1
|
Strickland S, Turashvili G. Are Columnar Cell Lesions the Earliest Non-Obligate Precursor in the Low-Grade Breast Neoplasia Pathway? Curr Oncol 2022; 29:5664-5681. [PMID: 36005185 PMCID: PMC9406596 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol29080447] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2022] [Revised: 08/09/2022] [Accepted: 08/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Columnar cell lesions (CCLs) of the breast comprise a spectrum of morphologic alterations of the terminal duct lobular unit involving variably dilated and enlarged acini lined by columnar epithelial cells. The World Health Organization currently classifies CCLs without atypia as columnar cell change (CCC) and columnar cell hyperplasia (CCH), whereas flat epithelial atypia (FEA) is a unifying term encompassing both CCC and CCH with cytologic atypia. CCLs have been increasingly recognized in stereotactic core needle biopsies (CNBs) performed for the assessment of calcifications. CCLs are believed to represent the earliest non-obligate precursor of low-grade invasive breast carcinomas as they share molecular alterations and often coexist with entities in the low-grade breast neoplasia pathway. Despite this association, however, the risk of progression of CCLs to invasive breast carcinoma appears low and may not exceed that of concurrent proliferative lesions. As the reported upgrade rates of pure CCL/FEA when identified as the most advanced high-risk lesion on CNB vary widely, the management of FEA diagnosed on CNB remains controversial. This review will include a historical overview of CCLs and will examine histologic diagnostic criteria, molecular alterations, prognosis and issues related to upgrade rates and clinical management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Strickland
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada
| | - Gulisa Turashvili
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University Hospital, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Katayama A, Toss MS, Parkin M, Sano T, Oyama T, Quinn CM, Ellis IO, Rakha EA. Nuclear morphology in breast lesions: refining its assessment to improve diagnostic concordance. Histopathology 2021; 80:515-528. [PMID: 34605058 DOI: 10.1111/his.14577] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2021] [Revised: 09/20/2021] [Accepted: 09/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although evaluation of nuclear morphology plays a crucial role in the diagnosis and categorisation of breast lesions, the criteria used to assess nuclear atypia rely on the subjective evaluation of several features that may result in inter- and intra-observer variation. This study aims to refine the definitions of cytonuclear features in various breast lesions. METHODS ImageJ was used to assess the nuclear morphological features including nuclear diameter, axis length, perimeter, area, circularity, and roundness in 160 breast lesions comprising ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), invasive breast carcinoma of no special type (IBC-NST), tubular carcinoma, usual ductal hyperplasia (UDH), columnar cell change (CCC) and flat epithelial atypia (FEA). Reference cells included normal epithelial cells, red blood cells (RBCs) and lymphocytes. RESULTS Reference cells showed size differences not only between normal epithelial cells and RBCs but also between RBCs in varied-sized blood vessels. Nottingham grade nuclear pleomorphism scores 1 and 3 cut-offs in IBC, compared to normal epithelial cells, were <1.2x and >1.4x that of mean maximum Feret's diameter and <1.6x and >2.4x that of mean nuclear area, respectively. Nuclear morphometrics were significantly different in low-grade IBC-NST vs. tubular carcinoma, low-grade DCIS vs. UDH, and in CCC vs. FEA. No differences in the nuclear features between grade matched DCIS and IBC were identified. CONCLUSION This study provides a guide for the assessment of nuclear atypia in breast lesions, refines the comparison with reference cells and highlights the potential diagnostic value of image analysis tools in the era of digital pathology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ayaka Katayama
- Translational Medical Sciences Unit, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, City Hospital, Nottingham, UK.,Diagnostic Pathology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, Japan
| | - Michael S Toss
- Translational Medical Sciences Unit, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, City Hospital, Nottingham, UK
| | - Matthew Parkin
- Translational Medical Sciences Unit, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, City Hospital, Nottingham, UK
| | - Takaaki Sano
- Diagnostic Pathology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, Japan
| | - Tetsunari Oyama
- Diagnostic Pathology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, Japan
| | - Cecily M Quinn
- Department of Histopathology, St Vincent's University Hospital, University College, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Ian O Ellis
- Translational Medical Sciences Unit, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, City Hospital, Nottingham, UK.,Department of Histopathology, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, City Hospital, Nottingham, UK
| | - Emad A Rakha
- Translational Medical Sciences Unit, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, City Hospital, Nottingham, UK.,Department of Histopathology, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, City Hospital, Nottingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Rageth CJ, O'Flynn EAM, Pinker K, Kubik-Huch RA, Mundinger A, Decker T, Tausch C, Dammann F, Baltzer PA, Fallenberg EM, Foschini MP, Dellas S, Knauer M, Malhaire C, Sonnenschein M, Boos A, Morris E, Varga Z. Second International Consensus Conference on lesions of uncertain malignant potential in the breast (B3 lesions). Breast Cancer Res Treat 2018; 174:279-296. [PMID: 30506111 PMCID: PMC6538569 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-018-05071-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 146] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2018] [Accepted: 11/23/2018] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Purpose The second International Consensus Conference on B3 lesions was held in Zurich, Switzerland, in March 2018, organized by the International Breast Ultrasound School to re-evaluate the consensus recommendations. Methods This study (1) evaluated how management recommendations of the first Zurich Consensus Conference of 2016 on B3 lesions had influenced daily practice and (2) reviewed current literature towards recommendations to biopsy. Results In 2018, the consensus recommendations for management of B3 lesions remained almost unchanged: For flat epithelial atypia (FEA), classical lobular neoplasia (LN), papillary lesions (PL) and radial scars (RS) diagnosed on core-needle biopsy (CNB) or vacuum-assisted biopsy (VAB), excision by VAB in preference to open surgery, and for atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) and phyllodes tumors (PT) diagnosed at VAB or CNB, first-line open surgical excision (OE) with follow-up surveillance imaging for 5 years. Analyzing the Database of the Swiss Minimally Invasive Breast Biopsies (MIBB) with more than 30,000 procedures recorded, there was a significant increase in recommending more frequent surveillance of LN [65% in 2018 vs. 51% in 2016 (p = 0.004)], FEA (72% in 2018 vs. 62% in 2016 (p = 0.005)), and PL [(76% in 2018 vs. 70% in 2016 (p = 0.04)] diagnosed on VAB. A trend to more frequent surveillance was also noted also for RS [77% in 2018 vs. 67% in 2016 (p = 0.07)]. Conclusions Minimally invasive management of B3 lesions (except ADH and PT) with VAB continues to be appropriate as an alternative to first-line OE in most cases, but with more frequent surveillance, especially for LN.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christoph J Rageth
- Département de Gynécologie et d'Obstétrique, Centre du sein, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève, Bd de la Cluse 30, 1211, Geneva 14, Switzerland. .,, Ringlikerstrasse 53, 8142, Uitikon Waldegg, Switzerland.
| | - Elizabeth A M O'Flynn
- The Rose Centre, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Perimeter Road, London, SW17 0QT, UK
| | - Katja Pinker
- Breast Imaging Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 300 E 66th St, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Rahel A Kubik-Huch
- Department of Medical Services, Institute of Radiology, Kantonsspital Baden, im Ergel, 5404, Baden, Switzerland
| | - Alexander Mundinger
- Zentrum Radiologie der Niels-Stensen-Kliniken; Marienhospital Osnabrück, Bischofsstraße 1, 49074, Osnabrück, Germany
| | - Thomas Decker
- Institut für Pathologie am Dietrich-Bonhoeffer-Klinikum, Salvador-Allende-Straße 30, 17036, Neubrandenburg, Germany
| | - Christoph Tausch
- Brust-Zentrum Zürich, Seefeldstr. 214, 8008, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Florian Dammann
- Interventional and Pediatric Radiology, Department of Diagnostic, Inselspital, University Hospital Bern, Freiburgstrasse 10, 3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Pascal A Baltzer
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Allgemeines Krankenhaus, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - Eva Maria Fallenberg
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Maria P Foschini
- Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, Unit of Anatomic Pathology at Bellaria Hospital, University of Bologna, Via Altura 3, 40139, Bologna, Italy
| | - Sophie Dellas
- Clinic of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Petersgraben 4, 4031, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Michael Knauer
- Breast Center St. Gallen, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, Rorschacher Str. 95, 9007, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Caroline Malhaire
- Imaging Department, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris, France
| | - Martin Sonnenschein
- Division of Radiology, Breast Center Bern (Brustzentrum Bern), Klinik Engeried, Lindenhofgruppe AG, Riedweg 15, 3012, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Andreas Boos
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, Rämistr. 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Elisabeth Morris
- Breast Imaging Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 300 E 66th St, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Zsuzsanna Varga
- Institute of Pathology and Molecular Pathology, University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland Schmelzbergstrasse 12., 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|