Role of endoscopy to predict a leak after esophagectomy

Anastomotic Leak After Esophagectomy: Modern Approaches to Prevention and Diagnosis

Anastomotic leak (AL) remains one of the most serious complications following esophagectomy, contributing to significant morbidity, prolonged hospital stays, and increased mortality. Despite advancements in surgical techniques and perioperative care, AL continues to challenge surgeons and negatively impact patient outcomes. Various factors contribute to its development, including patient-specific comorbidities, tumor characteristics, anastomotic technique, conduit perfusion, and perioperative management. Prevention strategies have evolved with the integration of intraoperative techniques such as fluorescence-guided perfusion assessment, omental reinforcement, and meticulous surgical handling of the gastric conduit. Emerging technologies, including endoluminal vacuum therapy (EVT) and multimodal perioperative protocols, have demonstrated potential in reducing leak incidence and improving management. Diagnosing AL remains complex due to its variable presentation, necessitating a combination of clinical evaluation, inflammatory markers, imaging studies, and endoscopic assessments. While routine postoperative imaging has shown limited sensitivity, on-demand CT and endoscopic evaluations play a crucial role in early detection and intervention. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of the risk factors, prevention strategies, and diagnostic modalities for AL after esophagectomy, incorporating recent advancements and emerging technologies.

Effectiveness of computed tomography scoring for the early diagnosis of anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy

PURPOSE

Anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy is associated with increased mortality; therefore, early diagnosis is highly important. This study aimed to identify the characteristic computed tomography (CT) findings of cervical anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer and evaluate the effectiveness of CT scoring in screening the anastomotic leakage.

METHODS

Overall, 91 patients who underwent thoracoscopic esophagectomy with cervical esophago-gastric anastomosis were included. We investigated the correlation between anastomotic leakage and the presence of the microbubble sign, evident air retention, and fluid collection in the cervical and mediastinal regions. CT findings were scored, and the cutoff value was set to 2 points on the receiver operating characteristic curve. The patients were divided into two groups based on the CT score (≥ 2 points and ≤ 1 point).

RESULTS

CT findings of the microbubble sign (p = 0.01; odds ratio [OR], 8.545; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.596-45.73), cervical air retention (p < 0.01; OR, 12.43; 95% CI, 2.084-74.17), and cervical fluid collection (p < 0.01; OR, 9.359; 95% CI, 1.753-49.96) significantly correlated with anastomotic leakage. The ≥ 2-point CT score group showed a significantly higher incidence of anastomotic leakage than the ≤ 1-point group (p < 0.01; OR, 16.28; 95% CI [4.704-56.38]). A ≥ 2-point CT score had higher sensitivity (84.2%) than upper gastrointestinal series (36.8%).

CONCLUSION

The presence of microbubble sign, air retention, and fluid collection in the cervical area correlated with anastomotic leakage after cervical anastomosis in thoracoscopic esophagectomy. CT scores are useful early anastomotic leakage detectors.

Serum albumin at resection predicts in-hospital death, while serum lactate and aPTT on the first postoperative day anticipate anastomotic leakage after Ivor-Lewis-esophagectomy

Background

Anastomotic leakage (AL) is a major complication after esophagectomy, potentiating morbidity and mortality. There are several patient risk factors associated with AL, but high-fidelity postoperative predictors are still under debate. The aim was to identify novel reliable predictors for AL after esophagectomy.

Methods

A high-volume single-center database study, including 138 patients receiving Ivor-Lewis-esophagectomy between 2017 and 2019, was performed. Serum levels of albumin, aPTT, and lactate before and after surgery were extracted to assess their impact on AL and in-hospital mortality.

Results

High serum lactate on postoperative day 1 (POD1) could be shown to predict AL after esophagectomy [AL vs. no AL: 1.2 (0.38) vs. 1.0 (0.37); p < 0.001]. Accordingly, also differences of serum lactate level between end (POD0-2) and start of surgery (POD0-1) (p < 0.001) as well as between POD1 and POD0-1 (p < 0.001) were associated with AL. Accordingly, logistic regression identified serum lactate on POD 1 as an independent predictor of AL [HR: 4.37 (95% CI: 1.28–14.86); p = 0.018]. Further, low serum albumin on POD0 [2.6 (0.53) vs. 3.1 (0.56); p = 0.001] and high serum lactate on POD 0–1 [1.1 (0.29) vs. 0.9 (0.30); p = 0.043] were associated with in-hospital death. Strikingly, logistic-regression (HR: 0.111; p = 0.008) and cox-regression analysis (HR: 0.118; p = 0.003) showed low serum albumin as an independently predictor for in-hospital death after esophagectomy.

Conclusions

This study identified high serum lactate as an independent predictor of AL and low serum albumin as a high-fidelity predictor of in-hospital death after esophagectomy. These parameters can facilitate improved postoperative treatment leading to better short-term as well as long-term outcomes.

Pre-emptive active drainage of reflux (PARD) in Ivor-Lewis oesophagectomy with negative pressure and simultaneous enteral nutrition using a double-lumen open-pore film drain (dOFD)

BACKGROUND

Postoperative reflux can compromise anastomotic healing after Ivor-Lewis oesophagectomy (ILE). We report on Pre-emptive Active Reflux Drainage (PARD) using a new double-lumen open-pore film drain (dOFD) with negative pressure to protect the anastomosis.

METHODS

To prepare a dOFD, the gastric channel of a triluminal tube (Freka®Trelumina, Fresenius) is coated with a double-layered open-pore film (Suprasorb®CNP drainage film, Lohmann & Rauscher) over 25 cm. The ventilation channel is blocked. The filmcoated segment is placed in the stomach and the intestinal feeding tube in the duodenum. Negative pressure is applied with an electronic vacuum pump (- 125 mmHg, continuous suction) to the gastric channel. Depending on the findings in the endoscopic control, PARD will either be continued or terminated.

RESULTS

PARD was used in 24 patients with ILE and started intraoperatively. Healing was observed in all the anastomoses. The median duration of PARD was 8 days (range 4-21). In 10 of 24 patients (40%) there were issues with anastomotic healing which we defined as "at-risk anastomosis". No additional endoscopic procedures or surgical revisions to the anastomoses were required.

CONCLUSIONS

PARD with dOFD contributes to the protection of anastomosis after ILE. Negative pressure applied to the dOFD (a nasogastric tube) enables enteral nutrition to be delivered simultaneously with permanent evacuation and decompression.

Diagnosing anastomotic leak post-esophagectomy: a systematic review

Esophagectomy is the gold-standard treatment for esophageal cancer; however, postoperative anastomotic leakage remains the primary concern for surgeons. No consensus exists on the optimal investigations to predict an anastomotic leak. This systematic review aims to identify a single test or combination of tests with acceptable sensitivity and specificity to identify anastomotic leak after esophagectomy and to formulate a diagnostic algorithm to facilitate surgical decision-making. A systematic review of PubMed and EMBASE databases was undertaken to evaluate diagnostic investigations for anastomotic leak post-esophagectomy. Each study was reviewed and where possible, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were extracted. The review identified 3,204 articles, of which 49 met the inclusion criteria. Investigations most commonly used for diagnosis of anastomotic leak were: C-reactive protein (CRP), oral contrast imaging, computed tomography (CT), pleural drain amylase concentration, and the 'NUn score'. The sensitivity of CRP for detecting anastomotic leak varied from 69.2% to 100%. Oral contrast studies sensitivities varied between 16% and 87.5% and specificity varied from 20% to 100%. Pleural drain amylase sensitivities ranged between 75% and 100% and specificity ranged from 52% to 95.5%. The NUn score sensitivities ranged from 0% to 95% and specificity from 49% to 94.4%. No single investigation was identified to rule out anastomotic leak in asymptomatic patients. However, the authors propose a diagnostic algorithm incorporating CRP, pleural drain amylase concentration, and CT with oral contrast to aid clinicians in predicting anastomotic leak to facilitate safe, timely discharge post-esophagectomy.

Anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: definitions, diagnostics, and treatment

Anastomotic leakage is one of the most severe complications after esophagectomy and is associated with increased postoperative morbidity and mortality. Several projects ranging from small retrospective studies to large collaborations have aimed to identify potential pre- and perioperative risk factors and to improve the diagnostic processes and management. Despite the increase in available literature, many aspects of anastomotic leakage are still debated, without the existence of widely accepted guidelines. The purpose of this review is to provide a cutting edge overview of the recent literature regarding the definition and classification of anastomotic leakage, risk factors, novel diagnostic modalities, and emerging therapeutic options for treatment and prevention of anastomotic leakage following esophagectomy.

Ultrathin endoscopy versus computed tomography in the detection of anastomotic leak in the early period after esophagectomy

BACKGROUND

Anastomotic leak after esophagectomy is a major postoperative complication that leads to significant mortality. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety of early postoperative ultrathin endoscopy in detecting anastomotic leaks and compare diagnostic performance of ultrathin endoscopy and computed tomography (CT) scan in identifying anastomotic leak after esophagectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A prospective trial of 71 patients undergoing esophagectomy was conducted between January 2016 to December 2017. A contrast CT was performed prior to ultrathin endoscopy on postoperative day 5-7.

RESULTS

All 71 patients underwent ultrathin endoscopy and CT scan safely without complications. Among the 71 patients, transoral ultrathin endoscopy was performed on 51 patients and 20 patients with hypertension and coronary artery disease received transnasal ultrathin endoscopy. Overall, 14 leaks (20%) were identified. Endoscopy not only correctly identified the 2 patients of false-positive evaluations by CT, but also determined 4 leaks that were missed on CT. In addition, ultrathin endoscopy accurately identified 3 potential leaks based on pathological findings of anastomosis: ischemia and much fibrin coverings. One patient with normal postoperative CT findings showed healthy anastomosis but an ulcer on gastric conduit on endoscopy. Both sensitivity and specificity of endoscopy were 100%, while sensitivity and specificity of CT were 71.4% and 96.5%.

CONCLUSIONS

Ultrathin endoscopy after esophagectomy is safe and provides more accurate and reliable identification of anastomotic leak than CT scan. Ultrathin transnasal endoscopy may be a more appropriate diagnostic test to detect anastomosis for patients with hypertension and coronary artery disease.

[Intrathoracic anastomotic leakage following esophageal and cardial resection : Definition and validation of a new severity grading classification]

BACKGROUND

Anastomotic leakage is still the most frequent cause of postoperative mortality following esophageal and cardial surgery. The German Advanced Surgical Study Group recommended that endoscopy should be the first diagnostic method if leakage is suspected. The German Surgical Endoscopy Association developed and validated a definition and severity classification of anastomotic leakage following esophageal and cardial resection.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In 2010 the international study group on insufficiency published a definition and severity grading of anastomotic leakage following anterior resection of the rectum, which was validated in 2013. The severity of anastomotic leakage should be graded according to the impact on clinical management: type I requires only conservative management, type II requires interventional radiological or endoscopic treatment and type III requires surgical revision. In contrast to the rectal classification type III is divided into a category without (type IIIa) or with (type IIIb) conduit resection and diversion. The validation was carried out on a 10-year collective from the university hospitals in Heidelberg and Tübingen.

RESULTS

From 2006-2015 all 92 patients who developed an anastomotic leakage following esophageal and cardial resection were enrolled in the study. We found a significant increase in the length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) with increasing classification type (p < 0.0143). Furthermore, there was a significant correlation with the general classification of postoperative complications according to Clavien-Dindo as well as with mortality (p < 0.001).

DISCUSSION

Standardized parameters are the prerequisite to be able to compare the results between hospitals and studies. The validation of the suggested classification shows that the differentiation between the groups is substantiated by the correlation to the length of ICU stay, Clavien-Dindo and mortality and will therefore contribute to a better comparability of data on leakage following esophageal resection in the future.

Diagnosis, assessment, and management of surgical complications following esophagectomy

Despite improvements in operative strategies for esophageal resection, anastomotic leaks, fistula, postoperative pulmonary complications, and chylothorax can occur. Our review seeks to identify potential risk factors, modalities for early diagnosis, and novel interventions that may ameliorate the potential adverse effects of these surgical complications following esophagectomy.

Significant decrease of mortality due to anastomotic leaks following esophageal resection: management makes the difference

PURPOSE

Anastomotic leakage is the most frequent cause of postoperative mortality following esophageal surgery. However, no gold standard for diagnosing and managing leakage has been established. Continuous clinical judgment is extremely important; therefore, to optimize the management of leakage, we established a special group for decision-making in cases of suspected leakage in the early postoperative period.

METHODS

Between January 2010 and December 2016, 234 consecutive patients underwent elective esophageal resection with a thoracoabdominal incision. In 2014, we established a group consisting of a surgeon, surgical endoscopist, and anesthesiologist for decision-making in cases of suspected leakage. They discussed emerging problems and decided on further diagnostics or therapy. The data were documented prospectively and compared to the years prior to 2014.

RESULTS

Two hundred and thirty-four consecutive patients were enrolled in the study, 110 in the years 2010-2013 (group A), and 124 in the years 2014-2016 (group B). Neither patients' characteristics nor the rate of anastomotic leakage differed significantly between the two study groups. The hospital mortality rate was 10% (11 patients) in group A and 4.8% (six patients) in group B. Most interestingly, mortality due to anastomotic leakage was 35% in group A (9/26), whereas it decreased significantly to 6.5% (2/31 patients) (P < 0.001) in group B.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data clearly demonstrated that optimizing the management of anastomotic leakage by making team decisions can lead to a significant decrease in mortality.