Medicine preparation errors in ten Spanish neonatal intensive care units

Healthcare-associated bloodstream infections caused by bacterial and fungal contamination of intravenous fluids and medicines in healthcare facilities in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review

INTRODUCTION

We reviewed culture-confirmed healthcare-associated outbreaks linked to bacterial and fungal contamination of intravenous fluids and medicines (further "infusates") in low-income countries and lower and upper middle-income countries (LIC, Lower-MIC and Upper-MIC). We assessed the scope, impact, risks, and gaps in knowledge.

METHODOLOGY

Literature search including PubMed, Web of Science, Worldwide Database for Nosocomial Outbreaks, Global Health, and Google Scholar. National essential medicine lists (NEMLs) of sub-Saharan countries were searched for listing of pediatric infusates.

RESULTS

Between 1975 and 2023, 50 articles were retrieved. Median (range) number of patients affected was 12 (3-185); 74.2% (761/1025) of all patients affected were children. All patients presented with bloodstream infections; median case fatality ratio was 21.1% (0.0-87.5%). Upper-MIC, Lower-MIC and LIC accounted for 21, 25 and 4 articles, respectively. Most frequently affected wards were neonatal and adult intensive care units (19 and 6 articles). The 50 articles revealed 59 contaminated infusates: IV fluids (n = 37), including TPN (n = 10, of which 8 were from Upper-MIC), and IV medicines (n = 22), comprising amongst others propofol (n = 4) and Water for Injection (n = 3). The 63 isolates included Enterobacterales (46.0% (29/63) of isolates), non-fermentative Gram-negative bacteria (NFGNB, 47.6% (30/63)), fungi (4.8%, 3/63)) and Bacillus circulans (1.6% (1/63)). Among the Enterobacterales, the genera Serratia, Klebsiella, and Enterobacter represented 82.8% (24/29) of isolates. Burkholderia cepacia was the most frequent NFGNB (53.3% (16/30) isolates). Excluding TPN, 18 IV fluids and 7 IV medicines (representing half (51.0%, (25/49) of these infusates) were incorrectly used as multidose vial. A third (33.9%, 20/59) of infusates in 40.0% (20/50) of articles was intrinsically contaminated. In LIC and LMIC, staff in neonatology units turned to in-ward preparation of infusates because of lack of access to pediatric IV formulations and sizes. Less than a third (31.8%, 18/44) of the NEMLs listed neonatal IV premixtures.

CONCLUSION

Infusate contamination is a serious, underreported risk especially for children in LICs and Lower-MIC. Outstanding issues are access to pediatric infusates and preventing in-ward preparation of IV medicines in LIC and Lower-MIC, and safe preparation and administration of TPN in Upper-MIC.

Implementation of a national system for best practice delivery of paediatric infusions

BACKGROUND

Standard concentration infusions and 'smart-pumps' are recognised as best practice in the paediatric setting. Implementation rates in European hospitals remain low. Children's Health Ireland (CHI) developed a paediatric 'smart-pump' drug library using standardised concentrations. At time of development, other Irish hospitals continued to use traditional pumps and weight-based paediatric infusions.

AIM

To expand best paediatric infusion practices by nationalising use of the CHI drug library.

SETTING

Tertiary paediatric, maternity and general acute hospitals, and associated transport services in Ireland.

DEVELOPMENT

The CHI drug library was first developed for paediatric intensive care and then adapted over a 10-year period for use in emergency departments, general paediatric wards, neonatal units, adult intensive care and transport services. The original library (42 drug lines, 1 'care-unit') was substantially expanded (223 drug lines, 6 'care-units'). A neonatal sub-library was created.

IMPLEMENTATION

Executive support, dedicated resources and governance structures were secured. Implementation and training packages were developed. Implementation has occurred across CHI, in paediatric and neonatal transport services, 58% (n = 11) of neonatal units, and 23% (n = 6) of paediatric sites.

EVALUATION

A before and after study demonstrated significant reductions in infusion prescribing errors (29.0% versus 8.4%, p < 0.001). Direct observation of infusions (n = 1023) found high compliance rates (98.9%) and low programming errors (1.6%). 100% of nurses (n = 132) surveyed 9 months after general ward implementation considered the drug library had enhanced patient safety.

CONCLUSION

Strategic planning and collaboration can standardise infusion practices. The CHI drug library has been approved as a National Standard of Care, with implementation continuing.

Protocolization of Analgesia and Sedation Through Smart Technology in Intensive Care: Improving Patient Safety

BACKGROUND

The risk of medication errors in intensive care units is high, primarily in the drug administration phase.

LOCAL PROBLEM

Management of high-alert medications within intensive care units in the study institution varied widely. The aim of this quality improvement project was to protocolize and centralize the management of high-alert medications in acute care settings and to implement smart intravenous infusion pump technology in intensive care units.

METHODS

The project was conducted in 4 phases: (1) protocolization and standardization of intravenous mixtures, (2) centralization of intravenous mixture preparation in the Pharmacy Department, (3) programming of the smart pumps, and (4) dissemination and staged implementation of intravenous mixture protocols. Smart pumps (Alaris, CareFusion) were used to deliver the medicines, and the manufacturer's software (Alaris Guardrails, CareFusion) was used to analyze data regarding adherence to the drug library and the number of programming errors detected.

RESULTS

Morphine, remifentanil, fentanyl, midazolam, dexmedetomidine, and propofol were included. After implementation of the smart pumps, 3283 infusions were started; of these, 2198 were programmed through the drug library, indicating 67% compliance with the safety software. The pumps intercepted 398 infusion-related programming errors that led to cancellation or reprogramming of drug infusions.

CONCLUSIONS

Protocolization and centralization of the preparation of high-alert sedative and analgesic medications for critically ill patients and the administration of these drugs using smart pump technology decrease variability of clinical practice and intercept potentially serious medication errors.

Effect of a Pharmacy-based Centralized Intravenous Admixture Service on the Prevalence of Medication Errors: A Before-and-After Study

OBJECTIVES

Intravenous admixture preparation errors (IAPEs) may lead to patient harm. The primary aim of this study was to assess the effect of a pharmacy-based centralized intravenous admixture service (CIVAS) on IAPEs.

METHODS

We conducted a before-and-after study in 3 clinical wards before CIVAS implementation and in the CIVAS unit 18 months after implementation. Intravenous admixture preparation error data were collected by disguised observation. The primary outcome was the proportion of admixtures with 1 or more IAPEs. Secondary outcomes were the type and potential severity of IAPEs, noncompliance to hygiene procedures, and nursing staff satisfaction with the CIVAS. The primary outcome was analyzed using a multivariable mixed-effects logistic regression model.

RESULTS

One or more IAPEs were identified in 14 of 543 admixtures (2.6%) in the CIVAS unit and in 148 of 282 admixtures (52.5%) in the clinical wards (odds ratio, 0.02; 95% confidence interval, 0.004-0.05). The most common IAPE types were wrong solvent or diluent (n = 95) and wrong volume of infusion fluid (n = 45). No potentially harmful IAPEs occurred in the CIVAS unit as opposed to 22 (7.8%) in the clinical wards. Disinfection procedures were better adhered to in the CIVAS unit. Overall nurse satisfaction with the CIVAS increased from a median of 70 (n = 166) 5 months after intervention to 77 (n = 115) 18 months after intervention ( P < 0.001) on a 100-point scale.

CONCLUSIONS

Centralized intravenous admixture service performed notably better than the clinical wards with regard to IAPEs and noncompliance to hygiene procedures. Nurses were satisfied with the CIVAS. Hence, the implementation of CIVAS is an important strategy to improve medication safety in hospitals.

Prevalence, Causes and Severity of Medication Administration Errors in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Neonates are at greater risk of preventable adverse drug events as compared to children and adults.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to estimate and critically appraise the evidence on the prevalence, causes and severity of medication administration errors (MAEs) amongst neonates in Neonatal Intensive Care Units (NICUs).

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted by searching nine electronic databases and the grey literature for studies, without language and publication date restrictions. The pooled prevalence of MAEs was estimated using a random-effects model. Data on error causation were synthesised using Reason's model of accident causation.

RESULTS

Twenty unique studies were included. Amongst direct observation studies reporting total opportunity for errors as the denominator for MAEs, the pooled prevalence was 59.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 35.4-81.3, I² = 99.5%). Whereas, the non-direct observation studies reporting medication error reports as the denominator yielded a pooled prevalence of 64.8% (95% CI 46.6-81.1, I² = 98.2%). The common reported causes were error-provoking environments (five studies), while active failures were reported by three studies. Only three studies examined the severity of MAEs, and each utilised a different method of assessment.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis estimating the prevalence, causes and severity of MAEs amongst neonates. There is a need to improve the quality and reporting of studies to produce a better estimate of the prevalence of MAEs amongst neonates. Important targets such as wrong administration-technique, wrong drug-preparation and wrong time errors have been identified to guide the implementation of remedial measures.

Analysis of standard concentrations of continuous infusions in nine Spanish neonatal intensive care units

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to describe the use of standard concentrations for continuous infusion drugs in Spanish neonatal intensive care units (NICUs).

METHODS

We conducted an observational multicentre study based on a survey sent by email to 9 Spanish NICUs during January and February 2018. We collected data on intravenous drugs frequently used in neonates, and their preparation. Continuous infusion drugs with a standard concentration implemented in ≥2 NICUs were selected. An analysis of the concentrations reported was performed, and the rate of adherence to international recommendations of the Institute of Safe Medication Practice (ISMP) and Vermont Oxford Network (VON) was calculated.

RESULTS

From 69 drugs mentioned in the survey, 14 were included in the study, with all but one (furosemide) being considered high-alert medications by the ISMP. From the 9 participating NICUs, 3 had no established standard concentrations for any of the 14 drugs selected. In the other participating NICUs, dexmedetomidine was used with a standard concentration in the 3 NICUs which used the drug, whereas furosemide showed the lowest implementation rate (a standard concentration was implemented in 2 of the 7 NICUs which used the drug). In regard to concentrations adopted in the different NICUs, 80 variations were identified for the 14 drugs. The mean number of different standard concentrations for each drug per NICU was 2 (range 1-5). Adherence to ISMP/VON recommendations varied considerably depending on the drugs, from high adherence for heparin (2/3) and fentanyl (2/3) to low adherence for norepinephrine (0/4).

CONCLUSIONS

The establishment of standard concentrations is highly recommended for continuous infusion medications as an effective error-prevention strategy. Nevertheless, we detected a low implementation rate in our NICUs and a lack of consistency in the concentrations selected.

Systemic Causes of In-Hospital Intravenous Medication Errors: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVES

Delivery of intravenous medications in hospitals is a complex process posing to systemic risks for errors. The aim of this study was to identify systemic causes of in-hospital intravenous medication errors.

METHODS

A systematic review adhering to PRISMA guidelines was conducted. We searched MEDLINE (Ovid), Scopus, CINAHL, and EMB reviews for articles published between January 2005 and June 2016. Peer-reviewed journal articles published in English were included. Two reviewers independently selected articles according to a predetermined PICO tool. The quality of studies was assessed using the GRADE system and the evidence analyzed using qualitative content analysis.

RESULTS

Eleven studies from six countries were included in the analysis. We identified systemic causes related to prescribing (n = 6 studies), preparation (n = 6), administration (n = 6), dispensing and storage (n = 5), and treatment monitoring (n = 2). Administration, prescribing, and preparation were the process phases most prone to systemic errors. Insufficient actions to secure safe use of high-alert medications, lack of knowledge of the drug, calculation tasks, failure in double-checking procedures, and confusion between look-alike, sound-alike medications were the leading causes of intravenous medication errors. The number of the included studies was limited, all of them being observational studies and graded as low quality.

CONCLUSIONS

Current intravenous medication systems remain vulnerable, which can result in patient harm. Our findings suggest further focus on medication safety activities related to administration, prescribing, and preparation of intravenous medications. This study provides healthcare organizations with preliminary knowledge about systemic causes of intravenous medication errors, but more rigorous evidence is needed.

Systemic Defenses to Prevent Intravenous Medication Errors in Hospitals: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVES

Intravenous medication delivery is a complex process that poses systemic risks of errors. The objective of our study was to identify systemic defenses that can prevent in-hospital intravenous (IV) medication errors.

METHODS

A systematic review adhering to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines was conducted. We searched MEDLINE (Ovid), Scopus, CINAHL, and EMB reviews for articles published between January 2005 and June 2016. Peer-reviewed journal articles published in English were included. Two reviewers independently selected articles according to a predetermined PICO tool. The quality of studies was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system, and the evidence was analyzed using qualitative content analysis.

RESULTS

Forty-six studies from 11 countries were included in the analysis. We identified systemic defenses related to administration (n = 24 studies), prescribing (n = 8), preparation (n = 6), treatment monitoring (n = 2), and dispensing (n = 1). In addition, 5 studies explored defenses related to multiple stages of the drug delivery process. Systemic defenses including features of closed-loop medication management systems appeared in 61% of the studies, with smart pumps being the defense most widely studied (24%). The evidence quality of the included articles was limited, as 83% were graded as low quality, 13% were of moderate quality, and only 4% were of high quality.

CONCLUSIONS

In-hospital IV medication processes are developing toward closed-loop medication management systems. Our study provides health care organizations with preliminary knowledge about systemic defenses that can prevent IV medication errors, but more rigorous evidence is needed. There is a need for further studies to explore combinations of different systemic defenses and their effectiveness in error prevention throughout the drug delivery process.

Intravenous drug use in neonatal intensive care units

OBJECTIVES

Intravenous drug use in neonates is frequent and prone to medication errors. The aim of this study was to describe the intravenous drugs most frequently used in Spanish Neonatal Intensive Care Units (NICU), their preparation and the implementation rate of standardised concentration infusions.

METHODS

We conducted an observational multicentre study based on a survey sent by email to nine Spanish NICUs during January and February 2018. We collected data describing the intravenous drugs frequently used in neonates and their preparation. A descriptive analysis of the medicines reported (and their preparation) was performed, to assess how frequently standard concentrations were used and how medications were prepared in central pharmacies.

RESULTS

Overall, 69 different drugs were reported by participating NICUs. Of these, 33% (n=23) were not approved for use in neonates and 38% (n=26) corresponded to high-alert medications, according to the Institute for Safe Medication Practices. A mean of only 63.5% of intravenous medicines were standardised. The standard-concentration implementation rate was somewhat higher for intermittent (mean 74.1%) than continuous (mean 42.9%) infusions. Notably, infusions were more commonly prepared on wards than in hospital pharmacies.

CONCLUSIONS

Intravenous drug use in NICUs has been identified as a high-risk process, and error-reduction strategies (such as concentration standardisation) have been recommended. Further data are necessary to design the most suitable intervention in our country (Spain), but institutional initiatives are needed to achieve this.

Prevalence and determinants of intravenous admixture preparation errors: A prospective observational study in a university hospital

Background Intravenous admixture preparation errors (IAPEs) may lead to patient harm. Insight into the prevalence as well as the determinants associated with these IAPEs is needed to elicit preventive measures. Aim The primary aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of IAPEs. Secondary aims were to identify the type, severity, and determinants of IAPEs. Method A prospective observational study was performed in a Dutch university hospital. IAPE data were collected by disguised observation. The primary outcome was the proportion of admixtures with one or more IAPEs. Descriptive statistics were used for the prevalence, type, and severity of IAPEs. Mixed-effects logistic regression analyses were used to estimate the determinants of IAPEs. Results A total of 533 IAPEs occurred in 367 of 614 admixtures (59.8%) prepared by nursing staff. The most prevalent errors were wrong preparation technique (n = 257) and wrong volume of infusion fluid (n = 107). Fifty-nine IAPEs (11.1%) were potentially harmful. The following variables were associated with IAPEs: multistep versus single-step preparations (adjusted odds ratio [OR_adj] 4.08, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.27–7.35); interruption versus no interruption (OR_adj 2.32, CI 1.13–4.74); weekend versus weekdays (OR_adj 2.12, CI 1.14–3.95); time window 2 p.m.-6 p.m. versus 7 a.m.-10 a.m. (OR_adj 3.38, CI 1.60–7.15); and paediatric versus adult wards (OR_adj 0.14, CI 0.06–0.37). Conclusion IAPEs, including harmful IAPEs, occurred frequently. The determinants associated with IAPEs point to factors associated with preparation complexity and working conditions. Strategies to reduce the occurrence of IAPEs and therefore patient harm should target the identified determinants.

Pharmacokinetic modelling and Bayesian estimation-assisted decision tools to optimize vancomycin dosage in neonates: only one piece of the puzzle

Introduction: Vancomycin is commonly administered to neonates, while observational data on therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM, trough levels) suggest that vancomycin exposure and dosage remain substandard. Area covered: Data on vancomycin pharmacokinetics (PK) and its covariates are abundant. Consequently, modeling is an obvious tool to improve targeted exposure, with a shift from TDM trough levels to area under the curve (AUC_24h) targets, as in adults. Continuous administration appeared as a practice to facilitate AUC_24h target attainment, while Bayesian model-supported targeting emerged as a novel tool. However, the AUC_24h/MIC (minimal inhibitory concentration) target itself should consider neonate-specific aspects (bloodstream infections, coagulase-negative staphylococci, protein binding, underexplored causes of variability, like assays, preparation and administration inaccuracies, or missing covariates). Expert opinion: To improve targeted exposure in neonates, initial vancomycin prescription should be based on 'a priori model-based individual dosing' using validated dosing regimens, followed by further tailoring by dosing optimization applying Bayesian estimation-assisted TDM. Future research should focus on the feasibility to integrate these tools (individualized dosing, Bayesian models) in clinical practice, and to perform PK/PD studies in the relevant animal models and human neonatal setting (coagulase-negative staphylococci, bloodstream infections).

Incident reports versus direct observation to identify medication errors and risk factors in hospitalised newborns

Newborns are often exposed to medication errors in hospitals. Identification and understanding the causes and risk factors associated with medication errors will help to improve the effectiveness of medication. We sought to compare voluntary incident reports and direct observation in the identification of medication errors. We also identified corresponding risk factors in order to establish measures to prevent medication errors. Medication errors identified by a clinical pharmacist and those recorded in our incident reporting system by caregivers were analysed. Main outcomes were rates, type and severity of medication error, and other variables related to medication errors. Ultimately, 383 medication errors were identified by the clinical pharmacist, and two medication errors were declared by caregivers. Prescription errors accounted for 38.4%, preparation errors for 16.2%, and administration errors for 45.4%. The two variables significantly related to the occurrence of medication errors were gestational age < 32.0 weeks (p = 0.04) and the number of drugs prescribed (p < 0.01).Conclusion: Caregivers underreported the true rate of medication errors. Most medication errors were caused by inattention and could have been limited by simplifying the medication process. Risk of medication errors is increased in newborns < 32.0 weeks and increases with the number of drugs prescribed to each patient. What is Known: • Newborns in hospitals are particularly susceptible to medication errors. • Identification and understanding the reasons for medication errors should help us to establish preventive measures to reduce the occurrence of such errors. What is New: • Direct observation of the medication process, though time consuming, is essential to accurately assess the frequency of medication errors, which are underreported by caregivers. Most medication errors are caused by inattention and could be limited by simplifying the medication process. • The risk of medication errors was significantly increased in very preterm newborns (< 32 weeks) and when the number of prescription per patient increased.

SEGURANÇA DA TERAPIA MEDICAMENTOSA EM NEONATOLOGIA: OLHAR DA ENFERMAGEM NA PERSPECTIVA DO PENSAMENTO ECOLÓGICO RESTAURATIVO

RESUMO Objetivo: analisar os fatores que interferem na segurança no processo de medicação em uma unidade de terapia intensiva (UTI) neonatal. Método: estudo exploratório com abordagem qualitativa. A coleta ocorreu no período de dezembro de 2014 a março de 2015, através de grupos focais e caminhada fotográfica, na perspectiva do pensamento ecológico restaurativo, com 12 profissionais de enfermagem da UTI neonatal de um hospital público da Região Sul do Brasil. As informações foram organizadas através do software Nvivo 10 e submetidas à análise de conteúdo temática. Resultados: a partir da análise, emergiram as seguintes categorias temáticas: Abordagem individualizada e cultura de punição dos erros de medicação; Fatores de (in)segurança relacionados à estrutura física dos medicamentos na UTI neonatal; Fatores de (in)segurança relacionados a rotinas e protocolos; e A enfermagem como barreira para a ocorrência de falhas de prescrição médica. Conclusão: o estudo demonstra a complexidade do processo de medicação em neonatologia e destaca pontos críticos no mesmo que podem ocasionar falhas e eventos adversos, assim como propostas de melhoria para prevenir os erros. Destaca-se o papel da equipe de enfermagem na detecção de erros da prescrição medicamentosa, funcionando como última barreira para prevenção e redução de erros associados à medicação.

Direct Observation of Medication Errors in Critical Care Setting: A Systematic Review

Medication errors continue to be an issue for the critically ill and are costly to both patients and health care facilities. This article reviews published research about these errors and reports results of observational studies. The types of errors, incidence, and root causes have been considered along with adverse consequences. The implications for bedside practice as a result of this review are fairly straightforward. Medication errors are happening at an alarming rate in the critical care environment, and these errors are preventable. It is imperative that all personnel respect and follow established guidelines and procedural safeguards to ensure flawless drug delivery to patients.

Systematic evidence review of rates and burden of harm of intravenous admixture drug preparation errors in healthcare settings

OBJECTIVE

To examine published evidence on intravenous admixture preparation errors (IAPEs) in healthcare settings.

METHODS

Searches were conducted in three electronic databases (January 2005 to April 2017). Publications reporting rates of IAPEs and error types were reviewed and categorised into the following groups: component errors, dose/calculation errors, aseptic technique errors and composite errors. The methodological rigour of each study was assessed using the Hawker method.

RESULTS

Of the 34 articles that met inclusion criteria, 28 reported the site of IAPEs: central pharmacies (n=8), nursing wards (n=14), both settings (n=4) and other sites (n=3). Using the Hawker criteria, 14% of the articles were of good quality, 74% were of fair quality and 12% were of poor quality. Error types and reported rates varied substantially, including wrong drug (~0% to 4.7%), wrong diluent solution (0% to 49.0%), wrong label (0% to 99.0%), wrong dose (0% to 32.6%), wrong concentration (0.3% to 88.6%), wrong diluent volume (0.06% to 49.0%) and inadequate aseptic technique (0% to 92.7%)%). Four studies directly compared incidence by preparation site and/or method, finding error incidence to be lower for doses prepared within a central pharmacy versus the nursing ward and lower for automated preparation versus manual preparation. Although eight studies (24%) reported ≥1 errors with the potential to cause patient harm, no study directly linked IAPE occurrences to specific adverse patient outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The available data suggest a need to continue to optimise the intravenous preparation process, focus on improving preparation workflow, design and implement preventive strategies, train staff on optimal admixture protocols and implement standardisation. Future research should focus on the development of consistent error subtype definitions, standardised reporting methodology and reliable, reproducible methods to track and link risk factors with the burden of harm associated with these errors.

Intravenous medicine preparation technique training programme for nurses in clinical areas

Objective

The key objective of this study was to highlight the weak points in the medicine use process.

Method

We collected 15 videos from eight neonatal intensive care units where staff nurses showed how medicine preparation was performed. Recorded medicines were: vancomycin (6), gentamicin (5), caffeine citrate (2) and phenobarbital (2).

Results

We did not review any video without errors. In 8/15 (53.3%) videos, the same syringe was used to measure the medicine and the diluent. In 8/15 (53.3%) videos, the syringes used were not the correct size for the volume being measured. In 4/15 (26.6%) videos, the volume measured into the syringes was not checked after it was measured from vials or ampoules. In just one vancomycin preparation could the reconstitution process be described as a correct process; in the other five videos, mixing after diluent addition to the vancomycin vial was almost non-existent (less than 10 s). Mixing after the medicine and diluent were in the same syringe was also non-existent in all of the videos.

Conclusions

Hospitals should provide training programmes outlining the correct preparation technique.

Standard concentration infusions in paediatric intensive care: the clinical approach

The use of standard concentrations of intravenous infusions has been advocated by international organisations to increase intravenous medication safety in paediatric and neonatal critical care. However, there is no guidance on how to identify and implement these infusions leading to great interunit variability.

OBJECTIVE

To identify the most appropriate clinical concentrations required by our paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) population with regard to accuracy of delivery and overall fluid allowance.

METHODS

Firstly a matrix was used to balance the concentration, dose and infusion volume (weight range 1.5-50 kg). Results were further refined considering: patient fluid allowance based on fluid volume targets, infusion pump accuracy and challenging each infusion against clinical scenarios requiring administration of multiple drug infusions found in PICU. Consideration was given to the standard concentrations routinely used in adults, in order to assess whether alignment with paediatrics was possible for some of the concentrations proposed. Finally a risk assessment of the infusions was conducted using the NPSA 20 tool.

KEY FINDINGS

Twenty-five drugs identified as the most commonly used intravenous infusions in the unit. For the majority of the medicines, three weight bands of standard concentrations were necessary to cover the children's weight ranges and kept within predefined fluid requirements and accuracy of delivery.

CONCLUSIONS

This work shows a patient focused systematic approach for defining and evaluating standardised concentrations in intensive care children.

Evaluation of an intravenous preparation information system for improving the reconstitution and dilution process

BACKGROUND

There are very few studies reporting the impact of providing intravenous (IV) preparation information on quality use of antimicrobials, particularly regarding their reconstitution and dilution. Therefore, to improve these processes in IV antimicrobial administration, an IV preparation information system (IPIS) was implemented in a hospital.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to evaluate the effect of improving reconstitution and dilution by implementing an IPIS in the electronic medical record (EMR) system.

METHODS

Prescriptions and activity records of nurses for injectable antimicrobials that required reconstitution and dilution for IV preparation from January 2008 to December 2013 were retrieved from EMR, and assessed based on packaging label information for reconstituting and diluting solutions. We defined proper reconstitution and dilution as occurring when the reconstitution and dilution solutions prescribed were consistent with the nurses' acting records. The types of intervention in the IPIS were as follows: a pop-up alert for proper reconstitution and passive guidance for proper dilution. We calculated the monthly proper reconstitution rate (PRR) and proper dilution rate (PDR) and evaluated the changes in these rates and trends using interrupted time series analyses.

RESULTS

Prior to the initiation of the reconstitution alert and dilution information, the PRR and PDR were 12.7 and 46.1%, respectively. The reconstitution alert of the IPIS rapidly increased the PRR by 41% (p<0.001), after which the PRR decreased by 0.9% (p=0.013) per month after several months. However, there was no significant change in the rate or trend of the PDR during the study period.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that the provision of reconstitution alerts by the IPIS contributed to improving the reconstitution process of IV antimicrobial injection administration. However, providing passive information on dilution solutions was ineffective. Furthermore, solutions to ensure the continuous effectiveness of alert systems are warranted and should be actively sought.