Publication activity of chief and consultant general/visceral surgeons in German university hospitals-a ten-year analysis

Publication performance of university maxillofacial surgeons in Germany

The aim of this bibliometric analysis was to benchmark the publication activities of German university departments of oral and maxillofacial surgery. The publication performance of staff surgeons (chief and consultants), documented by first or last authorship, from 37 German university departments was captured over a 10-year period (January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2019). All publications listed in PubMed were included. Additionally, the Impact Factor (IF) was determined. A total of 213 surgeons were identified, of whom 158 (74.2%) were publishing. The number of publications was 1,777, published in 311 journals. Publication activity ranged from an average of 23.3 publications per staff surgeon in the top-ranked department to 0 publications in the last-ranked. The same trend was observed for the total cumulative IFs (CIFs) per member (range from 56.2 to 0). The most common used journal was the Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery (19.7%), with focus on "dentoalveolar surgery" (24%) and "operative techniques and procedures" (28.3%). Women constituted 19.2% of the staff, contributing to 8.5% of the publications. The publication performance of German university departments of oral and maxillofacial surgery exhibits a high variance, which did not correlate with the number of personnel and could only be explained by different research motivations.

[Scientific Activity in German Thoracic Surgery, as Measured in Publication Output]

Thoracic surgery in Germany is primarily provided in non-university centres with a clinical focus and less at university hospitals. The extent to which scientific activity can be achieved within these different structures is investigated on the basis of publication output.A PubMed analysis was carried out for selected authors (leader in thoracic surgery in Germany) between Jan 2012 to Dec 2021. University hospitals, DKG-certified lung cancer centres (DKG: German Cancer Society) and DGT-certified thoracic centres (DGT: German Society for Thoracic Surgery) were included.An analysis of n = 54 non-university centres (DKG certificate n = 50 and/or DGT certificate n = 22) and n = 36 university hospitals (n = 9 autonomous clinic/department) was performed. A total of n = 2414 publications were identified, with original papers (n = 1776; 74%) and publications focussing on thoracic surgery (n = 1501; 62%) being found most frequently. The publication performance of the non-university centres was n = 599 publications (11/centre) and thus significantly lower than that of the university hospitals (n = 902; 25/clinic; p ≤ 0.001). Significantly higher publication output was confirmed for autonomous (n = 560; 62/clinic) compared to non-autonomous university thoracic surgery (n = 342; 13/clinic; p = 0.003). A 10-year trend was recorded, with almost doubling of publication output from n = 105 (university: n = 63) to n = 203 (university: n = 124) publications/year. The cumulative impact factors (IF) resulted in 2845 IF (52.7 IF/clinic) for non-university centres, 6361 IF (235.6 IF/clinic) for non-autonomous and 2931 IF (325.7 IF/clinic) for autonomous university thoracic surgery.Scientific activities have increased in non-university centres, but above all in university thoracic surgery. These positive developments are in acute danger due to the upcoming political changes (Hospital Structure Act, minimum volumes). Structural changes such as independent university thoracic surgery or cooperation models with non-university centres could offer solutions.