The role of Ultrabithorax in the patterning of adult thoracic muscles in Drosophila melanogaster

Single-cell type analysis of wing premotor circuits in the ventral nerve cord of Drosophila melanogaster

To perform most behaviors, animals must send commands from higher-order processing centers in the brain to premotor circuits that reside in ganglia distinct from the brain, such as the mammalian spinal cord or insect ventral nerve cord. How these circuits are functionally organized to generate the great diversity of animal behavior remains unclear. An important first step in unraveling the organization of premotor circuits is to identify their constituent cell types and create tools to monitor and manipulate these with high specificity to assess their function. This is possible in the tractable ventral nerve cord of the fly. To generate such a toolkit, we used a combinatorial genetic technique (split-GAL4) to create 195 sparse driver lines targeting 198 individual cell types in the ventral nerve cord. These included wing and haltere motoneurons, modulatory neurons, and interneurons. Using a combination of behavioral, developmental, and anatomical analyses, we systematically characterized the cell types targeted in our collection. Taken together, the resources and results presented here form a powerful toolkit for future investigations of neural circuits and connectivity of premotor circuits while linking them to behavioral outputs.

Different transcriptional responses by the CRISPRa system in distinct types of heterochromatin in Drosophila melanogaster

Transcription factors (TFs) activate gene expression by binding to elements close to promoters or enhancers. Some TFs can bind to heterochromatic regions to initiate gene activation, suggesting that if a TF is able to bind to any type of heterochromatin, it can activate transcription. To investigate this possibility, we used the CRISPRa system based on dCas9-VPR as an artificial TF in Drosophila. dCas9-VPR was targeted to the TAHRE telomeric element, an example of constitutive heterochromatin, and to promoters and enhancers of the HOX Ultrabithorax (Ubx) and Sex Combs Reduced (Scr) genes in the context of facultative heterochromatin. dCas9-VPR robustly activated TAHRE transcription, showing that although this element is heterochromatic, dCas9-VPR was sufficient to activate its expression. In the case of HOX gene promoters, although Polycomb complexes epigenetically silence these genes, both were ectopically activated. When the artificial TF was directed to enhancers, we found that the expression pattern was different compared to the effect on the promoters. In the case of the Scr upstream enhancer, dCas9-VPR activated the gene ectopically but with less expressivity; however, ectopic activation also occurred in different cells. In the case of the bxI enhancer located in the third intron of Ubx, the presence of dCas9-VPR is capable of increasing transcription initiation while simultaneously blocking transcription elongation, generating a lack of functional phenotype. Our results show that CRISPRa system is able to activate transcription in any type of heterochromatin; nevertheless, its effect on transcription is subject to the intrinsic characteristics of each gene or regulatory element.

Hox Proteins in the Regulation of Muscle Development

Hox genes encode evolutionary conserved transcription factors that specify the anterior-posterior axis in all bilaterians. Being well known for their role in patterning ectoderm-derivatives, such as CNS and spinal cord, Hox protein function is also crucial in mesodermal patterning. While well described in the case of the vertebrate skeleton, much less is known about Hox functions in the development of different muscle types. In contrast to vertebrates however, studies in the fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster, have provided precious insights into the requirement of Hox at multiple stages of the myogenic process. Here, we provide a comprehensive overview of Hox protein function in Drosophila and vertebrate muscle development, with a focus on the molecular mechanisms underlying target gene regulation in this process. Emphasizing a tight ectoderm/mesoderm cross talk for proper locomotion, we discuss shared principles between CNS and muscle lineage specification and the emerging role of Hox in neuromuscular circuit establishment.

Roles for intrinsic disorder and fuzziness in generating context-specific function in Ultrabithorax, a Hox transcription factor

Surprisingly few transcription factors drive animal development relative to the number and diversity of final tissues and body structures. Therefore, most transcription factors must function in more than one tissue. In a famous example, members of the Hox transcription factor family are expressed in contiguous stripes along the anterior/posterior axis during animal development. Individual Hox transcription factors specify all tissues within their expression domain and thus must respond to cellular cues to instigate the correct tissue-specific gene regulatory cascade. We describe how, in the Drosophila Hox protein Ultrabithorax, intrinsically disordered regions implement, regulate and co-ordinate multiple functions, potentially enabling context-specific gene regulation. The large N-terminal disordered domain encodes most of the transcription activation domain and directly impacts DNA binding affinity by the Ubx homeodomain. Similarly, the C-terminal disordered domain alters DNA binding affinity and specificity, interaction with a Hox binding protein and strongly influences both transcription activation and repression. Phosphorylation of the N-terminal disordered domain and alternative splicing of the C-terminal disordered domain could allow the cell to both regulate and co-ordinate DNA binding, protein interactions and transcription regulation. For regulatory mechanisms relying on disorder to continue to be available when Ubx is bound to other proteins or DNA, fuzziness would need to be preserved in these macromolecular complexes. The intrinsically disordered domains in Hox proteins are predicted to be on the very dynamic end of the disorder spectrum, potentially allowing disorder to persist when Ubx is bound to proteins or DNA to regulate the function of these "fuzzy" complexes. Because both intrinsically disordered regions within Ubx have multiple roles, each region may implement several different regulatory mechanisms identified in fuzzy complexes. These intrinsic disorder-based regulatory mechanisms are likely to be critical for allowing Ubx to sense tissue identity and respond by implementing a context-specific gene regulatory cascade.

Regulation and functions of the lms homeobox gene during development of embryonic lateral transverse muscles and direct flight muscles in Drosophila

BACKGROUND

Patterning and differentiation of developing musculatures require elaborate networks of transcriptional regulation. In Drosophila, significant progress has been made into identifying the regulators of muscle development and defining their interactive networks. One major family of transcription factors involved in these processes consists of homeodomain proteins. In flies, several members of this family serve as muscle identity genes to specify the fates of individual muscles, or groups thereof, during embryonic and/or adult muscle development. Herein, we report on the expression and function of a new Drosophila homeobox gene during both embryonic and adult muscle development.

METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

The newly described homeobox gene, termed lateral muscles scarcer (lms), which has yet uncharacterized orthologs in other invertebrates and primitive chordates but not in vertebrates, is expressed exclusively in subsets of developing muscle tissues. In embryos, lms is expressed specifically in the four lateral transverse (LT) muscles and their founder cells in each hemisegment, whereas in larval wing imaginal discs, it is expressed in myoblasts that develop into direct flight muscles (DFMs), which are important for proper wing positioning. We have analyzed the regulatory inputs of various other muscle identity genes with overlapping or complementary expression patterns towards the cell type specific regulation of lms expression. Further we demonstrate that lms null mutants exhibit reduced numbers of embryonic LT muscles, and null mutant adults feature held-out-wing phenotypes. We provide a detailed description of the pattern and morphology of the direct flight muscles in the wild type and lms mutant flies by using the recently-developed ultramicroscopy and show that, in the mutants, all DFMs are present and present normal morphologies.

CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE

We have identified the homeobox gene lms as a new muscle identity gene and show that it interacts with various previously-characterized muscle identity genes to regulate normal formation of embryonic lateral transverse muscles. In addition, the direct flight muscles in the adults require lms for reliably exerting their functions in controlling wing postures.