Critical appraisal of the modified ante situm liver resection : Is the original method the better choice?

Liver surgery in the 2020s: ante-situm and in-situ resection are still indicated - A single-center study

BACKGROUND

Tumor infiltration of the hepatic outflow comprising all three hepatic veins and the inferior vena cava remains a surgical challenge. Liver resection under total vascular exclusion with or without extracorporeal bypass has been described as a therapeutic option for these tumors. Here, we present our experience with these complex surgical methods.

METHODS

We searched our database for patients treated with an in-situ or ante-situm liver resection (ISR and ASR, respectively) with extracorporeal bypass. We collected demographic and perioperative data.

RESULTS

From January 2010 to December 2021, we performed 2122 liver resections. Nine patients were treated with ASR and five were treated with ISR. Out of these 14 patients, six had colorectal liver metastases, six had cholangiocarcinoma, and two had non-colorectal liver metastases. The median operative time and bypass time in all patients were 536.5 and 150 min, respectively. Compared with ISR, ASR required a longer operative time (ASR 586 min and ISR 495 min) and a longer bypass time (ASR 155 min and ISR 122 min). Morbidity (Clavien-Dindo grade > 3A adverse events) occurred in 78.5% of patients. 90-day postoperative mortality was 7%. Median overall survival was 33 months. Seven patients experienced recurrence. In these patients, median disease-free survival was 9 months.

CONCLUSION

Resection of tumors infiltrating the hepatic outflow poses a high risk for patients. However, with rigorous selection and an experienced perioperative team, these patients can be treated surgically with reasonable oncological outcomes.

Vascular surgery in liver resection

Vascular surgery in liver resection is a standard part of liver transplantation, but is also used in oncological liver surgery. Malignant liver tumors with vascular involvement have a poor prognosis without resection. Surgery is currently the only treatment to provide long-term survival in advanced hepatic malignancy. Even though extended liver resections are increasingly performed, vascular involvement with need of vascular reconstruction is still considered a contraindication for surgery in many institutions. However, vascular resection and reconstruction in liver surgery-despite being complex procedures-are safely performed in specialized centers. The improvements of the postoperative results with reduced postoperative morbidity and mortality are a result of rising surgical and anesthesiological experience and advancements in multimodal treatment concepts with preconditioning measures regarding liver function and systemic treatment options. This review focuses on vascular surgery in oncological liver resections. Even though many surgical techniques were developed and are also used during liver transplantation, this special procedure is not particularly covered within this review article. We provide a summary of vascular reconstruction techniques in oncological liver surgery according to the literature and present also our own experience. We aim to outline the current advances and standards in extended surgical procedures for liver tumors with vascular involvement established in specialized centers, since curative resection improves long-term survival and shifts palliative concepts to curative therapy.

Complex Liver Resections for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

The only curative treatment option for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) is liver resection. Due to central tumor localization and vascular invasion, complex liver resections play an important role in curative treatment. However, the long-term outcomes after complex liver resection are not known. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted for all patients undergoing liver surgery for iCCA. Complex liver resections included ante situm resections, associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) and major liver resection with vascular reconstructions. Results: Forty-nine patients (34%) received complex liver resection, 66 patients (46%) received conventional liver resection and 28 patients (20%) were not resectable during exploration. Preoperative characteristics were not different between the groups, except for Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) stages. The postoperative course for complex liver resections was associated with more complications and perioperative mortality. However, long-term survival was not different between complex and conventional resections. Independent risk factors for survival were R0 resections and UICC stage. Four patients underwent ante situm resection without any mortality. Conclusions: Complex liver resections are justified in selected patients and survival is comparable with conventional liver resections. Survival in iCCA is affected by UICC stage or resections margins and not by the complexity of the case.