Updates on eosinophilic disorders

T cell phenotype and lack of eosinophilia are not uncommon in extramedullary myeloid/lymphoid neoplasms with ETV6::FLT3 fusion: a case report and review of the literature

In the 2022, WHO and ICC classifications, myeloid/lymphoid neoplasms with eosinophilia (M/LN-eo) and tyrosine kinase gene fusions represent rare hematologic malignancies driven by rearrangements of PDGFRA, PDGFRB, FGFR1, JAK2, FLT3, and ETV6::ABL1 fusion. Eosinophilia is the most constant finding, whereas the clinicopathological features are quite heterogeneous, presenting as Chronic eosinophilic leukemia (CEL) NOS, myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasm (MDS/MPN), MDS, MPN, systemic mastocytosis (SM), T or B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoblastic lymphoma (ALL/LBL), acute myeloid leukemia (AML), blastic phase of MPN, or mixed phenotype acute leukemia (MPAL). Extramedullary involvement at diagnosis or during progression is common. Here, we report a very unusual case of myeloid/lymphoid neoplasm with ETV6::FLT3 fusion with a nodal presentation without associated eosinophilia. Our case draws attention to diagnostic pitfalls in these rare entities.

Clinical and Therapeutic Intervention of Hypereosinophilia in the Era of Molecular Diagnosis

Hypereosinophilia (HE) presents with an elevated peripheral eosinophilic count of >1.5 × 109/L and is composed of a broad spectrum of secondary non-hematologic disorders and a minority of primary hematologic processes with heterogenous clinical presentations, ranging from mild symptoms to potentially lethal outcome secondary to end-organ damage. Following the introduction of advanced molecular diagnostics (genomic studies, RNA sequencing, and targeted gene mutation profile, etc.) in the last 1-2 decades, there have been deep insights into the etiology and molecular mechanisms involved in the development of HE. The classification of HE has been updated and refined following to the discovery of clinically novel markers and targets in the 2022 WHO classification and ICOG-EO 2021 Working Conference on Eosinophil Disorder and Syndromes. However, the diagnosis and management of HE is challenging given its heterogeneity and variable clinical outcome. It is critical to have a diagnostic algorithm for accurate subclassification of HE and hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES) (e.g., reactive, familial, idiopathic, myeloid/lymphoid neoplasm, organ restricted, or with unknown significance) and to follow established treatment guidelines for patients based on its clinical findings and risk stratification.

[Guideline of the diagnosis and treatment of eosinophilic disorders (2024)]

The eosinophilias encompass a broad range of nonhematologic (secondary or reactive) and hematologic (primary or clonal) disorders with potential for end-organ damage. Based on new clinical data and increased understanding of disease molecular genetics, the World Health Organization (WHO) and the international consensus classification (ICC) has provided updated criteria and classifications for eosinophilic disorders in 2022. This guideline represents an update of Chinese expert consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of eosinophilia published in 2017 and aim to provide Chinese hematologist with clear guidance on management for eosinophilic disorders.

Hematological Neoplasms with Eosinophilia

Eosinophils in peripheral blood account for 0.3-5% of leukocytes, which is equivalent to 0.05-0.5 × 109/L. A count above 0.5 × 109/L is considered to indicate eosinophilia, while a count equal to or above 1.5 × 109/L is defined as hypereosinophilia. In bone marrow aspirate, eosinophilia is considered when eosinophils make up more than 6% of the total nuclear cells. In daily clinical practice, the most common causes of reactive eosinophilia are non-hematologic, whether they are non-neoplastic (allergic diseases, drugs, infections, or immunological diseases) or neoplastic (solid tumors). Eosinophilia that is associated with a hematological malignancy may be reactive or secondary to the production of eosinophilopoietic cytokines, and this is mainly seen in lymphoid neoplasms (Hodgkin lymphoma, mature T-cell neoplasms, lymphocytic variant of hypereosinophilic syndrome, and B-acute lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma). Eosinophilia that is associated with a hematological malignancy may also be neoplastic or primary, derived from the malignant clone, usually in myeloid neoplasms or with its origin in stem cells (myeloid/lymphoid neoplasms with eosinophilia and tyrosine kinase gene fusions, acute myeloid leukemia with core binding factor translocations, mastocytosis, myeloproliferative neoplasms, myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms, and myelodysplastic neoplasms). There are no concrete data in standardized cytological and cytometric procedures that could predict whether eosinophilia is reactive or clonal. The verification is usually indirect, based on the categorization of the accompanying hematologic malignancy. This review focuses on the broad differential diagnosis of hematological malignancies with eosinophilia.

Myeloid/lymphoid neoplasms with eosinophilia and tyrosine kinase fusion genes: A workshop report with focus on novel entities and a literature review including paediatric cases

Myeloid/lymphoid neoplasms with eosinophilia (M/LN-eo) and tyrosine kinase (TK) gene fusions are a rare group of haematopoietic neoplasms with a broad range of clinical and morphological presentations. Paediatric cases have increasingly been recognised. Importantly, not all appear as a chronic myeloid neoplasm and eosinophilia is not always present. In addition, standard cytogenetic and molecular methods may not be sufficient to diagnose M/LN-eo due to cytogenetically cryptic aberrations. Therefore, additional evaluation with fluorescence in-situ hybridisation and other molecular genetic techniques (array-based comparative genomic hybridisation, RNA sequencing) are recommended for the identification of specific TK gene fusions. M/LN-eo with JAK2 and FLT3-rearrangements and ETV6::ABL1 fusion were recently added as a formal member to this category in the International Consensus Classification (ICC) and the 5th edition of the WHO classification (WHO-HAEM5). In addition, other less common defined genetic alterations involving TK genes have been described. This study is an update on M/LN-eo with TK gene fusions with focus on novel entities, as illustrated by cases submitted to the Bone Marrow Workshop, organised by the European Bone Marrow Working Group (EBMWG) within the frame of the 21st European Association for Haematopathology congress (EAHP-SH) in Florence 2022. A literature review was performed including paediatric cases of M/LN-eo with TK gene fusions.

Clinical Validation of FusionPlex RNA Sequencing and Its Utility in the Diagnosis and Classification of Hematologic Neoplasms

Recurrent gene rearrangements result in gene fusions that encode chimeric proteins, driving the pathogenesis of many hematologic neoplasms. The fifth edition World Health Organization classification and International Consensus Classification 2022 include an expanding list of entities defined by such gene rearrangements. Therefore, sensitive and rapid methods are needed to identify a broad range of gene fusions for precise diagnosis and prognostication. In this study, we validated the FusionPlex Pan-Heme panel analysis using anchored multiplex PCR/targeted RNA next-generation sequencing for routine clinical testing. Furthermore, we assessed its utility in detecting gene fusions in myeloid and lymphoid neoplasms. The validation cohort of 61 cases demonstrated good concordance between the FusionPlex Pan-Heme panel and other methods, including chromosome analysis, fluorescence in situ hybridization, RT-PCR, and Sanger sequencing, with an analytic sensitivity and specificity of 95% and 100%, respectively. In an independent cohort of 28 patients indicated for FusionPlex testing, gene fusions were detected in 21 patients. The FusionPlex Pan-Heme panel analysis reliably detected fusion partners and patient-specific fusion sequences, allowing accurate classification of hematologic neoplasms and the discovery of new fusion partners, contributing to a better understanding of the pathogenesis of the diseases.

Guide to the Diagnosis of Myeloid Neoplasms: A Bone Marrow Pathology Group Approach

OBJECTIVES

The practicing pathologist is challenged by the ever-increasing diagnostic complexity of myeloid neoplasms. This guide is intended to provide a general roadmap from initial case detection, often triggered by complete blood count results with subsequent blood smear review, to final diagnosis.

METHODS

The integration of hematologic, morphologic, immunophenotypic, and genetic features into routine practice is standard of care. The requirement for molecular genetic testing has increased along with the complexity of test types, the utility of different testing modalities in identifying key gene mutations, and the sensitivity and turnaround time for various assays.

RESULTS

Classification systems for myeloid neoplasms have evolved to achieve the goal of providing a pathology diagnosis that enhances patient care, outcome prediction, and treatment options for individual patients and is formulated, endorsed, and adopted by hematologists/oncologists.

CONCLUSIONS

This guide provides diagnostic strategies for all myeloid neoplasm subtypes. Special considerations are provided for each category of testing and neoplasm category, along with classification information, genetic testing requirements, interpretation information, and case reporting recommendations based on the experience of 11 Bone Marrow Pathology Group members.

Progression in Myeloid Neoplasms: Beyond the Myeloblast

Disease progression in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), myelodysplastic-myeloproliferative neoplasms (MDS/MPN), and myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN), altogether referred to as myeloid neoplasms (MN), is a major source of mortality. Apart from transformation to acute myeloid leukemia, the clinical progression of MN is mostly due to the overgrowth of pre-existing hematopoiesis by the MN without an additional transforming event. Still, MN may evolve along other recurrent yet less well-known scenarios: (1) acquisition of MPN features in MDS or (2) MDS features in MPN, (3) progressive myelofibrosis (MF), (4) acquisition of chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML)-like characteristics in MPN or MDS, (5) development of myeloid sarcoma (MS), (6) lymphoblastic (LB) transformation, (7) histiocytic/dendritic outgrowths. These MN-transformation types exhibit a propensity for extramedullary sites (e.g., skin, lymph nodes, liver), highlighting the importance of lesional biopsies in diagnosis. Gain of distinct mutations/mutational patterns seems to be causative or at least accompanying several of the above-mentioned scenarios. MDS developing MPN features often acquire MPN driver mutations (usually JAK2), and MF. Conversely, MPN gaining MDS features develop, e.g., ASXL1, IDH1/2, SF3B1, and/or SRSF2 mutations. Mutations of RAS-genes are often detected in CMML-like MPN progression. MS ex MN is characterized by complex karyotypes, FLT3 and/or NPM1 mutations, and often monoblastic phenotype. MN with LB transformation is associated with secondary genetic events linked to lineage reprogramming leading to the deregulation of ETV6, IKZF1, PAX5, PU.1, and RUNX1. Finally, the acquisition of MAPK-pathway gene mutations may shape MN toward histiocytic differentiation. Awareness of all these less well-known MN-progression types is important to guide optimal individual patient management.

Advances in molecular evaluation of myeloproliferative neoplasms

Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) are a group of clonal hematopoietic stem cell disorders with uncontrolled proliferation of one or more hematopoietic cell types, including myeloid, erythroid and megakaryocytic lineages, and minimal defect in maturation. Most MPN are associated with well-defined molecular abnormalities involving genes that encode protein tyrosine kinases that lead to constitutive activation of the downstream signal transduction pathways and confer cells proliferative and survival advantage. Genome-wide sequencing analyses have discovered secondary cooperating mutations that are shared by most of the MPN subtypes as well as other myeloid neoplasms and play a major role in disease progression. Without appropriate management, the natural history of most MPN consists of an initial chronic phase and a terminal blast phase. Molecular aberrations involving protein tyrosine kinases have been used for the diagnosis, classification, detection of minimal/measurable residual disease, and target therapy. We review recent advances in molecular genetic aberrations in MPN with a focus on MPN associated with gene rearrangements or mutations involving tyrosine kinase pathways.

What’s New in the Classification, Diagnosis and Therapy of Myeloid Leukemias

Myeloid leukemias are a broad group of hematological disorders, characterized by heterogeneous clinical and biological features. In recent years, unprecedented genetic discoveries and clinical–biological correlations have revolutionized the field of myeloid leukemias. The most relevant changes have specifically occurred in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML), chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and myeloid neoplasms (MNs) with eosinophilia. The recently published International Consensus Classification (ICC) of myeloid neoplasms has addressed these changes, providing an updated framework and revised diagnostic criteria for such entities. This is also the aim of the 5th edition of the WHO classification of hematopoietic tumors, whose preliminary version was published in 2022. Parallel to this, new therapeutic options and novel molecular targets have changed the management of many myeloid entities, including AML and CML. This review aims to address the most relevant updates in the classification and diagnosis of AML, CMML, CML and MNs with eosinophilia. The state of the art of treatment and future therapeutic options for such disorders are also discussed.

Proposed refined diagnostic criteria and classification of eosinophil disorders and related syndromes

Eosinophilia and eosinophil activation are recurrent features in various reactive states and certain hematologic malignancies. In patients with hypereosinophilia (HE), HE-induced organ damage is often encountered and may lead to the diagnosis of a hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES). A number of known mechanisms and etiologies contribute to the development of HE and HES. Based on these etiologies and the origin of eosinophils, HE and HES are divided into primary forms where eosinophils are clonal cells, reactive forms where an underlying reactive or neoplastic condition is detected and eosinophils are considered to be "non-clonal" cells, and idiopathic HE and HES in which neither a clonal nor a reactive underlying pathology is detected. Since 2012, this classification and the related criteria have been widely accepted and regarded as standard. However, during the past few years, new developments in the field and an increasing number of markers and targets have created a need to update these criteria and the classification of HE and HES. To address this challenge, a Working Conference on eosinophil disorders was organized in 2021. In this conference, a panel of experts representing the relevant fields, including allergy, dermatology, hematology, immunology, laboratory medicine, and pathology, met and discussed new markers and concepts as well as refinements in definitions, criteria and classifications of HE and HES. The outcomes of this conference are presented in this article and should assist in the diagnosis and management of patients with HE and HES in daily practice and in the preparation and conduct of clinical trials.