The effect of automated oxygen control on clinical outcomes in preterm infants: a pre- and post-implementation cohort study

Automated oxygen control in preterm babies on respiratory support: protocol for a randomised crossover trial

INTRODUCTION

Respiratory support is frequently needed for babies admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit. Among them, preterm babies are most likely to have issues of respiratory distress, and they may need invasive or non-invasive breathing support. Providing respiratory support, keeping the oxygen saturation (SpO2) in the target range (TR) and preventing abnormal high and low oxygen levels should be the aim of providing respiratory therapy. Usually, this control is achieved by manual adjustment of FiO2 (fraction of inspired oxygen) by bedside staff nurses to keep SpO2 in TR. However, the latest ventilators have automated oxygen control devices that adjust the FiO2 to keep SpO2 in TR. This study protocol is prepared to assess the effectiveness of automated versus manual oxygen control in keeping SpO2 in TR.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This is a single-centre, non-blinded, randomised crossover trial that aims to recruit 26 preterm babies who may need invasive or non-invasive respiratory support. The 12-hour periods of automated oxygen control by ventilator will be compared with 12 hours of manual oxygen control by bedside staff nurse. The primary outcome will compare both interventions and will assess their efficacy to keep SpO2 in TR. Secondary outcomes will compare abnormal high and low SpO2 levels, and number and duration of fluctuations in both interventions. Median FiO2 values and median number of manual adjustments of FiO2 will also be compared. Secondary outcomes will also look for the impact of sedative and respiratory stimulant medications on target oxygen saturation.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The ethics review committee at Aga Khan University Hospital Karachi has given ethical approval for this trial (approval number: 2024-10189-30775). Results from this trial will be published in journals.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT06622161.

Prolonged use of closed-loop inspired oxygen support in preterm infants: a randomised controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

This randomised study in preterm infants on non-invasive respiratory support investigated the effectiveness of automated oxygen control (A-FiO2) in keeping the oxygen saturation (SpO2) within a target range (TR) during a 28-day period compared with manual titration (M-FiO2).

DESIGN

A single-centre randomised control trial.

SETTING

A level III neonatal intensive care unit.

PATIENTS

Preterm infants (<28 weeks' gestation) on non-invasive respiratory support.

INTERVENTIONS

A-FiO2 versus M-FiO2 control.

METHODS

Main outcomes were the proportion of time spent and median area of episodes in the TR, hyperoxaemia, hypoxaemia and the trend over 28 days using a linear random intercept model.

RESULTS

23 preterm infants (median gestation 25.7 weeks; birth weight 820 g) were randomised. Compared with M-FiO2, the time spent within TR was higher in the A-FiO2 group (68.7% vs 48.0%, p<0.001). Infants in the A-FiO2 group spent less time in hyperoxaemia (13.8% vs 37.7%, p<0.001), but no difference was found in hypoxaemia. The time-based analyses showed that the A-FiO2 efficacy may differ over time, especially for hypoxaemia. Compared with the M-FiO2 group, the A-FiO2 group had a larger intercept but with an inversed slope for the daily median area below the TR (intercept 70.1 vs 36.3; estimate/day -0.70 vs 0.69, p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

A-FiO2 control was superior to manual control in keeping preterm infants on non-invasive respiratory support in a prespecified TR over a period of 28 days. This improvement may come at the expense of increased time below the TR in the first days after initiating A-FiO2 control.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NTR6731.

Automated oxygen delivery for preterm infants with respiratory dysfunction

BACKGROUND

Many preterm infants require respiratory support to maintain an optimal level of oxygenation, as oxygen levels both below and above the optimal range are associated with adverse outcomes. Optimal titration of oxygen therapy for these infants presents a major challenge, especially in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) with suboptimal staffing. Devices that offer automated oxygen delivery during respiratory support of neonates have been developed since the 1970s, and individual trials have evaluated their effectiveness.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the benefits and harms of automated oxygen delivery systems, embedded within a ventilator or oxygen delivery device, for preterm infants with respiratory dysfunction who require respiratory support or supplemental oxygen therapy.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, CINAHL, and clinical trials databases without language or publication date restrictions on 23 January 2023. We also checked the reference lists of retrieved articles for other potentially eligible trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials and randomised cross-over trials that compared automated oxygen delivery versus manual oxygen delivery, or that compared different automated oxygen delivery systems head-to-head, in preterm infants (born before 37 weeks' gestation).

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard Cochrane methods. Our main outcomes were time (%) in desired oxygen saturation (SpO2) range, all-cause in-hospital mortality by 36 weeks' postmenstrual age, severe retinopathy of prematurity (ROP), and neurodevelopmental outcomes at approximately two years' corrected age. We expressed our results using mean difference (MD), standardised mean difference (SMD), and risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We used GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 18 studies (27 reports, 457 infants), of which 13 (339 infants) contributed data to meta-analyses. We identified 13 ongoing studies. We evaluated three comparisons: automated oxygen delivery versus routine manual oxygen delivery (16 studies), automated oxygen delivery versus enhanced manual oxygen delivery with increased staffing (three studies), and one automated system versus another (two studies). Most studies were at low risk of bias for blinding of personnel and outcome assessment, incomplete outcome data, and selective outcome reporting; and half of studies were at low risk of bias for random sequence generation and allocation concealment. However, most were at high risk of bias in an important domain specific to cross-over trials, as only two of 16 cross-over trials provided separate outcome data for each period of the intervention (before and after cross-over). Automated oxygen delivery versus routine manual oxygen delivery Automated delivery compared with routine manual oxygen delivery probably increases time (%) in the desired SpO2 range (MD 13.54%, 95% CI 11.69 to 15.39; I2 = 80%; 11 studies, 284 infants; moderate-certainty evidence). No studies assessed in-hospital mortality. Automated oxygen delivery compared to routine manual oxygen delivery may have little or no effect on risk of severe ROP (RR 0.24, 95% CI 0.03 to 1.94; 1 study, 39 infants; low-certainty evidence). No studies assessed neurodevelopmental outcomes. Automated oxygen delivery versus enhanced manual oxygen delivery There may be no clear difference in time (%) in the desired SpO2 range between infants who receive automated oxygen delivery and infants who receive manual oxygen delivery (MD 7.28%, 95% CI -1.63 to 16.19; I2 = 0%; 2 studies, 19 infants; low-certainty evidence). No studies assessed in-hospital mortality, severe ROP, or neurodevelopmental outcomes. Revised closed-loop automatic control algorithm (CLACfast) versus original closed-loop automatic control algorithm (CLACslow) CLACfast allowed up to 120 automated adjustments per hour, whereas CLACslow allowed up to 20 automated adjustments per hour. CLACfast may result in little or no difference in time (%) in the desired SpO2 range compared to CLACslow (MD 3.00%, 95% CI -3.99 to 9.99; 1 study, 19 infants; low-certainty evidence). No studies assessed in-hospital mortality, severe ROP, or neurodevelopmental outcomes. OxyGenie compared to CLiO2 Data from a single small study were presented as medians and interquartile ranges and were not suitable for meta-analysis.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Automated oxygen delivery compared to routine manual oxygen delivery probably increases time in desired SpO2 ranges in preterm infants on respiratory support. However, it is unclear whether this translates into important clinical benefits. The evidence on clinical outcomes such as severe retinopathy of prematurity are of low certainty, with little or no differences between groups. There is insufficient evidence to reach any firm conclusions on the effectiveness of automated oxygen delivery compared to enhanced manual oxygen delivery or CLACfast compared to CLACslow. Future studies should include important short- and long-term clinical outcomes such as mortality, severe ROP, bronchopulmonary dysplasia/chronic lung disease, intraventricular haemorrhage, periventricular leukomalacia, patent ductus arteriosus, necrotising enterocolitis, and long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes. The ideal study design for this evaluation is a parallel-group randomised controlled trial. Studies should clearly describe staffing levels, especially in the manual arm, to enable an assessment of reproducibility according to resources in various settings. The data of the 13 ongoing studies, when made available, may change our conclusions, including the implications for practice and research.

Routine use of automated FiO2 control in Poland: prospective registry and survey

Objective

The performance of automated control of inspired oxygen (A-FiO2) has been confirmed in dozens of studies but reports of routine use are limited. Broadly adopted in Poland, our aim is to share that experience.

Methods

We used a prospectively planned observational study of the performance, general use patterns, unit practices, and problems with A-FiO2, based on a web registry of case reports, complemented by surveys of subjective impressions.

Results

In 2019, a total of 92 A-FiO2 systems were in routine use in 38 centers. Of the 38 centers, 20 had agreed in 2013 to participate in the project. In these centers, A-FiO2 was applied in infants of all weights, but some centers restricted its use to weaning from oxygen and unstable infants. A cohort had reported their experience with each use (5/20 centers, 593 cases). A quarter of those infants were managed with a lower target range and three-quarters with alarms looser than European guidelines for manual SpO2 control. The perceived primary advantages of A-FiO2 were as follows: keeping the readings in the target range, reducing exposure to SpO2 extremes, reducing risk from nurse distraction, reducing workload, and reducing alarm fatigue. Practices did evolve with experience, including implementing changes in the alarm strategy, indications for use, and target range. The potential for over-reliance on automation was cited as a risk. There were a few reports of limited effectiveness (moderate 12/593 and poor 2/593).

Conclusions

Automated oxygen control is broadly perceived by users as an improvement in controlling SpO2 with infrequent problems.

Neonatal respiratory support strategies-short and long-term respiratory outcomes

Mechanical ventilation (MV), although life-saving, is associated with chronic respiratory morbidity in both preterm and term born infants. New ventilation modes have been developed with the aim of minimising lung injury. These include invasive and non-invasive respiratory support strategies, techniques for less invasive surfactant administration (LISA) and closed-loop automated oxygen control (CLAC) systems. Increasingly, newborn infants with signs of respiratory distress are stabilised on continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and receive LISA. Early CPAP when compared to mechanical ventilation reduced the incidence of BPD and respiratory morbidity at 18 to 22 months corrected age. Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation reduced treatment failure rates compared to CPAP, but not bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD). LISA compared with intubation and surfactant delivery reduced BPD, but there is no evidence from randomised trials regarding long-term respiratory and neurodevelopmental outcomes. Synchronisation of positive pressure inflations with the infant's respiratory efforts used with volume targeting should be applied for infants requiring intubation as this strategy reduces BPD. A large RCT with long term follow up data demonstrated that prophylactic high frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) improved respiratory and functional outcomes at school age, but those effects were not maintained after puberty. CLAC systems appear promising, but their effect on long term clinical outcomes has not yet been explored in randomised trials. Further studies are required to determine the role of newer ventilation modes such as neurally adjusted ventilator assist (NAVA). All such respiratory support strategies should be tested in randomised controlled trials powered to assess long-term outcomes.

Does closed-loop automated oxygen control reduce the duration of supplementary oxygen treatment and the amount of time spent in hyperoxia? A randomised controlled trial in ventilated infants born at or near term

BACKGROUND

Ventilated infants frequently require supplemental oxygen, but its use should be monitored carefully due to associated complications. The achievement of oxygen saturation (SpO₂) targets can be challenging as neonates experience frequent fluctuations of their oxygen levels that further increase the risk of complications. Closed-loop automated oxygen control systems (CLAC) improve achievement of oxygen saturation targets, reduce hyperoxaemic episodes and facilitate weaning of the inspired oxygen concentration in ventilated infants born at or near term. This study investigates whether CLAC compared with manual oxygen control reduces the time spent in hyperoxia and the overall duration of supplemental oxygen treatment in ventilated infants born at or above 34 weeks gestation.

METHODS

This randomised controlled trial performed at a single tertiary neonatal unit is recruiting 40 infants born at or above 34 weeks of gestation and within 24 h of initiation of mechanical ventilation. Infants are randomised to CLAC or manual oxygen control from recruitment till successful extubation. The primary outcome is the percentage of time spent in hyperoxia (SpO₂ > 96%). The secondary outcomes are the overall duration of supplementary oxygen treatment, the percentage of time spent with an oxygen requirement above thirty per cent, the number of days on mechanical ventilation and the length of neonatal unit stay. The study is performed following informed parental consent and was approved by the West Midlands-Edgbaston Research Ethics Committee (Protocol version 1.2, 10/11/2022).

DISCUSSION

This trial will investigate the effect of CLAC on the overall duration of oxygen therapy and the time spent in hyperoxia. These are important clinical outcomes as hyperoxic injury is related to oxidative stress that can adversely affect multiple organ systems.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.Gov NCT05657795. Registered on 12/12/2022.

Closed-loop automated oxygen control in ventilated infants born at or near term: A crossover trial

AIM

To determine if the use of closed-loop automated oxygen control (CLAC) reduced the incidence and duration of hypoxemic episodes (SpO₂  < 92%) in ventilated infants born at or above 34 weeks of gestation.

METHODS

Infants were studied on two consecutive days for 6 h each day. They were randomised to receive standard care (manual oxygen control) or standard care with a CLAC system (automated oxygen control) first.

RESULTS

Sixteen infants with a median (IQR) gestational age of 37.4 (36.6-38.8) weeks were studied at a median (IQR) postmenstrual age of 38.8 (37.4-39.8) weeks. During the automated oxygen control period, infants spent less time in hypoxemia (SpO₂  < 92%) (p = 0.033), episodes of desaturation were shorter (p = 0.001), the time spent within target SpO₂ range (92%-96%) was increased (p = 0.001), and the FiO₂ delivery was lower (p = 0.018). The time spent in hyperoxemia (SpO₂  > 96%) was reduced during automated oxygen control (p = 0.011), the episodes of hyperoxemia were of shorter duration (p = 0.008) and fewer manual adjustments were made to the FiO₂ (p = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

Closed-loop automated oxygen control in ventilated infants born at or near term was associated with a reduction in the incidence and duration of hypoxemic episodes with more time spent in the target oxygen range.

Automated oxygen control for very preterm infants and neurodevelopmental outcome at 2 years-a retrospective cohort study

Faster resolution of hypoxaemic or hyperoxaemic events in preterm infants may reduce long-term neurodevelopmental impairment. Automatic titration of inspiratory oxygen increases time within the oxygen saturation target range and may provide a more prompt response to hypoxic and hyperoxic events. We assessed routinely performed follow-up at 2 years of age after the implementation of automated oxygen control (AOC) as standard care and compared this with a historical cohort. Neurodevelopmental outcomes at 2 years of age were compared for infants born at 24-29 weeks gestational age before (2012-2015) and after (2015-2018) the implementation of AOC as standard of care. The primary outcome was a composite outcome of either mortality or severe neurodevelopmental impairment (NDI), and other outcomes assessed were mild-moderate NDI, Bayley-III composite scores, cerebral palsy GMFCS, and CBCL problem behaviour scores. A total of 289 infants were included in the pre-AOC epoch and 292 in the post-AOC epoch. Baseline characteristics were not significantly different. Fifty-one infants were lost to follow-up (pre-AOC 6.9% (20/289), post-implementation 10.6% (31/292). The composite outcome of mortality or severe NDI was observed in 17.9% pre-AOC (41/229) vs. 24.0% (47/196) post-AOC (p = 0.12). No significant differences were found for the secondary outcomes such as mild-moderate NDI, Bayley-III composite scores, cerebral palsy GMFCS, and problem behaviour scores, with the exception of parent-reported readmissions until the moment of follow-up which was less frequent post-AOC than pre-AOC.

CONCLUSION

In this cohort study, the implementation of automated oxygen control in our NICU as standard of care for preterm infants led to no statistically significant difference in neurodevelopmental outcome at 2 years of age.

WHAT IS KNOWN

• Neurodevelopmental outcome is linked to hypoxemia, hyperoxaemia and choice of SpO2 target range. • Automated titration of inspired oxygen may provide a faster resolution of hypoxaemic and hyperoxaemic events.

WHAT IS NEW

• This cohort study did not find a significant difference in neurodevelopmental outcome at two years of age after implementing automated oxygen control as standard of care.

Clinical outcomes of preterm infants while using automated controllers during standard care: comparison of cohorts with different automated titration strategies

OBJECTIVE

To compare short-term clinical outcome after using two different automated oxygen controllers (OxyGenie and CLiO₂).

DESIGN

Propensity score-matched retrospective observational study.

SETTING

Tertiary-level neonatal unit in the Netherlands.

PATIENTS

Preterm infants (OxyGenie n=121, CLiO₂ n=121) born between 24+0-29+6 weeks of gestation. Median (IQR) gestational age in the OxyGenie cohort was 28+3 (26+3.5-29+0) vs 27+5 (26+5-28+3) in the CLiO₂ cohort, respectively 42% and 46% of infants were male and mean (SD) birth weight was 1034 (266) g vs 1022 (242) g.

INTERVENTIONS

Inspired oxygen was titrated by OxyGenie (SLE6000) or CLiO₂ (AVEA) during respiratory support.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Mortality, retinopathy of prematurity (ROP), bronchopulmonary dysplasia and necrotising enterocolitis.

RESULTS

Fewer infants in the OxyGenie group received laser coagulation for ROP (1 infant vs 10; risk ratio 0.1 (95% CI 0.0 to 0.7); p=0.008), and infants stayed shorter in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) (28 (95% CI 15 to 42) vs 40 (95% CI 25 to 61) days; median difference 13.5 days (95% CI 8.5 to 19.5); p<0.001). Infants in the OxyGenie group had fewer days on continuous positive airway pressure (8.4 (95% CI 4.8 to 19.8) days vs 16.7 (95% CI 6.3 to 31.1); p<0.001) and a significantly shorter days on invasive ventilation (0 (95% CI 0 to 4.2) days vs 2.1 (95% CI 0 to 8.4); p=0.012). There were no statistically significant differences in all other morbidities.

CONCLUSIONS

In this propensity score-matched retrospective study, the OxyGenie epoch was associated with less morbidity when compared with the CLiO₂ epoch. There were significantly fewer infants that received treatment for ROP, received less intensive respiratory support and, although there were more supplemental oxygen days, the duration of stay in the NICU was shorter. A larger study will have to replicate these findings.

Automated Oxygen Delivery in Neonatal Intensive Care

Oxygen is the most common drug used in the neonatal intensive care. It has a narrow therapeutic range in preterm infants. Too high (hyperoxemia) or low oxygen (hypoxemia) is associated with adverse neonatal outcomes. It is not only prudent to maintain oxygen saturations in the target range, but also to avoid extremes of oxygen saturations. In routine practice when done manually by the staff, it is challenging to maintain oxygen saturations within the target range. Automatic control of oxygen delivery is now feasible and has shown to improve the time spent with in the target range of oxygen saturations. In addition, it also helps to avoid extremes of oxygen saturation. However, there are no studies that evaluated the clinical outcomes with automatic control of oxygen delivery. In this narrative review article, we aim to present the current evidence on automatic oxygen control and the future directions.

Does closed-loop automated oxygen control reduce the duration of mechanical ventilation? A randomised controlled trial in ventilated preterm infants

BACKGROUND

Many preterm infants require supplemental oxygen in the newborn period but experience frequent fluctuations of their oxygen saturation levels. Intermittent episodes of hypoxia or hyperoxia increase the risk of complications. Compliance with achievement of oxygen saturation targets is variable, and the need for frequent adjustments of the inspired oxygen concentration increases workload. Closed-loop automated oxygen control systems (CLAC) improve achievement of oxygen saturation targets and reduce both episodes of hypoxia and hyperoxia and the number of manual adjustments. This study investigates whether CLAC compared with manual oxygen control reduces the duration of mechanical ventilation in preterm infants born at less than 31 weeks of gestation.

METHODS

This randomised controlled trial performed at a single tertiary neonatal unit is recruiting 70 infants born at less than 31 weeks of gestational age and within 48 h of initiation of mechanical ventilation. Infants are randomised to CLAC or manual oxygen control from recruitment until successful extubation. The primary outcome is the duration of mechanical ventilation, and secondary outcomes are the percentage of time spent within target oxygen saturation ranges, the time spent in hypoxia or hyperoxia, the number of manual adjustments required, the number of days on oxygen, the incidence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia and the length and cost of neonatal unit stay. The study is performed following informed parental consent and was approved by the Yorkshire and the Humber-Sheffield Research Ethics Committee (protocol version 1.1, 13 July 2021).

DISCUSSION

This trial will investigate the effect of CLAC on the duration of mechanical ventilation, which is an important clinical outcome as prolonged mechanical ventilation is associated with important adverse outcomes, such as bronchopulmonary dysplasia.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.Gov NCT05030337 . Registered on 17 August 2021.

Update on ventilatory management of extremely preterm infants-A Neonatal Intensive Care Unit perspective

Extremely preterm infants commonly suffer from respiratory distress syndrome. Ventilatory management of these infants starts from birth and includes decisions such as timing of respiratory support in relation to umbilical cord management, oxygenation targets, and options of positive pressure support. The approach of early intubation and surfactant administration through an endotracheal tube has been challenged in recent years by primary noninvasive respiratory support and newer methods of surfactant administration via thin catheters. Available data comparing the thin catheter method to endotracheal tube and delayed extubation in extremely preterm infants born before 28 weeks of gestation did not show differences in survival free of bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Data from numerous randomized trials comparing conventional ventilation with high-frequency oscillatory ventilation did not show differences in meaningful outcomes. Among conventional modes of ventilation, there is good evidence to favor volume-targeted ventilation over pressure-limited ventilation. The former reduces the combined risk of bronchopulmonary dysplasia or death and several important secondary outcomes without an increase in adverse events. There are no evidence-based guidelines to set positive end-expiratory pressure in ventilated preterm infants. Recent research suggests that the forced oscillation technique may help to find the lowest positive end-expiratory pressure at which lung recruitment is optimal. Benefits and risks of the various modes of noninvasive ventilation depend on the clinical setting, degree of prematurity, severity of lung disease, and competency of staff in treating associated complications. Respiratory care after discharge includes home oxygen therapy, lung function monitoring, weaning from medication started in the neonatal unit, and treatment of asthma-like symptoms.

Decoupling Oxygen Tension From Retinal Vascularization as a New Perspective for Management of Retinopathy of Prematurity. New Opportunities From β-adrenoceptors

Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is an evolutive and potentially blinding eye disease that affects preterm newborns. Unfortunately, until now no conservative therapy of active ROP with proven efficacy is available. Although ROP is a multifactorial disease, premature exposition to oxygen concentrations higher than those intrauterine, represents the initial pathogenetic trigger. The increase of oxygenation in a retina still incompletely vascularized promotes the downregulation of proangiogenic factors and finally the interruption of vascularization (ischemic phase). However, the increasing metabolic requirement of the ischemic retina induces, over the following weeks, a progressive hypoxia that specularly increases the levels of proangiogenic factors finally leading to proliferative retinopathy (proliferative phase). Considering non-modifiable the coupling between oxygen levels and vascularization, so far, neonatologists and ophthalmologists have "played defense", meticulously searching the minimum necessary concentration of oxygen for individual newborns, refining their diagnostic ability, adopting a careful monitoring policy, ready to decisively intervene only in a very advanced stage of disease progression. However, recent advances have demonstrated the possibility to pharmacologically modulate the relationship between oxygen and vascularization, opening thus the perspective for new therapeutic or preventive opportunities. The perspective of a shift from a defensive towards an attack strategy is now at hand.

Comparing Descriptive Statistics for Retrospective Studies From One-per-Minute and One-per-Second Data

BACKGROUND

Large amounts of data are collected in neonatal intensive care units, which could be used for research. It is unclear whether these data, usually sampled at a lower frequency, are sufficient for retrospective studies. We investigated what to expect when using one-per-minute data for descriptive statistics.

METHODS

One-per-second inspiratory oxygen and saturation were processed to one-per-minute data and compared, on average, standard deviation, target range time, hypoxia, days of supplemental oxygen, and missing signal.

RESULTS

Outcomes calculated from data recordings (one-per-minute = 92, one-per-second = 92) showed very little to no difference. Sub analyses of recordings under 100 and 200 h showed no difference.

CONCLUSION

In our study, descriptive statistics of one-per-minute data were comparable to one-per-second and could be used for retrospective analyses. Comparable routinely collected one-per-minute data could be used to develop algorithms or find associations, retrospectively.

Impact of early respiratory care for extremely preterm infants

Despite advances in neonatal intensive care, more than half of surviving infants born extremely preterm (EP; < 28 weeks' gestation) develop bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD). Prevention of BPD is critical because of its associated mortality and morbidity, including adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes and respiratory health in later childhood and beyond. The respiratory care of EP infants begins before birth, then continues in the delivery room and throughout the primary hospitalization. This chapter will review the evidence for interventions after birth that might improve outcomes for infants born EP, including the timing of umbilical cord clamping, strategies to avoid or minimize exposure to mechanical ventilation, modes of mechanical ventilation and non-invasive respiratory support, oxygen saturation targets, postnatal corticosteroids and other adjunct therapies.

Automation of oxygen titration in preterm infants: Current evidence and future challenges

For the preterm infant with respiratory insufficiency requiring supplemental oxygen, tight control of oxygen saturation (SpO₂) is advocated, but difficult to achieve in practice. Automated control of oxygen delivery has emerged as a potential solution, with six control algorithms currently embedded in commercially-available respiratory support devices. To date, most clinical evaluations of these algorithms have been short-lived crossover studies, in which a benefit of automated over manual control of oxygen titration has been uniformly noted, along with a reduction in severe SpO₂ deviations and need for manual FiO₂ adjustments. A single non-randomised study has examined the effect of implementation of automated oxygen control with the CLiO₂ algorithm as standard care for preterm infants; no clear benefits in relation to clinical outcomes were noted, although duration of mechanical ventilation was lessened. The results of randomised controlled trials are awaited. Beyond the gathering of evidence regarding a treatment effect, we contend that there is a need for a better understanding of the function of contemporary control algorithms under a range of clinical conditions, further exploration of techniques of adaptation to individualise algorithm performance, and a concerted effort to apply this technology in low resource settings in which the majority of preterm infants receive care. Attainment of these goals will be paramount in optimisation of oxygen therapy for preterm infants globally.

The Intertemporal Role of Respiratory Support in Improving Neonatal Outcomes: A Narrative Review

Defining improvements in healthcare can be challenging due to the need to assess multiple outcomes and measures. In neonates, although progress in respiratory support has been a key factor in improving survival, the same degree of improvement has not been documented in certain outcomes, such as bronchopulmonary dysplasia. By exploring the evolution of neonatal respiratory care over the last 60 years, this review highlights not only the scientific advances that occurred with the application of invasive mechanical ventilation but also the weakness of the existing knowledge. The contributing role of non-invasive ventilation and less-invasive surfactant administration methods as well as of certain pharmacological therapies is also discussed. Moreover, we analyze the cost-benefit of neonatal care-respiratory support and present future challenges and perspectives.

Respiratory Support of Infants With Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia

Optimisation of respiratory support of infants with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) is critical. Infants with CDH often have severe lung hypoplasia and abnormal development of their pulmonary vasculature, leading to ventilation perfusion mismatch. It is vital that lung protective ventilation strategies are employed during both initial stabilisation and post-surgical repair to avoid ventilator induced lung damage and oxygen toxicity to prevent further impairment to an already diminished gas-exchanging environment. There is a lack of robust evidence for the routine use of surfactant therapy during initial resuscitation of infants with CDH and thus administration cannot be recommended outside clinical trials. Additionally, inhaled nitric oxide has been shown to have no benefit in reducing the mortality rates of infants with CDH. Other therapeutic agents which beneficially act on pulmonary hypertension are currently being assessed in infants with CDH in randomised multicentre trials. The role of novel ventilatory modalities such as closed loop automated oxygen control, liquid ventilation and heliox therapy may offer promise for infants with CDH, but the benefits need to be determined in appropriately designed clinical trials.