the biceps brachii

UBC-Nepal Expedition: Motor Unit Characteristics in Lowlanders Acclimatized to High Altitude and Sherpa

INTRODUCTION

With acclimatization to high altitude (HA), adaptations occur throughout the nervous system and at the level of the muscle, which may affect motor unit (MU) characteristics. However, despite the importance of MUs as the final common pathway for the control of voluntary movement, little is known about their adaptations with acclimatization.

METHODS

Ten lowlanders and Sherpa participated in this study 7 to 14 d after arrival at HA (5050 m), with seven lowlanders repeating the experiment at sea level (SL), 6 months after the expedition. The maximal compound muscle action potential (M max ) was recorded from relaxed biceps brachii. During isometric elbow flexions at 10% of maximal torque, a needle electrode recorded the MU discharge rate (MUDR) and MU potential (MUP) characteristics of single biceps brachii MUs.

RESULTS

Compared with SL, acclimatized lowlanders had ~10% greater MUDR, ~11% longer MUP duration, as well as ~18% lower amplitude and ~6% greater duration of the first phase of the M max (all P < 0.05). No differences were noted between SL and HA for variables related to MUP shape (e.g., jitter, jiggle; P > 0.08). Apart from lower near-fiber MUP area for Sherpa than acclimatized lowlanders ( P < 0.05), no M max or MU data were different between groups ( P > 0.10).

CONCLUSIONS

Like other components of the body, MUs in lowlanders adapt with acclimatization to HA. The absence of differences between acclimatized lowlanders and Sherpa suggests that evolutionary adaptations to HA are smaller for MUs than components of the cardiovascular or respiratory systems.

Sex and limb comparisons of neuromuscular function in the morning versus the evening

The time-of-day influence on neuromuscular function is well-documented, but important details remain elusive. It is currently unknown whether males and females differ in their diurnal variation for optimal neuromuscular performance. The purpose of this study is to identify the time-of-day influence on neuromuscular function between sexes and determine whether these responses differ for the upper versus lower limbs. A group of males (n = 12) and females (n = 15) completed neuromuscular performance testing in the morning (07:00-09:00) and evening (17:00-19:00) on separate days in a randomized order. Maximal force, the normalized rate of force development, EMG, normalized EMG rise, and submaximal force steadiness were compared between morning and evening hours. The main findings show that maximal force was greater in the evening for the knee extensors (d = 0.570, p < 0.01) but not the elbow flexors (d = 0.212, p = 0.281), whereas maximal muscle excitation was greater in the evening for the biceps brachii (d = 0.348, p < 0.01) but not the vastus lateralis (d = 0.075, p = 0.526) with no influence of sex. However, force steadiness during knee extension was superior in the evening versus the morning for males (d = 0.734, p = 0.025) and compared to evening values for females (g = 1.19, p = 0.032). Overall, these findings show that time-of-day affects the knee extensors more than the elbow flexors and that diurnal variability between sexes appears to be task-dependent.

Resting Tendon Cross-Sectional Area Underestimates Biceps Brachii Tendon Stress: Importance of Measuring During a Contraction

Force produced by the muscle during contraction is applied to the tendon and distributed through the cross-sectional area (CSA) of the tendon. This ratio of force to the tendon CSA is quantified as the tendon mechanical property of stress. Stress is traditionally calculated using the resting tendon CSA; however, this does not take into account the reductions in the CSA resulting from tendon elongation during the contraction. It is unknown if calculating the tendon stress using instantaneous CSA during a contraction significantly increases the values of in vivo distal biceps brachii (BB) tendon stress in humans compared to stress calculated with the resting CSA. Nine young (22 ± 1 years) and nine old (76 ± 4 years) males, and eight young females (21 ± 1 years) performed submaximal isometric elbow flexion tracking tasks at force levels ranging from 2.5 to 80% maximal voluntary contraction (MVC). The distal BB tendon CSA was recorded on ultrasound at rest and during the submaximal tracking tasks (instantaneous). Tendon stress was calculated as the ratio of tendon force during contraction to CSA using the resting and instantaneous measures of CSA, and statistically evaluated with multi-level modeling (MLM) and Johnson–Neyman regions of significance tests to determine the specific force levels above which the differences between calculation methods and groups became statistically significant. The tendon CSA was greatest at rest and decreased as the force level increased (p < 0.001), and was largest in young males (23.0 ± 2.90 mm²) followed by old males (20.87 ± 2.0 mm²) and young females (17.08 ± 1.54 mm²) (p < 0.001) at rest and across the submaximal force levels. Tendon stress was greater in the instantaneous compared with the resting CSA condition, and young males had the greatest difference in the values of tendon stress between the two conditions (20 ± 4%), followed by old males (19 ± 5%), and young females (17 ± 5%). The specific force at which the difference between the instantaneous and resting CSA stress values became statistically significant was 2.6, 6.6, and 10% MVC for old males, young females, and young males, respectively. The influence of using the instantaneous compared to resting CSA for tendon stress is sex-specific in young adults, and age-specific in the context of males. The instantaneous CSA should be used to provide a more accurate measure of in vivo tendon stress in humans.

The effects of forearm position and contraction intensity on cortical and spinal excitability during a submaximal force steadiness task of the elbow flexors

Elbow flexor force steadiness is less with the forearm pronated (PRO) compared with neutral (NEU) or supinated (SUP) and may relate to neural excitability. Although not tested in a force steadiness paradigm, lower spinal and cortical excitability was observed separately for biceps brachii in PRO, possibly dependent on contractile status at the time of assessment. This study aimed to investigate position-dependent changes in force steadiness as well as spinal and cortical excitability at a variety of contraction intensities. Thirteen males (26 ± 7 yr; means ± SD) performed three blocks (PRO, NEU, and SUP) of 24 brief (~6 s) isometric elbow flexor contractions (5, 10, 25 or 50% of maximal force). During each contraction, transcranial magnetic stimulation or transmastoid stimulation was delivered to elicit a motor-evoked potential (MEP) or cervicomedullary motor-evoked potential (CMEP), respectively. Force steadiness was lower in PRO compared with NEU and SUP (P ≤ 0.001), with no difference between NEU and SUP. Similarly, spinal excitability (CMEP/maximal M wave) was lower in PRO than NEU (25 and 50% maximal force; P ≤ 0.010) and SUP (all force levels; P ≤ 0.004), with no difference between NEU and SUP. Cortical excitability (MEP/CMEP) did not change with forearm position (P = 0.055); however, a priori post hoc testing for position showed excitability was 39.8 ± 38.3% lower for PRO than NEU at 25% maximal force (P = 0.006). The data suggest that contraction intensity influences the effect of forearm position on neural excitability and that reduced spinal and, to a lesser extent, cortical excitability could contribute to lower force steadiness in PRO compared with NEU and SUP.NEW & NOTEWORTHY To address conflicting reports about the effect of forearm position on spinal and cortical excitability of the elbow flexors, we examine the influence of contraction intensity. For the first time, excitability data are considered in a force steadiness context. Motoneuronal excitability is lowest in pronation and this disparity increases with contraction intensity. Cortical excitability exhibits a similar pattern from 5 to 25% of maximal force. Lower corticospinal excitability likely contributes to relatively poor force steadiness in pronation.

Influence of forearm orientation on biceps brachii tendon mechanics and elbow flexor force steadiness

Achilles tendon mechanics influence plantar flexion force steadiness (FS) and balance. In the upper limb, elbow flexor FS is greater in supinated and neutral forearm orientations compared to pronated, with contributions of tendon mechanics remaining unknown in position-dependent FS. This study investigated whether distal biceps brachii (BB) tendon mechanics across supinated, neutral and pronated forearm orientations influence position-dependent FS of the elbow flexors. Eleven males (23 ± 3 years) performed submaximal isometric elbow flexion tasks at low (5, 10% maximal voluntary contraction (MVC)) and high (25, 50, 75% MVC) force levels in supinated, neutral and pronated forearm orientations. Distal BB tendon elongation and CSA were recorded on ultrasound to calculate mechanics of tendon stress, strain and stiffness. Relationships between FS, calculated as coefficient of variation (CV) of force, and tendon mechanics were evaluated with multiple regressions. Supinated and neutral were ∼50% stronger and ∼60% steadier than pronated (p < 0.05). Tendon stress was ∼52% greater in supinated and neutral compared to pronated, tendon strain was ∼36% greater in neutral than pronated (p < 0.05), while tendon stiffness (267.4 ± 78.9 N/mm) did not differ across orientations (p > 0.05). At low forces, CV of force was predicted by MVC (r²: 0.52) in supinated, and MVC and stress in neutral and pronated (r²: 0.65-0.81). At high force levels, CV of force was predicted by MVC and stress in supinated (r²: 0.49), and MVC in neutral (r²: 0.53). Absolute strength and tendon mechanics influence the ability of the BB tendon to distribute forces, and thus are key factors in position-dependent FS.

Voluntary activation and twitch potentiation of the elbow flexors across supinated, neutral, and pronated forearm orientations

Elbow flexion force depends on forearm orientation with supinated and neutral being stronger than pronated. The purpose of this study was to assess the influence of forearm orientation on voluntary activation (VA), postactivation potentiation (PAP), and twitch properties. Eleven males (23 ± 3 years) performed isometric elbow flexion maximal voluntary contractions (MVC) in supinated, neutral, and pronated forearm orientations with supramaximal stimulation to the biceps brachii muscle belly before, during, and after the MVC. MVC and VA were higher in supinated (213.6 ± 49.6 N; 93.0 ± 5.2%) and neutral (243.6 ± 48.0 N; 96.1 ± 3.2%) compared with pronated (113.6 ± 21.3 N; 70.9 ± 20.4%) (P < 0.05), while PAP did not differ across the three orientations (71.6 ± 42.2%) (P > 0.05). In the rested state, pronated peak tension (PT) was less compared with supinated (42%). In the potentiated state, pronated PT was less than supinated (50%) and neutral (53%) (P < 0.05). Reduced strength in the pronated orientation is partially attributed to reduced drive; however, reductions in peak tension indicate that there also is a mechanical disadvantage when the forearm is placed into a pronated orientation, and this does not alter PAP.

Changes in Corticospinal and Spinal Excitability to the Biceps Brachii with a Neutral vs. Pronated Handgrip Position Differ between Arm Cycling and Tonic Elbow Flexion

The purpose of this study was to examine the influence of neutral and pronated handgrip positions on corticospinal excitability to the biceps brachii during arm cycling. Corticospinal and spinal excitability were assessed using motor evoked potentials (MEPs) elicited via transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and cervicomedullary-evoked potentials (CMEPs) elicited via transmastoid electrical stimulation (TMES), respectively. Participants were seated upright in front on arm cycle ergometer. Responses were recorded from the biceps brachii at two different crank positions (6 and 12 o'clock positions relative to a clock face) while arm cycling with neutral and pronated handgrip positions. Responses were also elicited during tonic elbow flexion to compare/contrast the results to a non-rhythmic motor output. MEP and CMEP amplitudes were significantly larger at the 6 o'clock position while arm cycling with a neutral handgrip position compared to pronated (45.6 and 29.9%, respectively). There were no differences in MEP and CMEP amplitudes at the 12 o'clock position for either handgrip position. For the tonic contractions, MEPs were significantly larger with a neutral vs. pronated handgrip position (32.6% greater) while there were no difference in CMEPs. Corticospinal excitability was higher with a neutral handgrip position for both arm cycling and tonic elbow flexion. While spinal excitability was also higher with a neutral handgrip position during arm cycling, no difference was observed during tonic elbow flexion. These findings suggest that not only is corticospinal excitability to the biceps brachii modulated at both the supraspinal and spinal level, but that it is influenced differently between rhythmic arm cycling and tonic elbow flexion.

Intrinsic excitability of human motoneurons in biceps brachii versus triceps brachii

The intrinsic excitability of spinal motoneurons is mediated in part by the presence of persistent inward currents (PICs), which amplify synaptic input and promote self-sustained firing. Studies using animal models have shown that PICs are greater in extensor motoneurons over flexor motoneurons, but this difference has not yet been demonstrated in humans. The primary objective of this study was to determine whether a similar difference exists in humans by recording from motor units in biceps and triceps brachii during isometric contractions. We compared firing rate profiles of pairs of motor units, in which the firing rate of the lower-threshold "control" unit was used as an indicator of common drive to the higher-threshold "test" unit. The estimated contribution of the PIC was calculated as the difference in firing rate of the control unit at recruitment versus derecruitment of the test unit, a value known as the delta-F (ΔF). We found that ΔF values were significantly higher in triceps brachii (5.4 ± 0.9 imp/s) compared with biceps brachii (3.0 ± 1.4 imp/s; P < 0.001). This difference was still present even after controlling for saturation in firing rate of the control unit, rate modulation of the control unit, and differences in recruitment time between test and control units, which are known to contribute to ΔF variability. We conclude that human elbow flexor and extensor motor units exhibit differences in intrinsic excitability, contributing to different neural motor control strategies between muscle groups.

The effect of tendon vibration on motor unit activity, intermuscular coherence and force steadiness in the elbow flexors of males and females

BACKGROUND

Compartmentalized responses in motor unit (MU) activity of the short head (SH) and long head (LH) of the biceps brachii are observed following forearm position change. Differential muscle spindle afferent distribution has been proposed as a potential mechanism underlying this behaviour. Tendon vibration is an effective, non-invasive method of increasing muscle spindle afferent activity of a target muscle group offering a paradigm in which this hypothesis may be investigated further.

AIM

To determine the effect of tendon vibration on MU recruitment and discharge rates of the SH and LH, muscle activity of the elbow flexors and triceps brachii, intermuscular coherence among the SH, LH, brachioradialis and triceps brachii and force steadiness in young males and females during isometric elbow flexion.

METHODS

Intramuscular electromyography (EMG) of the SH and LH, and surface EMG of the elbow flexors were recorded pre- and post-vibration during low-force isometric contractions. Motor unit recruitment thresholds, MU discharge rates and MU discharge variability; surface EMG amplitude, intermuscular coherence and force steadiness were determined pre- and post-vibration.

RESULTS

Differential changes in all MU properties, EMG amplitude and intermuscular coherence were observed among elbow flexors. Although MU properties exhibited differential changes, they accounted for little variance in isometric force steadiness. However, intermuscular EMG coherence among all muscles investigated was reduced post-vibration.

CONCLUSION

Uncoupling of common oscillatory input as a result of differential muscle spindle afferent inputs to elbow flexors may be responsible for the reduction in force steadiness following tendon vibration and a forearm position change.

Daily electromyography in females with Parkinson's disease: a potential indicator of frailty

Females with Parkinson's disease (PD) are at increased risk for frailty, yet are often excluded from frailty studies. Daily electromyography (EMG) recordings of muscle activity can dissociate stages of frailty and indicate functional decline in non-neurological conditions. The purpose of this investigation was to determine whether muscle activity can be used to identify frailty phenotypes in females with PD. EMG during a typical 6.5-h day was examined in biceps brachii, triceps brachii, vastus lateralis and biceps femoris on less-affected PD side. Muscle activity was quantified through burst (>2% maximum exertion, >0.1s) and gap characteristics (<1% maximum exertion, >0.1s). Differences across frailty phenotype (nonfrail, prefrail, frail) and muscle (biceps brachii, BB; triceps brachii, TB; vastus lateralis, VL; biceps femoris, BF) were evaluated with a 2-way repeated measure ANOVA for each burst/gap characteristic. Thirteen right-handed females (mean=67 ± 8 years) were classified as nonfrail (n = 4), prefrail (n = 6), and frail (n = 3) according to the Cardiovascular Health Study frailty index (CHSfi). Frail females had 73% decreased gaps and 48% increased burst duration compared with nonfrail. Decreased gaps may be interpreted as reduced muscle recovery time, which may result in earlier onset fatigue and eventually culminating in frailty. Longer burst durations suggest more muscle activity is required to initiate movement leading to slower movement time in frail females with PD. This is the first study to use EMG to dissociate frailty phenotypes in females with PD during routine daily activities and provides insight into how PD-associated motor declines contributes to frailty and functional decline.

Age-related increase in electromyography burst activity in males and females

The rapid advancement of electromyography (EMG) technology facilitates measurement of muscle activity outside the laboratory during daily life. The purpose of this study was to determine whether bursts in EMG recorded over a typical 8-hour day differed between young and old males and females. Muscle activity was recorded from biceps brachii, triceps brachii, vastus lateralis, and biceps femoris of 16 young and 15 old adults using portable surface EMG. Old muscles were active 16–27% of the time compared to 5–9% in young muscles. The number of bursts was greater in old than young adults and in females compared to males. Burst percentage and mean amplitude were greater in the flexor muscles compared with the extensor muscles. The greater burst activity in old adults coupled with the unique activity patterns across muscles in males and females provides further understanding of how changes in neuromuscular activity effects age-related functional decline between the sexes.

Neural and morphological changes in response to a 20-day intense eccentric training protocol

The purpose of this study was to examine the time course of adaptation through 20 days of eccentric training and 5 days of detraining. A total of 22 untrained subjects trained one arm every 2nd day for 20 days. Subjects performed maximal isokinetic eccentric biceps brachii training at 90 degrees /s (six sets of eight reps). Muscle thickness (reported in cm) via ultrasound, strength (reported in Nm) and muscle activation (electromyography) were measured before, during, and after training (nine time points). Strength in the trained arm decreased after 8 days of training (65.6 +/- 4.1 to 57.5 +/- 3.5; p < 0.05) and remained decreased throughout the study. Agonist muscle activation amplitude of the trained arm increased after 14 days of training (p < 0.05) and remained elevated throughout the study. Antagonist muscle activation decreased after 20 days of training (p < 0.05). Muscle thickness increased after 8 days of training (3.66 +/- 0.11 to 3.90 +/- 0.12; p < 0.05) and remained above baseline until the end of training (3.97 +/- 0.12). After 5 days of detraining, muscle thickness decreased (3.97 +/- 0.12 vs. 3.85 +/- 0.11; p < 0.05), but remained higher than baseline (p < 0.05). Muscle thickness did not change significantly in the untrained arm at any time point. In conclusion, the early increase in biceps brachii muscle thickness coupled with a significant decrease in strength is an indicator of muscle damage leading to swelling and impaired muscle function. The persistent decrease in strength, despite an increase in muscle activation, suggests that the recovery interval was inadequate to allow complete repair of muscle damage. Intense eccentric training performed every 2nd day leads to a prolonged impairment of muscle strength in previously untrained individuals.