Outcome of intrahepatic portosystemic shunt diagnosed prenatally

Umbilical-portal-systemic venous shunt and intrauterine growth restriction: an inquiry from a prospective study

BACKGROUND

The investigation of the fetal umbilical-portal venous system is based on the premise that congenital anomalies of this system may be related to adverse perinatal outcomes. Several small retrospective studies have reported an association between umbilical-portal-systemic venous shunts and intrauterine growth restriction. However, the prevalence of portosystemic shunts in the fetal growth restricted population is yet to be determined.

OBJECTIVE

The aims of this study were (1) to determine the prevalence of fetal umbilical-portal-systemic venous shunts in pregnancies complicated by intrauterine growth restriction and (2) to compare the perinatal and neonatal outcomes of pregnancies with intrauterine growth restriction with and without umbilical-portal-systemic venous shunts.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a prospective, cross-sectional study of pregnancies diagnosed with intrauterine growth restriction, as defined by the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine intrauterine growth restriction guidelines. All participants underwent a detailed anomaly scan, supplemented with a targeted scan of the fetal portal system. Venous shunts were diagnosed using color Doppler mode. The perinatal outcomes of pregnancies with intrauterine growth restriction with and without umbilical-portal-systemic venous shunts were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 150 cases with intrauterine growth restriction were recruited. The prevalence of umbilical-portal-systemic venous shunts in our cohort was 9.3% (n=14). When compared with the control group (intrauterine growth restriction without umbilical-portal-systemic venous shunts, n=136), the study group had a significantly lower mean gestational age at the time of intrauterine growth restriction diagnosis (29.7±5.6 vs 32.47±4.6 weeks of gestation; P=.036) and an earlier gestational age at delivery (33.50±6.0 vs 36.13±2.8; P=.005). The study group had a higher rate of fetal death (21.4% vs 0.7%; P<.001) and, accordingly, a lower rate of live births (71.4% vs 95.6%; P=.001). Additional associated fetal vascular anomalies were significantly more prevalent in the study group than in the control group (35.7% vs 4.4%; P≤.001). The rate of other associated anomalies was similar. The study group had a significantly lower rate of abnormal uterine artery Doppler indices (0% vs 40.4%; P=.011) and a higher rate of abnormal ductus venosus Doppler indices (64.3% vs 23%; P=.001). There were no cases of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy in the study group, whereas the control group had an incidence of 12.5% (P=.16). Other perinatal and neonatal outcomes were comparable.

CONCLUSION

Umbilical-portal-systemic venous shunt is a relatively common finding among fetuses with growth restriction. When compared with pregnancies with intrauterine growth restriction with a normal portal system, these pregnancies complicated by intrauterine growth restriction and an umbilical-portal-systemic venous shunt are associated with a different Doppler flow pattern, an increased risk for fetal death, earlier presentation of intrauterine growth restriction, a lower gestational age at delivery, additional congenital vascular anomalies, and a lower rate of pregnancy-induced hypertensive disorders. Meticulous sonographic evaluation of the portal system should be considered in the prenatal workup of intrauterine growth restriction, as umbilical-portal-systemic venous shunts may affect perinatal outcomes.

Diagnosis and management of Abernethy syndrome

Abernethy syndrome (AS or extrahepatic portosystemic shunt) is an uncommon congenital malformation consisting of agenesis or hypoplasia of the portal vein (PV) in such a way that splanchnic venous blood drains directly into the systemic circulation through aberrant communications, resulting in a portosystemic shunt that bypasses the liver AS is an underdiagnosed condition with unknown incidence and complication rate given that symptoms are usually absent. AS identification is increasingly common because of improved imaging techniques, hence prognostic implications and clinical management need be understood. This editorial reviews the natural history of AS and its diagnostic-therapeutic implications, illustrating the process with a series of cases from our institution.

Intrahepatic portosystemic shunts, from prenatal diagnosis to postnatal outcome: a retrospective study

OBJECTIVE

Congenital intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (IHPSS) are rare vascular malformations resulting in blood bypassing the liver to the systemic circulation. Previous studies included symptomatic patients diagnosed postnatally, but the outcome of IHPSS diagnosed prenatally is rarely reported. We present a cohort of children prenatally diagnosed with IHPSS and report their natural course and outcome.

METHODS AND DESIGN

This was a retrospective study of all fetal cases diagnosed by ultrasound with IHPSS between 2006 and 2019 at a single tertiary centre which were prospectively followed up at the paediatric gastroenterology unit. The postnatal outcome was compared between patients with a single versus multiple intrahepatic shunts.

RESULTS

Twenty-six patients (70.3% boys) were included in the study, of them, eight (30.8%) patients had multiple intrahepatic shunts. The median gestational age at diagnosis was 29.5 weeks. Growth restriction affected 77% of the cohort. Postnatally, spontaneous shunt closure occurred in 96% of patients at a median age of 7.5 months (IQR 2.2-20 months). Failure to thrive (FTT) and mild developmental delay were observed in eight (30.8%) and seven (26.9%) patients, respectively. FTT was significantly more prevalent in patients with multiple shunts compared with patients with a single shunt (62.5% vs 16.7%, p=0.02); however, the rate of shunt closure and age at time of closure were similar between these groups. All patients survived with limited to no sequelae.

CONCLUSIONS

IHPSS usually close spontaneously by 2 years of age. Children with prenatally detected IHPSS may develop FTT and mild developmental delay. Close surveillance at a paediatric gastroenterology unit may be beneficial.

Congenital intra-hepatic porto-systemic shunts diagnosed during intrauterine life: Systematic review

OBJECTIVE

To describe the ultrasonographic characteristics of congenital porto-systemic venous shunts (CPSS) diagnosed during pregnancy, their outcomes, and their evolution.

METHODS

Two independent researchers selected 493 review articles and case reports through the analysis of titles, abstracts, and full text. The PubMed and LILACS databases were searched. Through the application of filters according to the PRISMA protocol, only six articles were used in the research. The following information was collected, when available: gestational age at diagnosis, gender, birth weight, type of shunt, associated anomalies/complications and treatment/progression.

RESULTS

The data were obtained from 27 cases, with 22 (82%) fetuses diagnosed with intra-hepatic CPSS and 5 (18%) with extra-hepatic CPSS. The median time of intrauterine diagnosis was 33 weeks. In 12 (57.1%) of the 21 pregnancies evaluated, delivery was preterm. The estimated fetal weight ranged from 1150 to 3760 g, with 4 (25%) cases at <3rd, 3 (18.75%) cases at <10th, 8 (50%) cases at <50th, and 1 (6.25%) case at >97th percentile for gestational age. The most frequent obstetric complication was fetal growth restriction, which occurred in nine (60%) cases. As for postnatal treatment, 19 (70.4%) cases were conservatively treated, and 8 (29.6%) cases required surgical intervention.

CONCLUSION

The diagnosis of CPSS still represents a challenge during prenatal care. Its early identification aims to provide guidance to pregnant women and their families, as well as follow-up and anticipation of possible complications, in addition to the evaluation of the mode of delivery and postnatal follow-up, directing the short- and long-term prognosis.

Congenital intrahepatic portosystemic shunt with spontaneous resolution in a newborn with severe fetal growth restriction

Owing to the advances in ultrasound, there are increasing reports of intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (IPSS) diagnosis in utero. However, few neonatal cases of IPSS diagnosed by abdominal ultrasonography screening at birth have been reported. This case demonstrated abdominal ultrasonography at birth was useful for the early detection of congenital IPSS.

Prenatal ultrasonographic features and follow-up outcomes of 19 cases of congenital intrahepatic portosystemic venous shunts diagnosed during the foetal period

Background

To investigate the prenatal ultrasonographic features and case characteristics of the congenital intrahepatic portosystemic venous shunt (IHPSS) diagnosed during the foetal period and analyse its prognosis.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients diagnosed with IHPSS between 2016 and 2021. IHPSS was defined as an abnormal connection between the foetal intrahepatic portal and the hepatic veins.

Results

In this study, 19 foetuses were identified, including 12 cases of single shunt and 7 cases of multiple shunts, with a gestational age of 33.8 ± 4.5 (range 25–40) weeks at diagnosis. In the single-shunt group, the origin position of the shunts was all from the left branch of the portal vein (LPV), whereas in the multiple-shunt group, the origin position of the shunts was from the LPV in six cases. Common concomitant intrauterine abnormalities of IHPSS include foetal growth restriction (47.4%) and foetal cardiac enlargement (21.1%). The postnatal manifestations of IHPSS include biochemical abnormalities (increased gamma-glutamyl transferase and bilirubin levels), neonatal hypoglycaemia, neonatal hyperammonaemia, pulmonary hypertension, multiple intrahepatic hyperechoic nodules, and cutaneous haemangiomas. Spontaneous closure of shunts occurred in ten cases, and the mean time to shunt closure was 8.1 months (1–28 months).

Conclusions

Most IHPSS found during the foetal period is located in the left branch of the portal vein, and the gestational age at diagnosis is usually in the late second or third trimester. Spontaneous closure of shunts can occur in most live births, and the prognosis is good.

Fetal Intrahepatic Umbilical-Porto-Systemic Venous Shunts (IHUPSVS): in-utero anatomic classification

OBJECTIVE

Congenital intrahepatic shunts divert highly oxygen and nutrients rich placental blood flow from the liver into the systemic flow having a negative influence on normal fetal growth and postnatal development. The ability to recognize this anomaly helps assess the possible clinical impact, counseling, and management of pregnancy. The present study aimed to propose in utero classification for the Intrahepatic Umbilical-Porto-Systemic Venous Shunt (IHUPSVS) based on our experience.

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective study. Grayscale ultrasound with two and three-dimensional high-definition Doppler modalities was used. IHUPSVS was defined as a diversion of blood from the liver tissue by abnormal communication between a branch of the intrahepatic Umbilical vein or the Portal veins with the systemic circulation (the Hepatic veins or the Sub-Diaphragmatic Vestibulum).

RESULTS

Twenty-five fetuses were diagnosed with IHUPSVS. We identified three main anatomic types: I) Porto-hepatic shunt which was divided into Ia) regular single shunt (15/25, 60%) and Ib) regular multiple shunts, (6/25, 24%) II) Umbilical-Porto-Hepatic shunt divided into a) Umbilical or b) Umbilical combined with Portal hepatic shunt (2/25, 8%) and III) Cavernous- aneurysmatic shunt (2/25, 8%). All the shunts were verified by postnatal targeted sonography.

CONCLUSIONS

This study creates the anatomic basis for common nomenclature and future probable updating for this anomaly.

Prenatal Ultrasound Analysis of Umbilical-Portal-Systemic Venous Shunts Concurrent With Trisomy 21

OBJECTIVES

A classification termed umbilical-portal-systemic venous shunt (UPSVS) for an abnormal umbilical vein (UV), portal vein (PV), and ductus venosus (DV) was proposed recently. According to this classification, there are 3 types of UPSVSs: types I, II, and III. Trisomy 21 associated with UV-PV-DV anomalies has been described, but the incidence of trisomy 21 in UPSVS cases, the relationship between UPSVS types and trisomy 21, and the pregnancy outcome are poorly documented. This study aimed to address these issues.

METHODS

All UPSVS cases diagnosed at our department from 2016 to 2019 were retrospectively studied. The English literature describing UV-PV-DV anomalies and trisomy 21 from 2000 to 2019 was searched, and the retrieved cases were analyzed.

RESULTS

Four of 20 UPSVS cases identified by us also had trisomy 21, with 2 type I and 2 type II UPSVSs. Ultrasound markers of Down syndrome were observed in all 4 cases that underwent termination of pregnancy (TOP). The literature search retrieved 12 reports including 279 patients, with 29 also having trisomy 21, giving a pooled trisomy 21 incidence rate of 10.4%. Of the 29 cases, 16 had type I, and 9 had type II, whereas UPSVS types in 4 were undeterminable, and 22 cases underwent TOP.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a high incidence of trisomy 21 in UPSVS cases. Trisomy 21 is associated with a type I or II UPSVS. Most cases with the combined defect underwent TOP. These findings may be used to direct prenatal counseling and management of the combined condition.

Characterization and natural history of congenital intrahepatic portosystemic shunts

Congenital intrahepatic portosystemic shunts are rare vascular malformations in which abnormal communications are created between the portal veins and the hepatic veins or the inferior vena cava system. Diagnosis is made by prenatal or postpartum ultrasound. Published data regarding presentation, symptoms, and prognosis is scarce. This study aimed to better understand the natural history and the course of the intrahepatic portosystemic shunts. Data were collected from children in two medical centers who were diagnosed with congenital intrahepatic portosystemic shunts on either prenatal or postnatal sonographic screening. The subjects' medical information was collected including demographics, medical background, and sonographic and clinical outcome. Blood test results including ammonia levels and liver function tests were documented, as well as the sonographic dimensions of the shunt vessels and the spleen size. The data were analyzed using various statistical methods. Twenty-three children with portosystemic shunts were found and reviewed. Eight children were excluded from the study since records and follow-up were insufficient. Fifteen patients were included in the study (six females). All had intrahepatic shunt diagnosed either by prenatal screening or postnatal abdominal ultrasound and had more than one ultrasound and repeated blood tests. Shunt closure was observed in all children within a mean of 114.31 ± 115.05 days (median 84). There was no correlation between liver enzymes, ammonia, and ultrasound vascular and splenic diameters to time to closure. None of the children had any hepatic or other sequelae.Conclusions: Our study suggests that congenital intrahepatic portosystemic shunt is a benign, self-limiting condition in which no correlation between the size of the shunt and the blood ammonia level to the outcome of the shunt was found. This is the first study that correlated radiological measures to the outcome. These results suggest that the treating physician should reassure families and conduct minimal follow-up and interventions in children with such conditions. Further, larger and prospective studies should be done to corroborate these conclusions. What is Known: • Characteristics and natural history of intrahepatic portosystemic shunts are less defined. • The natural course of the intrahepatic malformations varies, but spontaneous, self-resolution of small shunts, usually occures within 1 to 2 years. What is New: • In this study, congenital intrahepatic portosystemic shunt was shown to be benign, self-limiting condition in which all shunts closed within 3 months. • No correlation between the size of the shunt and the blood ammonia level to the outcome of the shunt was found.

Case Report: Clinical Features of Congenital Portosystemic Shunts in the Neonatal Period

Objective: The aim of this single-center retrospective study was to analyze the clinical characteristics, treatment options, and course of neonatal-onset congenital portosystemic shunts (CPSS). Methods: We included all patients with CPSS who presented with clinical symptoms within the neonatal period in our institution between 2015 and 2020. Results: Sixteen patients were identified, including 13 patients with intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (IPSS) and three patients with extrahepatic portosystemic shunts (EPSS). The median age of diagnosis was 16 days (range prenatal 24 weeks-12 months). Hyperammonemia (60%), neonatal cholestasis (44%), elevated liver enzyme (40%), hypoglycemia (40%), thrombocytopenia (38%), and coagulation abnormalities (23%) appeared in neonatal CPSS. Twelve patients (75%) presented with congenital anomalies, of which congenital heart disease (CHD) (44%) was the most common. Thirteen patients with IPSS initially underwent conservative treatment, but two of them were recommended for the catheter interventional therapy and liver transplantation, respectively, due to progressive deterioration of liver function. Spontaneous closure occurred in nine patients with IPSS. The shunt was closed using transcatheter embolization in one patient with EPSS type II. Another patient with EPSS type II underwent surgical treatment of CHD firstly. The remaining patient with EPSS type Ib received medical therapy and refused liver transplantation. Conclusion: Hyperammonemia, neonatal cholestasis, elevated liver enzyme, hypoglycemia, and thrombocytopenia are the main complications of neonatal CPSS. Moreover, CPSS is associated with multiple congenital abnormalities, especially CHD. Intrahepatic portosystemic shunts may close spontaneously, and conservative treatment can be taken first. Extrahepatic portosystemic shunts should be closed to prevent complications.

The intra-hepatic umbilical-Porto-systemic venous shunt and fetal growth

OBJECTIVE

The fetal liver circulation has an important role in fetal growth. The intra-hepatic Umbilical-Porto-Systemic Venous Shunt (IHUPSVS) causes a reduction of the umbilical blood flow to the liver and has been reported to have a restrictive effect on fetal growth. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of IHUPSVS on fetal growth.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of IHUPSVS diagnosed between 2001 and 2019. IHUPSVS was defined as any abnormal communication between any branch of the portal vein and hepatic vein. Pre- and postnatal characteristics were collected from medical files and compared between cases with fetal growth restriction (FGR) and those appropriate for gestational age (AGA).

RESULTS

Twenty-five fetuses were included in the study. Eighteen (72%) had last estimated fetal weight and birth weight below the 10th centile, four (16%) of them between the third and fifth centile, and 11 (44%) below the third centile. Median gestational age at delivery was lower for FGR than AGA fetuses (37 vs. 38 weeks, p = 0.034) and rate of preterm delivery was higher (38.9 vs. 14.3, P = 0.24). Four cases had associated structural anomalies (2 in each group), and two had minor genetic aberrations (1 in each group).

CONCLUSIONS

Growth restriction is prevalent in fetuses with IHUPSVS, suggesting that fetal growth should be monitored. In equal measure, in cases with growth restriction, especially without other apparent cause, an intrahepatic shunt should be looked for.

The Ductus Venosus

BACKGROUND

 the ductus venosus (DV) is not well known in general radiology, but it plays a role in the daily work of pediatric radiologists. Consequently all general radiologists who also care for a pediatric department should be familiar with the physiological and pathological findings related to the DV.

METHODS

Literature research in Medline, using the keywords "ductus venosus" and "umbilical vein catheter".

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

 In the first weeks of life the DV is regularly still patent. It should be recognized as DV and not be mistaken for a pathological portosystemic shunt.The ductus venosus is the lead structure for umbilical vein catheters. Radiologists should be able to assess the correct catheter position. Radiologically important findings of an umbilical vein catheter are mainly malposition and intrahepatic extravasation. Agenesis of the DV can lead to intra- or extrahepatic compensatory portosystemic shunts, in which as well as in the case of persistent patency of the DV, there may be the necessity for radiological-interventional or surgical occlusion.

KEY POINTS

  · In the first weeks of life in infants the Ductus venosus is regularly still patent.. · The Ductus venosus should not be mistaken for a pathological portosystemic shunt.. · An umbilcal vein catheter should project onto the Ductus venosus and end caudal to the right atrium.. · Intrahepatic portosystemic shunts in DV agenesis show a high rate of spontaneous closure postnatally..

CITATION FORMAT

· Born M. The Ductus Venosus. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2021; 193: 521 - 526.

Management of focal nodular hyperplasia of the liver: Experience of 50 pediatric patients in a tertiary center

BACKGROUND

Focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) is a rare benign hepatic lesion in children. No management guidelines for pediatric population exist because of limited evidence.

OBJECTIVE

To review the experience of a large tertiary liver center, providing additional clinical data to help formulate management guidelines for FNH in the pediatric population.

METHODS

We analyzed data of children <18 years diagnosed with FNH from 1996 to 2018 at our hospital, detailing management and long-term clinical outcome.

RESULTS

50 patients were identified. The median age was 10 years old (range 0.75-15.5 years old). The mean diameter of FNH was 5.9 cm (±3.1 cm). 10 patients had multiple lesions. First-line management: watchful waiting with serial checks (n = 37), surgery (n = 13). Of the watchful waiting patients, 10 required eventual second-line surgery. After a median follow-up of 4.7 years (range 0.5-20 years), 46 patients were asymptomatic, with no significant difference in clinical outcome (p = 0.962) between the two first-line management approaches. Lesions demonstrated growth in 13 cases: 5 of these required second-line surgery. In these patients, there was no significant difference in clinical outcome (p = 0.188) compared to nonoperative patients. Considering all surgically treated patients, there was no significant difference between first-line and second-line surgery for clinical outcome (p = 0.846), hospital stay (p = 0.410), complications (p = 0.510) and severe complications (p = 0.385).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data support the hypothesis that watchful waiting is a safe initial approach to pediatric FNH management in patients with no major symptoms or complications. Surgery should be reserved for patients with diagnostic doubt, persistent symptoms and/or biological or significant anatomical abnormalities. FNH growth alone should not be considered as an indication for surgery.

TYPE OF STUDY

Therapeutic study.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Congenital Extrahepatic Portosystemic Shunts (Abernethy Malformation): An International Observational Study

Congenital extrahepatic portosystemic shunt (CEPS) or Abernethy malformation is a rare condition in which splanchnic venous blood bypasses the liver draining directly into systemic circulation through a congenital shunt. Patients may develop hepatic encephalopathy (HE), pulmonary hypertension (PaHT), or liver tumors, among other complications. However, the actual incidence of such complications is unknown, mainly because of the lack of a protocolized approach to these patients. This study characterizes the clinical manifestations and outcome of a large cohort of CEPS patients with the aim of proposing a guide for their management. This is an observational, multicenter, international study. Sixty-six patients were included; median age at the end of follow-up was 30 years. Nineteen patients (28%) presented HE. Ten-, 20-, and 30-year HE incidence rates were 13%, 24%, and 28%, respectively. No clinical factors predicted HE. Twenty-five patients had benign nodular lesions. Ten patients developed adenomas (median age, 18 years), and another 8 developed HCC (median age, 39 years). Of 10 patients with dyspnea, PaHT was diagnosed in 8 and hepatopulmonary syndrome in 2. Pulmonary complications were only screened for in 19 asymptomatic patients, and PaHT was identified in 2. Six patients underwent liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma or adenoma. Shunt closure was performed in 15 patients with improvement/stability/cure of CEPS manifestations. Conclusion: CEPS patients may develop severe complications. Screening for asymptomatic complications and close surveillance is needed. Shunt closure should be considered both as a therapeutic and prophylactic approach.

Correlations among Congenital Hepatic Shunt, Absent Ductus Venosus, and Umbilical Vein Shunt Revealed by Prenatal Ultrasound

OBJECTIVES

Congenital disruptions of the hepatic vasculature such as hepatic vascular shunt and absence of ductus venosus (ADV) are rare and often asymptomatic. Moreover, hepatic vasculature abnormality, ADV, and umbilical shunt are easily missed during ultrasound screening due to insufficient scope of examination. In our study, we analyzed the associations among congenital hepatic shunt, ADV, and umbilical vein (UV) shunt by prenatal ultrasound screening.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of 9 cases of congenital hepatic vascular shunt and 14 cases of isolated ADV identified by prenatal ultrasound screening at Chengdu Women and Children's Center Hospital from 2014 to 2018. The review parameters included ultrasound findings of the fetal hepatic vessels, fetal heart, UV, other malformations, complications, and fetal prognosis.

RESULTS

The 9 cases of hepatic shunt included 6 cases of isolated portosystemic shunt, 2 mixed cases of vascular shunt with portosystemic shunt, and 1 case of intrahepatic arteriovenous fistula. Among the 8 total cases of portosystemic shunt, 5 were accompanied by ADV (62.5%). Of the 5 cases of congenital hepatic shunt with ADV, 3 were accompanied by umbilical shunt (60%). Among the 9 cases of hepatic vascular shunt, 6 were accompanied by dilated inferior vena cava and cardiomegaly (66.7%). Of the 19 total ADV cases identified, there were 14 cases without hepatic shunt, 5 with hepatic shunt, and 17 with umbilical shunt (89.4%). Among the 14 ADV cases without hepatic shunt, there were 5 cases with congenital heart defect (35.7%) and 4 with cardiomegaly (28.6%).

CONCLUSIONS

Portosystemic shunt, ADV, and umbilical shunt are closely associated. Appreciation of these associations can improve prenatal ultrasound screening for a timely prognosis and initiation of appropriate treatment.

Congenital portosystemic shunts: diagnosis and treatment

Congenital portosystemic shunts (CPSS) are rare vascular malformations that create an abnormal connection between portal and systemic veins resulting in complete or partial diversion of the portal flow away from the liver to the systemic venous system. Different anatomic types exist and several classifications have been proposed. They can be associated with other malformations especially cardiac and heterotaxia. The main complications include hepatic encephalopathy, liver tumors, portopulmonary hypertension, and pulmonary arteriovenous shunts. Diagnosis relies on imaging, and prenatal diagnosis is possible. Spontaneous closure of the CPSS is possible in some anatomic forms during the first year of life. When the CPSS remains patent, radiologic or surgical closure of the CPSS may prevent, resolve, or stabilize complications. Interventional radiology plays a key role for both the preoperative evaluation with occlusion test to assess the exact anatomy and to measure portal pressure after occlusion of the CPSS. Endovascular closure is the first option for treatment when possible.