1
|
Evans M, Kang S, Bajaber A, Gordon K, Martin C. Augmented Reality for Surgical Navigation: A Review of Advanced Needle Guidance Systems for Percutaneous Tumor Ablation. Radiol Imaging Cancer 2025; 7:e230154. [PMID: 39750112 PMCID: PMC11791678 DOI: 10.1148/rycan.230154] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2023] [Revised: 10/31/2024] [Accepted: 11/08/2024] [Indexed: 01/04/2025]
Abstract
Percutaneous tumor ablation has become a widely accepted and used treatment option for both soft and hard tissue malignancies. The current standard-of-care techniques for performing these minimally invasive procedures require providers to navigate a needle to their intended target using two-dimensional (2D) US or CT to obtain complete local response. These traditional image-guidance systems require operators to mentally transpose what is visualized on a 2D screen into the inherent three-dimensional (3D) context of human anatomy. Advanced navigation systems designed specifically for percutaneous needle-based procedures often fuse multiple imaging modalities to provide greater awareness and planned needle trajectories for the avoidance of critical structures. However, even many of these advanced systems still require mental transposition of anatomy from a 2D screen to human anatomy. Augmented reality (AR)-based systems have the potential to provide a 3D view of the patient's anatomy, eliminating the need for mental transposition by the operator. The purpose of this article is to review commercially available advanced percutaneous surgical navigation platforms and discuss the current state of AR-based navigation systems, including their potential benefits, challenges for adoption, and future developments. Keywords: Computer Applications-Virtual Imaging, Technology Assessment, Augmented Reality, Surgical Navigation, Percutaneous Ablation, Interventional Radiology ©RSNA, 2025.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Evans
- From the Department of Clinical Affairs, MediView XR, Cleveland, Ohio
(M.E.); College of Medicine, Alfaisal University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia (A.B.);
and Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology,
Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH 44195-5243 (S.K.,
K.G., C.M.)
| | | | - Abubakr Bajaber
- From the Department of Clinical Affairs, MediView XR, Cleveland, Ohio
(M.E.); College of Medicine, Alfaisal University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia (A.B.);
and Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology,
Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH 44195-5243 (S.K.,
K.G., C.M.)
| | | | - Charles Martin
- From the Department of Clinical Affairs, MediView XR, Cleveland, Ohio
(M.E.); College of Medicine, Alfaisal University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia (A.B.);
and Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology,
Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH 44195-5243 (S.K.,
K.G., C.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Knapen RRMM, Homberg MC, Balthasar AJR, Jans K, Van Kuijk SMJ, de Boer SW, Bouman EAC, Van der Leij C. Sex-Differences in Post-Procedural Pain Experiences After Thermal Liver Ablations for Liver Tumors: A Retrospective Study. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2024; 47:1485-1492. [PMID: 39231889 PMCID: PMC11541288 DOI: 10.1007/s00270-024-03851-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2024] [Accepted: 08/23/2024] [Indexed: 09/06/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Literature shows differences in pain experiences between sexes. The exact influence of thermal liver ablation on experienced pain is still not well-known. This study aims to investigate the maximum pain intensity at the recovery between men and women after percutaneous thermal liver ablation. METHODS Patients treated with percutaneous thermal liver ablation (radiofrequency or microwave ablation) in Maastricht University Medical Center + between 2018 and 2022 for primary or secondary liver tumors were included retrospectively. Outcomes included maximum numerical rating scale (NRS, scale:0-10) score at the recovery room, prevalence of post-procedural pain (defined as NRS score ≥ 4), duration of anesthesia, length of stay at recovery, and complications. Regression analyses were adjusted for age, ASA-score, BMI, tumor type, maximum diameter of lesion, chronic pain in patients' history, and history of psychological disorder. RESULTS 183 patients were included of which 123 men (67%). Results showed higher average maximum NRS scores in women patients compared to men (mean:3.88 versus 2.73), but not after adjustments (aß:0.75, 95%CI:-0.13-1.64). Women suffered more from acute post-procedural pain (59% versus 35%; aOR:2.50, 95%CI:1.16-5.39), and needed analgesics more often at the recovery room (aOR:2.43, 95%CI:1.07-5.48) compared to men. NRS score at recovery arrival did not significantly differ (aß:0.37, 95%CI:-0.48-1.22). No differences were seen in the length of stay at the recovery, duration of anesthesia, procedure time, and complication rate. Location of the tumor (subcapsular or deep), total tumors per patient, and distinction between primary and secondary tumors had no influence on the NRS. CONCLUSION This retrospective single-center study shows higher post-procedural pain rates after thermal liver ablation in women, resulting in higher analgesics use at the recovery room. The results suggest considering higher dosage of analgesics during thermal liver ablation in women to reduce post-procedural pain. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 3: Non-controlled retrospective cohort study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R R M M Knapen
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
- School for Cardiovascular Diseases (CARIM), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - M C Homberg
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - A J R Balthasar
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - K Jans
- Department of Cardiology, VieCuri Medical Center, Venlo, The Netherlands
| | - S M J Van Kuijk
- Department of Epidemiology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - S W de Boer
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- School for Cardiovascular Diseases (CARIM), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - E A C Bouman
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - C Van der Leij
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Research Institute for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Abdelmalak J, Strasser SI, Ngu N, Dennis C, Sinclair M, Majumdar A, Collins K, Bateman K, Dev A, Abasszade JH, Valaydon Z, Saitta D, Gazelakis K, Byers S, Holmes J, Thompson AJ, Pandiaraja D, Bollipo S, Sharma S, Joseph M, Nicoll A, Batt N, Sawhney R, Tang MJ, Lubel J, Riordan S, Hannah N, Haridy J, Sood S, Lam E, Greenhill E, Majeed A, Kemp W, Zalcberg J, Roberts SK. Improved Survival Outcomes with Surgical Resection Compared to Ablative Therapy in Early-Stage HCC: A Large, Real-World, Propensity-Matched, Multi-Centre, Australian Cohort Study. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:5741. [PMID: 38136287 PMCID: PMC10742146 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15245741] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2023] [Revised: 12/01/2023] [Accepted: 12/06/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023] Open
Abstract
The optimal treatment approach in very-early and early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is not precisely defined, and there is ambiguity in the literature around the comparative efficacy of surgical resection versus ablation as curative therapies for limited disease. We performed this real-world propensity-matched, multi-centre cohort study to assess for differences in survival outcomes between those undergoing resection and those receiving ablation. Patients with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) 0/A HCC first diagnosed between 1 January 2016 and 31 December 2020 who received ablation or resection as initial treatment were included in the study. A total of 450 patients were included in the study from 10 major liver centres including two transplant centres. Following propensity score matching using key covariates, 156 patients were available for analysis with 78 in each group. Patients who underwent resection had significantly improved overall survival (log-rank test p = 0.023) and local recurrence-free survival (log rank test p = 0.027) compared to those who received ablation. Based on real-world data, our study supports the use of surgical resection in preference to ablation as first-line curative therapy in appropriately selected BCLC 0/A HCC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Abdelmalak
- Department of Gastroenterology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia; (J.A.); (M.J.T.); (J.L.); (A.M.); (W.K.)
- Department of Medicine, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia; (E.L.)
| | - Simone I. Strasser
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia; (S.I.S.); (N.N.); (C.D.)
| | - Natalie Ngu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia; (S.I.S.); (N.N.); (C.D.)
| | - Claude Dennis
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia; (S.I.S.); (N.N.); (C.D.)
| | - Marie Sinclair
- Department of Gastroenterology, Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, VIC 3084, Australia; (M.S.); (A.M.); (K.C.); (K.B.)
| | - Avik Majumdar
- Department of Gastroenterology, Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, VIC 3084, Australia; (M.S.); (A.M.); (K.C.); (K.B.)
| | - Kate Collins
- Department of Gastroenterology, Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, VIC 3084, Australia; (M.S.); (A.M.); (K.C.); (K.B.)
| | - Katherine Bateman
- Department of Gastroenterology, Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, VIC 3084, Australia; (M.S.); (A.M.); (K.C.); (K.B.)
| | - Anouk Dev
- Department of Gastroenterology, Monash Health, Clayton, VIC 3168, Australia; (A.D.); (J.H.A.)
| | - Joshua H. Abasszade
- Department of Gastroenterology, Monash Health, Clayton, VIC 3168, Australia; (A.D.); (J.H.A.)
| | - Zina Valaydon
- Department of Gastroenterology, Western Health, Footscray, VIC 3011, Australia; (Z.V.); (D.S.); (K.G.); (S.B.)
| | - Daniel Saitta
- Department of Gastroenterology, Western Health, Footscray, VIC 3011, Australia; (Z.V.); (D.S.); (K.G.); (S.B.)
| | - Kathryn Gazelakis
- Department of Gastroenterology, Western Health, Footscray, VIC 3011, Australia; (Z.V.); (D.S.); (K.G.); (S.B.)
| | - Susan Byers
- Department of Gastroenterology, Western Health, Footscray, VIC 3011, Australia; (Z.V.); (D.S.); (K.G.); (S.B.)
| | - Jacinta Holmes
- Department of Gastroenterology, St. Vincent’s Hospital Melbourne, Fitzroy, VIC 3065, Australia; (J.H.); (A.J.T.); (D.P.)
- Department of Medicine, St. Vincent’s Hospital, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia
| | - Alexander J. Thompson
- Department of Gastroenterology, St. Vincent’s Hospital Melbourne, Fitzroy, VIC 3065, Australia; (J.H.); (A.J.T.); (D.P.)
- Department of Medicine, St. Vincent’s Hospital, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia
| | - Dhivya Pandiaraja
- Department of Gastroenterology, St. Vincent’s Hospital Melbourne, Fitzroy, VIC 3065, Australia; (J.H.); (A.J.T.); (D.P.)
| | - Steven Bollipo
- Department of Gastroenterology, John Hunter Hospital, New Lambton Heights, NSW 2305, Australia; (S.B.); (S.S.); (M.J.)
| | - Suresh Sharma
- Department of Gastroenterology, John Hunter Hospital, New Lambton Heights, NSW 2305, Australia; (S.B.); (S.S.); (M.J.)
| | - Merlyn Joseph
- Department of Gastroenterology, John Hunter Hospital, New Lambton Heights, NSW 2305, Australia; (S.B.); (S.S.); (M.J.)
| | - Amanda Nicoll
- Department of Gastroenterology, Eastern Health, Box Hill, VIC 3128, Australia; (A.N.); (N.B.); (R.S.)
- Department of Medicine, Eastern Health Clinical School, Box Hill, VIC 3128, Australia
| | - Nicholas Batt
- Department of Gastroenterology, Eastern Health, Box Hill, VIC 3128, Australia; (A.N.); (N.B.); (R.S.)
| | - Rohit Sawhney
- Department of Gastroenterology, Eastern Health, Box Hill, VIC 3128, Australia; (A.N.); (N.B.); (R.S.)
- Department of Medicine, Eastern Health Clinical School, Box Hill, VIC 3128, Australia
| | - Myo J. Tang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia; (J.A.); (M.J.T.); (J.L.); (A.M.); (W.K.)
| | - John Lubel
- Department of Gastroenterology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia; (J.A.); (M.J.T.); (J.L.); (A.M.); (W.K.)
| | - Stephen Riordan
- Department of Gastroenterology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia;
| | - Nicholas Hannah
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia; (N.H.); (J.H.); (S.S.)
| | - James Haridy
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia; (N.H.); (J.H.); (S.S.)
| | - Siddharth Sood
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia; (N.H.); (J.H.); (S.S.)
| | - Eileen Lam
- Department of Medicine, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia; (E.L.)
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia;
| | - Elysia Greenhill
- Department of Medicine, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia; (E.L.)
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia;
| | - Ammar Majeed
- Department of Gastroenterology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia; (J.A.); (M.J.T.); (J.L.); (A.M.); (W.K.)
- Department of Medicine, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia; (E.L.)
| | - William Kemp
- Department of Gastroenterology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia; (J.A.); (M.J.T.); (J.L.); (A.M.); (W.K.)
- Department of Medicine, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia; (E.L.)
| | - John Zalcberg
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia;
- Department of Medical Oncology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia
| | - Stuart K. Roberts
- Department of Gastroenterology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia; (J.A.); (M.J.T.); (J.L.); (A.M.); (W.K.)
- Department of Medicine, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia; (E.L.)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Knapen RRMM, Korenblik R, James S, Dams G, Olij B, de Boer SW, van Dam RM, van der Leij C. The Effect of Microwave and Radiofrequency Ablation (MWA/RFA) on Liver Volume in Patients with Primary and Secondary Liver Tumours: A Retrospective Analysis. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2023:10.1007/s00270-023-03503-0. [PMID: 37430014 PMCID: PMC10382361 DOI: 10.1007/s00270-023-03503-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2022] [Accepted: 06/21/2023] [Indexed: 07/12/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE It is known that thermal liver ablation can induce liver hypertrophy. However, exact impact in liver volume remains unclear. The aim of this study is to assess the influence of radiofrequency or microwave ablation (RFA/MWA) on liver volume in patients with primary and secondary liver lesions. Findings can be relevant in assessing the potential extra benefit of thermal liver ablation in preoperatively performed liver hypertrophy inducing procedures, such as portal vein embolization (PVE). METHODS Between January 2014-May 2022, 69 invasive treatment naïve patients with primary (n = 43) or secondary/metastatic (n = 26) liver lesions (in all segments, except in segments II/III) treated percutaneously by RFA/MWA were included. Total liver volume (TLV), segment II + III volume (serving as "distant liver volume"), ablation zone volume and absolute liver volume (ALV, calculated by subtracting the ablation zone volume from the TLV) were the study outcomes. RESULTS ALV in patients with secondary liver lesions increased to a median percentage of 106.87% (IQR = 99.66-113.03%, p = 0.016), volume of segments II/III increased to a median percentage of 105.81% (IQR = 100.06-115.65%, p = 0.003). ALV and segments II/III in patients with primary liver tumours remained stable, with a median percentage of 98.72% (IQR = 92.99-108.35%, p = 0.856) and 100.43% (IQR = 92.85-109.41%, p = 0.699), respectively. CONCLUSION In patients with secondary liver tumours, ALV and segments II/III increased after MWA/RFA by an average of approximately 6%, while ALV in patients with primary liver lesions remained unchanged. Besides the curative intent, these findings indicate the potential added benefit of thermal liver ablation on FLR hypertrophy inducing procedures in patients with secondary liver lesions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level 3, non-controlled retrospective cohort study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robrecht R M M Knapen
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
- CARIM, School for Cardiovascular Diseases, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - Remon Korenblik
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- GROW, School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Sinead James
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- GROW, School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Glenn Dams
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Zuyderland, Sittard, Heerlen, The Netherlands
| | - Bram Olij
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- GROW, School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Sanne W de Boer
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- CARIM, School for Cardiovascular Diseases, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Ronald M van Dam
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- GROW, School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Christiaan van der Leij
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- GROW, School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Peng C, Li X, Ao F, Li T, Guo J, Liu J, Zhang X, Gu J, Mao J, Zhou B. Mitochondrial ROS driven by NOX4 upregulation promotes hepatocellular carcinoma cell survival after incomplete radiofrequency ablation by inducing of mitophagy via Nrf2/PINK1. J Transl Med 2023; 21:218. [PMID: 36964576 PMCID: PMC10039571 DOI: 10.1186/s12967-023-04067-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2023] [Accepted: 03/17/2023] [Indexed: 03/26/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after radiofrequency ablation (RFA) remains a major clinical problem. Cells that survive the sublethal heat stress that is induced by incomplete RFA are the main source of HCC relapse. Heat stress has long been reported to increase intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation. Although ROS can induce apoptosis, a pro-survival effect of ROS has also been demonstrated. However, the role of ROS in HCC cells exposed to sublethal heat stress remains unclear. METHODS HepG2 and HuH7 cells were used for this experiment. Insufficient RFA was performed in cells and in a xenograft model. ROS and antioxidant levels were measured. Apoptosis was analyed by Annexin-V/PI staining and flow cytometry. Protein expression was measured using western blotting. Colocalization of lysosomes and mitochondria was analyzed to assess mitophagy. Corresponding activators or inhibitors were applied to verify the function of specific objectives. RESULTS Here,we showed that sublethal heat stress induced a ROS burst, which caused acute oxidative stress. This ROS burst was generated by mitochondria, and it was initiated by upregulated NOX4 expression in the mitochondria. N-acetylcysteine (NAC) decreased HCC cell survival under sublethal heat stress conditions in vivo and in vitro. NOX4 triggers the production of mitochondrial ROS (mtROS), and NOX4 inhibitors or siNOX4 also decreased HCC cell survival under sublethal heat stress conditions in vitro. Increased mtROS trigger PINK1-dependent mitophagy to eliminate the mitochondria that are damaged by sublethal heat stress and to protect cells from apoptosis. Nrf2 expression was elevated in response to this ROS burst and mediated the ROS burst-induced increase in PINK1 expression after sublethal heat stress. CONCLUSION These data confirmed that the ROS burst that occurs after iRFA exerted a pro-survival effect. NOX4 increased the generation of ROS by mitochondria. This short-term ROS burst induced PINK1-dependent mitophagy to eliminate damaged mitochondria by increasing Nrf2 expression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chao Peng
- Department of Interventional Medicine, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai, 519000, Guangdong, China
| | - Xi Li
- Department of Interventional Medicine, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai, 519000, Guangdong, China
| | - Feng Ao
- Department of Interventional Medicine, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai, 519000, Guangdong, China
| | - Ting Li
- Department of Anesthesiology, Gansu Provincial People's Hospital, Lanzhou, 730000, Gansu, China
| | - Jingpei Guo
- Department of Interventional Medicine, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai, 519000, Guangdong, China
| | - Junfeng Liu
- Department of Interventional Medicine, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai, 519000, Guangdong, China
| | - Xiaoting Zhang
- Department of Interventional Medicine, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai, 519000, Guangdong, China
| | - Jinyan Gu
- Library Department, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai, 519000, Guangdong, China.
| | - Junjie Mao
- Department of Interventional Medicine, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai, 519000, Guangdong, China.
| | - Bin Zhou
- Department of Interventional Medicine, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai, 519000, Guangdong, China.
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Biomedical Imaging and Guangdong Provincial Engineering Research Center of Molecular Imaging, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai, 519000, Guangdong, China.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Takayama T, Hasegawa K, Izumi N, Kudo M, Shimada M, Yamanaka N, Inomata M, Kaneko S, Nakayama H, Kawaguchi Y, Kashiwabara K, Tateishi R, Shiina S, Koike K, Matsuyama Y, Omata M, Makuuchi M, Kokudo N. Surgery versus Radiofrequency Ablation for Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Randomized Controlled Trial (SURF Trial). Liver Cancer 2021; 11:209-218. [PMID: 35949295 PMCID: PMC9218617 DOI: 10.1159/000521665] [Citation(s) in RCA: 98] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2021] [Accepted: 12/22/2021] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION It remains unclear which surgery or radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is the more effective treatment for small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We aimed to compare survival between patients undergoing surgery (surgery group) and patients undergoing RFA (RFA group). METHODS We conducted a randomized controlled trial involving 49 institutions in Japan. Patients with Child-Pugh scores ≤7, largest HCC diameter ≤3 cm, and ≤3 HCC nodules were considered eligible. The co-primary endpoints were recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). The current study reports the final result of RFS, and the follow-up of OS is still ongoing. RESULTS During 2009-2015, 308 patients were registered. After excluding ineligible patients, the surgery and RFA groups included 150 and 151 patients, respectively. Baseline factors did not differ significantly between the groups. In both groups, 90% of patients had solitary HCC. The median largest HCC diameter was 1.8 cm (interquartile range [IQR], 1.5-2.2 cm) in the surgery group and 1.8 cm (IQR, 1.5-2.3 cm) in the RFA group. The median procedure duration (274 vs. 40 min, p < 0.01) and the median duration of hospital stay (17 days vs. 10 days, p < 0.01) were longer in the surgery group than in the RFA group. RFS did not differ significantly between the groups as the median RFS was 3.5 (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.6-5.1) years in the surgery group and 3.0 (95% CI, 2.4-5.6) years in the RFA group (hazard ratio, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.67-1.25; p = 0.58). DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION Our study did not show which surgery or RFA is the better treatment option for small HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tadatoshi Takayama
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kiyoshi Hasegawa
- Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, the University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan,*Kiyoshi Hasegawa,
| | - Namiki Izumi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Musashino Red Cross Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masatoshi Kudo
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kinki University School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Mitsuo Shimada
- Department of Surgery, Tokushima University School of Medicine, Tokushima, Japan
| | | | - Masafumi Inomata
- Department of Gastroenterological and Pediatric Surgery, Oita University Faculty of Medicine, Oita, Japan
| | - Shuichi Kaneko
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kanazawa University, Ishikawa, Japan
| | - Hisashi Nakayama
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yoshikuni Kawaguchi
- Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, the University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kosuke Kashiwabara
- Biostatistics Division, Central Coordinating Unit, Clinical Research Support Center, the University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ryosuke Tateishi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, the University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shuichiro Shiina
- Department of Gastroenterological Imaging and Interventional Oncology, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kazuhiko Koike
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, the University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yutaka Matsuyama
- Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, the University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masao Omata
- Internal Medicine, Yamanashi Prefectural Central Hospital, Yamanashi, Japan
| | | | - Norihiro Kokudo
- National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lee HY, Hong SK, Hong SY, Suh S, Han ES, Lee JM, Choi Y, Yi NJ, Lee KW, Suh KS. Outcomes of Living Donor Liver Transplantation in Patients With a History of Ruptured Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Front Surg 2021; 8:722098. [PMID: 34733878 PMCID: PMC8558350 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.722098] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2021] [Accepted: 09/20/2021] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Liver transplantation (LT) is considered a contraindication in patients with a history of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) rupture because ruptured HCCs are classified as T4 in the current American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM system. This study aimed to assess living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) in these patients and elucidate the factors that may have affected their outcomes. Methods: Data of patients with a history of ruptured HCC who underwent LDLT between January 1999 and December 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Results: Among 789 patients who underwent LDLT for HCC, five (0.64%) had a history of HCC rupture. Three patients (60%) were treated with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) or transarterial embolization (TAE) for hemostasis, and two patients (40%) achieved spontaneous hemostasis. One of two patients who achieved spontaneous hemostasis underwent surgical resection and LT at 1 week and 6 years after the rupture, respectively. The other patient underwent LT 2 days after the rupture. Four patients (80%) survived for >5 years, while two patients (40%) experienced recurrence and succumbed during the median follow-up duration of 85.3 months (range, 12.4–182.7). The recurrence first developed at 4.3 and 17.0 months after LT; these patients were managed well using surgical resection for peritoneal seeding and TACE for intrahepatic HCC. Conclusion: LDLT can be considered a treatment method even in patients with a history of HCC rupture after full evaluation of tumor biology and risk of recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hwi Yeol Lee
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Suk Kyun Hong
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Su Young Hong
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Sanggyun Suh
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Eui Soo Han
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jeong-Moo Lee
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - YoungRok Choi
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Nam-Joon Yi
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Kwang-Woong Lee
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Kyung-Suk Suh
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Chen Y, Bei J, Liu M, Huang J, Xie L, Huang W, Cai M, Guo Y, Lin L, Zhu K. Sublethal heat stress-induced O-GlcNAcylation coordinates the Warburg effect to promote hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence and metastasis after thermal ablation. Cancer Lett 2021; 518:23-34. [PMID: 34126196 DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2021.06.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2021] [Revised: 05/15/2021] [Accepted: 06/05/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
The malignant transformation of residual hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cells after thermal ablation is considered as the main factor promoting postoperative HCC progression, which greatly limits the improvement of long-term survival, and at present there is no effective targeted therapeutic strategies. The Warburg effect is a metabolic feature correlated highly with malignant transformation (e.g. epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition [EMT]). Here, we showed that sublethal heat stress triggered a stronger Warburg effect of HCC cells, which contributed to the thermotolerance and invasion of HCC cells. Sublethal heat stress-induced O-GlcNAcylation was involved in this process. Such enhanced Warburg effect in HCC cells may be eliminated through O-GlcNAcylation inhibition, resulting in impaired thermotolerance and EMT, and thereby preventing tumor recurrence and metastasis of HCC-bearing mice after insufficient thermal ablation. Finally, we present evidence that sublethal heat stress-induced O-GlcNAcylation regulates the Warburg effect in HCC cells by promoting hypoxia-inducible factor 1α (HIF-1α) stability. In conclusion, the present study suggests that O-GlcNAcylation coordinates the Warburg effect to promote HCC progression after thermal ablation, which may serve as a novel potential target for controlling postoperative HCC recurrence and metastasis.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Acylation/physiology
- Animals
- Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/metabolism
- Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/pathology
- Cell Line, Tumor
- Cell Transformation, Neoplastic/metabolism
- Cell Transformation, Neoplastic/pathology
- Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition/physiology
- Heat-Shock Response/physiology
- Humans
- Hyperthermia, Induced/methods
- Hypoxia-Inducible Factor 1, alpha Subunit/metabolism
- Liver Neoplasms/metabolism
- Liver Neoplasms/pathology
- Male
- Mice
- Mice, Inbred BALB C
- Mice, Nude
- Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/metabolism
- Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology
- Warburg Effect, Oncologic
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ye Chen
- Laboratory of Interventional Radiology, Department of Minimally Invasive Interventional Radiology and Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, 250 East Changgang Road, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, 510260, China
| | - Jiaxin Bei
- Laboratory of Interventional Radiology, Department of Minimally Invasive Interventional Radiology and Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, 250 East Changgang Road, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, 510260, China
| | - Mingyu Liu
- Laboratory of Interventional Radiology, Department of Minimally Invasive Interventional Radiology and Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, 250 East Changgang Road, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, 510260, China
| | - Jingjun Huang
- Laboratory of Interventional Radiology, Department of Minimally Invasive Interventional Radiology and Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, 250 East Changgang Road, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, 510260, China
| | - Lulu Xie
- Laboratory of Interventional Radiology, Department of Minimally Invasive Interventional Radiology and Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, 250 East Changgang Road, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, 510260, China
| | - Wensou Huang
- Laboratory of Interventional Radiology, Department of Minimally Invasive Interventional Radiology and Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, 250 East Changgang Road, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, 510260, China
| | - Mingyue Cai
- Laboratory of Interventional Radiology, Department of Minimally Invasive Interventional Radiology and Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, 250 East Changgang Road, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, 510260, China
| | - Yongjian Guo
- Laboratory of Interventional Radiology, Department of Minimally Invasive Interventional Radiology and Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, 250 East Changgang Road, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, 510260, China
| | - Liteng Lin
- Laboratory of Interventional Radiology, Department of Minimally Invasive Interventional Radiology and Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, 250 East Changgang Road, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, 510260, China.
| | - Kangshun Zhu
- Laboratory of Interventional Radiology, Department of Minimally Invasive Interventional Radiology and Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, 250 East Changgang Road, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, 510260, China.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Prognostic significance of preoperative systemic inflammatory biomarkers in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after microwave ablation and establishment of a nomogram. Sci Rep 2021; 11:13814. [PMID: 34226605 PMCID: PMC8257620 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-93289-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2021] [Accepted: 06/21/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The study aimed to evaluate the prognostic significance of preoperative systemic inflammatory biomarkers including albumin to globulin ratio (AGR), neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), lymphocyte to monocyte ratio (LMR), and platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and establish a nomogram in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients after microwave ablation (MWA). 192 HCC patients receiving MWA as initial therapy from the first ward of hepatobiliary surgery were classified as training cohort. Whereas, 84 patients from the second of hepatobiliary surgery were classified as validation cohort. Kaplan–Meier (KM) method and univariate analyses showed that AGR, NLR, LMR, and PLR were significantly associated with OS in the training cohort. Multivariate analysis including clinicopathologic features screened out independent predictors including ascites, tumor size, cancer embolus, AGR, and PLR. Based on those variables, a nomogram for predicting OS was established. The C-index was 0.794 in the training cohort and 0.772 in the validation cohort. Calibration plots identified the nomogram performed well with an ideal model. Compared with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging system and simple tumor size, the nomogram showed better predictive ability. Besides, the nomogram discovered the highest diagnostic accuracy in predicting postoperative clinical outcome than the combination of the present models with tumor size. In conclusion, the constructed nomogram could accurately predict individualized survival probability and might support clinician in individual treatment optimization and clinical decision-making.
Collapse
|
10
|
Huang J, Huang W, Guo Y, Cai M, Zhou J, Lin L, Zhu K. Risk Factors, Patterns, and Long-Term Survival of Recurrence After Radiofrequency Ablation With or Without Transarterial Chemoembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Front Oncol 2021; 11:638428. [PMID: 34123790 PMCID: PMC8191459 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.638428] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2020] [Accepted: 04/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives To classify hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence patterns after radiofrequency ablation (RFA) or transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with RFA (TACE-RFA) and analyze their risk factors and impacts on survival. Methods We retrospectively evaluated the medical records of HCC patients who underwent RFA or TACE-RFA from January 2006 to December 2016. HCC recurrences were classified into four patterns: local tumor progression (LTP), intra-segmental recurrence, extra-segmental recurrence, and aggressive recurrence. Risk factors, overall survival (OS), and post-recurrence survival of each pattern were evaluated. Results A total of 249 patients with a single, hepatitis-B virus (HBV)-related HCC ≤ 5.0 cm who underwent RFA (HCC ≤ 3.0 cm) or TACE-RFA (HCC of 3.1-5.0 cm) were included. During follow-up (median, 53 months), 163 patients experienced HCC recurrence: 40, 43, 62 and 18 patients developed LTP, intra-segmental recurrence, extra-segmental recurrence, and aggressive recurrence, respectively; the median post-recurrence survival was 49, 37, 25 and 15 months, respectively (P < .001); the median OS was 65, 56, 58 and 28 months, respectively (P < .001). Independent risk factors for each pattern were as follows: tumor sized 2.1-3.0 cm undergoing RFA alone and insufficient ablative margin for LTP, periportal tumor and non-smooth tumor margin for intra-segmental recurrence, HBV-DNA ≥ 2000 IU/mL for extra-segmental recurrence, and periportal tumor and α-fetoprotein ≥ 100 ng/mL for aggressive recurrence. Recurrence pattern (P < .001) and Child-Pugh class B (P = .025) were independent predictors for OS. Conclusions Based on our classification, each recurrence pattern had different recurrence risk factors, OS, and post-recurrence survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jingjun Huang
- Department of Minimally Invasive Interventional Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Wensou Huang
- Department of Minimally Invasive Interventional Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yongjian Guo
- Department of Minimally Invasive Interventional Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Mingyue Cai
- Department of Minimally Invasive Interventional Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jingwen Zhou
- Department of Minimally Invasive Interventional Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Liteng Lin
- Department of Minimally Invasive Interventional Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Kangshun Zhu
- Department of Minimally Invasive Interventional Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Lin Y, Pan XB. Differences in Survival Between First-Line Radiofrequency Ablation versus Surgery for Early-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Population Study Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Database. Med Sci Monit 2020; 26:e921782. [PMID: 32461542 PMCID: PMC7278337 DOI: 10.12659/msm.921782] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The first-line therapy for early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is unclear. This study was conducted to assess and compare survival after surgery vs. after radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for early-stage HCC. Material/Methods Data from HCC patients with a single tumor measuring 31–50 mm were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database from 2004 to 2015. Overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were assessed and compared between surgery and RFA treatment. Propensity score matching was performed. Multiple imputations were used to create 5 sets of complete data. Fine and Gray competing risk multivariate regression models were used to control biases. Results This study included 839 patients: 339 (40.41%) received RFA and 500 (59.59%) underwent surgery. Surgery improved the 5-year OS (63.95% vs. 37.13%, p<0.01) and CSS (64.01% vs. 38.29%, p<0.01) compared with RFA after propensity score matching. The competing risk regression models revealed that, compared with RFA, surgery resulted in better survival in the unmatched cohort with an adjusted sub-distribution hazard ratio of 0.689 (95% confident interval [CI], 0.562–0.868; p=0.001) and in the propensity-matched cohort with an adjusted sub-distribution hazard ratio of 0.642 (95% CI, 0.514–0.801; p<0.001). Conclusions Surgery appears to be a better therapy choice than RFA for patients with early-stage HCC with a single tumor measuring 31–50 mm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yan Lin
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Third People's Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning, Guangxi, China (mainland)
| | - Xin-Bin Pan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, Guangxi, China (mainland)
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Zhao WJ, Zhu GQ, Wu YM, Wang WW, Bai BL. Comparative Effectiveness of Radiofrequency Ablation, Surgical Resection and Transplantation for Early Hepatocellular Carcinoma by Cancer Risk Groups: Results of Propensity Score-Weighted Analysis. Onco Targets Ther 2019; 12:10389-10400. [PMID: 31819521 PMCID: PMC6890195 DOI: 10.2147/ott.s224809] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2019] [Accepted: 11/14/2019] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Controversies exist for which treatment is optimal for early hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): radiofrequency ablation (RFA), surgical resection (SR), or transplantation (LT). We compared outcomes between treatments as first-line therapy for HCC patients measuring up to 5 cm or different cancer risk groups. Patients and methods The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database was retrieved for HCC patients treated with RFA, SR, or LT between 2004 and 2015. The effects of three treatments were compared using propensity score, inverse probability of treatment weights adjustment, and instrumental variable analysis for overall survival (OS) and competing risks regression models for disease-specific survival (DSS). We also evaluated whether the effect of treatments varied according to baseline clinical characteristics by locally weighted regression method. Results Of 7664 patients, RFA and SR yielded worse OS (HR 1.67, CI 1.43–1.70, P<0.001; HR 1.43, CI 1.40–1.67, P<0.001) and DSS (HR 2.00, CI 1.10–3.30, P<0.011; HR 2.50, CI 2.00–3.30, P<0.001) than LT. In patients with small tumors, SR may confer more survival benefits than RFA (HR>1) for different tumor sizes measuring up to 5 cm and may be an appropriate first-line treatment. Additionally, RFA has more survival benefits compared with SR (HR 0.83, CI 0.53–1.25) for those patients with low tumor risk and good general health condition (without any prognostic risk factors). However, those patients with a predicted 5-year overall mortality risk >30% seem to benefit more for SR than RFA. Conclusion Due to a shortage of donors, RFA and SR can be applied as either primary management of HCC or as a bridging therapy for LT. Furthermore, SR is an effective option for patients with different HCC tumor size. However, RFA could achieve comparable survival benefits with SR for patients without any risk factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei-Jia Zhao
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang 325000, People's Republic of China
| | - Gui-Qi Zhu
- Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, People's Republic of China; State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, People's Republic of China
| | - Yi-Ming Wu
- Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang 325000, People's Republic of China
| | - Wen-Wen Wang
- Department of Oncology, The Affiliated Wuxi No.2 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Wuxi 214000, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China
| | - Bing-Long Bai
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang 325000, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Jiang YQ, Wang ZX, Deng YN, Yang Y, Wang GY, Chen GH. Efficacy of Hepatic Resection vs. Radiofrequency Ablation for Patients With Very-Early-Stage or Early-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Population-Based Study With Stratification by Age and Tumor Size. Front Oncol 2019; 9:113. [PMID: 30863723 PMCID: PMC6400103 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2018] [Accepted: 02/07/2019] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Because of the poor health conditions of elderly patients (age >65) with very-early-stage and early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), primary treatment via hepatic resection (HR), or radiofrequency ablation (RFA) must be considered. However, few studies have examined this issue. Methods: A retrospective cohort was obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database from 2004 to 2015. Patients were grouped by tumor size (0-20, 21-30, 31-35, and 31-50 mm) and age (>65 and ≤65). Overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) were assessed. Results: In total, 1912 patients aged >65 and 2,784 patients aged ≤65 were analyzed after propensity score matching (PSM). For patients >65 with tumors ≤20 mm, OS and DSS did not differ significantly between the RFA and HR groups (p = 0.47 and p = 0.76, respectively). For patients with tumors measuring 21-30 mm, the HR group had better OS and a trend toward better DSS compared with the RFA group (p = 0.03 and p = 0.09, respectively). For patients with tumors measuring 31-50 mm, the HR group had better OS and DSS compared with the RFA group (p < 0.001 for both). For patients <65, the HR group had better OS and DSS compared with the RFA group for all tumor sizes. Conclusions: For elderly patients (age >65), RFA is recommended for tumors ≤20 mm. For patients older than 65 with tumors measuring 21-50 mm and for those younger than 65 with tumors of any size, HR is the better choice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi-Quan Jiang
- Department of Hepatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation Center of the Third Affiliated Hospital, Organ Transplantation Institute, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
- Department of Minimally Invasive Interventional Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zi-Xian Wang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, China
- Artificial Intelligence Laboratory of Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yi-Nan Deng
- Department of Hepatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation Center of the Third Affiliated Hospital, Organ Transplantation Institute, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yang Yang
- Department of Hepatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation Center of the Third Affiliated Hospital, Organ Transplantation Institute, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Guo-Ying Wang
- Department of Hepatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation Center of the Third Affiliated Hospital, Organ Transplantation Institute, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Gui-Hua Chen
- Guangdong Key Laboratory of Liver Disease Research, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Liu Y, Sun L, Gao F, Yang X, Li Y, Zhang Q, Zhu B, Niu S, Huang Y, Hu Y, Feng Y, Jiang Y, Wang X. A new scoring model predicting macroscopic vascular invasion of early-intermediate hepatocellular carcinoma. Medicine (Baltimore) 2018; 97:e13536. [PMID: 30544459 PMCID: PMC6310496 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000013536] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Macroscopic vascular invasion cannot be properly predicted in advance in hepatocellular carcinoma patients based on clinical characteristics and imaging features.To develop a predictive scoring model of macroscopic vascular invasion in hepatocellular carcinoma patients after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization combined with radiofrequency ablation based on specific laboratory and tumor indicators.A predictive scoring model, which estimates the incidence of macroscopic vascular invasion at 1-year follow-up, was constructed based on a derivation cohort of 324 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma; a validation cohort of 120 patients was prospectively included. The prognostic value of the scoring model was determined by concordance index, time-dependent receiver operating characteristics, and calibration curves.Cox multivariate analysis of the derivation cohort identified prothrombin time, aspartate aminotransferase, and Barcelona clinic liver cancer (BCLC) staging as independent predictive factors of macroscopic vascular invasion. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves of the predictive scoring model were 0.832 and 0.785 in the derivation and validation cohorts, respectively, and the calibration curves fitted well. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the incidence of macroscopic vascular invasion was significantly higher in the high-risk group (score 0-2) than in the low-risk group (score 3-4) in both the derivation and validation cohorts (P < .0001 and P = .0008, respectively).The predictive scoring model enables the accurate prediction of macroscopic vascular invasion incidence 1 year in advance in hepatocellular carcinoma patients who undergo transcatheter arterial chemoembolization combined with radiofrequency ablation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yao Liu
- Center of Integrative Medicine, Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University
| | - Le Sun
- Center of Integrative Medicine, Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University
| | - Fangyuan Gao
- Center of Integrative Medicine, Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University
| | - Xue Yang
- Center of Integrative Medicine, Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University
| | - Yuxin Li
- Center of Integrative Medicine, Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University
| | - Qun Zhang
- Center of Integrative Medicine, Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University
| | - Bingbing Zhu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Shuaishuai Niu
- Center of Integrative Medicine, Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University
| | - Yunyi Huang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Ying Hu
- Center of Integrative Medicine, Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University
| | - Ying Feng
- Center of Integrative Medicine, Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University
| | - Yuyong Jiang
- Center of Integrative Medicine, Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University
| | - Xianbo Wang
- Center of Integrative Medicine, Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Li G, Liang Y, Sun C, Peng X, Hao N, Liu M, Gao W, Wu H, He B. Effective combination therapy of percutaneous ethanol injection and chemotherapy based on injectable low molecular weight gels. ARTIFICIAL CELLS NANOMEDICINE AND BIOTECHNOLOGY 2018; 46:683-693. [PMID: 29741394 DOI: 10.1080/21691401.2018.1468766] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI) therapy was used in liver cancer treatment, however, the therapeutic ethanol in PEI easily flew away from injected solid tumours and hinder the treatment effect. In this paper, injectable supramolecular gels formed by self-assembly of low molecular weight gelators (LMWGs) based on glycylglycine modified phenylboronic acid were prepared to localize ethanol and load chemotherapeutic drug for in situ synergistic therapy. The mechanism, morphology and rheological property of supramolecular gels were characterized by NMR, UV, SEM, etc. The rheological study revealed that the gels were formed in situ rapidly and recovered promptly once damaged. The gels were non-toxicity to both normal 3T3 fibroblasts cells and 4T1 breast cancer cells. Doxorubicin (DOX) hydrochloride and ethanol were encapsulated in the gels for the combination of chemotherapy and PEI therapy. The in vivo anticancer activity of the DOX-loaded gels was carried out in tumour bearing mice. The injected gels were coated around tumour tissues to lock ethanol, and DOX was released sustainingly from the gels to maintain effective concentration to induce the apoptosis of tumour cells. DOX-loaded gels and the ethanol exhibited excellent therapeutic efficacy and low side effects in local cancer therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guotao Li
- a College of Chemistry and Materials Engineering , Wenzhou University , Wenzhou , China
| | - Yan Liang
- b Department of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmacy , Qingdao University , Qingdao , China
| | - Changzhen Sun
- c National Engineering Research Center for Biomaterials , Sichuan University , Chengdu , China
| | - Xinyu Peng
- c National Engineering Research Center for Biomaterials , Sichuan University , Chengdu , China
| | - Na Hao
- c National Engineering Research Center for Biomaterials , Sichuan University , Chengdu , China
| | - Miaochang Liu
- a College of Chemistry and Materials Engineering , Wenzhou University , Wenzhou , China
| | - Wenxia Gao
- a College of Chemistry and Materials Engineering , Wenzhou University , Wenzhou , China
| | - Huayue Wu
- a College of Chemistry and Materials Engineering , Wenzhou University , Wenzhou , China
| | - Bin He
- c National Engineering Research Center for Biomaterials , Sichuan University , Chengdu , China
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Lee HW, Lee JM, Yoon JH, Kim YJ, Park JW, Park SJ, Kim SH, Yi NJ, Suh KS. A prospective randomized study comparing radiofrequency ablation and hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Surg Treat Res 2018; 94:74-82. [PMID: 29441336 PMCID: PMC5801331 DOI: 10.4174/astr.2018.94.2.74] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2017] [Revised: 07/03/2017] [Accepted: 07/18/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Although there are several prospective clinical studies comparing radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and hepatic resection (HR) for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma, there are few trials that have been performed in strictly homogeneous patients. Methods Patients who were newly diagnosed with a solitary hepatocellular carcinoma were randomized to the HR or RFA group. Inclusion criteria were as follows: age ≥ 20 years but ≤ 70 years, Child-Pugh class A, maximal diameter of the tumor ≥ 2 cm but ≤ 4 cm, no previous treatment history, and platelet count > 80,000/mm3. Results Although the study was early terminated, 29 and 34 patients were enrolled in the HR and RFA groups, respectively, and prospectively followed on an intention-to-treat basis. The 5-year overall survival rates were 83.4% and 86.2% in the HR and RFA groups, respectively, which were not significantly different (P = 0.812 by log-rank, P = 0.990 by Breslow). The 3- and 5-year disease-free survival rates in the HR group were significantly superior to those in the RFA group (66.7%, 44.4% vs. 44.1%, 31.2%, P = 0.071 by log-rank, P = 0.023 by Breslow). Intrahepatic local recurrence tended to develop more frequently in the RFA group (P = 0.042), while the frequency of intrahepatic distant and extrahepatic recurrence was similar bet ween the 2 groups. There were no significant differences in the frequency and severity of complications between the 2 groups. Conclusion HR was significantly superior to RFA in terms of disease-free survival; however, the overall survival was excellent in both groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hae Won Lee
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.,Department of Surgery, Seoul Metropolitan Government - Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jeong Min Lee
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jung-Hwan Yoon
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yoon Jun Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Joong-Won Park
- Liver Cancer Center, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Sang-Jae Park
- Liver Cancer Center, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Seong Hoon Kim
- Liver Cancer Center, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Nam-Joon Yi
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kyung-Suk Suh
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Lee JW, Choi MH, Lee YJ, Ali B, Yoo HM, Song KY, Park CH. Radiofrequency ablation for liver metastases in patients with gastric cancer as an alternative to hepatic resection. BMC Cancer 2017; 17:185. [PMID: 28283024 PMCID: PMC5345207 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-017-3156-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2016] [Accepted: 02/23/2017] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The purpose of this retrospective study was to determine whether RFA could provide an alternative treatment modality for selected patients who are not candidates for hepatic resection. Methods A total of 18 consecutive patients with liver metastases alone from gastric cancer treated with radiofrequency ablation (RFA, n = 11) or hepatic resection (HR, n = 7) at Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, Korea, between January 2000 and September 2014, were enrolled. Results The median OS and DFS in the RFA group were 40.5 ± 22.3 and 10.3 ± 1.07 months, respectively. There was no significant difference between the RFA and HR groups in terms of baseline characteristics except for performance status. Mean survival and DFS times of all patients were 60.1 ± 9.4 and 40.9 ± 10.2 months, respectively. Mean OS times in the HR and RFA groups were 67.5 ± 15.4 and 51.1 ± 9.8 months (P = 0.671), respectively, and the mean DFS time in the HR group (74.1 ± 14.2 months) was longer than that in the RFA group (26.9 ± 9.2 months), but the difference was not significant (P = 0.076). Conclusions In patients who are not candidates for surgical treatment, RFA may be an alternative to HR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jin Won Lee
- Department of Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea.,Present Address: Department of Surgery, Chuncheon Sacred Heart Hospital, College of Medicine, The Hallym University of Korea, Chuncheon, South Korea
| | - Moon Hyung Choi
- Department of Radiology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Young Joon Lee
- Department of Radiology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Bandar Ali
- Department of Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Han Mo Yoo
- Department of Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Kyo Young Song
- Department of Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Cho Hyun Park
- Department of Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea. .,Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 505 Banpo-dong, Seocho-gu, Seoul, 137-701, South Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Mironov O, Jaberi A, Kachura JR. Thermal Ablation versus Surgical Resection for the Treatment of Stage T1 Hepatocellular Carcinoma in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Database Population. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2017; 28:325-333. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2016.11.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2016] [Revised: 11/01/2016] [Accepted: 11/02/2016] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
|
19
|
Kutlu OC, Chan JA, Aloia TA, Chun YS, Kaseb AO, Passot G, Yamashita S, Vauthey JN, Conrad C. Comparative effectiveness of first-line radiofrequency ablation versus surgical resection and transplantation for patients with early hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer 2017; 123:1817-1827. [PMID: 28085184 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.30531] [Citation(s) in RCA: 72] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2016] [Revised: 10/27/2016] [Accepted: 10/31/2016] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Significant controversy exists as to which treatment modality is most effective for small, solitary hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs): radiofrequency ablation (RFA), surgical resection (RXN), or transplantation (TXP). Size cutoff values ranging from 20 to 50 mm have been proposed to achieve complete ablation. The current study compares outcomes between RFA, RXN, and TXP as first-line therapy for patients with HCC tumors measuring as large as 50 mm. METHODS The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database was queried for patients with HCC tumors measuring up to 50 mm who were treated with RFA, RXN, or TXP between 2004 and 2013. Overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) were examined in patients with tumors measuring ≤20 mm, 21 to 30 mm, or 31 to 50 mm. The impact of an increase in tumor size of only 5 mm beyond 30 mm was evaluated by also examining outcomes in patients with tumors measuring 31 to 35 mm. RESULTS Of 1894 cases, patients with HCC tumors measuring ≤20 mm and 21 to 30 mm demonstrated no difference in OS or DSS regardless of whether RFA and RXN was used. RFA was associated with a worse OS and DSS than TXP, whereas there was no difference in OS observed between RXN and TXP. In patients with tumors measuring 31 to 50 mm, OS and DSS were worse with RFA compared with RXN or TXP. Most important, the inferior DSS and OS noted with RFA were observed with only a 5-mm increase in tumors measuring >30 mm. CONCLUSIONS Although RFA frequently is used as first-line treatment of HCC tumors measuring as large as 50 mm, it is associated with worse results than RXN or TXP for tumors measuring >30 mm. To the best of the authors' knowledge, the results of the current study are the first to demonstrate that although RFA is an appropriate option for patients with HCC tumors measuring ≤30 mm, its use for tumors even slightly larger than 30 mm is associated with inferior outcomes. Cancer 2017;123:1817-1827. © 2017 American Cancer Society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Onur C Kutlu
- Department of Surgery, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida.,Division of Surgical Oncology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
| | - Jennifer A Chan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Thomas A Aloia
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Yun S Chun
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Ahmed O Kaseb
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Guillaume Passot
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Suguru Yamashita
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jean-Nicolas Vauthey
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Claudius Conrad
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Qiu J, Peng B, Tang Y, Qian Y, Guo P, Li M, Luo J, Chen B, Tang H, Lu C, Cai M, Ke Z, He W, Zheng Y, Xie D, Li B, Yuan Y. CpG Methylation Signature Predicts Recurrence in Early-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Results From a Multicenter Study. J Clin Oncol 2017; 35:734-742. [PMID: 28068175 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2016.68.2153] [Citation(s) in RCA: 119] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (E-HCC) is being diagnosed increasingly, and in one half of diagnosed patients, recurrence will develop. Thus, it is urgent to identify recurrence-related markers. We investigated the effectiveness of CpG methylation in predicting recurrence for patients with E-HCCs. Patients and Methods In total, 576 patients with E-HCC from four independent centers were sorted by three phases. In the discovery phase, 66 tumor samples were analyzed using the Illumina Methylation 450k Beadchip. Two algorithms, Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selector Operation and Support Vector Machine-Recursive Feature Elimination, were used to select significant CpGs. In the training phase, penalized Cox regression was used to further narrow CpGs into 140 samples. In the validation phase, candidate CpGs were validated using an internal cohort (n = 141) and two external cohorts (n = 191 and n =104). Results After combining the 46 CpGs selected by the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selector Operation and the Support Vector Machine-Recursive Feature Elimination algorithms, three CpGs corresponding to SCAN domain containing 3, Src homology 3-domain growth factor receptor-bound 2-like interacting protein 1, and peptidase inhibitor 3 were highlighted as candidate predictors in the training phase. On the basis of the three CpGs, a methylation signature for E-HCC (MSEH) was developed to classify patients into high- and low-risk recurrence groups in the training cohort ( P < .001). The performance of MSEH was validated in the internal cohort ( P < .001) and in the two external cohorts ( P < .001; P = .002). Furthermore, a nomogram comprising MSEH, tumor differentiation, cirrhosis, hepatitis B virus surface antigen, and antivirus therapy was generated to predict the 5-year recurrence-free survival in the training cohort, and it performed well in the three validation cohorts (concordance index: 0.725, 0.697, and 0.693, respectively). Conclusion MSEH, a three-CpG-based signature, is useful in predicting recurrence for patients with E-HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiliang Qiu
- Jiliang Qiu, Muyan Cai, Wei He, Yun Zheng, Dan Xie, Binkui Li, and Yunfei Yuan, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center; Baogang Peng, Junhang Luo, Bin Chen, and Zunfu Ke, First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University; Pi Guo and Mengfeng Li, Sun Yat-sen University; Jiliang Qiu, Muyan Cai, Wei He, Yun Zheng, Dan Xie, Binkui Li, and Yunfei Yuan, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China and Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine; Jiliang Qiu, Yunqiang Tang, and Hui Tang, Guangzhou Medical University Cancer Center, Guangzhou; and Yeben Qian and Canliang Lu, First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
| | - Baogang Peng
- Jiliang Qiu, Muyan Cai, Wei He, Yun Zheng, Dan Xie, Binkui Li, and Yunfei Yuan, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center; Baogang Peng, Junhang Luo, Bin Chen, and Zunfu Ke, First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University; Pi Guo and Mengfeng Li, Sun Yat-sen University; Jiliang Qiu, Muyan Cai, Wei He, Yun Zheng, Dan Xie, Binkui Li, and Yunfei Yuan, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China and Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine; Jiliang Qiu, Yunqiang Tang, and Hui Tang, Guangzhou Medical University Cancer Center, Guangzhou; and Yeben Qian and Canliang Lu, First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
| | - Yunqiang Tang
- Jiliang Qiu, Muyan Cai, Wei He, Yun Zheng, Dan Xie, Binkui Li, and Yunfei Yuan, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center; Baogang Peng, Junhang Luo, Bin Chen, and Zunfu Ke, First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University; Pi Guo and Mengfeng Li, Sun Yat-sen University; Jiliang Qiu, Muyan Cai, Wei He, Yun Zheng, Dan Xie, Binkui Li, and Yunfei Yuan, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China and Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine; Jiliang Qiu, Yunqiang Tang, and Hui Tang, Guangzhou Medical University Cancer Center, Guangzhou; and Yeben Qian and Canliang Lu, First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
| | - Yeben Qian
- Jiliang Qiu, Muyan Cai, Wei He, Yun Zheng, Dan Xie, Binkui Li, and Yunfei Yuan, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center; Baogang Peng, Junhang Luo, Bin Chen, and Zunfu Ke, First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University; Pi Guo and Mengfeng Li, Sun Yat-sen University; Jiliang Qiu, Muyan Cai, Wei He, Yun Zheng, Dan Xie, Binkui Li, and Yunfei Yuan, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China and Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine; Jiliang Qiu, Yunqiang Tang, and Hui Tang, Guangzhou Medical University Cancer Center, Guangzhou; and Yeben Qian and Canliang Lu, First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
| | - Pi Guo
- Jiliang Qiu, Muyan Cai, Wei He, Yun Zheng, Dan Xie, Binkui Li, and Yunfei Yuan, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center; Baogang Peng, Junhang Luo, Bin Chen, and Zunfu Ke, First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University; Pi Guo and Mengfeng Li, Sun Yat-sen University; Jiliang Qiu, Muyan Cai, Wei He, Yun Zheng, Dan Xie, Binkui Li, and Yunfei Yuan, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China and Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine; Jiliang Qiu, Yunqiang Tang, and Hui Tang, Guangzhou Medical University Cancer Center, Guangzhou; and Yeben Qian and Canliang Lu, First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
| | - Mengfeng Li
- Jiliang Qiu, Muyan Cai, Wei He, Yun Zheng, Dan Xie, Binkui Li, and Yunfei Yuan, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center; Baogang Peng, Junhang Luo, Bin Chen, and Zunfu Ke, First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University; Pi Guo and Mengfeng Li, Sun Yat-sen University; Jiliang Qiu, Muyan Cai, Wei He, Yun Zheng, Dan Xie, Binkui Li, and Yunfei Yuan, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China and Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine; Jiliang Qiu, Yunqiang Tang, and Hui Tang, Guangzhou Medical University Cancer Center, Guangzhou; and Yeben Qian and Canliang Lu, First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
| | - Junhang Luo
- Jiliang Qiu, Muyan Cai, Wei He, Yun Zheng, Dan Xie, Binkui Li, and Yunfei Yuan, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center; Baogang Peng, Junhang Luo, Bin Chen, and Zunfu Ke, First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University; Pi Guo and Mengfeng Li, Sun Yat-sen University; Jiliang Qiu, Muyan Cai, Wei He, Yun Zheng, Dan Xie, Binkui Li, and Yunfei Yuan, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China and Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine; Jiliang Qiu, Yunqiang Tang, and Hui Tang, Guangzhou Medical University Cancer Center, Guangzhou; and Yeben Qian and Canliang Lu, First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
| | - Bin Chen
- Jiliang Qiu, Muyan Cai, Wei He, Yun Zheng, Dan Xie, Binkui Li, and Yunfei Yuan, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center; Baogang Peng, Junhang Luo, Bin Chen, and Zunfu Ke, First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University; Pi Guo and Mengfeng Li, Sun Yat-sen University; Jiliang Qiu, Muyan Cai, Wei He, Yun Zheng, Dan Xie, Binkui Li, and Yunfei Yuan, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China and Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine; Jiliang Qiu, Yunqiang Tang, and Hui Tang, Guangzhou Medical University Cancer Center, Guangzhou; and Yeben Qian and Canliang Lu, First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
| | - Hui Tang
- Jiliang Qiu, Muyan Cai, Wei He, Yun Zheng, Dan Xie, Binkui Li, and Yunfei Yuan, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center; Baogang Peng, Junhang Luo, Bin Chen, and Zunfu Ke, First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University; Pi Guo and Mengfeng Li, Sun Yat-sen University; Jiliang Qiu, Muyan Cai, Wei He, Yun Zheng, Dan Xie, Binkui Li, and Yunfei Yuan, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China and Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine; Jiliang Qiu, Yunqiang Tang, and Hui Tang, Guangzhou Medical University Cancer Center, Guangzhou; and Yeben Qian and Canliang Lu, First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
| | - Canliang Lu
- Jiliang Qiu, Muyan Cai, Wei He, Yun Zheng, Dan Xie, Binkui Li, and Yunfei Yuan, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center; Baogang Peng, Junhang Luo, Bin Chen, and Zunfu Ke, First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University; Pi Guo and Mengfeng Li, Sun Yat-sen University; Jiliang Qiu, Muyan Cai, Wei He, Yun Zheng, Dan Xie, Binkui Li, and Yunfei Yuan, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China and Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine; Jiliang Qiu, Yunqiang Tang, and Hui Tang, Guangzhou Medical University Cancer Center, Guangzhou; and Yeben Qian and Canliang Lu, First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
| | - Muyan Cai
- Jiliang Qiu, Muyan Cai, Wei He, Yun Zheng, Dan Xie, Binkui Li, and Yunfei Yuan, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center; Baogang Peng, Junhang Luo, Bin Chen, and Zunfu Ke, First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University; Pi Guo and Mengfeng Li, Sun Yat-sen University; Jiliang Qiu, Muyan Cai, Wei He, Yun Zheng, Dan Xie, Binkui Li, and Yunfei Yuan, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China and Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine; Jiliang Qiu, Yunqiang Tang, and Hui Tang, Guangzhou Medical University Cancer Center, Guangzhou; and Yeben Qian and Canliang Lu, First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
| | - Zunfu Ke
- Jiliang Qiu, Muyan Cai, Wei He, Yun Zheng, Dan Xie, Binkui Li, and Yunfei Yuan, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center; Baogang Peng, Junhang Luo, Bin Chen, and Zunfu Ke, First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University; Pi Guo and Mengfeng Li, Sun Yat-sen University; Jiliang Qiu, Muyan Cai, Wei He, Yun Zheng, Dan Xie, Binkui Li, and Yunfei Yuan, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China and Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine; Jiliang Qiu, Yunqiang Tang, and Hui Tang, Guangzhou Medical University Cancer Center, Guangzhou; and Yeben Qian and Canliang Lu, First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
| | - Wei He
- Jiliang Qiu, Muyan Cai, Wei He, Yun Zheng, Dan Xie, Binkui Li, and Yunfei Yuan, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center; Baogang Peng, Junhang Luo, Bin Chen, and Zunfu Ke, First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University; Pi Guo and Mengfeng Li, Sun Yat-sen University; Jiliang Qiu, Muyan Cai, Wei He, Yun Zheng, Dan Xie, Binkui Li, and Yunfei Yuan, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China and Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine; Jiliang Qiu, Yunqiang Tang, and Hui Tang, Guangzhou Medical University Cancer Center, Guangzhou; and Yeben Qian and Canliang Lu, First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
| | - Yun Zheng
- Jiliang Qiu, Muyan Cai, Wei He, Yun Zheng, Dan Xie, Binkui Li, and Yunfei Yuan, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center; Baogang Peng, Junhang Luo, Bin Chen, and Zunfu Ke, First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University; Pi Guo and Mengfeng Li, Sun Yat-sen University; Jiliang Qiu, Muyan Cai, Wei He, Yun Zheng, Dan Xie, Binkui Li, and Yunfei Yuan, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China and Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine; Jiliang Qiu, Yunqiang Tang, and Hui Tang, Guangzhou Medical University Cancer Center, Guangzhou; and Yeben Qian and Canliang Lu, First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
| | - Dan Xie
- Jiliang Qiu, Muyan Cai, Wei He, Yun Zheng, Dan Xie, Binkui Li, and Yunfei Yuan, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center; Baogang Peng, Junhang Luo, Bin Chen, and Zunfu Ke, First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University; Pi Guo and Mengfeng Li, Sun Yat-sen University; Jiliang Qiu, Muyan Cai, Wei He, Yun Zheng, Dan Xie, Binkui Li, and Yunfei Yuan, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China and Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine; Jiliang Qiu, Yunqiang Tang, and Hui Tang, Guangzhou Medical University Cancer Center, Guangzhou; and Yeben Qian and Canliang Lu, First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
| | - Binkui Li
- Jiliang Qiu, Muyan Cai, Wei He, Yun Zheng, Dan Xie, Binkui Li, and Yunfei Yuan, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center; Baogang Peng, Junhang Luo, Bin Chen, and Zunfu Ke, First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University; Pi Guo and Mengfeng Li, Sun Yat-sen University; Jiliang Qiu, Muyan Cai, Wei He, Yun Zheng, Dan Xie, Binkui Li, and Yunfei Yuan, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China and Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine; Jiliang Qiu, Yunqiang Tang, and Hui Tang, Guangzhou Medical University Cancer Center, Guangzhou; and Yeben Qian and Canliang Lu, First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
| | - Yunfei Yuan
- Jiliang Qiu, Muyan Cai, Wei He, Yun Zheng, Dan Xie, Binkui Li, and Yunfei Yuan, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center; Baogang Peng, Junhang Luo, Bin Chen, and Zunfu Ke, First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University; Pi Guo and Mengfeng Li, Sun Yat-sen University; Jiliang Qiu, Muyan Cai, Wei He, Yun Zheng, Dan Xie, Binkui Li, and Yunfei Yuan, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China and Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine; Jiliang Qiu, Yunqiang Tang, and Hui Tang, Guangzhou Medical University Cancer Center, Guangzhou; and Yeben Qian and Canliang Lu, First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Qi X, Zhao Y, Li H, Guo X, Han G. Management of hepatocellular carcinoma: an overview of major findings from meta-analyses. Oncotarget 2016; 7:34703-34751. [PMID: 27167195 PMCID: PMC5085185 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.9157] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2016] [Accepted: 04/11/2016] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
This paper aims to systematically review the major findings from meta-analyses comparing different treatment options for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). A total of 153 relevant papers were searched via the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane library databases. They were classified according to the mainstay treatment modalities (i.e., liver transplantation, surgical resection, radiofrequency ablation, transarterial embolization or chemoembolization, sorafenib, and others). The primary outcome data, such as overall survival, diseases-free survival or recurrence-free survival, progression-free survival, and safety, were summarized. The recommendations and uncertainties regarding the treatment of HCC were also proposed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xingshun Qi
- Department of Gastroenterology and Meta-analysis Study Interest Group, General Hospital of Shenyang Military Area, Shenyang, 110840 China
- Department of Liver Diseases and Digestive Interventional Radiology, Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, 710032 China
| | - Yan Zhao
- Department of Liver Diseases and Digestive Interventional Radiology, Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, 710032 China
- Department of Gastroenterology, First Affiliated Hospital of the Medical College, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710000 China
| | - Hongyu Li
- Department of Gastroenterology and Meta-analysis Study Interest Group, General Hospital of Shenyang Military Area, Shenyang, 110840 China
| | - Xiaozhong Guo
- Department of Gastroenterology and Meta-analysis Study Interest Group, General Hospital of Shenyang Military Area, Shenyang, 110840 China
| | - Guohong Han
- Department of Liver Diseases and Digestive Interventional Radiology, Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, 710032 China
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Mazzanti R, Arena U, Tassi R. Hepatocellular carcinoma: Where are we? World J Exp Med 2016; 6:21-36. [PMID: 26929917 PMCID: PMC4759352 DOI: 10.5493/wjem.v6.i1.21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 93] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2015] [Revised: 12/14/2015] [Accepted: 01/05/2016] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the second cause of death due to malignancy in the world, following lung cancer. The geographic distribution of this disease accompanies its principal risk factors: Chronic hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus infection, alcoholism, aflatoxin B1 intoxication, liver cirrhosis, and some genetic attributes. Recently, type II diabetes has been shown to be a risk factor for HCC together with obesity and metabolic syndrome. Although the risk factors are quite well known and it is possible to diagnose HCC when the tumor is less than 1 cm diameter, it remains elusive at the beginning and treatment is often unsuccessful. Liver transplantation is thus far considered the best treatment for HCC as it cures HCC and the underlying liver disease. Using the Milan criteria, overall survival after liver transplantation for HCC is about 70% after 5 years. Many attempts have been made to go beyond the Milan Criteria and according to recent works reasonably good results have been achieved by using a histochemical marker such as cytokeratine 19 and the so-called "up to seven criteria" to divide patients into categories according to their risk of relapse. In addition to liver transplantation other therapies have been proposed such as resection, tumor ablation by different means, embolization and chemotherapy. An important step in the treatment of advanced HCC has been the introduction of sorafenib, the first oral, systemic drug that has provided significant improvement in survival. Treatment of HCC patients must be multidisciplinary and by using the different approaches discussed in this review it is possible to offer prolonged survival and quite good and sometimes even excellent quality of life to many patients.
Collapse
|
23
|
Ueno M, Hayami S, Shigekawa Y, Kawai M, Hirono S, Okada KI, Tamai H, Shingaki N, Mori Y, Ichinose M, Yamaue H. Prognostic impact of surgery and radiofrequency ablation on single nodular HCC ⩽5 cm: Cohort study based on serum HCC markers. J Hepatol 2015. [PMID: 26212030 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2015.07.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Serological markers of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) indicate its invasiveness. We aimed to investigate whether the prognostic impact of surgical resection (SR) and radiofrequency thermal ablation (RFA) on patients with single nodular HCC ⩽5cm were different regarding positive conditions of the following three HCC markers: alpha-fetoprotein (AFP); lens culinaris agglutinin-reactive fraction of AFP; and des-γ-carboxy prothrombin. METHODS This study reviewed 296 patients with single nodular HCC ⩽5cm with Child-Pugh grade A between 2001 and 2011 (SR, n=136; RFA, n=160). Based on positive conditions of previous HCC markers (defined as non-positive, single-positive, double-positive, and triple-positive), overall survival (OS) and prognostic factors were analyzed. RESULTS Five-year OS rates of SR and RFA among all patients were 70.1% and 69.8%, respectively (p=0.14). However, when stratified by the positive conditions of three HCC markers, their rates of non-, single-, double-, and triple-positive patients were 60.6%, 78.2%, 54.2%, and 75.9% in the SR group, whereas rates were 83.3%, 75.7%, 62.2%, and 47.6% in the RFA group (p values between SR and RFA of each tumor marker condition were 0.45, 0.10, 0.77, and <0.01, respectively). Multivariate analyses showed that RFA itself became an independent prognostic factor in the triple-positive group, with an odds ratio of 1.78 (95% confidence interval, 1.16-2.72). CONCLUSIONS Positive conditions of three HCC markers differently influenced survival rates of those who underwent SR and RFA when treating single nodular HCC ⩽5cm. RFA itself became an independent prognostic risk when all three HCC markers were positive. Preoperative evaluation of multiple HCC markers might become an index for selecting treatment modalities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masaki Ueno
- Second Department of Surgery, Wakayama Medical University, 811-1 Kimiidera, Wakayama 641-8510, Japan
| | - Shinya Hayami
- Second Department of Surgery, Wakayama Medical University, 811-1 Kimiidera, Wakayama 641-8510, Japan
| | - Yoshinobu Shigekawa
- Second Department of Surgery, Wakayama Medical University, 811-1 Kimiidera, Wakayama 641-8510, Japan
| | - Manabu Kawai
- Second Department of Surgery, Wakayama Medical University, 811-1 Kimiidera, Wakayama 641-8510, Japan
| | - Seiko Hirono
- Second Department of Surgery, Wakayama Medical University, 811-1 Kimiidera, Wakayama 641-8510, Japan
| | - Ken-ichi Okada
- Second Department of Surgery, Wakayama Medical University, 811-1 Kimiidera, Wakayama 641-8510, Japan
| | - Hideyuki Tamai
- Second Department of Internal Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, 811-1 Kimiidera, Wakayama 641-8510, Japan
| | - Naoki Shingaki
- Second Department of Internal Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, 811-1 Kimiidera, Wakayama 641-8510, Japan
| | - Yoshiyuki Mori
- Second Department of Internal Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, 811-1 Kimiidera, Wakayama 641-8510, Japan
| | - Masao Ichinose
- Second Department of Internal Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, 811-1 Kimiidera, Wakayama 641-8510, Japan
| | - Hiroki Yamaue
- Second Department of Surgery, Wakayama Medical University, 811-1 Kimiidera, Wakayama 641-8510, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Spolverato G, Vitale A, Ejaz A, Kim Y, Maithel SK, Cosgrove DP, Pawlik TM. The relative net health benefit of liver resection, ablation, and transplantation for early hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Surg 2015; 39:1474-84. [PMID: 25665675 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-015-2987-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There are no conclusive cost-effectiveness studies measuring the efficacy of salvage LT after liver resection (LR) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in patients with early hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and compensated cirrhosis. The aim of the present study is to compare liver transplantation (LT) versus locoregional therapy plus salvage LT (to treat tumor recurrence) in patients with early HCC and compensated cirrhosis. METHODS Reference case: 55-year old male with HCC within Milan criteria and Child-Pugh A cirrhosis. The analysis was performed in two geographical cost settings: USA and Italy. Survival benefit measured in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), costs (C) in US$, incremental cost-effectiveness, willingness to pay, and net health benefit (NHB). RESULTS In the base-case analysis, NHB of LT vs. LR and RFA was -1.7 and -1.3 years for single tumor ≤3 cm, -1.2 and -0.7 for single nodules measuring 3.1-5 cm and -0.7 and -0.7 for multi-nodular tumor ≤3 cm in Italy. In USA, NHB of LT versus LR and RFA were -1.2 and -0.8 years for single tumor ≤3 cm, -0.9 and -0.5 for single nodules measuring 3.1-5 cm, and -0.5 and -0.4 for multi-nodular tumor ≤ 3 cm. On the Monte Carlo simulation, only young patients with multi-nodular HCC and short waiting list time had a positive NHB. Salvage LT proved to be an ineffective cost strategy after RFA or LR. CONCLUSION In patients with HCC within Milan criteria and Child-Pugh A cirrhosis, LR and RFA were more cost-effective than LT. Salvage LT was not cost-effective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gaya Spolverato
- Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 N. Wolfe Street, Blalock 688, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
|
26
|
High local recurrence of early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma after percutaneous thermal ablation in routine clinical practice. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2015; 27:349-54. [PMID: 25563141 DOI: 10.1097/meg.0000000000000270] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM The risk of local tumour progression (LTP) and factors predicting LTP following percutaneous thermal ablation (PTA) of early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have not been well studied in non-trial settings and may be underestimated. We aimed to assess these outcomes in a multicentre study. PATIENTS AND METHODS This was a retrospective review of consecutive patients with early-stage HCC treated with a curative intent across three tertiary Australian centres between 2006 and 2012 with either radiofrequency ablation or microwave ablation. The primary endpoint was LTP and multivariate analysis was carried out to identify the independent predictors of LTP. RESULTS In total 145 HCC nodules were treated in 126 patients (78% men, mean±SD age 62±10 years) with a mean±SD follow-up of 13.5±13 months. Local recurrence was observed in 23.4% (34/145). Mean±SD LTP-free survival was 46.9±3.6 months. For HCC nodules 2 cm or less, local recurrence rates were lower (15.9%), with a mean±SD LTP-free survival of 48.8±4.2 months. Poorly differentiated HCC [hazard ratio (95% confidence interval)=4.8 (1.1-20.4), P=0.032] and pretreatment α-fetoprotein more than 50 kIU/l [8.2 (1.7-39.0), P=0.008] were independent predictors of LTP. LTP rates were not significantly different between the radiofrequency ablation and the microwave ablation groups (22.8 vs. 25.8%, P=0.7). There were six (4.8%) procedure-related adverse events, but no deaths. CONCLUSION Local recurrence after PTA for early-stage HCC is high in routine clinical practice. Poorly differentiated HCC and pretreatment α-fetoprotein are important, independent predictors of LTP. Further well-designed randomized controlled trials with larger sample sizes using adjuvant therapies in combination with PTA to decrease LTP rates are warranted.
Collapse
|
27
|
Pang TCY, Lam VWT. Surgical management of hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Hepatol 2015; 7:245-252. [PMID: 25729479 PMCID: PMC4342606 DOI: 10.4254/wjh.v7.i2.245] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2014] [Revised: 10/21/2014] [Accepted: 11/19/2014] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the second most common cause of death from cancer worldwide. Standard potentially curative treatments are either resection or transplantation. The aim of this paper is to provide an overview of the surgical management of HCC, as well as highlight current issues in hepatic resection and transplantation. In summary, due to the relationship between HCC and chronic liver disease, the management of HCC depends both on tumour-related and hepatic function-related considerations. As such, HCC is currently managed largely through non-surgical means as the criteria, in relation to the above considerations, for surgical management is still largely restrictive. For early stage tumours, both resection and transplantation offer fairly good survival outcomes (5 years overall survival of around 50%). Selection therefore would depend on the level of hepatic function derangement, organ availability and local expertise. Patients with intermediate stage cancers have limited options, with resection being the only potential for cure. Otherwise, locoregional therapy with transarterial chemoembolization or radiofrequency ablation are viable options. Current issues in resection and transplantation are also briefly discussed such as laparoscopic resection, ablation vs resection, anatomical vs non-anatomical resection, transplantation vs resection, living donor liver transplantation and salvage liver transplantation.
Collapse
|
28
|
Abi-Jaoudeh N, Venkatesan AM, Van der Sterren W, Radaelli A, Carelsen B, Wood BJ. Clinical experience with cone-beam CT navigation for tumor ablation. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2015; 26:214-9. [PMID: 25645409 PMCID: PMC4315943 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2014.10.049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2014] [Revised: 10/02/2014] [Accepted: 10/30/2014] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To describe clinical use and potential benefits of cone-beam computed tomography (CT) navigation to perform image-guided percutaneous tumor ablation. MATERIALS AND METHODS All ablations performed between February 2011 and February 2013 using cone-beam CT navigation were included. There were 16 patients who underwent 20 ablations for 29 lesions. Cone-beam CT ablation planning capabilities include multimodality image fusion and tumor segmentation for visualization, depiction of the predicted ablation zones for intraprocedural planning, and segmentation of the ablated area for immediate verification after treatment. Number and purpose of cone-beam CT scans were examined. The initial ablation plan, defined as number of probes and duration of energy delivery, was recorded for the 20 of the 29 lesions ablated. Technical success and local recurrences were recorded. Primary and secondary effectiveness rates were calculated. RESULTS Image fusion was used for 16 lesions, and intraprocedural ultrasound was used for 4 lesions. Of the 20 ablations, where the ablation plans were recorded, there was no deviation from the plan in 14 ablations. In the remaining 6 ablations, iterative planning was needed for complete tumor coverage. An average of 8.7 cone-beam CT scans ± 3.2 were performed per procedure, including 1.3 ± 0.5 for tumor segmentation and planning, 1.7 ± 0.7 for probe position confirmation, and 3.9 ± 2 to ensure complete coverage. Mean follow-up time was 18.6 months ± 6.5. Ablations for 28 of 29 lesions were technically successful (96.5%). Of ablations performed with curative intent, technical effectiveness at 1 month was 25 of 26 lesions (96.1%) and 22 of 26 lesions (84.6%) at last follow-up. Local tumor progression was observed in 11.5% (3 of 26 lesions). CONCLUSIONS Cone-beam CT navigation may add information to assist and improve ablation guidance and monitoring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadine Abi-Jaoudeh
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Room 1C365 Building 10 MSC 1182, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20892.
| | - Aradhana M Venkatesan
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Room 1C365 Building 10 MSC 1182, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20892
| | | | | | - Bart Carelsen
- iXR Division, Philips Healthcare, Best, The Netherlands
| | - Bradford J Wood
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Room 1C365 Building 10 MSC 1182, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20892
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Liver Cirrhosis: Surgical Resection versus Transarterial Chemoembolization-A Meta-Analysis. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2015; 2015:696120. [PMID: 25642245 PMCID: PMC4302354 DOI: 10.1155/2015/696120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2014] [Revised: 12/08/2014] [Accepted: 12/09/2014] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
We compare the value of TACE to liver resection for patients with BCLC stage A and B HCC. For patients with HCC in cirrhosis LT is the treatment of choice. TACE represents the current standard for unresectable BCLC stage B patients not eligible for LT. Recently liver resection for HCC and significant cirrhosis has become increasingly popular. A systematic search of the literature and meta-analysis was conducted to identify studies, reporting short- and long-term results of hepatic resection versus TACE for HCC treatment. The data were analyzed regarding the odds for 30-day mortality and hazard ratio for overall-survival. 12 studies comparing short- and long-term outcome of HR versus TACE for HCC were identified. Peri-interventional mortality and overall survival were investigated. Peri-interventional mortality was higher for surgical resection (n.s.), and overall-survival was significantly better for surgically treated patients at one year (P = 0.002) and 3 years (P ≤ 0.00001). The hazard ratio of overall-survival for all twelve studies was 0.70 (P = 0.0001) and significantly in favor of surgical treatment. Although large RCTs are missing and the available data are limited and not homogeneous a reappraisal of the current treatment guidelines should be considered based on the superior long-term outcome for surgically treated patients.
Collapse
|
30
|
Xu Q, Kobayashi S, Ye X, Meng X. Comparison of hepatic resection and radiofrequency ablation for small hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis of 16,103 patients. Sci Rep 2014; 4:7252. [PMID: 25429732 PMCID: PMC4246212 DOI: 10.1038/srep07252] [Citation(s) in RCA: 81] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2014] [Accepted: 11/04/2014] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the therapeutic effects of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and surgical hepatic resection (HR) in the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Thirty-one studies were included in the analysis. A total of 16,103 patients were involved: 8,252 treated with RFA and 7,851 with HR. Compared to the RFA group, the 3, 5-year overall and disease-free survival rates in the HR group were significantly higher. On the other hand, complications were significantly fewer and hospital-stay was significantly shorter in the RFA group than in the HR group. In subgroup analyses, the overall and disease-free survival in the HR group were also significantly higher than those in the RFA group for HCCs ≤ 3 cm, whereas there were no significant differences between the two groups for HCCs ≤ 2 cm. Our analysis showed that although HR was associated with higher complication rate and longer hospital-stay, HR is proposed as the first-line treatment rather than RFA for patients with HCCs larger than 2 cm. For patients with HCCs of 2 cm or less, RFA may be an alternative to HR because of their comparable long-term efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qinghua Xu
- 1] Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center - Institut Mérieux Laboratory, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China [2] bioMérieux (Shanghai) Co. Ltd., Shanghai, China
| | | | - Xun Ye
- 1] Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center - Institut Mérieux Laboratory, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China [2] bioMérieux (Shanghai) Co. Ltd., Shanghai, China
| | - Xia Meng
- 1] Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center - Institut Mérieux Laboratory, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China [2] bioMérieux (Shanghai) Co. Ltd., Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Braat AJAT, Huijbregts JE, Molenaar IQ, Borel Rinkes IHM, van den Bosch MAAJ, Lam MGEH. Hepatic radioembolization as a bridge to liver surgery. Front Oncol 2014; 4:199. [PMID: 25126539 PMCID: PMC4115667 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2014.00199] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2014] [Accepted: 07/15/2014] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Treatment of oncologic disease has improved significantly in the last decades and in the future a vast majority of cancer types will continue to increase worldwide. As a result, many patients are confronted with primary liver cancers or metastatic liver disease. Surgery in liver malignancies has steeply improved and curative resections are applicable in wider settings, leading to a prolonged survival. Simultaneously, radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and liver transplantation (LTx) have been applied more commonly in oncologic settings with improving results. To minimize adverse events in treatments of liver malignancies, locoregional minimal invasive treatments have made their appearance in this field, in which radioembolization (RE) has shown promising results in recent years with few adverse events and high response rates. We discuss several other applications of RE for oncologic patients, other than its use in the palliative setting, whether or not combined with other treatments. This review is focused on the role of RE in acquiring patient eligibility for radical treatments, like surgery, RFA, and LTx. Inducing significant tumor reduction can downstage patients for resection or, through attaining stable disease, patients can stay on the LTx waiting list. Hereby, RE could make a difference between curative of palliative intent in oncologic patient management. Prior to surgery, the future remnant liver volume might be inadequate in some patients. In these patients, forming an adequate liver reserve through RE leads to prolonged survival without risking post-operative liver failure and minimizing tumor progression while inducing hypertrophy. In order to optimize results, developments in procedures surrounding RE are equally important. Predicting the remaining liver function after radical treatment and finding the right balance between maximum tumor irradiation and minimizing the chance of inducing radiation-related complications are still challenges.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arthur J A T Braat
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht , Utrecht , Netherlands
| | - Julia E Huijbregts
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht , Utrecht , Netherlands
| | - I Quintus Molenaar
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht , Utrecht , Netherlands
| | | | | | - Marnix G E H Lam
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht , Utrecht , Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Shirabe K, Toshima T, Kimura K, Yamashita Y, Ikeda T, Ikegami T, Yoshizumi T, Abe K, Aishima S, Maehara Y. New scoring system for prediction of microvascular invasion in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Liver Int 2014; 34:937-41. [PMID: 24393295 DOI: 10.1111/liv.12459] [Citation(s) in RCA: 69] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2013] [Accepted: 12/24/2013] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS The microvascular invasion of cancer cells (mvi) is a good prognostic factor after hepatic resection (HR) and liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study aimed to predict mvi in patients with HCC. METHODS We studied 63 hepatectomized patients with HCC who had HCC without any extrahepatic metastases and vascular invasion, which were detected during preoperative evaluation. The preoperative clinicopathological data of these patients were analysed to predict presence of mvi. A scoring system was designed using significant risk factors. This system was applied to another series of 34 patients with HCC who underwent HR, and was evaluated for validation. RESULTS Tumour size, serum des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin (DCP) levels and the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) on 2-[18F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography were independent clinical predictors for mvi after multivariate analyses. Tumour size, serum DCP levels, and values of SUVmax were used to plot a receiver operating characteristic curve for predicting mvi. Areas under the curve of tumour size, serum DCP levels and SUV max values, were 0.8652, 0.8027 and 0.7848 respectively. Maximal sensitivity and specificity were obtained when the tumour size was 3.6 cm, SUVmax was 4.2, and the serum DCP level was 101 mAU/ml. A scoring system was designed using these three variables. The sensitivity and specificity of our scoring system were 100% and 90.9%, respectively, in the validation test. CONCLUSION Our scoring system for mvi, consisting of tumour size, serum DCP levels, and SUV max, provides a precise prediction of mvi.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ken Shirabe
- Department of Surgery and Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Nemunaitis J, Barve M, Orr D, Kuhn J, Magee M, Lamont J, Bedell C, Wallraven G, Pappen BO, Roth A, Horvath S, Nemunaitis D, Kumar P, Maples PB, Senzer N. Summary of bi-shRNA/GM-CSF augmented autologous tumor cell immunotherapy (FANG™) in advanced cancer of the liver. Oncology 2014; 87:21-29. [PMID: 24968881 DOI: 10.1159/000360993] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2014] [Accepted: 02/26/2014] [Indexed: 01/04/2025]
Abstract
Therapies for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are limited. We carried out a phase I trial of a novel autologous whole-cell tumor cell immunotherapy (FANG™), which incorporates a dual granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) expressive/bifunctional small hairpin RNA interference (bi-shRNAi) vector. The bi-shRNAi DNA targets furin, which is a proconvertase of transforming growth factors beta (TGFβ) 1 and 2. Safety, mechanism, immunoeffectiveness, and suggested benefit were previously shown [Senzer et al.: Mol Ther 2012;20:679-689; Senzer et al.: J Vaccines Vaccin 2013;4:209]. We now provide further follow-up of a subset of 8 HCC patients. FANG manufacturing was successful in 7 of 8 attempts (one failure due to insufficient cell yield). Median GM-CSF expression was 144 pg/10(6) cells, TGFβ1 knockdown was 100%, and TGFβ2 knockdown was 93% of the vector-transported cells. Five patients were vaccinated (1 or 2.5×10(7) cells/intradermal injection, 6-11 vaccinations). No FANG toxicity was observed. Three of these patients demonstrated evidence of an immune response to the autologous tumor cell sample. Long-term follow-up demonstrated survival of 319, 729, 784, 931+, and 1,043+ days of the FANG-treated patients. In conclusion, evidence supports further assessment of the FANG immunotherapy in HCC.
Collapse
|
34
|
Reataza M, Imagawa DK. Advances in managing hepatocellular carcinoma. Front Med 2014; 8:175-89. [PMID: 24810646 DOI: 10.1007/s11684-014-0332-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/01/2014] [Accepted: 02/28/2014] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Multiple modalities for treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma are available, depending on tumor size and number. Surgical resection remains the gold standard, so long as the residual liver function reserve is sufficient. In patients with advanced cirrhosis, liver transplantation is the preferred option, as these patients may not have adequate hepatic reserve after resection. Salvage liver transplantation has also become an option for a select few patients who recur after surgical resection. Ablative techniques have been used for palliation as well as to either completely destroy the tumor, act as an adjunct to resection, or downstage the tumor to meet Milan criteria such that a patient may be a candidate for liver transplantation. Radiofrequency ablation, microwave ablation, chemoembolization, radioembolization, and irreversible electroporation have all been used in this capacity. Currently, sorafenib is the only US Food and Drug Administration-approved chemotherapeutic for hepatocellular carcinoma. The efficacy of sorafenib, in combination with other agents, transarterial chemoembolization, and surgical resection is currently being investigated. Sunitinib and brivanib, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, have failed as potential first- or second-line options for chemotherapy. Bevacizumab in combination with erlotinib is also currently being studied. Final analysis for ramucirumab and axitinib are pending. Tivantinib, a selective mesenchymal-epithelial transition factor (MET) inhibitor, is also undergoing clinical trials for efficacy in MET-high tumors. This review serves to emphasize the current and new technologies emerging in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marielle Reataza
- Irvine Medical Center, University of California, Orange, CA, 92868, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|