Could hyponatremia be a marker of anastomotic leakage after colorectal surgery? A single center analysis of 1,106 patients over 5 years

Role of Biomarkers in the Diagnosis of Anastomotic Leakage After Colorectal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Due to its diverse presentation, anastomotic leakage (AL) following colorectal surgery is challenging to detect and frequently discovered when the patient becomes critically ill. When diagnosing AL in its early stages, biomarkers play a large role. This review was conducted to evaluate the diagnostic value of biomarkers in AL after colorectal surgeries. A literature search was undertaken electronically in major search engines such as Medline (PubMed), Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, EMBASE, and CENTRAL (Cochrane Library) databases. Observational studies of both retrospective and prospective nature were included. Origin Pro 2022 (Origin Labs) software was used to assess the prevalence of AL and generate the forest plot. A total of 13 articles fulfilled the eligibility criteria. A pooled prevalence of 9.19% was noted for AL in colorectal surgeries. In the present review, the observed sensitivity for C-reactive protein (CRP) was 80.5% and the specificity was 84% (postoperative day three). In contrast, these were 100% and 83.9% for procalcitonin on postoperative day five. CRP showed the highest diagnostic accuracy and excels at eliminating AL, but combining biomarkers can increase the diagnostic precision of early detection of AL.

Diagnostic accuracy of C-reactive protein, procalcitonin and neutrophils for the early detection of anastomotic leakage after colorectal resection: a multicentric, prospective study

AIM

The aim was to determine the accuracy of C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin and neutrophils in the early detection (fourth postoperative day) of anastomotic leakage (AL) after colorectal surgery.

METHODS

We conducted a multicentre, prospective study that included a consecutive series of patients who underwent colorectal resection with anastomosis without ostomy (September 2015 to December 2017). CRP, procalcitonin and neutrophil values on the fourth postoperative day after colorectal resection along with the postoperative outcome (60-day AL, morbidity and mortality) were prospectively included in an online, anonymous database.

RESULTS

The analysis ultimately included 2501 cases. The overall morbidity and mortality was 30.1% and 1.6%, respectively, and the AL rate was 8.6%. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve values (95% CI) for detecting AL were 0.84 (0.81-0.87), 0.75 (0.72-0.79) and 0.70 (0.66-0.74) for CRP, procalcitonin and neutrophils, respectively. The best cut-off level for CRP was 119 mg/l, resulting in 70% sensitivity, 81% specificity and 97% negative predictive value. After laparoscopic resection, the accuracy for CRP and procalcitonin was increased, compared with open resection. The combination of two or three of these biomarkers did not significantly increase their accuracy.

CONCLUSION

On the fourth postoperative day, CRP was the most reliable marker for excluding AL. Its high negative predictive value, especially after laparoscopic resection, allows for safe hospital discharge on the fourth postoperative day. The routine use of procalcitonin or neutrophil counts does not seem to increase the diagnostic accuracy.

Predictive and Diagnostic Biomarkers of Anastomotic Leakage: A Precision Medicine Approach for Colorectal Cancer Patients

Development of an anastomotic leak (AL) following intestinal surgery for the treatment of colorectal cancers is a life-threatening complication. Failure of the anastomosis to heal correctly can lead to contamination of the abdomen with intestinal contents and the development of peritonitis. The additional care that these patients require is associated with longer hospitalisation stays and increased economic costs. Patients also have higher morbidity and mortality rates and poorer oncological prognosis. Unfortunately, current practices for AL diagnosis are non-specific, which may delay diagnosis and have a negative impact on patient outcome. To overcome these issues, research is continuing to identify AL diagnostic or predictive biomarkers. In this review, we highlight promising candidate biomarkers including ischaemic metabolites, inflammatory markers and bacteria. Although research has focused on the use of blood or peritoneal fluid samples, we describe the use of implantable medical devices that have been designed to measure biomarkers in peri-anastomotic tissue. Biomarkers that can be used in conjunction with clinical status, routine haematological and biochemical analysis and imaging have the potential to help to deliver a precision medicine package that could significantly enhance a patient's post-operative care and improve outcomes. Although no AL biomarker has yet been validated in large-scale clinical trials, there is confidence that personalised medicine, through biomarker analysis, could be realised for colorectal cancer intestinal resection and anastomosis patients in the years to come.

Redefined hyponatremia as a marker to exclude the diagnosis of anastomotic leakage after colorectal cancer surgery

Objective

Our objective was to investigate the association between anastomotic leakage (AL) and hyponatremia after colorectal cancer surgery.

Methods

All anastomoses in colorectal cancer surgery performed in our hospital between January 2015 and December 2017 were retrospectively identified. According to the diagnostic criteria of AL, the patients were divided into an AL group and a no anastomotic leakage (NAL) group.

Results

We reviewed records of 498 consecutive colorectal cancer patients. The total incidence of AL was 5.4%. Postoperative serum sodium levels differed significantly: 137.63 ± 4.29 and 139.81 ± 3.41 mmol/L in the AL and NAL groups, respectively. By using area under the receiver-operating characteristic (auROC) curves, we determined the optimum postoperative serum sodium cut-off to be 139.5 mmol/L and redefined hyponatremia as postoperative serum sodium <139.5 mmol/L. Redefined hyponatremia had an auROC of 0.65, corresponding to a 97.2% negative predictive value. The negative predictive value reached 99.1% when serum sodium level was combined with leukocytosis. Multivariable analysis found that redefined hyponatremia (odds ratio, 1.176) was an independent predictive factor for AL.

Conclusions

Redefined hyponatremia has good negative predictive value for AL diagnosis after colorectal cancer surgery and could be used as a marker to exclude the diagnosis.

Hyponatremia could identify patients with intrabdominal sepsis and anastomotic leak after colorectal surgery: a systematic review of the literature

Anastomotic leak (AL) is a serious post-operative complication in colorectal surgery. It can lead to devastating morbidity and mortality. Clinicians usually depend on a combination of clinical, biochemical and radiological findings to diagnose this problem. In our article, we tried to look if electrolyte disturbances could be indicators for intra-abdominal sepsis due to AL. Systematic review of the literature identifies a potential correlation between electrolyte alterations and AL in digestive surgery. The following databases were searched: PubMed, EMBASE and MIDLINE. The review adhered to the PRISMA statement for systematic review. Our literature search did not identify any articles linking any electrolyte disturbances-except for hyponatremia-to AL. Pathophysiology of these electrolyte disturbances does not seem to be linked to AL, except for hyponatremia which might be explained. Our review included 442 patients with intra-abdominal sepsis and 1133 controls. The mean specificity of hyponatremia being associated with intra-abdominal sepsis is 86%, whereas mean sensitivity is 28%. Hyponatremia seems to be a significant and clinically relevant marker for of intra-abdominal sepsis and AL.

Systematic review of the role of biomarkers in diagnosing anastomotic leakage following colorectal surgery

BACKGROUND

Anastomotic leakage (AL) following colorectal surgery can be difficult to diagnose owing to varying clinical presentations. This systematic review aimed to assess biomarkers as potential diagnostic tests for preclinical detection of AL.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. All published studies evaluating biomarkers, both systemic and peritoneal, in the context of AL following colorectal surgery were included. Studies were sought in three electronic databases (MEDLINE, PubMed and Embase) from January 1990 to June 2016.

RESULTS

Thirty-six studies evaluated 51 different biomarkers in the context of AL after colorectal surgery. Biomarkers included markers of ischaemia and inflammation, and microbiological markers, and were measured in both peritoneal drain fluid and the systemic circulation. The most commonly evaluated peritoneal drain fluid biomarkers were interleukin (IL) 6, IL-10 and tumour necrosis factor. Significantly raised drain levels in the early postoperative period were reported to be associated with the development of AL. C-reactive protein, procalcitonin and leucocytes were the most commonly evaluated systemic biomarkers with significant negative and positive predictive values. Associated area under the curve values ranged from 0·508 to 0·960.

CONCLUSION

Peritoneal drain fluid and systemic biomarkers are poor predictors of AL after colorectal surgery. Combinations of these biomarkers showed improvement in predictive accuracy.