Prognostic differences in grading and metastatic lymph node pattern in patients with small bowel neuroendocrine tumors

Influence of Lymphatic, Microvascular and Perineural Invasion on Oncological Outcome in Patients with Neuroendocrine Tumors of the Small Intestine

For the histopathological work-up of resected neuroendocrine tumors of the small intestine (siNET), the determination of lymphatic (LI), microvascular (VI) and perineural (PnI) invasion is recommended. Their association with poorer prognosis has already been demonstrated in many tumor entities. However, the influence of LI, VI and PnI in siNET has not been sufficiently described yet. A retrospective analysis of all patients treated for siNET at the ENETS Center of Excellence Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, from 2010 to 2020 was performed (n = 510). Patients who did not undergo primary resection or had G3 tumors were excluded. In the entire cohort (n = 161), patients with LI, VI and PnI status had more distant metastases (48.0% vs. 71.4%, p = 0.005; 47.1% vs. 84.4%, p < 0.001; 34.2% vs. 84.7%, p < 0.001) and had lower rates of curative surgery (58.0% vs. 21.0%, p < 0.001; 48.3% vs. 16.7%, p < 0.001; 68.4% vs. 14.3%, p < 0.001). Progression-free survival was significantly reduced in patients with LI, VI or PnI compared to patients without. This was also demonstrated in patients who underwent curative surgery. Lymphatic, vascular and perineural invasion were associated with disease progression and recurrence in patients with siNET, and these should therefore be included in postoperative treatment considerations.

Outlook for 615 Small Intestinal Neuroendocrine Tumor Patients: Recurrence Risk after Surgery and Disease-Specific Survival in Advanced Disease

BACKGROUND

Small intestinal neuroendocrine tumors (siNET) are one of the most common neuroendocrine neoplasms. Radical surgery is the only curative treatment.

METHOD

We utilized a single-center study including consecutive patients diagnosed from 2000 to 2020 and followed them until death or the end of study. Disease-specific survival and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were investigated by Cox regression analyses with the inclusion of prognostic factors. Aims/primary outcomes: We identified three groups: (1) disease specific-survival in the total cohort (group1), (2) RFS and disease-specific survival after intended radical surgery (group2), (3) disease specific-survival in patients with unresectable disease or residual tumor after primary resection (group3).

RESULTS

In total, 615 patients, with a mean age (SD) 65 ± 11 years were included. Median (IQR) Ki-67 index was 4 (2-7)%. Median disease-specific survival in group1 was 130 months. Median RFS in group2 was 138 months with 5- and 10-year RFS rates of 72% and 59% with age, plasma chromogranin A (p-CgA) and Ki-67 index as prognostic factors. The ten year disease-specific survival rate in group2 was 86%. The median disease-specific survival in group3 was 85 months with age, Ki-67 index, p-CgA and primary tumor resection as prognostic factors. When proliferation was expressed by WHO grade, no difference was observed between G1 vs. G2 for any of the primary outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Recurrence rates remained high 5-10 years after surgery (group2) supporting long-term follow-up. Median disease-specific survival in patient with unresectable disease (group3) was 7 years, with a favorable impact of primary tumor resection. Our data does not support the current grading system since no significant prognostic information was detected in G1 vs. G2 tumors.