Enucleation in pancreatic surgery: indications, technique, and outcome compared to standard pancreatic resections

Optimizing pancreatic enucleation for benign tumors: the role of pre-placed pancreatic duct stents-a retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effectiveness of pre-placed pancreatic duct stents on improving outcomes of pancreatic enucleation for benign tumors, a procedure often discouraged by postoperative complications, such as pancreatic fistulae.

METHODS

This single-center retrospective cohort study analyzed 148 patients with benign tumors located in the head, neck, and body of the pancreas between February 2021 and February 2024. Thirty-four patients received stent placement by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography 1-2 days before surgery, while 114 did not. Propensity score matching resulted in two groups: stent (n = 30) and non-stent (n = 60). Outcomes compared included enucleation success rate, incidence of pancreatic fistulae, hospital stay, procedural costs, pancreatic function deficiency, and quality of life.

RESULTS

Pre-placement of stents significantly increased enucleation success rate (86.7% vs. 28.3%, p = 1.763 × 10-7), facilitated more laparoscopic surgeries (86.7% vs. 41.7%, p = 4.9 × 10-5), and shortened hospital stays (median 7.5 days vs. 11 days, p = 0.001). The stent group also showed a lower incidence of pancreatic exocrine dysfunction (10.3% vs. 35.7%, p = 0.016) and higher quality of life scores (91.2 ± 5.8 vs. 85.5 ± 13.6, p = 0.019). No significant differences were observed in postoperative complications or overall costs. Additionally, the distance between tumor and main pancreatic duct was shorter in the stent group (4.2 ± 2.2 mm vs. 6.2 ± 2.5 mm, p = 0.008).

CONCLUSION

Pre-placement of pancreatic duct stents significantly enhances enucleation success rate, reduces hospital stays, preserves pancreatic function, and improves quality of life. These findings advocate the use of pre-placed stents in enucleation procedures. Further prospective studies are warranted to validate these outcomes.

Characteristics and outcomes of observed versus resected pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

Background

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) are a rare group of tumors with a wide range of clinical presentations. pNETs may present as incidentally discovered slow-growing tumors or as more aggressive tumors with metastatic potential. The mainstay of treatment is surgical resection; however, some have argued that observation can be considered for small, nonfunctional tumors. The objective of this study was to compare patients with pNETs who underwent initial resection versus observation to better understand tumor characteristics that favor either treatment approach.

Methods

A retrospective review was performed of patients diagnosed with pNETs at a tertiary referral center from 2018 to 2023. Information on the patient and tumor, disease and treatment course, and outcomes was collected.

Results

Forty-three patients were included in the study; 33% underwent initial resection, 37% underwent observation, and 30% underwent surgical resection following a period of observation (delayed resection). Patients who underwent initial resection were more likely to be younger with fewer comorbidities and have symptomatic or functional tumors. Patients with tumors >2 cm were more likely to have a postoperative complication. In a subgroup of patients with incidentally discovered tumors ≤2 cm, 33% underwent delayed resection and did not experience any postoperative complications; 66% underwent observation, and none had progression of their disease over the follow-up period of 17 months.

Conclusion

While surgical resection remains the mainstay of treatment for pNETs, a period of observation in select individuals with small, incidentally discovered pNETs may also be considered safe. Management with surgical resection or initial observation must be an individualized decision and may be optimally supported with formal multidisciplinary tumor board discussion.

Solid Pseudopapillary Tumor of the Pancreas: Is Enucleation Safe?

BACKGROUND

While solid pseudopapillary tumor (SPT) of the pancreas are oncologically low-risk tumors, their resection with pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) or partial pancreatectomy (PP) carries a significant risk for morbidity. To balance the favorable prognosis with the surgical morbidity of pancreas resection, this study explores the oncologic safety of enucleation (EN).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried for resected SPT from January 2004 through December 2020. Perioperative outcomes and survival were analyzed with Kruskal-Wallis tests, and Kaplan-Meier analysis (with log-rank test). Survival analysis was performed to compare patients with and without lymph node (LN) metastases and binary logistic regression for predictors of LN metastasis.

RESULTS

A total of 922 patients met inclusion criteria; 18 patients (2%) underwent EN, 550 (59.6%) underwent PP, and 354 (38.4%) underwent PD. Mean tumor size was 57.6 mm. Length of hospital stay was significantly shorter for EN compared with PP and PD groups (3.8 versus 6.2 versus 9.4 days, p < 0.001). There was a nonsignificant improvement in unplanned readmission [0% versus 8% versus 10.7% (p = 0.163)], 30-day mortality [0% versus 0.5% versus 0% (p = 0.359)], and 90-day mortality [0% versus 0.5% versus 0% (p = 0.363)] between EN, PP, and PD groups. Survival analyses showed no difference in OS when comparing EN versus PP (p = 0.443), and EN versus PD (p = 0317). Patients with LN metastases (p < 0.001) fared worse, and lymphovascular invasion, higher T category (T3-4) and M1 status were found as predictors for LN metastasis.

CONCLUSIONS

EN may be considered for select patients leading to favorable outcomes. Because survival was worse in the rare cohort of patients with LN metastases, the predictors for LN metastasis identified here may aid in stratifying patients to EN versus resection.

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: Are tumors smaller than 2 cm truly indolent?

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) are relatively rare but rank as the second most common pancreatic neoplasm. They can be functional, causing early metabolic disturbances due to hormone secretion, or non-functional and diagnosed later based on tumor size-related symptoms. Recent diagnoses of PNETs under 2 cm in size have sparked debates about their management; some practitioners advocate for surgical removal and others suggest observation due to the tumors' lower potential for malignancy. However, it is unclear whether managing these small tumors expectantly is truly safe.

AIM

To evaluate poor prognostic factors in PNETs based on tumor size (> 2 cm or < 2 cm) in surgically treated patients.

METHODS

This cohort study included 64 patients with PNETs who underwent surgical resection between 2006 and 2019 at a high-complexity reference hospital in Medellín, Colombia. To assess patient survival, quarterly follow-ups were conducted during the first year after surgery, followed by semi-annual consultations at the hospital's hepatobiliary surgery department. Qualitative variables were described using absolute and relative frequencies, and quantitative variables were expressed using measures of central tendency and their corresponding measures of dispersion.

RESULTS

The presence of lymph node involvement, neural involvement, and lymphovascular invasion were all associated with an increased risk of mortality, with hazard ratios of 5.68 (95%CI: 1.26-25.61, P = 0.024), 6.44 (95%CI: 1.43-28.93, P = 0.015), and 24.87 (95%CI: 2.98-207.19, P = 0.003), respectively. Neural involvement and lymphovascular invasion were present in tumors smaller than 2 cm in diameter and those larger than 2 cm in diameter. The recurrence rates between the two tumor groups were furthermore similar: 18.2% for tumors smaller than 2 cm and 21.4% for tumors larger than 2 cm. Patient survival was additionally comparable between the two tumor groups.

CONCLUSION

Tumor size does not dictate prognosis; lymph node and lymphovascular involvement affect mortality, which highlights that histopathological factors-rather than tumor size-may play a role in management.

Cavitron ultrasonic surgical aspirator (CUSA) compared with conventional pancreatic transection in distal pancreatectomy: study protocol for the randomised controlled CUSA-1 pilot trial

BACKGROUND

Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) remains the most common and serious complication after distal pancreatectomy. Many attempts at lowering fistula rates have led to unrewarding insignificant results as still up to 30% of the patients suffer from clinically relevant POPF. Therefore, the development of new innovative methods and procedures is still a cornerstone of current surgical research.The cavitron ultrasonic surgical aspirator (CUSA) device is a well-known ultrasound-based parenchyma transection method, often used in liver and neurosurgery which has not yet been thoroughly investigated in pancreatic surgery, but the first results seem very promising.

METHODS

The CUSA-1 trial is a randomised controlled pilot trial with two parallel study groups. This single-centre trial is assessor and patient blinded. A total of 60 patients with an indication for open distal pancreatectomy will be intraoperatively randomised after informed consent. The patients will be randomly assigned to either the control group with conventional pancreas transection (scalpel or stapler) or the experimental group, with transection using the CUSA device. The primary safety endpoint of this trial will be postoperative complications ≥grade 3 according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. The primary endpoint to investigate the effect will be the rate of POPF within 30 days postoperatively according to the ISGPS definition. Further perioperative outcomes, including postpancreatectomy haemorrhage, length of hospital stay and mortality will be analysed as secondary endpoints.

DISCUSSION

Based on the available literature, CUSA may have a beneficial effect on POPF occurrence after distal pancreatectomy. The rationale of the CUSA-1 pilot trial is to investigate the safety and feasibility of the CUSA device in elective open distal pancreatectomy compared with conventional dissection methods and gather the first data on the effect on POPF occurrence. This data will lay the groundwork for a future confirmatory multicentre randomised controlled trial.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The CUSA-1 trial protocol was approved by the ethics committee of the University of Heidelberg (No. S-098/2022). Results will be published in an international peer-reviewed journal and summaries will be provided in lay language to study participants and their relatives.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

DRKS00027474.

Robotic enucleation & uncinectomy of complex lesions of the proximal pancreas

BACKGROUND

Malignant tumours within the proximal pancreas traditionally require pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for cure. For smaller lesions with borderline malignant potential the risk/benefit of PD becomes difficult to justify. Robotic approaches to these lesions allow for parenchymal preserving resection with reduced complication profile without oncological compromise.

METHODS

A review of a single surgeons prospectively collated database across two institutions of consecutive robotic enucleations or parenchyma preserving resections of the proximal pancreas was performed between July 2018 and October 2021. Standard demographic data, preoperative variables, intraoperative parameters, post-operative outcomes, morbidity and mortality were recorded.

RESULTS

Thirteen patients (8 female and 5 male) underwent robotic enucleation (EN) (8) and/or uncinectomy (UN) (5) in the proximal pancreas. Mean BMI was 32(kg/m2 ). Three patients (21%) underwent preoperative prophylactic pancreatic duct stenting. One patient required conversion to open. The median operative time in the EN group was 170 min (108-224 min) and the UN group was 160 min (110-204 min). The majority (8) of lesions were pNETs. Three lesions were IPMNs, with 1 solitary fibrous tumour and a serous cystic neoplasm (SCN) respectively. Median tumour size was 23 mm (11-58 mm) in the EN group, and 27 mm (17-38 mm) in the UN group. Ten of 13 patients had an R0 resection. There was no mortality in our series. Four (31%) patients across both groups developed clinically relevant POPF while none developed new endocrine or exocrine insufficiency. Average outpatient follow-up has been 6 months (1-18 months).

CONCLUSION

A robotic approach in proximal parenchymal preserving pancreatectomy is expanding, safe and feasible.

Diagnosis and Surgical Management of Insulinomas-A 23-Year Single-Center Experience

Background and Objectives: Insulinoma is a rare tumor of the Langerhans islets of the pancreas. It produces insulin and causes severe hypoglycemia with neuroglycopenic symptoms. The incidence is low, at about 1-2 per 1 million inhabitants per year. The diagnosis is based on the presence of Whipple's triad and the result of a fasting test. Surgery is the treatment of choice. Objectives: A retrospective observational study of patients operated on for insulinoma in our hospital focused on the diagnosis, the type of surgery, and complications. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients operated on due to insulinoma. There were 116 surgeries between 2000 and 2022. There were 79 females and 37 males in this group. A fasting test and a CT examination were performed on all the patients. Results: The average duration of the fasting test was 18 h. Insulinoma was found in the body and tail of the pancreas in more than half of the patients. Enucleation was the most frequent type of surgery. Complications that were Clavien Dindo grade III or more occurred in 18% of the patients. The most frequent complications were abscesses and pancreatic fistula. Five patients had malignant insulinoma. Conclusions: Surgery is the treatment of choice in the case of insulinomas. The enucleation of the tumor is a sufficient treatment for benign insulinomas, which are not in contact with the main pancreatic duct. Due to the low incidence of the condition, the centralization of patients is recommended.

Minimally invasive enucleation versus open enucleation for benign or low-grade malignant pancreatic neoplasms: Effects on clinical outcomes and quality of life

Introduction

The efficacy and safety of minimally invasive pancreatic enucleation (PE) have rarely been investigated. This study aimed to compare the perioperative and long-term outcomes of minimally invasive enucleation (MIEn) with those of open enucleation (OEn) for benign/low-grade malignant pancreatic neoplasms.

Patients and Methods

Data collected from patients who underwent PE between January 2011 and June 2020 at our centre were analysed.

Results

Forty-two patients who underwent MIEn (10 - robot-assisted and 32 - laparoscopic) and 47 who underwent OEn were included in this study. Compared with the OEn group, the MIEn group showed shorter operation time (147.6 ± 71.3 min vs. 183.1 ± 64.3 min), shorter post-operative hospital stay (11.5 ± 3.9 days vs. 13.4 ± 4.2 days), shorter off-bed activity time (2.9 ± 0.9 days vs. 3.7 ± 1.0 days) and lower estimated blood loss (EBL) (118.5 ± 59.2 mL vs. 153.1 ± 85.0 mL). Overall complication rate (47.6% vs. 55.3%), overall post-operative pancreatic fistula (POPF) rate (40.5% vs. 44.7%) and Grade B + C POPF rate (11.9% vs. 19.1%) were similar in both the groups. For neoplasms located in the proximal pancreas, MIEn showed more favourable perioperative outcomes than OEn. Unlike MIEn for superficial neoplasms, MIEn for neoplasms deeply embedded in the pancreas resulted in a longer operative time and tended to increase EBL and the incidence of complications and POPF. During the follow-up period, no significant differences were observed between these two groups in terms of pancreatic function or quality of life.

Conclusions

Compared to OEn, MIEn is effective and safe for patients with benign or low-grade malignant pancreatic neoplasms. However, MIEn for embedded pancreatic neoplasms is recommended only in experienced centres because of the high rates of complications and POPF.

Efficacy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition for solid pancreatic lesions 20 mm or less in diameter suspected as neuroendocrine tumors or requiring differentiation

BACKGROUND

For non-functioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) ≤ 20 mm, most guidelines consider follow-up observations as an option; however, the various treatment strategies are defined by size alone, even though the Ki-67 index is important for malignancy grading. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA) is the standard for the histopathological diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions; however, recent results for small lesions remain unclear. Therefore, we examined the efficacy of EUS-TA for solid pancreatic lesions ≤ 20 mm suspected as pNETs or requiring differentiation and the non-increase rate in tumor size in follow-up cases.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed data of 111 patients (median age = 58 years) with lesions ≤ 20 mm suspected as pNETs or requiring differentiation who underwent EUS-TA. All patients underwent specimen evaluation by rapid onsite evaluation (ROSE).

RESULTS

EUS-TA led to a diagnosis of pNETs in 77 patients (69.4%) and tumors other than pNETs in 22 patients (19.8%). The histopathological diagnostic accuracy of EUS-TA was 89.2% (99/111) overall, 94.3% (50/53) for 10-20 mm lesions, and 84.5% (49/58) for ≤ 10 mm lesions, with no significant difference in diagnostic accuracy (p = 0.13). The Ki-67 index was measurable in all patients with a histopathological diagnosis of pNETs. Among 49 patients with a diagnosis of pNETs who were followed up, one patient (2.0%) showed tumor enlargement.

CONCLUSIONS

EUS-TA for solid pancreatic lesions ≤ 20 mm suspected as pNETs or requiring differentiation is safe and has adequate histopathological diagnostic accuracy, suggesting that follow-up observations of pNETs with a histological pathologic diagnosis are acceptable in the short term.

The role of main pancreatic duct stent in the enucleation of benign/borderline pancreatic head tumors: a cohort study

PURPOSE

This study aimed to reveal the role of preoperative main pancreatic duct (MPD) stent placement in reducing the intraoperative main pancreatic duct injury rate and the incidence of postoperative pancreatic leakage following pancreatic tumor enucleation.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort analysis was performed for all patients with benign/borderline pancreatic head tumors who were treated with enucleation. The patients were divided into two groups (standard vs. stent) depending on whether they underwent main pancreatic duct stent placement prior to surgery.

RESULTS

Thirty-three patients were finally included in the analytical cohort. Compared with the standard group, patients in the stent group had a shorter distance between tumors and main pancreatic duct (p=0.01) and presented with larger tumors (p<0.01). The rates of POPF (grade B&C) were 39.1% (9/23) and 20% (2/10) in the standard and stent groups, respectively (p<0.01). Major postoperative complications occurred more frequently in the standard group than in the stent group (14 versus 2; p<0.01). No significant differences in mortality, in-hospital stay or medical cost were observed between the two groups (p>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

MPD stent placement prior to surgery may facilitate pancreatic tumor enucleation, minimize MPD injury and decrease the occurrence of postoperative fistula.

Pancreatic Enucleation Patients Share the Same Quality of Life as the General Population at Long-Term Follow-Up: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess short- and long-term outcomes including quality of life (QoL) following pancreatic enucleation (PE).

BACKGROUND

PE is deemed to preserve both the endocrine and the exocrine function while ensuring radicality. However, to assess whether this reflects an actual benefit perceived by patients, QoL has to be considered.

METHODS

Data from all consecutive patients undergoing PE from January 2010 to December 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Surgical outcomes were graded according to the Clavien-Dindo classification, and EORTC-C30 and the EORTC-Pan26 were administered as a cross-sectional assessment of QoL. A control group consisting of healthy individuals from the general population was obtained and matched using the propensity score matching method.

RESULTS

Eighty-one patients underwent PE using the open (59.3%), laparoscopic (27.2%), or robot-assisted (13.5%) approach. Sixty-five (80.2%) patients exhibited functioning/nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors at final pathology.Surgical morbidity and complications of a Clavien-Dindo grade ≥3 were 48.1% and 16.0%, respectively. In-hospital mortality was 0%. Postoperative pancreatic fistula, post-pancreatectomy hemorrhage, and delayed gastric emptying rates were 21.0%, 9.9%, and 4.9%, respectively.Patients returned the questionnaires after a median of 74.2 months from the index surgery. Postoperative new onset of diabetes mellitus (NODM) was observed in 5 subjects (7.1%), with age being an independent predictor. Seven patients (10.0%) developed postoperative exocrine insufficiency. At the analysis of QoL, all function and symptom scales were comparable between the 2 groups, except for 2 of the EORTC-Pan 26 symptom scales, ("worries for the future" and "body image", P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite being associated with significant postoperative morbidity, PE provides excellent long-term outcomes. The risk of NODM is low and related to patient age, with QoL being comparable to the general population. Such information should drive surgeons to pursue PE whenever properly indicated.

Enucleation for low-grade branch duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms: Long-term follow-up

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic enucleation allows resection of branch-duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms with full parenchyma preservation. The aim of this study was to assess intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms recurrence and functional outcomes during long-term follow-up after enucleation.

METHODS

Patient characteristics, as well as radiologic and clinicopathologic follow-up data of patients who underwent enucleation for branch-duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms between 2004 and 2014, were analyzed. Quality of life was assessed using the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-PAN26 questionnaires.

RESULTS

Seventy-four patients underwent enucleation for low-grade branch-duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms in 71 and high-grade branch-duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms in 3 patients. Long-term follow-up data were available for 66 patients (89%; median follow-up: 87 months). Radiologic imaging (n = 56) showed intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm recurrence in 10 patients (18%) including local recurrence at the site of enucleation in 3 patients (5%) and new onset intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms manifestation in 7 patients (13%) at a distant site in the pancreatic remnant. Four patients (6%) underwent reoperation. Two of these patients had intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm-associated carcinoma, one of them at the enucleation site. During the follow-up period, no intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm-related deaths occurred and no new onsets of insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus were observed. QLQ-C30 revealed a global health status of 66.0% and overall functioning and symptom scores of 81.0% and 22.8%, respectively. Additionally, QLQ-PAN26 showed an overall symptom score of 26.5%.

CONCLUSION

Enucleation is an organ-preserving surgical treatment option for low-grade branch-duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms with low local recurrence risk and excellent functional long-term outcome. However, postoperative life-long follow-up must be performed as for any type of partial pancreatectomy for intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms due to the risk of recurrence and potential malignancy.

Personalisierte Resektionsverfahren bei neuroendokrinen Neoplasien des Pankreas

Neuroendokrine Neoplasien des Pankreas (pNEN) haben eine steigende Inzidenz und erhalten klinisch dadurch eine immer höhere Relevanz. Neben den hormonell inaktiven pNEN gibt es die hormonproduzierenden Tumoren, und sowohl die inaktiven als auch die aktiven pNEN können entweder sporadisch oder hereditär vorkommen. Die Behandlung orientiert sich an tumorassoziierten Faktoren, aber auch an individuellen patienteneigenen Gegebenheiten. Für die Behandlung sind individuelle maßgeschneiderte Konzepte notwendig, welche die jeweiligen Faktoren und Gegebenheiten berücksichtigen.

Enucleation Is a Feasible Procedure for Well-Differentiated pNEN-A Matched Pair Analysis

The extent of surgical resection in the treatment of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (pNEN) is still controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of enucleation for well-differentiated non-functional (nf) pNEN. Patients undergoing enucleation (2001−2020) were analyzed. Clinicopathological parameters, perioperative outcomes and survival were assessed. The analysis was performed as a nested case-control study and matched-pair analysis with formal resection. Sixty-one patients undergoing enucleation were identified. Compared to patients undergoing formal resection, enucleation was associated with a significantly shorter median length of operative time (128 (IQR 95−170) versus 263 (172−337) minutes, p < 0.0001) and a significantly lower rate of postoperative diabetes (2% versus 21%, p = 0.0020). There was no significant difference in postoperative pancreatic fistula rate (18% versus 16% type B/C, p = 1.0), Clavien−Dindo ≥ III complications (20% versus 26%, p = 0.5189), readmission rate (12% versus 15%, p = 0.6022) or length of hospital stay (8 (7−11) versus 10 (8−17) days, p = 0.0652). There was no 30-day mortality after enucleation compared to 1.6% (n = 1) after formal resection. 10-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) was similar between the two groups (OS: 89% versus 77%, p = 0.2756; DFS: 98% versus 91%, p = 0.0873). Enucleation presents a safe surgical approach for well-differentiated nf-pNEN with good long-term outcomes for selected patients.

[Surgery of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: state of the art]

Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (pNEN) have a rising incidence and are increasingly diagnosed at early and thus potentially resectable stages. Due to the rarity of these neoplasms the recommendations of currently available guidelines are mainly based on retrospective data. Surgical and oncological treatment of these rare diseases should only be performed at specialized centers. In cases of resectability without indications of diffuse metastases, complete resection with curative intent should be the treatment of choice. For small nonfunctional pNENs < 2 cm watch and wait strategies are recommended as an alternative to surgical treatment. Recent data, however, also showed an increased survival even of small (1-2 cm) pNENs after resection. For benign insulinomas and small nonfunctional well-differentiated pNENs parenchyma-sparing procedures, such as enucleation and segmental resection are available. The question of the influence of lymph node metastases on long-term disease-free survival and overall survival and consequently the role of systematic lymphadenectomy is still a matter of debate. In pNENs > 2 cm formal resection with lymphadenectomy is considered the gold standard. Minimally invasive and robotic-assisted procedures are of increasing importance also for formal pancreatic resection.

Laparoscopic Enucleation of Pancreatic Neoplasms: A Single-Center Experience and Outcomes

Background: Laparoscopic technique has been increasingly applied in the treatment of selected pancreatic tumors. The aim of this study is to evaluate the experience with laparoscopic enucleation of pancreatic neoplasms (LEPNs), for selected pancreatic diseases, at a high-volume referral center. Methods: Between May 2012 and October 2020, LEPNs was attempted in 16 patients with selected pancreatic neoplasms. The localization of tumors, etiology, indications, and clinical outcomes were analyzed. Results: Sixteen patients were included. LEPN was successfully performed in 13 patients, 3 conversions to open procedure were required. The definitive histopathological result of the resected pieces showed prevalence of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms. Postoperative major complications occurred for 3 patients (18.7%), the 3 of them presented postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF). The median hospital stay was 4.5 days (range 2-7) for patients without POPF and 14.6 days (3-30) for those who presented with POPF. No deaths were registered. During a median follow-up of 43.8 months (0.2-109), no new-onset exocrine or endocrine insufficiency was diagnosed, no patient experienced tumor recurrence and, the 4 patients who underwent LEPN for insulinoma, remained asymptomatic. Conclusion: LEPNs has become a valuable alternative for patients with benign or low risk of malignancy tumors. Appropriate preoperative imaging is key for localization. Whenever feasible, this technique not only reduces the risks of exocrine and endocrine insufficiency, but also adds the well-known advantages of minimally invasive techniques, making it a safe and feasible treatment.

Rare case of pancreatic lipomatous hamartoma

A middle-aged man had an incidental finding of 10.1 cm lipomatous mass arising from pancreatic body/neck detected on CT scan. He was asymptomatic. He underwent surgical resection of the mass due to concern for malignancy. His postoperative course was complicated by a high-volume pancreatic leak of approximately 900 mL/day. He underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and insertion of a pancreatic stent, with some improvement in the pancreatic leak. His leak eventually settled after 3 months. The final histopathology showed lobules of mature adipocytes with small islands of disorganised benign pancreatic ducts and acini interspersed within them, suggestive of pancreatic hamartoma of lipomatous variant. Pancreatic lipomatous hamartomas are rare and are often diagnosed on final histopathology when the initial resection was performed due to diagnostic uncertainty or concern for malignancy. It is a benign lesion with an indolent course and must be discriminated from other lipomatous lesions of the pancreas. An awareness of the condition is important to help guide management.

Preoperative Prediction of G1 and G2/3 Grades in Patients With Nonfunctional Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors Using Multimodality Imaging

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to develop and validate a multimodality radiomics model for the preoperative prediction of nonfunctional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (NF-pNET) grade (G).

METHODS

This retrospective study assessed 123 patients with surgically resected, pathologically confirmed NF-pNETs who underwent multidetector computed tomography and MRI scans between December 2012 and May 2020. Radiomic features were extracted from multidetector computed tomography and MRI. Wilcoxon rank-sum test and Max-Relevance and Min-Redundancy tests were used to select the features. The linear discriminative analysis (LDA) was used to construct the four models including a clinical model, MRI radiomics model, computed tomography radiomics model, and mixed radiomics model. The performance of the models was assessed using a training cohort (82 patients) and a validation cohort (41 patients), and decision curve analysis was applied for clinical use.

RESULTS

We successfully constructed 4 models to predict the tumor grade of NF- pNETs. Model 4 combined 6 features of T2-weighted imaging radiomics features and 1 arterial-phase computed tomography radiomics feature, and showed better discrimination in the training cohort (AUC = 0.92) and validation cohort (AUC = 0.85) relative to the other models. In the decision curves, if the threshold probability was 0.07-0.87, the use of the radiomics score to distinguish NF-pNET G1 and G2/3 offered more benefit than did the use of a "treat all patients" or a "treat none" scheme in the training cohort of the MRI radiomics model.

CONCLUSION

The LDA classifier combining multimodality images may be a valuable noninvasive tool for distinguishing NF-pNET grades and avoid unnecessary surgery.

Resektionsstrategien beim BD-IPMN - Enukleation oder onkologische Resektion?

Hintergrund Das maligne Potenzial und die chirurgische Behandlung intraduktaler papillärer muzinöser Neoplasien der Seitengänge der Bauchspeicheldrüse (BD-IPMNs) bleiben umstritten. Die Enukleation (EN) als parenchymsparende Resektion des Pankreas kann eine wertvolle Alternative zu Standardresektionen (SR), z. B. Whipple oder distale Pankreatektomie, für die Behandlung von BD-IPMNs darstellen, ihre Rolle ist jedoch noch unzureichend definiert. Ziel dieser Übersichtsarbeit ist es, Indikationen und postoperative Ergebnisse nach Pankreas-Enukleation im Vergleich zur Standardresektion (SR) zu vergleichen.

Methoden Es wurde eine selektive Literaturrecherche durchgeführt. Die postoperativen Kurz- und Langzeitergebnisse beider Operationsverfahren wurden ausgewertet.

Ergebnisse Die EN ist im Vergleich zur SR mit einer kürzeren Operationszeit und einem geringeren Blutverlust verbunden. Die chirurgische Gesamtmorbidität unterscheidet sich nicht zwischen den beiden Verfahren. Obwohl die EN weniger invasiv ist, stellt die Entwicklung einer Pankreasfistel die häufigste Komplikation nach EN dar, und in mehreren Studien wird über eine höhere Rate an Pankreasfisteln nach EN als nach SR berichtet. Die Unterschiede, bezogen auf die Pankreasfistel, werden zwischen den beiden Verfahren in High-Volume-Zentren abgemildert. Die EN ermöglicht im Vergleich zur SR öfter den Erhalt der exokrinen und endokrinen Funktion der Bauchspeicheldrüse, dies ist der wichtigste Vorteil dieses Verfahrens.

Schlussfolgerungen Die EN scheint eine sichere und wirksame Alternative in der Behandlung der Seitengang-IPMN mit geringem Risiko zu sein, die den Erhalt der endokrinen und exokrinen Funktion ermöglicht. Außerdem sind die postoperativen Komplikationen und Rezidivraten nach EN vergleichbar mit den wesentlich umfangreicheren chirurgischen Verfahren. Die EN der Bauchspeicheldrüse sollte jedoch von erfahrenen Chirurgen durchgeführt werden. Da es sich um ein nicht onkologisches Verfahren handelt, muss die Auswahl der Patienten sehr genau erfolgen, was die Bedeutung der Behandlung in Einrichtungen mit hohem Patientenaufkommen unterstreicht.

Organ preserving pancreatic resections offer better long-term conservation of pancreatic function at the expense of high perioperative major morbidity: a fair trade-off for benign or low malignant potential pancreatic neoplasms-a single-center experience

BACKGROUND

Standard pancreatic resections (SPRs) might have long-term deleterious effects on pancreatic function, without added oncological advantage in low malignant potential (LMP) or benign neoplasms. This study aimed to evaluate outcomes following organ-preserving pancreatic resections (OPPARs) and SPRs.

METHOD

Post hoc analysis of patients undergoing OPPAR or SPR for benign or LMP pancreatic tumors from January 2011 to January 2020 at Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai.

RESULTS

Thirty-six and 114 patients were identified in OPPAR and SPR groups respectively. The overall morbidity (58.3% vs 43.9%, p-0.129) was comparable. Major morbidity (41.7% vs 21.9%, p-0.020), post-operative pancreatic fistula (POPF) (63.9% vs 35.1%, p-0.002), and clinically relevant POPF (41.7% vs 20.2%, p-0.010) were significantly higher with OPPAR. Post-operative endocrine insufficiency (14.9% vs 11.1%, p-0.567), exocrine insufficiency (19.3% vs 0%, p-0.004), and requirement of long-term pancreatic enzyme replacement (17.5% vs 0%, p-0.007) were higher in SPRs. Comparing left-sided and right-sided resections in the entire cohort, incidence of endocrine insufficiency was 17.1% vs 11.2% (p-0.299) and that of exocrine insufficiency was 8.6% vs 20% (p-0.048) respectively.

CONCLUSION

OPPAR is associated with high post-operative major morbidity and pancreatic fistula rate but offers long-term benefit due to better preservation of pancreatic function than SPR. The incidence of exocrine insufficiency is higher in right sided as compared to left-sided pancreatic resections.

Comparison of Outcomes of Enucleation vs. Standard Surgical Resection for Pancreatic Neoplasms: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

With advancement in health technology, the detection rate of pancreatic neoplasms is increasing. Tissue sparing surgery (enucleation) as well as standard surgical resection are two commonly used modalities of management. There are studies comparing clinical outcomes between these two modalities; however, there is lack of studies that systematically pool the available findings to present conclusive and reliable evidence.

Methods

A systematic search was conducted using the PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases. Studies that were randomised controlled trials or cohort based or analysed retrospective data were considered for inclusion. Studies should have been done in adult patients with pancreatic neoplasms and should have examined the outcomes of interest by the two management modalities i.e., enucleation and standard surgical resection. Statistical analysis was performed using STATA software.

Results

A total of 20 studies were included in the meta-analysis. The operation time (in minutes) (WMD −78.20; 95% CI: −89.47, −66.93) and blood loss (in ml) (WMD −204.30; 95% CI: −281.70, −126.90) for enucleation was significantly lesser than standard surgical resection. The risk of endocrine (RR 0.32; 95% CI: 0.18, 0.56) and exocrine insufficiency (RR 0.16; 95% CI: 0.07, 0.34) was lower whereas the risk of post-operative pancreatic fistula (RR 1.46; 95% CI: 1.22, 1.75) was higher in enucleation, compared to standard surgical resection group. There were no differences in the risk of reoperation, readmission, recurrence, mortality within 90 days and 5-years overall mortality between the two groups.

Conclusions

Enucleation, compared to standard surgical resection, was associated with better clinical outcomes and therefore, might be considered for selected pancreatic neoplasms. There is a need for randomised controlled trials to document the efficacy of these two management techniques.

Multimodal Management of Grade 1 and 2 Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (p-NETs) are rare tumors with a recent growing incidence. In the 2017 WHO classification, p-NETs are classified into well-differentiated (i.e., p-NETs grade 1 to 3) and poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (i.e., p-NECs). P-NETs G1 and G2 are often non-functioning tumors, of which the prognosis depends on the metastatic status. In the localized setting, p-NETs should be surgically managed, as no benefit for adjuvant chemotherapy has been demonstrated. Parenchymal sparing resection, including both duodenum and pancreas, are safe procedures in selected patients with reduced endocrine and exocrine long-term dysfunction. When the p-NET is benign or borderline malignant, this surgical option is associated with low rates of severe postoperative morbidity and in-hospital mortality. This narrative review offers comments, tips, and tricks from reviewing the available literature on these different options in order to clarify their indications. We also sum up the overall current data on p-NETs G1 and G2 management.

Diagnosis and treatment of hemosuccus pancreaticus induced by intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm: a case report and review of the literature

Determining the cause of gastrointestinal bleeding is critical to determining appropriate treatment. Upper gastrointestinal bleeding from the pancreas, referred to hemosuccus pancreaticus, is a rare entity that can cause massive and life-threatening bleeding. Diagnosis remains challenging, and the mortality rate of hemosuccus pancreaticus remains high, ranging from 9.6%–90%. In this article, we present a case that was successfully diagnosed and treated at the Department of General Surgery, Hanoi Medical University Hospital, and a review of the available literature regarding this rare disease.

Exendin-4-based imaging in insulinoma localization: Systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND CONTEXT

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1 R) based imaging has shown higher sensitivity for insulinoma localization as compared to other anatomic/functional imaging.

METHODOLOGY

We reviewed the published English literature for GLP-1 R targeted imaging in insulinoma in PubMed until August 2020 in accordance with PRISMA guidelines using the MeSH terms "((Exendin-4 PET/CT) OR (Exendin-4 SPECT/CT) OR (GLP-1 R imaging)) AND (Insulinoma)". An individual patient data-metanalysis (IPD-MA) was performed, and performance parameters were calculated for the histopathological diagnosis of insulinoma.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

True-positive (TP), false-positive (FP), false-negative (FN), true-negative (TN), sensitivity (Sn), specificity (Sp), positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) for insulinoma localization.

RESULTS

A total of 179 cases (316 lesions) from 16 publications were included for IPD-MA. For insulinoma localization, exendin-4-PET/CT (Sn & PPV: 94%) performed better than exendin-4-SPECT/CT (Sn: 63%, PPV: 94%). The Sn was lower in malignant insulinoma cases whereas the Sp was higher in cases with MEN-1 syndrome. With exendin-4-based imaging, FP uptakes in Brunner's gland, normal pancreas, and other β-cell pathologies and FN results in pancreatic tail lesions and malignancy were seen in a few patients. TN results suggested the correct diagnosis of other endogenous hyperinsulinemic hypoglycaemia (EHH) subtypes.

CONCLUSION

For insulinoma localization, exendin-4 PET/CT should be preferred over exendin-4 SPECT/CT because of higher sensitivity and specificity. FP uptakes in Brunner's gland, normal pancreas, and other β-cell pathologies and FN results in tail lesions, and malignant insulinomas are limitations. Higher specificity for insulinoma localization is particularly useful in patients with MEN-1 syndrome.

Investigating difficult to detect pancreatic lesions: Characterization of benign pancreatic islet cell tumors using multiparametric pancreatic 3-T MRI

Introduction

Pancreatic islet-cell tumors (PICT) often present with atypical signal-characteristics and are often missed on preoperative imaging. The aim of this study is to provide a multiparametric PICT characterization and investigate factors impeding PICT detection.

Material and methods

This is a detailed MRI analysis of a prospective, monocenter study, including 49 consecutive patients (37 female, 12 male; median age 50) with symptoms due to endogenous hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia (EHH) and mostly negative prior-imaging. All patients received a 3-T MRI and a ⁶⁸Ga-DOTA-exendin-4-PET/CT. Pooled accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and inter-reader agreement were calculated. Reference-standard was histopathology and ⁶⁸Ga-DOTA-Exendin-4-PET/CT in one patient who refused surgery. For PICT analyses, 34 patients with 49 PICTs (48 histologically proven; one ⁶⁸Ga-DOTA-exendin-4-PET/CT positive) were assessed. Dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) Magnetic Resonance Images (MRI) with Golden-Angle-Radial-Sparse-Parallel (GRASP) reconstruction, enabling imaging at high spatial and temporal resolution, was used to assess enhancement-patterns of PICTs. Tumor-to-background (T2B) ratio for each sequence and the employed quantitative threshold for conspicuity of PICTs were analyzed in regard to prediction of true-positive PICTs.

Results

Evaluation of 49 patients revealed a pooled lesion-based accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of 70.3%, 72.9% and 62.5%, respectively. Mean PICT size was 12.9±5.3mm for detected, 9.0±2.9mm for undetected PICTs (p-value 0.0112). In-phase T1w detected the most PICT (67.3%). Depending on the sequence, PICTs were isointense and poorly visible in 29–68%. Only 2/41(4.9%) PICTs showed typical signal-characteristics across T1w, T2w, DWI and ceT1w combined. 66.6% of PICTs enhanced simultaneously to the parenchyma, 17.8% early and 15.6% late. Predictor screening analysis showed number of sequences detecting a PICT, lesion size and in-phase T1w T2B ratio had the highest contribution for detecting a true-positive PICT.

Conclusion

The majority of PICTs enhance simultaneously to surrounding parenchyma, present with atypical signal-characteristics and thus are poorly visible. In non-enhancing PICTs, radiologists should search for small lesions most likely conspicuous on unenhanced T1w or DWI.

Enucleation for benign or borderline tumors of the pancreas: comparing open and minimally invasive surgery

BACKGROUND

The feasibility and safety of minimally invasive enucleation (ME) for benign or borderline pancreatic tumors is still unclear. The aim of this study was to compare outcomes between ME and open enucleation (OE).

METHODS

All patients undergoing pancreatic enucleation between October 2001 and January 2020 were analyzed from a prospective database. Consecutive patients undergoing ME were compared with patients undergoing OE in a matched-pair analysis (1:2).

RESULTS

Of 358 patients, undergoing enucleation, 120 matched patients (ME n = 40, OE n = 80) were included. Patients undergoing ME had less blood loss (median 50 vs. 100 ml, P = 0.025) and had a higher proportion of patients discharged by 7 days, than patients undergoing OE (38% vs. 18%, P = 0.016). The rates of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) and major complications (Clavien grade ≥ 3) were similar between both groups. Risk factor analysis for POPF B/C showed no significant parameters associated with POPF, including tumor size and proximity to the main pancreatic duct.

CONCLUSION

Compared with conventional OE, ME reduces the amount of bleeding and allows earlier postoperative discharge, without increasing the incidence of major complications. Thus, minimally invasive enucleation should be considered for benign tumors of the pancreas when technically and oncologically feasible.

Parenchymal Sparing Resection: Options in Duodenal and Pancreatic Surgery

Parenchymal sparing duodenal and pancreatic resection are safe procedures in selected patients with the aim to reduce endocrine and exocrine long-term dysfunction. When the tumor is benign or borderline malignant, this appears to be a good option for the surgeon, associated with low rates of severe surgery-related early postoperative complications and low in-hospital mortality. This mini review offers comments, tips and tricks, and a review of literature concerning those different options with specific illustrations in order to clarify their indication.

Solid pseudopapillary neoplasm-diagnostic approach and post-surgical follow up: Three case reports and review of literature

BACKGROUND

Solid pseudopapillary neoplasm (SPN) is a rare tumor that was first described by Frantz in 1959. Although this tumor is benign, some may have malignant potential that can be predicted based on demographics, imaging characteristics, and pathologic evaluation. This case series presents 3 SPN cases with discussion on gender differences, preoperative predictors of malignancy, and a suggested algorithm for diagnostic approach as well as post-surgical follow up.

CASE SUMMARY

Three adult patients in a tertiary hospital found to have SPN, one elderly male and two young females. Each of the cases presented with abdominal pain and were discovered incidentally. Two cases underwent endoscopic ultrasound with fine needle aspiration and biopsy to assess tumor markers and immuno-histochemical staining (which were consistent with SPN before undergoing surgery), and one case underwent surgery directly after imaging. The average tumor size was 5 cm. Diagnosis was confirmed by histology. Two patients had post-surgical complications requiring intervention.

CONCLUSION

Demographic and imaging characteristics can be sufficient to establish diagnosis for SPN, while malignant cases require pre-operative evaluation with endoscopic ultrasound fine needle aspiration/fine needle biopsy.

Indications and outcomes of enucleation versus formal pancreatectomy for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

BACKGROUND

Pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) or distal pancreatectomy (DP) are common procedures for patients with a pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (pNET). Nevertheless, certain patients may benefit from a pancreas-preserving resection such as enucleation (EN). The aim of this study was to define the indications and differences in long-term outcomes among patients undergoing EN and PD/DP.

METHODS

Patients undergoing resection of a pNET between 1992 and 2016 were identified. Indications and outcomes were evaluated, and propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was performed to compare long-term outcomes between patients who underwent EN versus PD/DP.

RESULTS

Among 1034 patients, 143 (13.8%) underwent EN, 304 (29.4%) PD, and 587 (56.8%) DP. Indications for EN were small size (1.5 cm, IQR:1.0-1.9), functional tumors (58.0%) that were mainly insulinomas (51.7%). After PSM (n = 109 per group), incidence of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) grade B/C was higher after EN (24.5%) compared with PD/DP (14.0%) (p = 0.049). Median recurrence-free survival (RFS) was comparable among patients who underwent EN (47 months, 95% CI:23-71) versus PD/DP (37 months, 95% CI: 33-47, p = 0.480).

CONCLUSION

Comparable long-term outcomes were noted among patients who underwent EN versus PD/DP for pNET. The incidence of clinically significant POPF was higher after EN.

Prognosis analysis of patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors after surgical resection and the application of enucleation

Objective

To investigate the prognostic factors of patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (pNETs) after surgical resection, and to analyze the value of enucleation for pNETs without distant metastasis that are well-differentiated (G1) and have a diameter ≤ 4 cm.

Methods

Data from pNET patients undergoing surgical resection between 2004 and 2017 were collected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Kaplan–Meier analysis and log-rank testing were used for the survival comparisons. Adjusted HRs with 95% CIs were calculated using univariate and multivariate Cox regression models to estimate the prognostic factors. P < 0.05 was regarded as statistically significant.

Results

This study found that female, cases diagnosed after 2010, and pancreatic body/tail tumors were protective factors for good survival, while histological grade G3, a larger tumor size, distant metastasis, AJCC 8th stage III-IV and age over 60 were independent prognostic factors for a worse OS/CSS. For the pNETs that were well-differentiated (G1) and had a tumor diameter ≤ 4 cm, the type of surgery was an independent factor for the long-term prognosis of this group. Compared with pancreaticoduodenectomy and total pancreatectomy, patients who were accepted enucleation had better OS/CSS.

Conclusion

For pNETs patients undergoing surgical resection, sex, year of diagnosis, tumor location, pathological grade, tumor size, distant metastasis, race, and age were independent prognostic factors associated with the OS/CSS of patients. For pNETs patients with G1 and a tumor diameter less than 4 cm, if the tumor was located over 3 mm from the pancreatic duct, enucleation may be a wise choice.

Value of multi-detector computed tomography during intra-arterial infusion of contrast medium for locating insulinomas

Objective

This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of multi-detector computed tomography (CT) during intra-arterial infusion of contrast medium (MDCT-IA) for locating insulinomas.

Methods

This retrospective study included patients with insulinomas who underwent surgery at the Chinese PLA General Hospital in 2013 to 2014. The patients’ case notes and investigation results were reviewed. Preoperative tumor localization was carried out by MDCT-IA and noninvasive methods including MDCT, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS). Insulinoma localization using these methods was compared with the histologically confirmed location following surgical excision.

Results

Twelve insulinomas were identified in 12 patients, all of which were treated surgically. All patients received MDCT-IA (100%), 11 patients also underwent MRI (91.7%), seven underwent CT (58.3%), and all 12 underwent CEUS (100%). Tumor localization was determined successfully in 12/12 patients by MDCT-IA (100%), in 9/11 by MRI (81.8%), 4/7 by CT (57.1%), and 7/12 by CEUS (58.3%). Overall, MDCT-IA correctly localized 100% of the lesions.

Conclusions

MDCT-IA can be used to determine the preoperative localization of insulinomas.

Exendin-4-based imaging in endogenous hyperinsulinemic hypoglycaemia cohort: A tertiary Endocrine centre experience

CONTEXT

Insulinoma needs accurate preoperative localization for minimally invasive surgery. Exendin-4-based imaging has shown promising results.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate performance parameters of exendin-4-based imaging in insulinoma localization and compare with other imaging modalities.

DESIGN

Retrospective cross-sectional study.

PATIENTS

We report 14 patients with endogenous hyperinsulinemic hypoglycaemia (EHH) managed at our centre; in whom, the final diagnosis was insulinoma (n = 11), Munchausen syndrome (MS) (n = 2) and inconclusive (n = 1). Retrospective reporting of CECT, ⁶⁸ Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT and ⁶⁸ Ga-NODAGA-exendin-4-PET/CT was done. With per-lesion analysis, performance parameters were calculated for the histopathological diagnosis of insulinoma.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

True positive (TP), false positive (FP), false negative (FN), true negative (TN), sensitivity (Sn), specificity (Sp), positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) for insulinoma localization.

RESULTS

In our cohort, 12 histopathologically proven insulinoma lesions [(TP): 11 primary lesions, 1 metastasis] were detected in 11 patients, whereas two patients had MS (TN). Sn and PPV were 75% and 100%, 33.3% and 80% and 83.3% and 71.4% for CECT, ⁶⁸ Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT and ⁶⁸ Ga-NODAGA-exendin-4-PET/CT, respectively. With exendin-4-based imaging, FP uptake in normal pancreatic tissue and FN results in the pancreatic tail lesion was seen. In one patient, TN result suggested the correct diagnosis of MS.

CONCLUSION

⁶⁸ Ga-NODAGA-exendin-4-PET/CT has higher sensitivity than ⁶⁸ Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT and CECT for insulinoma localization. FP uptake in normal pancreas and FN result in tail lesions are limitations of currently utilized exendin-4-based imaging.

Detection of Insulinomas Using Dual-Time-Point 68Ga-DOTA-Exendin 4 PET/CT

PURPOSE

Insulinomas are predominantly benign neuroendocrine tumors originating from beta cells within the islets of Langerhans of the endocrine pancreas. Because surgical resection represents the only curative therapy option, exact tumor localization and discrimination of insulinomas from focal or diffuse manifestations of congenital hyperinsulinism are crucial for optimal treatment strategies. We investigated the diagnostic value of glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor PET/CT using Ga-DOTA-exendin 4 for detecting insulinomas and compared the diagnostic value of PET scans performed at 2 time points.

METHODS

In 10 patients with clinically and biochemically suspected insulinoma, PET/CT was performed at 1 hour (PET1) and 2 hours (PET2) after injection of Ga-DOTA-exendin 4. In this retrospective analysis, tracer uptake was visually assessed in both scans by 2 independent readers. SUVmax and tumor-to-background ratio (TBR) of focal lesions were assessed. Imaging results were compared with histopathologic findings, if patients underwent resection.

RESULTS

Increased focal Ga-DOTA-exendin 4 uptake was observed in 8 of 10 patients concordantly by both readers. Seven patients with focal uptake underwent surgery with tumor enucleation and histopathologic proof of insulinoma (7/8). Two of 10 patients without focal uptake were considered to suffer from diffuse form of congenital hyperinsulinism and consequently received medical treatment. A significant increase of tumoral SUVmax on PET2 (PET1: SUVmax 20.2 ± 8.2 g/mL; PET2: SUVmax 24.7 ± 7.9 g/mL; P = 0.0018) did not result in a significant improvement in TBR (PET1: TBR 4.9 ± 1.7; PET2: TBR 4.3 ± 1.2; P = 0.2892).

CONCLUSIONS

Focal uptake of Ga-DOTA-exendin 4 reliably indicated insulinomas as histopathologically confirmed in all patients undergoing consecutive surgery. The diagnostic value of PET2 was not found to be superior to PET1, indicating that a single 1-hour Ga-DOTA-exendin 4 PET/CT scan is a sufficient and convenient approach for patient care.

Short- and Long-Term Outcomes of Laparoscopic Organ-Sparing Resection for Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PNENs) are rare neoplasms associated with a long life expectancy after resection. In this setting, patients may benefit from laparoscopic organ-sparing resection. Studies of laparoscopic organ-sparing resection for PNENs are limited. The aim of this study was to evaluate the short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic organ-sparing resection for PNENs.

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed for patients with PNENs who underwent laparoscopic organ-sparing pancreatectomy between March 2005 and May 2018. The patients' demographic data, operative results, pathological reports, hospital courses and morbidity, mortality, and follow-up data (until August 2018) were analysed.

RESULTS

Thirty-five patients were included in the final analysis. There were 9 male and 26 female patients, with a median age of 46 years (range 25-75 years). The mean BMI was 24.6 ± 3.3 kg/m². Nine patients received laparoscopic enucleation (LE), 20 received laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy (LSPDP), and 6 received laparoscopic central pancreatectomy. The operative time, intraoperative blood loss, transfusion rate, and postoperative hospital stay were 186.4 ± 60.2 min, 165 ± 73.0 ml, 0 days, and 9 days (range 5-23 days), respectively. The morbidity rate, grade ≥ III complication rate, and grade ≥ B pancreatic fistula rate were 34.2%, 11.4%, and 8.7%, respectively, with no mortality. The rate of follow-up was 94.3%, and the median follow-up time was 55 months (range 3-158 months). One patient developed recurrence 36 months after LE and was managed with surgical resection. The other patients survived without metastases or recurrence during the follow-up. One patient had diabetes after LSPDP, and no patients had symptoms of pancreatic exocrine insufficiency. Nineteen patients who underwent LSPDP (16 with the Kimura technique and 3 with the Warshaw technique) were followed. Normal patency of the splenic artery and vein was observed in 14 and 14 patients within 1 month of surgery and in 15 and 14 patients 6 months or more after the operation, respectively. Partial splenic infarction was observed in 3 patients within 1 month of surgery and in no patients 6 months or more after the operation. Three patients eventually developed collateral venous vessels around the gastric fundus and reserved spleen, with one case of variceal bleeding.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic organ-sparing resection for selected cases of PNENs is safe and feasible and has favourable short- and long-term outcomes.

[Quality of indications in cystic lesions of the pancreas]

Cystic tumors of the pancreas (PCN) have increasingly gained importance in the clinical routine as they are frequently diagnosed as an incidental finding due to the continuous improvement in cross-sectional imaging. A differentiation is made between non-neoplastic and neoplastic cysts, whereby the latter has a tendency to malignant transformation to a varying extent. Therefore, they can be considered as precursor lesions of pancreatic cancer (PDAC). In addition to a detailed patient history and examination, imaging modalities, such as computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) with fine needle aspiration (FNA) are used for the differential diagnosis. The indications for surgical resection of these lesions are based on the current European guidelines from 2018; however, the content is not evidence-based but relies on knowledge and recommendations from experts. According to these consensus recommendations asymptomatic serous cystic neoplasms (SCN) are serous lesions with a low tendency for malignant transformation and can be monitored. In contrast resection is warranted for all mucinous cystic neoplasms (MCN) >4 cm and all solid pseudopapillary neoplasms (SPN). Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMN), which are differentiated into main duct (MD-IPMN) and branch duct type (BD-IPMN) IPMN based on the position in the pancreatic duct system, should be resected as MD-IPMN and mixed type (MT)-IPMN. The risk of malignant transformation in BD-IPMN is variable and depends on risk factors, which are defined clinically and by imaging morphology. The treatment management is therefore carried out on an individual basis following risk estimation. In order to quantify the quality of indications in PCN and thereby also contributing to optimized medical care, prospective long-term studies are urgently needed.

[Indications for the Surgical Management of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms]

Neuroendocrine neoplasms of the pancreas (pNEN) have an increasing incidence and prevalence. Thus, this entity is of increasing clinical significance. Patients with pNEN become clinically apparent due to different and unspecific symptoms. Some tumours secrete hormones and peptides and become clinically symptomatic. In general, these tumours can metastasise early and even small tumours lead to distant metastases. Nonetheless, primary tumour size and grading are important prognostic factors. On the basis of a systematic literature research and the formulation of key issues according to the PICO system, therapeutic concepts were established. These concepts were evaluated with a Delphi process among the members of the pancreas research group and the indications for surgery group of the German Society of General and Visceral Surgery. Thus this article gives an overview of the surgical treatment modalities and indications for the treatment of pNEN. Surgery is still the gold standard in treatment and the only potential chance of cure. Surgery is indicated for sporadic as well as hereditary pNEN > 2 cm independent of the functional activity. A so called "wait and see" strategy might be indicated in smaller pNEN; however, there is little evidence for this approach. In this respect, pNEN of 1 - 2 cm represent a surgical indication. The treatment of hereditary pNEN is challenging and should be interdisciplinary. Even in the case of distant metastases, a curative approach might be feasible and multimodal treatment is indicated.

Endoscopic placement of pancreatic stent for "Deep" pancreatic enucleations operative technique and preliminary experience at two high-volume centers

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic enucleation (PE) is a viable option for the removal of non-malignant pancreatic masses leading to complete preservation of organ function. Nevertheless, PE is associated with substantial rates of post-operative pancreatic fistula (POPF), particularly when the mass is close to the main pancreatic duct (MPD). Preoperative stenting of the MPD may prevent its injury when performing PE. This paper describes a novel technique of "deep" PE preceded by endoscopic stenting of the MPD.

METHODS

From January 2017 to May 2019, patients with small pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors proximal to the MPD were candidates for PE with previous stenting of the MPD at the University of Verona, Italy, and at the UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, California. The endoscopic stenting was scheduled either the day before or 3 weeks before surgery, depending on the participating institute.

RESULTS

Ten patients were included in this pilot study. The endoscopic procedure was successful and well tolerated in all cases. Open, laparoscopic and robotic PE were performed. Seven patients had surgical complications. Among these, six developed a post-operative pancreatic fistula (POPF), but neither grade C fistulas nor disruptions of the MPD were detected. At pathology, a low grade pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor was confirmed in all cases.

CONCLUSION

In the setting of high-volume centers, this procedure is safe, and it is associated with acceptable short-term surgical morbidity. The preoperative stenting of the MPD might extend the surgical indications for PE.

Comparison of prognosis between observation and surgical resection groups with small sporadic non-functional pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms without distant metastasis

BACKGROUND

The treatment of small (≤ 2 cm), sporadic localized non-functional pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PNENs) is often controversial. This study aimed to investigate the clinical outcomes with observation and surgical resection in small PNENs.

METHODS

Seventy-five patients with small localized sporadic non-functional PNENs ≤ 2 cm, who underwent observation or surgical resection, were retrospectively reviewed. Changes in tumor size during follow-up in the observation group were also investigated.

RESULTS

The median age of the cohort was 61 (range 35-81) years. The tumor grades were G1, G2, and unknown, in 61 (81.3%), 8 (10.7%), and 6 (8.0%) patients, respectively. The mean follow-up periods in the observation (n = 23) and surgical resection groups (n = 52) were 52.3 (range 6.8-133.3) months and 73.0 (range 9.1-179.9) months, respectively. The median overall survival was not reached. During follow-up, no patient died of PNENs, two died of other diseases, three had lymph node metastases, and one experienced recurrence after surgical resection. There was no significant difference in overall survival between the observation and surgical resection groups (hazard ratio: 0.031, P = 0.417). The mean change in tumor size in the observation group was + 0.30 mm (range - 1.6 to + 3.0 mm). No deaths, tumor progression, lymph node metastases, distant metastases, or recurrence were noted in patients with PNENs ≤ 1 cm (n = 36).

CONCLUSIONS

The prognosis of small localized PNENs is good. Observation may be an alternative to surgery in high-risk patients and those with small G1 tumors, particularly those measuring ≤ 1 cm.

Incidence and impact of Textbook Outcome among patients undergoing resection of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: Results of the US Neuroendocrine Tumor Study Group

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

We sought to define the incidence and impact of Textbook Outcome (TO) on disease-free survival [DFS] among patients undergoing resection of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNET).

METHODS

Patients undergoing resection of a PNET between 2000 and 2016 were identified using a multi-institutional database. TO was defined as no postoperative severe complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ III), no 90-day mortality, no prolonged length-of-hospital stay (LOS) (ie, > 75th percentile), no 90-day readmission after discharge, and R0 resection. The 5-year DFS was calculated and the association with TO was examined.

RESULTS

Among 821 patients with a PNET, median tumor size was 2.1 cm (IQR 1.4-14.6). Resection consisted of pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) (n = 231, 28.1%), distal pancreatectomy (DP) (n = 492, 59.9%), and enucleation (EN) (n = 98, 11.9%). Overall TO rate was 49.3% (n = 405). The incidence of TO varied by procedure type (PD: 32.5% vs DP: 56.7% vs EN: 52.0%; P < .001). After adjusting for all competing factors, achievement of a TO was independently associated with improved DFS (hazard ratio: 0.54, 95% CI, 0.35-0.81; P = .003).

CONCLUSIONS

Only one in two patients undergoing resection of a PNET achieved a TO, which varied markedly based on procedure type. Achievement of a TO was associated with improved DFS.

The North American Neuroendocrine Tumor Society Consensus Paper on the Surgical Management of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

This manuscript is the result of the North American Neuroendocrine Tumor Society consensus conference on the surgical management of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors from July 19 to 20, 2018. The group reviewed a series of questions of specific interest to surgeons taking care of patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, and for each, the available literature was reviewed. What follows are these reviews for each question followed by recommendations of the panel.

Enucleation for branch duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The role of enucleation (EN) for branch duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (BD-IPMN) is poorly defined. This systematic review aims to review EN for BD-IPMN and compare it with pancreatic resection (pancreaticoduodenectomy, distal pancreatectomy and central pancreatectomy).

METHODS

A systematic review of published literature was performed using PRISMA guidelines, and included a search of PubMed, MEDLINE and SCOPUS databases.

RESULTS

Sixteen studies were included in the final analysis comprising 991 patients with 293 EN patients and 698 resected patients. EN was most often performed for low grade (77%, 151/197) BD-IPMN's (99%, 251/253) of the pancreatic head (64%, 106/165), with a pooled mean diameter of 21 mm (SD 28 mm). EN was a shorter procedure (MD -115.8 min, CI -142.2 to -89.5 min, P=<0.001) with a lower rate of post-pancreatectomy haemorrhage (EN 1% 2/144, Resection 5% 10/186, RR 0.32, CI 0.11 to 0.94, P = 0.043) and postoperative exocrine and endocrine insufficiency (P = <0.001 and P = 0.003 respectively) than resection.

CONCLUSION

EN for BD-IPMN's appears to be a reasonable alternative to resection in low risk BD-IPMN's, allowing preservation of exocrine and endocrine function with comparable reoperation and recurrence rates to resection. However, surveillance was indicated in these low risk patients based on current published guidelines.

Does surgical approach affect outcomes of enucleation for benign and low-grade pancreatic tumors? An ACS-NSQIP evaluation

BACKGROUND

Enucleation of low-grade pancreatic tumors achieves oncological outcomes equivalent to resection but conserves parenchyma. Given strict selection criteria, we hypothesized that minimally-invasive (MI) enucleation is associated with decreased composite major morbidity (CMM) compared to open.

METHODS

Pancreas-targeted ACS NSQIP (2014 -2016) was queried for enucleation (CPT code: 48120) and analyzed by intended surgical approach regardless of conversion. The primary outcome was CMM, a validated 30-day composite metric of adverse events.

RESULTS

Enucleation was performed using an open (n = 71; 62.3%) or MI (n = 43; 37.7%) approach with 7 conversions (16.2%). Both cohorts had interchangeable baseline characteristics. No selection factors governing MI were identified. MI-enucleation reduced median length of stay (4 vs. 5 days; p = 0.003), whereas rates of CMM after open (24; 34%) and MIenucleation (12; 28%) were equivalent (p = 0.541). Multivariable analysis demonstrated an association between CMM and prolonged operative time (OR 2.7, 95% CI 1.14 -6.74), female sex (OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.16 -0.94), and ASA score <3 (OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.16 -0.96) but not surgical approach.

CONCLUSION

MI-enucleation was not associated with reduced 30-day CMM compared to open, whereas prolonged operating time and unmodifiable patient factors were correlated with adverse outcomes.

Pre- and intraoperative diagnostic requirements, benefits and risks of minimally invasive and robotic surgery for neuroendocrine tumors of the pancreas

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (PanNET) are rare tumours, accounting for 1%-2% of all pancreatic neoplasms. These tumors are classified as functioning neuroendocrine tumours (F-PanNETs) or non-functioning (NF-PanNETs) depends on whether the tumour is associated with clinical hormonal hypersecretion syndrome or not. In the last decades, diagnosis of PanNETs has increased significantly due to the widespread of cross-sectional imaging. Whenever possible, surgery is the cornerstone of PanNETs management and the only curative option for these patients. Indeed, after R0 resection, the 5-year overall survival rate is around 90-100% for low grade lesions but significantly drops after incomplete resections. Compared to standard resections, pancreatic sparing surgery, i.e. enucleation and central pancreatectomy, significantly decreased the risk of pancreatic insufficiency. It should be performed in patients with good general condition and normal pancreatic function to limit the operative risk and enhance the benefit of surgery. Nowadays, due to many known advantages of minimally invasive surgery, there is an ongoing trend towards laparoscopic and robotic pancreatic surgery. The aim of this study is to describe the pre- and intraoperative diagnostic requirements for the management of PanNETs and the benefits and risks of minimally invasive surgery including laparoscopic and robotic approach in view of the recent literature.

Robotic enucleations of pancreatic benign or low-grade malignant tumors: preliminary results and comparison with robotic demolitive resections

BACKGROUND

The incidental detection of benign to low-grade malignant small pancreatic neoplasms increased in the last decades. The surgical management of these patients is still under debate. The aim of this paper is to evaluate the safety and feasibility of robotic enucleations and to compare the outcomes with non-parenchymal sparing robotic resections.

METHODS

The study included a total of 25 patients. Nine of them underwent a robotic enucleation (EN Group) and 16 patients received a robotic demolitive resection (DR Group). Perioperative and medium-term outcomes were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Patients' baseline characteristics were similar in the two groups except for presence of symptoms and tumor size, due to the inclusion criteria. Operative time was significantly shorter and postoperative results were better for EN group, including a significant shorter hospitalization (5 vs. 8 days, p = 0.027), reduced pancreatic leaks (22% vs. 50%, p = 0.287) and a better preservation of glandular function (100% vs. 62.5%, p = 0.066). Mortality rate was zero in both groups, with all patients free from disease at a median follow-up of 18 months.

CONCLUSIONS

The risks of under/overtreatment remain still unavoidable for benign to low-grade malignant small pancreatic neoplasms. Simple enucleation should be performed whenever oncological appropriate, to achieve the best postoperative outcomes. The adoption of robotic technique might widen the indications for parenchymal sparing, minimally invasive surgery.

Open and minimally invasive pancreatic neoplasms enucleation: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic enucleation (pEN) as parenchyma-sparing procedure for small pancreatic neoplasms is quickly becoming the most common surgical option in such setting. Nowadays, pEN is frequently carried out through a minimally invasive approach either laparoscopic or robotic. Its impact on overall perioperative complications and pancreatic fistula (POPF) is still under evaluation. The scope of our systematic review is to assess pEN's perioperative outcomes and to evaluate the effect of the minimally invasive techniques over POPF and other surgical complications.

METHODS

We performed a systematic literature search (time-frame January 1999-September 2018), considering exclusively those studies which included at least 5 cases of either open or minimally invasive pEN. Data regarding postoperative outcome and POPF were extracted and analyzed. We defined postoperative morbidities by the Clavien-Dindo classification while POPF according to the International Study Group of Pancreatic Fistula (ISGPF) definition.

RESULTS

Sixty-three studies met the criteria selected, accounting for a study population of 2485 patients. 27.7% had a minimally invasive pEN. The overall postoperative morbidity rate was 46.1% with 11.9% rated as severe (Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3). Mortality rate was 0.69%. The minimally invasive approach to pEN led to a statistically significant reduction of both the overall POPF rate (28.7% vs. 45.9%, p < 0.001), and clinically significant B-C POPF (p < 0.027). The postoperative overall morbidity rate was clearly in favor of the minimally invasive approach (27.6% vs. 55.2%, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our review confirms that pEN is a safe and feasible technique for the treatment of small benign or low-grade pancreatic neoplasms and it can be implemented with an acceptable morbidity rate along with low mortality. The minimally invasive approach is gaining widespread acceptance due to its supposed non-inferiority compared with the traditional open approach. In our review, it showed to be even better in terms of POPF incidence rate and short-term postoperative outcome. Still, such data need to be corroborated by randomized clinical trials.

Margin status and long-term prognosis of primary pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor after curative resection: Results from the US Neuroendocrine Tumor Study Group

BACKGROUND

The impact of margin status on resection of primary pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors has been poorly defined. The objectives of the present study were to determine the impact of margin status on long-term survival of patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors after curative resection and evaluate the impact of reresection to obtain a microscopically negative margin.

METHODS

Patients who underwent curative-intent resection for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors between 2000 and 2016 were identified at 8 hepatobiliary centers. Overall and recurrence-free survival were analyzed relative to surgical margin status using univariable and multivariable analyses.

RESULTS

Among 1,020 patients, 866 (84.9%) had an R0 (>1 mm margin) resection, whereas 154 (15.1%) had an R1 (≤1 mm margin) resection. R1 resection was associated with a worse recurrence-free survival (10-year recurrence-free survival, R1 47.3% vs R0 62.8%, hazard ratio 1.8, 95% confidence interval 1.2-2.7, P = .002); residual tumor at either the transection margin (R1t) or the mobilization margin (R1m) was associated with increased recurrence versus R0 (R1t versus R0: hazard ratio 1.8, 95% confidence interval 1.0-3.0, P = .033; R1m versus R0: hazard ratio 1.3, 95% confidence interval 1.0-1.7, P = .060). In contrast, margin status was not associated with overall survival (10-year overall survival, R1 71.1% vs R0 71.8%, P = .392). Intraoperatively, 539 (53.6%) patients had frozen section evaluation of the surgical margin; 49 (9.1%) patients had a positive margin on frozen section analysis; 38 of the 49 patients (77.6%) had reresection, and a final R0 (secondary R0) margin was achieved in 30 patients (78.9%). Extending resection to achieve an R0 status remained associated with worse overall survival (hazard ratio 3.1, 95% confidence interval 1.6-6.2, P = .001) and recurrence-free survival (hazard ratio 2.6, 95% confidence interval 1.4-5.0, P = .004) compared with primary R0 resection. On multivariable analyses, tumor-specific factors, such as cellular differentiation, perineural invasion, Ki-67 index, and major vascular invasion, rather than surgical margin, were associated with long-term outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Margin status was not associated with long-term survival. The reresection of an initially positive surgical margin to achieve a negative margin did not improve the outcome of patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Parenchymal-sparing pancreatic procedures for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors may be appropriate when feasible.