Acute effects of heated resistance exercise in female and male power athletes

Load-Velocity Profiles Before and After Heated Resistance Exercise

ABSTRACT

Sweet, DK, Qiao, J, Rosbrook, P, and Pryor, JL. Load-velocity profiles before and after heated resistance exercise. J Strength Cond Res 38(6): 1019-1024, 2024-This study examined neuromuscular performance using load-velocity (L-V) profiles in men and women before and after resistance exercise (RE) in hot (HOT; 40° C) and temperate (TEMP; 21° C) environments. Sixteen (f = 8, m = 8) resistance-trained individuals completed a single 70-minute whole-body high-volume load (6 exercises, 4 sets of 10 repetitions) RE bout in HOT and TEMP. Before and after RE, rectal temperature (TRE), muscle temperature of the vastus lateralis (TVL) and triceps brachii (TTB), and an L-V profile for the deadlift and bench press were recorded. Thermoregulatory and L-V data were analyzed using separate 2-way repeated measures analysis of variances (ANOVAs; condition [hot, temperate] and time [pre, post]) with significance level set at p ≤ 0.05. Deadlift peak velocity was reduced at 60% 1 repetition maximum (1RM) after RE in HOT but not TEMP. Peak velocity of 40% 1RM bench press was lower in TEMP vs. HOT pre-RE (p < 0.01). Peak velocity was decreased at all loads in the deadlift L-V profile after RE, regardless of condition. Despite elevated TRE (TEMP; 37.58 ± 0.35, HOT; 38.20 ± 0.39° C), TVL (TEMP; 35.24 ± 0.62, HOT; 37.92 ± 0.55° C), and TTB (TEMP; 35.05 ± 0.78, HOT; 38.00 ± 0.16° C) after RE in HOT vs. TEMP (p < 0.01), RE in HOT did not broadly affect L-V profiles. This indicates heated resistance exercise can be performed with high-volume load and high ambient temperature with minimal performance impairment.

Endocrine Responses to Heated Resistance Exercise in Men and Women

ABSTRACT

Pryor, JL, Sweet, DK, Rosbrook, P, Qiao, J, Looney, DP, Mahmood, S, and Rideout, T. Endocrine responses to heated resistance exercise in men and women. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000-000, 2024-We examined the endocrine responses of 16 (female = 8) resistance trained volunteers to a single bout of whole-body high-volume load resistance exercise in hot (HOT; 40° C) and temperate (TEMP; 20° C) environmental conditions. Thermoregulatory and heart rate (HR) data were recorded, and venous blood was acquired before and after resistance exercise to assess serum anabolic and catabolic hormones. In men, testosterone increased after resistance exercise in HOT and TEMP (p < 0.01), but postexercise testosterone was not different between condition (p = 0.51). In women, human growth hormone was different between condition at pre-exercise (p = 0.02) and postexercise (p = 0.03). After controlling for pre-exercise values, the between-condition postexercise difference was abolished (p = 0.16). There were no differences in insulin-like growth factor-1 for either sex (p ≥ 0.06). In women, cortisol increased from pre-exercise to postexercise in HOT (p = 0.04) but not TEMP (p = 0.19), generating a between-condition difference at postexercise (p < 0.01). In men, cortisol increased from pre-exercise to postexercise in HOT only (p < 0.01). Rectal temperature increased to a greater extent in HOT compared with TEMP in both men (p = 0.01) and women (p = 0.02). Heart rate increased after exercise under both conditions in men and women (p = 0.01), but only women experience greater postexercise HR in HOT vs. TEMP (p = 0.04). The addition of heat stress to resistance exercise session did not overtly shift the endocrine response toward an anabolic or catabolic response. When acute program variables are prescribed to increase postresistance exercise anabolic hormones, adding heat stress is not synergistic but does increase physiologic strain (i.e., elevated HR and rectal temperature).

The Heat Shock Connection: Skeletal Muscle Hypertrophy and Atrophy

Skeletal muscle is an integral tissue system that plays a crucial role in the physical function of all vertebrates and is a key target for maintaining or improving health and performance across the lifespan. Based largely on cellular and animal models, there is some evidence that various forms of heat stress with or without resistance exercise may enhance skeletal muscle growth or reduce its loss. It is not clear whether these stimuli are similarly effective in humans or meaningful in comparison to exercise alone across various heating methodologies. Furthermore, the magnitude by which heat stress may influence whole body thermoregulatory responses and the connection to skeletal muscle adaptation remains ambiguous. Finally, the underlying mechanisms, which may include interaction between relevant heat shock proteins and intracellular hypertrophy and atrophy related factors, remain unclear. In this narrative mini-review we examine the relevant literature regarding heat stress alone or in combination with resistance exercise emphasizing skeletal muscle hypertrophy and atrophy across cellular and animal models, as well as human investigations. Additionally, we present working mechanistic theories for heat shock protein mediated signaling effects regarding hypertrophy and atrophy related signaling processes. Importantly, continued research is necessary to determine the practical effects and mechanisms of heat stress with and without resistance exercise on skeletal muscle function via growth and maintenance.

Resistance Exercise in a Hot Environment Alters Serum Markers in Untrained Males

Purpose: We examined the effects of moderate resistance exercise (RE) on serum cortisol, testosterone, extracellular heat shock protein (HSP70), and interleukin (IL)-6 and IL-15 concentrations in untrained males in a hot environment.

Methods: Ten untrained young males (26 ± 3 years; 75.8 ± 6 kg; 177.4 ± 5.3 cm) performed two series of full body RE [3 sets of 8 to 10 repetitions, 30–60 s recovery between series with 70% of one maximal repetition (1-RM), with a rest period of 1 to 3 min between exercises] carried out in a random order in both heated (∼35°C) and thermoneutral (22°C) conditions. Serum concentrations of testosterone, cortisol, HSP70, and IL-6 and IL-15 were measured before, at the end, and 1 h after RE sessions. Participants in both groups consumed 4 ml of water/kg body mass every 15 min.

Results: There were time-related changes in testosterone, HSP70, and IL-6 (P < 0.001), and cortisol and IL-15 (P < 0.05). Levels of cortisol, HSP70, and IL-6 increased immediately for RE at 35°C, and testosterone and IL-15 levels were decreased. Changes in serum testosterone, HSP70, cortisol, and IL-15 and IL-6 levels were reversed after 1 h. A significant time × condition interaction was observed for IL-15 and HSP70 (P < 0.001), cortisol and IL-6 (P < 0.05), but not for testosterone (P > 0.05).

Conclusion: RE in a heated environment may not be appropriate for achieving muscle adaptations due to acute changes of hormonal and inflammatory markers.

Short-Term Effects of Suspension Training on Strength and Power Performances

Suspension Training (ST) workouts include a variety of movements requiring the individual to maintain balance while performing various resistance exercises in an interval fashion. Although ST is thought to elicit higher muscle activations than traditional exercises, only limited information is available on its acute effects on strength and power performances, especially in relation to gender. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the strength and power acute responses after ST, also in relation to gender. Eighty-eight (46 males, 42 females) participants were administered countermovement jumps (CMJ), squat jumps (SJ), lower limb Maximum Voluntary Contraction (MVC) at 90° angle knee extension, and grip strength (handgrip) before (PRE) and after (POST) a 50 min ST session involving upper, lower body and core exercises. ANOVA for repeated measures was used to evaluate the differences (p < 0.05) in relation to gender and experimental session. After ST session, significantly higher values emerged in males, whereas no significant changes were found in females. Findings indicate that ST as a form of exercise is useful to maintain and improve acute strength and power performances, especially in male participants. Future studies should be carried out to explore the gender-related differences in response to acute bout of ST exercises.

Effect of two-weeks endurance training wearing additional clothing in a temperate outdoor environment on performance and physiology in the heat

This investigation assessed performance, physiological and perceptual responses to wearing additional clothing during endurance training for two-weeks in temperate environments, to determine if this approach could be used as a practical, alternative, heat acclimation strategy for athletes. Fifteen trained male triathletes assigned to performance-matched groups completed a two-week unsupervised endurance cycling and running program in either (i) shorts and a short sleeve top (CON; n = 8) or (ii) additional clothing of full-length pants, a "winter" jacket and gloves made from nylon, polyurethane and polyester (AC; n = 7). Participants completed three separate (i.e. familiarisation, pre-program and post-program), identical, pre-loaded cycling time-trials (20 min at 180 W followed by a 40 min self-paced time trial) in 32.5 ± 0.1°C and 55 ± 6% RH. Core and skin temperatures, heart rate, sweat rate, perceived exertion, thermal sensation and thermal comfort were measured across the pre-loaded time trials, and heart rate and thermal sensation were measured across the training program. All of the participants recorded in their diaries that they completed all of the programmed training sessions in the required attire. Mean thermal sensation was most likely hotter in AC (5.5 ± 0.4 AU) compared to CON (4.4 ± 0.4 AU; ES = 1.61, ± 0.68) during the training sessions. However, follow up tests revealed no physiological or perceptual signs of heat acclimation, and the change in time-trial performance from pre-post between groups was trivial (CON: -3.5 ± 12.0 W, AC: -4.1 ± 9.6 W; difference = -0.7%, ± 5.4%). Training in additional clothing for two-weeks in a temperate environment was not an effective heat acclimation strategy for triathletes.

No clear benefit of muscle heating on hypertrophy and strength with resistance training

Heat is a major stressor during exercise, though its value in driving adaptation is not well understood. Muscle heating can upregulate pathways facilitating protein synthesis and could thereby enhance effects of exercise training, however, few studies have investigated this possibility. We examined whether heating active muscle during resistance training differentially affected physical and functional adaptations. Within a randomised contralateral-limb control study, ten healthy, resistance-untrained individuals (21 ± 3 y; 5 female) completed 30 sessions of progressive resistance training (12 weeks), performing 4 × 8 unilateral knee extensions at 70% of 1RM. One randomly-allocated thigh was heated during, and for 20 min after, each session using an electric pad eliciting muscle temperatures of >38 °C (HOT); the contralateral limb remained unheated (CON). Training intensity was progressed using 4-weekly strength assessments. Quadricep lean mass (measured using DXA) increased by 15 ± 7% in HOT (p = 0.00) and 15 ± 6% in CON (p = 0.00); the difference being trivial (p = 0.94). Peak isokinetic torque at 90°.s^-1 increased by 30 ± 25% (HOT; p = 0.00) and 34 ± 33% (CON; p = 0.01), with no difference (p = 0.84) between limbs. Rate of torque development increased ∼40%, with no difference between limbs (p = 0.73). The increase in 3-RM strength was also similar in HOT (75 ± 16%) and CON (71 ± 14%; p = 0.80 for difference). No differences in mass or strength changes were evident between sexes. In conclusion, supplemental heating of active muscle during and after each bout of resistance training showed no clear positive (or negative) effect on training-induced hypertrophy or function.