Clinicopathological features of anastomotic recurrence after an anterior resection for rectal cancer

Association of resection margin distance with anastomotic recurrence in stage I-III colon cancer: data from the National Colorectal Cancer Cohort (NCRCC) study in China

PURPOSE

Few studies have focused on anastomotic recurrence (AR) in colon cancer. This study aimed to clarify the association of resection margin distance with AR and compare the prognosis with nonanastomotic local recurrence (NAR).

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included the clinical data of patients who underwent radical colon cancer surgery between January 1, 2009, and December 31, 2019.

RESULTS

A total of 1958 colon cancer patients were included in the study. 34 of whom (1.7%) had AR and 105 of whom (5.4%) had NAR. Multivariate analysis revealed that the lower distal resection margin distance, advanced N stage, and number of lymph nodes dissected were risk factors for AR. In the proximal resection margin, the risk of AR was lowest at a distance of 6 cm or greater, with a 3-year rate of 1.3%. In the distal resection margin, the 3-year AR risk increased rapidly if the distance was less than 3 cm. The prognosis of patients in the AR group was similar to that of patients in the NAR group, regardless of synchronous distant metastases. Furthermore, the radical surgery rate for AR was significantly higher than that for NAR, but the prognosis of AR was comparable to that of NAR.

CONCLUSIONS

The distal resection margin distance, advanced N stage, and less number of lymph nodes dissected are associated with AR of colon cancer. The prognosis of patients with AR was similar to that of patients with NAR.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinical Trial Numbers NCT04074538 ( clinicaltrials.gov ), August 26, 2019, registered, retrospectively registered.

Clinicopathological Characteristics of Anastomotic Recurrence After Curative Resection for Colorectal Cancer: Comparison With Nonanastomotic Local Recurrences

BACKGROUND

Anastomotic recurrence is thought to be caused by implantation of tumor cells to the anastomotic line; however, its risk factors and prognostic significance remain unclear.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to clarify the risk factors for anastomotic recurrence in colorectal cancer and assess the prognosis in comparison to nonanastomotic local recurrence.

DESIGN

A single-center retrospective observational study.

SETTINGS

The medical records of the study participants were retrospectively collected from the Department of Surgical Oncology at the University of Tokyo Hospital database.

PATIENTS

This study included 1584 patients with colorectal cancer who underwent surgical resection between January 2005 and December 2017. We focused on 15 patients who had an anastomotic recurrence.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The main outcome measures were the risk factors of anastomotic recurrence at the primary resection and prognosis data in comparison to that of nonanastomotic local recurrence.

RESULTS

There were 15 patients (0.95%) with anastomotic recurrence and 35 (2.21%) with nonanastomotic local recurrence. Univariate analysis revealed that lymph node metastasis and advanced T stage are the risk factors for anastomotic recurrence. The prognosis of patients with anastomotic recurrence was similar to that of those with nonanastomotic local recurrence who underwent resection.

LIMITATIONS

The small number of patients with anastomotic recurrence is a major limitation of this study. Additionally, the retrospective study design may have increased the risk of selection bias.

CONCLUSIONS

Lymph node metastasis and advanced T stage were associated with anastomotic recurrence. The prognosis of patients with anastomotic recurrence was similar to that with resected nonanastomotic local recurrence. Thus, surveillance should be carefully continued while considering the poor prognosis of patients with anastomotic recurrence. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/C92 .

CARACTERSTICAS CLINICOPATOLGICAS DE LA RECURRENCIA ANASTOMTICA DESPUS DE LA RESECCIN CURATIVA DEL CNCER COLORRECTAL COMPARACIN CON LAS RECURRENCIAS LOCALES NO ANASTOMTICAS

ANTECEDENTES:Se cree que la recurrencia anastomótica es causada por la implantación de células tumorales en la línea anastomótica; sin embargo, los factores de riesgo asociados y el significado en cuanto a pronóstico siguen sin estar claros.OBJETIVO:Este estudio tuvo como objetivo aclarar los factores de riesgo para la recurrencia anastomótica en el cáncer colorrectal y evaluar el pronóstico en comparación con la recurrencia local no anastomótica.DISEÑO:Un estudio observacional retrospectivo de un solo centro.ESCENARIO:Los registros médicos de los participantes del estudio se recopilaron retrospectivamente de la base de datos del Departamento de Cirugía Oncológica del Hospital de la Universidad de Tokio.PACIENTES:Este estudio incluyó a 1584 pacientes con cáncer colorrectal que se sometieron a resección quirúrgica entre enero de 2005 y diciembre de 2017. Nos enfocamos en 15 pacientes que tuvieron recurrencia anastomótica.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Las principales medidas de resultado fueron los factores de riesgo de recurrencia anastomótica en la resección primaria y los datos de pronóstico en comparación con la recurrencia local no anastomótica.RESULTADOS:Hubo 15 pacientes (0.95%) con recurrencia anastomótica y 35 (2.21%) con recurrencia local no anastomótica. El análisis univariable reveló que la metástasis en los ganglios linfáticos y el estadio T avanzado son los factores de riesgo para la recurrencia anastomótica. El pronóstico de los pacientes con recidiva anastomótica fue similar al de aquellos con recidiva local no anastomótica sometidos a resección.LIMITACIONES:El pequeño número de pacientes con recurrencia anastomótica es una limitación importante de este estudio. Además, el diseño retrospectivo del estudio puede haber aumentado el riesgo de sesgo de selección.CONCLUSIONES:La metástasis en los ganglios linfáticos y el estadio T avanzado se asociaron con recurrencia anastomótica. El pronóstico de los pacientes con recidiva anastomótica fue similar al de la recidiva local no anastomótica resecada. Por lo tanto, la vigilancia debe continuarse cuidadosamente considerando el mal pronóstico de los pacientes con recurrencia anastomótica. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/C92 . (Traducción-Dr. Jorge Silva Velazco ).

Isolated repeated anastomotic recurrence after sigmoidectomy

Repeated anastomotic recurrence (AR) of colonic cancer is uncommon. We report a case of a double-isolated AR after sigmoidectomy. In 2003, a 60-year-old woman underwent stapled sigmoid resection for a moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma. Further rectal bleeding occurred after six months, and colonoscopy detected an AR. Thus, an additional stapled colorectal anastomosis was performed. Ten months later, a colonoscopy detected a circumferential AR that prompted the completion of a second colorectal resection, with a double-stapled colorectal anastomosis. Twenty-four hours after surgery, a massive pulmonary embolism occurred, and the patient died within a few hours. At present, only six cases of repeated isolated AR have been described. Repeated segmental colorectal resections are generally associated with a favourable prognosis, with a median survival rate of 45 mo (range, 13-132 mo). Repeated isolated ARs are rare, and segmental colorectal resections are generally associated with long-term disease-free survival.

Post-chemoradiation anastomotic recurrence in locally advanced rectal cancer: no increased risk associated with distal margin

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Anastomotic recurrence after radical sphincter-preserving surgery preceded by neoadjuvant therapy in locally advanced rectal cancer is an uncommon event that merits further assessment. The aim of this study is to analyze the effect of preoperative chemoradiation on the risk of anastomotic recurrence. Based on the initial extension of the tumor, we analyzed whether the distal surgical section was calculated through the virtual initial extension of the rectal tumor.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eligible patients with locally advanced rectal cancer were offered preoperative chemoradiation, sphincter sparing surgery and intraoperative radiation therapy boost.

RESULTS

180 patients were treated with anterior resection (40 %), low anterior resection (45.6 %) and ultra-low anterior resection (14.4 %). With a median follow-up of 41.1 months (0.36-143 months), anastomotic recurrence was diagnosed in 9 patients (5 %). There was no statistical correlation with downstaging (T or N), downsizing effects, or with distance from the lower limit of the residual lesion to the distal margin. Virtual intratumoral surgical section was speculated in 44 patients (3 developed anastomotic recurrence; 6.8 vs 4.8 %, p = 0.482).

CONCLUSION

Anastomotic recurrence in patients with rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation is an infrequent event. Virtual intratumoral surgical sections followed by anastomosis do not contribute to an excessive risk of recurrence. Our findings encourage the development of policies for preservation of the ano-rectal complex in rectal cancer patients.

Rectal washout and local recurrence in rectal resection for cancer: a meta-analysis

AIM

The effectiveness of rectal washout was compared with no washout for the prevention of local recurrence after anterior rectal resection for rectal cancer.

METHOD

The following electronic databases were searched: PubMed, OVID Medline, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, EBM Reviews, CINAHL and EMBASE.

RESULTS

Five nonrandomized studies including a total of 5012 patients were identified. Meta-analysis suggested that rectal washout significantly reduced the local recurrence rate (P < 0.0001; OR 0.57; 95% CI 0.43-0.74). It was also significantly lower after washout in patients having radical resection only (P = 0.0004; OR 0.54; 95% CI 0.39-0.76), patients treated by a curative resection (P < 0.0001; OR 0.55; 95% CI 0.42-0.72) and those undergoing preoperative radiotherapy (P = 0.04; OR 0.62; 95% CI 0.39-0.98).

CONCLUSION

Taking into account the limitations of the design of the included studies the meta-analysis showed that rectal washout is associated with reduced local recurrence and therefore should be routine during anterior resection for rectal cancer.

Locally recurrent colorectal cancer: results of surgical therapy

PURPOSE

Up to 20 % of colorectal cancer patients develop recurrent disease despite standardized surgical techniques and multimodal treatment strategies. Radical resection is the central component of curative therapy in these cases. The aim of this study was to evaluate treatment results in patients with locoregionally recurrent colorectal cancer.

METHODS

From January 1995 to December 2007, surgery was performed for recurrent colorectal cancer in 82 patients who had undergone curative (R0) resection of their primary tumor. Assessment included patient, tumor and treatment characteristics, postoperative complications, and time without re-recurrence; recurrence-free and overall survival rates were calculated according to the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Resection was performed in 60 of the 82 patients (73 %), repeat R0 resection in 52 % (31/60). Patients had a postoperative morbidity of 39 % (31/82), a relaparotomy rate of 13 % (11/82), and a lethality of 7 % (6/82). Forty-eight percent of all surgically-treated patients received a permanent stoma. Re-recurrence was seen in 52 % (16/31). R0 resection was associated with a 5-year survival rate of 35 % (11/31).

CONCLUSIONS

Extensive reinterventions often enable repeat R0 resection. Despite relevant morbidity, the lethality appears to be acceptable. Decisive for the prognosis is re-recurrence.

Can radiotherapy alone be effective for treating anastomotic recurrence of rectal cancer? When the patient decides?

Among pelvic recurrences of rectal cancer following surgical resection, anastomotic recurrences are relatively rare; the literature reports an incidence between 2.4% and 12% of all patients who underwent colorectal anastomosis. The authors report the case of a patient already treated for an early rectal cancer who 1 year after surgery developed a 2 cm recurrence at the colorectal anastomosis. As he refused reoperation, he underwent radiation therapy only (54 Gy) with complete remission. After 8 years of follow-up, the patient is free of any further distant or local recurrence. The authors did not find, to the best of their knowledge, in the literature any similar case of a patient with anastomotic rectal recurrence who has been positively treated by radiotherapy only. The authors focus on its diagnostic and therapeutic problems: although surgical reresection is undoubtedly the best therapeutic option, in the case reported here, radiotherapy alone proved effective.