Efficacy and safety of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation versus surgical resection for small hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis of 23 studies

Localized hepatocellular carcinoma: Is liver-directed therapy alone as efficacious as surgical resection?

OBJECTIVE

Studies of the efficacy of nonsurgical methods of liver-directed therapy (percutaneous microwave or radiofrequency ablation, transarterial bland embolization, chemoembolization, and/or radioembolization) in the treatment of hepatocellular cancer lack contemporaneous comparative surgical cohorts. The role of these methods of liver-directed therapy as destination treatment in hepatocellular cancer is not well defined.

METHODS

We queried our institutional registry for patients undergoing resection or liver-directed therapy alone for clinical stage I to IVa hepatocellular cancer between 2012 and 2022. Multivariable regression and Cox modeling were used to identify factors associated with resection and all-cause mortality. Patients undergoing resection were 1:3 propensity matched for age, Mayo End-Stage Liver Disease score and clinical stage to those undergoing liver-directed therapy. Kaplan-Meier methods were used to compare 5-year disease-specific and overall survival for matched cohorts.

RESULTS

Three hundred thirty patients met inclusion criteria; 45 underwent resection, and 285 liver-directed therapy. On multivariable regression, factors associated with resection included age (adjusted odds ratio: 0.96, P = .007) and Mayo End-Stage Liver Disease score (adjusted odds ratio: 0.92, P = .033). On Cox modeling, factors associated with mortality-risk included Mayo End-Stage Liver Disease score (adjusted hazards ratio: 1.03, P = .01), advanced clinical stage (stage III adjusted hazards ratio: 1.9, P = .002), and resection (adjusted hazards ratio: 0.43, P = .001). Forty-five patients undergoing resection were matched to 135 undergoing liver-directed therapy. On Kaplan-Meier comparison of matched cohorts, patients undergoing resection demonstrated improved overall survival (38.1 vs 8.4%, P = .015) but disease-specific survival similar to that for those undergoing liver-directed therapy (84.0 vs 74.0%, P = .095).

CONCLUSION

Liver-directed therapy is effective as treatment for patients with localized hepatocellular cancer providing disease-specific survival similar to that provided by surgical resection.

Ablative Treatments and Surgery for Early-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Network Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

We compared overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) following radiofrequency ablation (RFA), microwave ablation (MWA), cryoablation, and liver resection (LR), with the aim of evaluating treatment plans for early-stage HCC.

METHODS

Studies in PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases from April 1, 2004, to April 1, 2024, were searched. Articles were evaluated for quality using the randomized controlled trials tool. Two tool and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Data obtained from the literature were netted using Stata 15.0 and r 4.2.3. The assessed primary outcomes were OS and DFS at 1 and 3 y.

RESULTS

A total of 25 publications with 4548 patients were included, including 13 studies in mainland China and 12 in other regions. For 1-y DFS, the hazard ratio (HR) was 0.54 (95% credible interval (CrI): 0.38-0.76) for LR compared with RFA and 0.57 (95% CrI: 0.3--0.82) for LR compared with MWA. For 3-y DFS, the HR was 0.52 (95% CrI: 0.38-0.72) for LR compared with RFA and 0.53 (95% CrI: 0.37-0.76). In the Chinese mainland, LR may have a better 1- and 3-y DFS than MWA, but similar survival to RFA. In the other regions, LR had a better DFS than MWA and RFA patients. The rest of the comparisons were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

For early-stage HCC, LR may be more effective in reducing tumor recurrence than ablative treatments. Cryoablation may be a potential treatment for HCC. The differences in treatment effectiveness in different regions are worth further study.

Open, laparoscopic liver resection and percutaneous thermal ablation in elderly patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: outcomes and therapeutic strategy

BACKGROUND

Liver resection and percutaneous thermal ablation (PTA) are considered curative option for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study aims to compare short- and long-term outcomes between open liver resection (OLR), laparoscopic liver resection (LLR), and PTA in elderly patients with single HCC and to define a liver map for therapeutic strategy according to HCC location and size.

METHODS

A multicenter retrospective study was conducted in 10 European Hospital Center, including 239 consecutive liver resection (OLR and LLR) and PTA in elderly patients ≥ 70 years old with single HCC ≤ 30 mm. Perioperative data and long-term oncological outcomes were collected and compared between groups before and after propensity score matching.

RESULTS

A total of 239 patients were enrolled, distributed as follows: 61 in the ORL group, 88 in the LLR group, and 90 in the PTA group. The hospital stay was longer in OLR and LLR groups compared to the PTA group (6, 5 and 3 days, respectively, p < 0.05). Morbidity was lower in the PTA group compared to the OLR group (11 vs. 26%, respectively, p < 0.05). Overall survival (OS) at 5 years was significantly higher in the OLR and LLR groups compared to the PTA group (82, 81, and 34%, respectively, p < 0.001). Disease-free survival (DFS) at 5 years was also significantly higher in the ORL and LLR groups compared to the PTA group (66, 50 and 20%, respectively, p < 0.001). These results were also confirmed after a propensity score matching analysis between surgery group (OLR and LLR) and the PTA group. PTA was the most used treatment for subcapsular and deep HCC not in contact with vascular structures compared to OLR and LLR.

CONCLUSION

PTA in elderly patients ensures a shorter hospital stay and lower morbidity but worst survival compared to liver resection.

Adjuvant and neoadjuvant immunotherapies in hepatocellular carcinoma

Liver cancer, specifically hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), is the sixth most common cancer and the third leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide. The development of effective systemic therapies, particularly those involving immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), has substantially improved the outcomes of patients with advanced-stage HCC. Approximately 30% of patients are diagnosed with early stage disease and currently receive potentially curative therapies, such as resection, liver transplantation or local ablation, which result in median overall survival durations beyond 60 months. Nonetheless, up to 70% of these patients will have disease recurrence within 5 years of resection or local ablation. To date, the results of randomized clinical trials testing adjuvant therapy in patients with HCC have been negative. This major unmet need has been addressed with the IMbrave 050 trial, demonstrating a recurrence-free survival benefit in patients with a high risk of relapse after resection or local ablation who received adjuvant atezolizumab plus bevacizumab. In parallel, studies testing neoadjuvant ICIs alone or in combination in patients with early stage disease have also reported efficacy. In this Review, we provide a comprehensive overview of the current approaches to manage patients with early stage HCC. We also describe the tumour immune microenvironment and the mechanisms of action of ICIs and cancer vaccines in this setting. Finally, we summarize the available evidence from phase II/III trials of neoadjuvant and adjuvant approaches and discuss emerging clinical trials, identification of biomarkers and clinical trial design considerations for future studies.

Present and future of metal nanoparticles in tumor ablation therapy

Cancer is an important factor affecting the quality of human life as well as causing death. Tumor ablation therapy is a minimally invasive local treatment modality with unique advantages in treating tumors that are difficult to remove surgically. However, due to its physical and chemical characteristics and the limitation of equipment technology, ablation therapy cannot completely kill all tumor tissues and cells at one time; moreover, it inevitably damages some normal tissues in the surrounding area during the ablation process. Therefore, this technology cannot be the first-line treatment for tumors at present. Metal nanoparticles themselves have good thermal and electrical conductivity and unique optical and magnetic properties. The combination of metal nanoparticles with tumor ablation technology, on the one hand, can enhance the killing and inhibiting effect of ablation technology on tumors by expanding the ablation range; on the other hand, the ablation technology changes the physicochemical microenvironment such as temperature, electric field, optics, oxygen content and pH in tumor tissues. It helps to stimulate the degree of local drug release of nanoparticles and increase the local content of anti-tumor drugs, thus forming a synergistic therapeutic effect with tumor ablation. Recent studies have found that some specific ablation methods will stimulate the body's immune response while physically killing tumor tissues, generating a large number of immune cells to cause secondary killing of tumor tissues and cells, and with the assistance of metal nanoparticles loaded with immune drugs, the effect of this anti-tumor immunotherapy can be further enhanced. Therefore, the combination of metal nanoparticles and ablative therapy has broad research potential. This review covers common metallic nanoparticles used for ablative therapy and discusses in detail their characteristics, mechanisms of action, potential challenges, and prospects in the field of ablation.

Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Primary Liver Cancer (2022 Edition)

Background

Primary liver cancer, of which around 75-85% is hepatocellular carcinoma in China, is the fourth most common malignancy and the second leading cause of tumor-related death, thereby posing a significant threat to the life and health of the Chinese people.

Summary

Since the publication of Guidelines for Diagnosis and Treatment of Primary Liver Cancer in China in June 2017, which were updated by the National Health Commission in December 2019, additional high-quality evidence has emerged from researchers worldwide regarding the diagnosis, staging, and treatment of liver cancer, that requires the guidelines to be updated again. The new edition (2022 Edition) was written by more than 100 experts in the field of liver cancer in China, which not only reflects the real-world situation in China but also may reshape the nationwide diagnosis and treatment of liver cancer.

Key Messages

The new guideline aims to encourage the implementation of evidence-based practice and improve the national average 5-year survival rate for patients with liver cancer, as proposed in the "Health China 2030 Blueprint."

Surgical Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Multicenter Competing-risk Analysis of Tumor-related Death Following Liver Resection and Transplantation Under an Intention-to-treat Perspective

BACKGROUND

Early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma could benefit from upfront liver resection (LR) or liver transplantation (LT), but the optimal strategy in terms of tumor-related outcomes is still debated. We compared the oncological outcomes of LR and LT for hepatocellular carcinoma, stratifying the study population into a low-, intermediate-, and high-risk class according to the risk of death at 5-y predicted by a previously developed prognostic model. The impact of tumor pathology on oncological outcomes of low- and intermediate-risk patients undergoing LR was investigated as a secondary outcome.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective multicentric cohort study involving 2640 patients consecutively treated by LR or LT from 4 tertiary hepatobiliary and transplant centers between 2005 and 2015, focusing on patients amenable to both treatments upfront. Tumor-related survival and overall survival were compared under an intention-to-treat perspective.

RESULTS

We identified 468 LR and 579 LT candidates: 512 LT candidates underwent LT, whereas 68 (11.7%) dropped-out for tumor progression. Ninety-nine high-risk patients were selected from each treatment cohort after propensity score matching. Three and 5-y cumulative incidence of tumor-related death were 29.7% and 39.5% versus 17.2% and 18.3% for LR and LT group ( P = 0.039), respectively. Low-risk and intermediate-risk patients treated by LR and presenting satellite nodules and microvascular invasion had a significantly higher 5-y incidence of tumor-related death (29.2% versus 12.5%; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

High-risk patients showed significantly better intention-to-treat tumor-related survival after upfront LT rather than LR. Cancer-specific survival of low- and intermediate-risk LR patients was significantly impaired by unfavorable pathology, suggesting the application of ab-initio salvage LT in such scenarios.

Hemocholecyst caused by accidental injury associated with radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma: A case report

BACKGROUND

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is an effective and safe treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma that features a lower incidence of serious complications than surgical resection. Hemocholecyst caused by RFA is a rare complication of secondary damage to the intrahepatic bile duct that results in hemobilia.

CASE SUMMARY

Here we report on a case of a hemocholecyst caused by accidental injury during RFA that induced hematemesis and melena. Digital subtraction angiography revealed no gallbladder arterial injuries. After conservative treatment and transcatheter arterial chemoembolization, the patient's condition stabilized, and she was discharged 1 wk later.

CONCLUSION

Therefore, when performing interventional procedures such as RFA, clinicians must be vigilant because even minor injuries can lead to serious complications such as hemocholecyst.

Liver resection versus liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma within the Milan criteria based on estimated microvascular invasion risks

BACKGROUND

Preoperative prediction of microvascular invasion (MVI) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) may optimize individualized treatment decision-making. This study aimed to investigate the prognostic differences between HCC patients undergoing liver resection (LR) and liver transplantation (LT) based on predicted MVI risks.

METHODS

We analysed 905 patients who underwent LR, including 524 who underwent anatomical resection (AR) and 117 who underwent LT for HCC within the Milan criteria using propensity score matching. A nomogram model was used to predict preoperative MVI risk.

RESULTS

The concordance indices of the nomogram for predicting MVI were 0.809 and 0.838 in patients undergoing LR and LT, respectively. Based on an optimal cut-off value of 200 points, the nomogram defined patients as high- or low-risk MVI groups. LT resulted in a lower 5-year recurrence rate and higher 5-year overall survival (OS) rate than LR among the high-risk patients (23.6% vs 73.2%, P < 0.001; 87.8% vs 48.1%, P < 0.001) and low-risk patients (19.0% vs 45.7%, P < 0.001; 86.5% vs 70.0%, P = 0.002). The hazard ratios (HRs) of LT vs LR for recurrence and OS were 0.18 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.09-0.37) and 0.12 (95% CI, 0.04-0.37) among the high-risk patients and 0.37 (95% CI, 0.21-0.66) and 0.36 (95% CI, 0.17-0.78) among the low-risk patients. LT also provided a lower 5-year recurrence rate and higher 5-year OS rate than AR among the high-risk patients (24.8% vs 63.5%, P = 0.001; 86.7% vs 65.7%, P = 0.004), with HRs of LT vs AR for recurrence and OS being 0.24 (95% CI, 0.11-0.53) and 0.17 (95% CI, 0.06-0.52), respectively. The 5-year recurrence and OS rates between patients undergoing LT and AR were not significantly different in the low-risk patients (19.4% vs 28.3%, P = 0.129; 85.7% vs 77.8%, P = 0.161).

CONCLUSIONS

LT was superior to LR for patients with HCC within the Milan criteria with a predicted high or low risk of MVI. No significant differences in prognosis were found between LT and AR in patients with a low risk of MVI.

The application of radiofrequency ablation in pancreatic cancer liver-only recurrence after radical pancreatectomy

To evaluate the safety, feasibility, and survival benefit of radiofrequency ablation in liver-only recurrence pancreatic cancer patients after radical pancreatectomy. The data and follow-up of pancreatic cancer patients who suffered liver-only recurrence after radical pancreatectomy from 2015 to 2021 were retrospectively collected. Finally, 19 liver metastases radiofrequency ablation patients were assigned to radiofrequency ablation group, and 41 patients were to systemic treatment group. (1) the baseline, perioperative characteristics, and pathological outcomes were well-balanced. (2) Recurrence pattern showed there were more multiple (> 3) recurrence tumors in systemic treatment patients (multiple one vs. 19, P = 0.005). (3) Median radiofrequency ablation operation time was 30.0 min, median blood loss was 1.0 ml, 4 (21.05%) patients suffered postoperative complications, and 94.74% liver metastases tumors got complete necrosis. The first efficacy evaluation showed a significantly better effect of radiofrequency ablation, complete and partial response rate 72.22% vs. 27.78%, P < 0.001. Overall survival from the initial surgery and after liver recurrence was significantly longer in the radiofrequency ablation group (43.0 vs. 22.0 months, 29.0 vs. 14.0 months, P = 0.003, 0.006, respectively). Progression-free survival after treatment was longer in the radiofrequency ablation group (6.0 vs. 5.0 months, P = 0.029). For liver recurrence tumor ≤ 3, overall survival from the initial surgery and after liver recurrence was significantly longer in radiofrequency ablation patients (43.0 vs. 22.0 months, 29.0 vs. 14.0 months, P = 0.011, 0.013, respectively). Progression-free survival after treatment was longer in the radiofrequency ablation group (7.0 vs. 4.0 months, P = 0.042). Radiofrequency ablation could get a curative purpose for patients with liver-only recurrence after pancreatectomy, improve progression-free survival and overall survival, and with minor surgery damage and risk.

The relationship between the efficacy of thermal ablation and inflammatory response and immune status in early hepatocellular carcinoma and the progress of postoperative adjuvant therapy

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a highly heterogeneous disease. Thermal ablation has the advantages of being equivalent to surgical resection, minimally invasive, low cost and significantly reducing hospital stay. Therefore, it is recommended as one of the first-line radical treatment for early HCC. However, with the deepening of research on early HCC, more and more studies have found that not all patients with early HCC can obtain similar efficacy after radical thermal ablation, which may be related to the heterogeneity of HCC. Previous studies have shown that inflammation and immunity play an extremely important role in the prognostic heterogeneity of patients with HCC. Therefore, the inflammatory response and immune status of patients may be closely related to the efficacy of early HCC after curative thermal ablation. This article elaborates the mechanism of high inflammatory response and poor immune status in the poor prognosis after radical thermal ablation of early HCC, and clarifies the population who may benefit from adjuvant therapy after radical thermal ablation in patients with early HCC, which provides a new idea for the precise adjuvant treatment after radical ablation of early HCC in the future.

A propensity score matching study on survival benefits of radiotherapy in patients with inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma

With the advancements in radiotherapy (RT) in recent years, several studies have shown that RT can significantly prolong the survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). As a noninvasive treatment option, the application of RT for the treatment of HCC is garnering increasing attention. In this retrospective study, we included data from 13,878 patients with HCC from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 2000 and 2019 and 325 patients with HCC treated in three tertiary hospitals in China between 2015 and 2021. Patient data were divided into RT and non-RT groups based on whether the patients underwent RT. Propensity score matching analysis was performed to minimize the deviation between the RT and non-RT groups, and the Kaplan-Meier method, Cox proportional hazard model, and nomogram were used to assess the efficacy of undergoing RT. The median overall survival (mOS) of the RT group was significantly longer compared with that of the non-RT group for the SEER data (16 months versus 9 months, p < 0.01). Similarly, the survival benefit was more significant in the RT group than in the non-RT group at our hospitals (34.1 months versus 15.4 months, p < 0.01). Furthermore, multivariate Cox analysis revealed that factors, including tumor (T) stage, patient age, tumor grade, serum AFP level, and chemotherapy, also affected patient survival. Moreover, these factors were also used to construct a nomogram. Subgroup analysis of these factors showed that RT was effective in prolonging patient survival in different populations. RT significantly improves the survival time of patients with inoperable HCC, thereby providing a basis for selecting HCC patients who can benefit from RT.

Efficacy and safety of radiofrequency ablation and surgery for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of surgical resection (RES) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with cirrhosis and to evaluate short- and long-term clinical outcomes.

METHODS

The EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Control Trials and Medline databases were searched for comparative studies of RES and RFA in HCC patients with cirrhosis from inception until 30 April 2021. Overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), local recurrence rate, complication rate, hospitalization duration and operation time were compared between the 2 groups. Begg's funnel plot and Egger's test were performed to assess publication bias.

RESULTS

A total of 16 studies met our inclusion criteria, including 1 randomized controlled trial. A total of 3760 patients were included, of which 2007 received RES and 1753 received RFA. The results showed that the 3-year OS rate, 5-year OS rate, 1-year DFS rate and 3-year DFS rate in the RFA group compared with the RES treatment group were significantly lower, and the local recurrence rate in the RFA group was significantly higher than that in the RES group. Compared with the RES group, the RFA group had lower postoperative complication rates, shorter operative times, and no significant difference in hospitalization duration. Subgroup analysis of laparoscopic RFA showed that there was no significant difference in 1- and 5-year OS rates and 3-year and 5-year DFS rates between the 2 groups, while the 3-year OS rates and 1-year DFS rates in the RES group were better than those in the laparoscopic RFA group.

CONCLUSION

Surgery is widely applied among HCC patients with cirrhosis, providing acceptable short- and long-term results.

Comparison of surgical resection and radiofrequency ablation for stages I and II elderly hepatocellular carcinoma patients (≥ 65 years): A SEER population-based propensity score matching’s study

Objectives

The treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains controversial and limited in elderly patients. Therefore, we aimed to explore treatment choices for the elderly patients (≥ 65years) following surgical resection (SR) versus radiofrequency ablation (RFA) with HCC (single lesion less than 5 cm).

Methods

We used SEER database to identify HCC patients who received treatment of SR/RFA. Kaplan–Meier method and Cox proportional hazards regression method were used to determine the prognostic factors associated with overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS). In addition, RFA group and SR group patients were matched with 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) for diagnosis age, sex, race, marital, American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC), grade, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy to decrease the possibility of selection bias. Conditional disease-specific survival (CS) was estimated using the life-table method.

Results

A total of 794 patients who underwent SR and 811 patients who underwent RFA were confirmed from the SEER database. Surgery type was an independent risk factor for HCC. Survival analysis indicated that SR, races, AJCC I, no chemotherapy treatment, and grade I were cumulative risk factors that can significantly improve median survival for HCC (P < 0.05). After PSM analysis, only surgery type was significantly improved median survival of HCC patients (SR vs. RFA, HR: 0.644, 95% CI: 0.482–0.86; P < 0.001). For RFA group, the 2-, 3-, and 5-year CS rates were approximately 71%, 65%, and 62%, respectively, and corresponding to 82%, 80%, and 78% in the SR group.

Conclusion

SR treatment can provide survival benefits for elderly patients of <5 cm single lesion HCC.

The Increasing Role of CT-Guided Cryoablation for the Treatment of Liver Cancer: A Single-Center Report

Purpose: Cryoablation (CrA) is a minimally invasive treatment that can be used in primary and metastatic liver cancer. The purpose of this study was to assess the effectiveness of CrA in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and liver metastases. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated the patients who had CrA for HCC or liver metastases between 2015 and 2020. Technical success, complete ablation, CrA-related complications, local tumor progression, local recurrences, and distant metastases were evaluated in the study population. In patients with HCC, the median survival was also estimated. Results: Sixty-four liver tumors in 49 patients were treated with CrA (50 metastases and 14 HCC). The mean tumor diameter was 2.15 cm. The mean follow-up was 19.8 months. Technical success was achieved in the whole study population. Complete tumor ablation was observed after one month in 92% of lesions treated with CrA (79% and 96% in the HCC Group and metastases Group, respectively, p < 0.001). Local tumor progression occurred in 12.5 of lesions, with no difference between the study groups (p = 0.105). Sixteen patients (33%) developed local recurrence (45% and 29% in the HCC Group and metastases Group, respectively, p = 0.477). Seven patients (14%) developed distant metastases in the follow-up period. Ten patients (20.8%) underwent redo CrA for local recurrence or incomplete tumor ablation. Minor complications were observed in 14% of patients. In patients with HCC, the median survival was 22 months. Conclusions: CrA can be safely used for treatment of HCC and liver metastases not amenable of surgical resection. Further studies are necessary to better define the role of CrA in the multidisciplinary treatment of liver malignancies.

Anatomical Versus Non-anatomical Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma, a Propensity-matched Analysis Between Taiwanese and Japanese Patients

BACKGROUND/AIM

The aim of the study was to compare the outcomes of anatomical resection (AR) versus non-anatomical resection (NAR) for Japanese and Taiwanese patients with single, resectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A propensity score matched (PSM) analysis was performed to compare the outcomes of the AR group to those of the NAR group. Tumor size <5 cm, T1 or T2 grade, without evidence of extrahepatic metastasis, invasion of portal or hepatic veins, or direct invasion of adjacent organs, were included in the study.

RESULTS

A total of 385 cases (Taiwanese 105, Japanese 280) were analyzed. After PSM, a total of 152 cases remain (Taiwan and Japan both 76 cases). Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) data were not significantly different between the two groups at 5 years follow-up.

CONCLUSION

AR of HCC in Japanese patients has a similar 5-year DFS and OS as NAR of HCC in Taiwanese patients.

Hepatobiliary Cancers, Version 2.2021, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology

The NCCN Guidelines for Hepatobiliary Cancers focus on the screening, diagnosis, staging, treatment, and management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), gallbladder cancer, and cancer of the bile ducts (intrahepatic and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma). Due to the multiple modalities that can be used to treat the disease and the complications that can arise from comorbid liver dysfunction, a multidisciplinary evaluation is essential for determining an optimal treatment strategy. A multidisciplinary team should include hepatologists, diagnostic radiologists, interventional radiologists, surgeons, medical oncologists, and pathologists with hepatobiliary cancer expertise. In addition to surgery, transplant, and intra-arterial therapies, there have been great advances in the systemic treatment of HCC. Until recently, sorafenib was the only systemic therapy option for patients with advanced HCC. In 2020, the combination of atezolizumab and bevacizumab became the first regimen to show superior survival to sorafenib, gaining it FDA approval as a new frontline standard regimen for unresectable or metastatic HCC. This article discusses the NCCN Guidelines recommendations for HCC.

Endoscopic radiofrequency ablation for palliative treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Recent data support a role for endoscopic radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in unresectable cholangiocarcinoma by improving stent patency and overall survival.

METHODS

We describe 3 patients with inoperable cholangiocarcinoma with jaundice and cholestasis who were recommended palliative chemotherapy. They underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with single-operator cholangioscope and intraductal RFA.

RESULTS

The procedures were performed without adverse events in all patients, with clinical and analytical improvement 1 month later.

CONCLUSIONS

RFA is a promising and safe palliative treatment in patients with unresectable cholangiocarcinoma.

Recurrence Beyond the Milan Criteria of HBV-Related Single Hepatocellular Carcinoma of 2-3 cm: Comparison of Resection and Ablation

BACKGROUND

Comparison of patterns of early hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence beyond the Milan criteria (HRBM) and identification of the independent risk factors of time to recurrence beyond the Milan criteria (TRBM) after resection or ablation can develop an optimal first-line treatment and provide more opportunities and waiting time for salvage transplantation.

METHODS

The patterns of HRBM after first-line resection or ablation in 384 patients with single-nodule HBV-associated HCC of 2-3 cm were retrospectively analyzed by one-to-one propensity score matching (PSM) between December 2008 and December 2017. The median TRBM between the resection group and the ablation group was estimated by Kaplan-Meier curves. The Cox regression analysis and binary logistic regression were used for the identification of the independent risk factors of TRBM and the occurrence of HRBM, respectively. The abilities of HRBM and the recurrence to predict overall survival (OS) were compared by the time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curves and estimated area under the curve.

RESULTS

Of 384 patients enrolled in our study, 260 (67.7%) received resection (resection group) and 124 (32.3%) underwent ablation (ablation group). The median TRBM in the resection group was significantly longer than that in the ablation group before PSM (median, not available vs. 101.4 months, P < 0.001) and after PSM (median, not available vs. 85.7 months, P < 0.001). Cox regression showed ablation, older age, CRP ≥1.81 mg/L, and PLT ≤80 × 10⁹/L were the independent risk factors of TRBM. Binary logistic regression also showed that ablation, CRP ≥1.81 mg/L, and PLT ≤80 × 10⁹/L were the independent risk factors of the occurrence of HRBM. The incidences of various phenotypes of HRBM were not significantly different between the two groups, but the incidence of HRBM at the first recurrence in the ablation group was significantly higher than that in the resection group (P < 0.05). Besides, compared with recurrence, HRBM was a better predictor of OS (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with ablation, resection should be considered as a more appropriate first-line option for patients with single-nodule HBV-associated HCC of 2-3 cm and a more promising bridge for liver transplantation in those patients.

Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma (2019 Edition)

BACKGROUND

Primary liver cancer, around 90% are hepatocellular carcinoma in China, is the fourth most common malignancy and the second leading cause of tumor-related death, thereby posing a significant threat to the life and health of the Chinese people.

SUMMARY

Since the publication of Guidelines for Diagnosis and Treatment of Primary Liver Cancer (2017 Edition) in 2018, additional high-quality evidence has emerged with relevance to the diagnosis, staging, and treatment of liver cancer in and outside China that requires the guidelines to be updated. The new edition (2019 Edition) was written by more than 70 experts in the field of liver cancer in China. They reflect the real-world situation in China regarding diagnosing and treating liver cancer in recent years.

KEY MESSAGES

Most importantly, the new guidelines were endorsed and promulgated by the Bureau of Medical Administration of the National Health Commission of the People's Republic of China in December 2019.

Chondroitin polymerizing factor (CHPF) promotes development of malignant melanoma through regulation of CDK1

Chondroitin polymerizing factor (CHPF) is an important member of glycosyltransferases involved in the biosynthesis of chondroitin sulfate (CS). However, the relationship between CHPF and malignant melanoma (MM) is still unknown. In this study, it was demonstrated that CHPF was up-regulated in MM tissues compared with the adjacent normal skin tissues and its high expression was correlated with more advanced T stage. Further investigations indicated that the over-expression/knockdown of CHPF could promote/inhibit proliferation, colony formation and migration of MM cells, while inhibiting/promoting cell apoptosis. Moreover, knockdown of CHPF could also suppress tumorigenicity of MM cells in vivo. RNA-sequencing followed by Ingenuity pathway analysis (IPA) was performed for exploring downstream of CHPF and identified CDK1 as the potential target. Furthermore, our study revealed that knockdown of CDK1 could inhibit development of MM in vitro, and alleviate the CHPF over-expression induced promotion of MM. In conclusion, our study showed, as the first time, CHPF as a tumor promotor for MM, whose function was carried out probably through the regulation of CDK1.

Radiofrequency ablation versus repeat resection for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (≤ 5 cm) after initial curative resection

OBJECTIVES

Recurrence rate is up to 70% at 5 years for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after initial resection, but the management of recurrent HCC remains unclear. To compare the efficacy and safety of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and repeat resection as the first-line treatment in recurrent HCC.

METHODS

This multicenter retrospective study analyzed 290 patients who underwent RFA (n = 199) or repeat resection (n = 91) between January 2006 and December 2016 for locally recurrent HCC (≤ 5 cm) following primary resection. We compared the overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and complications between the two treatment groups for the total cohort and the propensity score matched (PSM) cohort.

RESULTS

The 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS (90.7%, 69.04%, 55.6% vs. 87.7%, 62.9%, 38.1%, p = 0.11) and PFS (56.5%, 27.9%, 14.6% vs. 50.2%, 21.9%, 19.2%, p = 0.80) were similar in the RFA group and the repeat resection group. However, RFA was superior to repeat resection in complication rate and hospital stay (p ≤ 0.001). We observed similar findings in the PSM cohort of 48 pairs of patients and when OS and PFS were measured from the time of the primary resection. The OS of the RFA group was significantly better than repeat resection group among those with 2 or 3 recurrent tumor nodules in both the total cohort (p = 0.009) and the PSM cohort (p = 0.018).

CONCLUSION

RFA has the same efficacy as repeat resection in recurrent HCC patients, but with fewer complications. RFA is more efficient and safer than repeat resection in patients with 2 or 3 recurrent tumor nodules.

KEY POINTS

• Recurrence rate is up to 70% at 5 years for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after initial resection. • RFA has the same efficacy as repeat resection in recurrent HCC patients, but with fewer complications. • RFA may be preferred for those with 2 or 3 recurrent HCC nodules.

A novel microwave tool for robotic liver resection in minimally invasive surgery

Introduction: During the last two decades, many surgical procedures have evolved from open surgery to minimally invasive surgery (MIS). This limited invasiveness has motivated the development of robotic assistance platforms to obtain better surgical outcomes. Nowadays, the da Vinci robot is a commercial tele-robotic platform widely used for different surgical applications.Material and methods: In this work, the da Vinci Research Kit (dVRK), namely the research version of the da Vinci, is used to manipulate a novel microwave device in a teleoperation scenario. The dVRK provides an open source platform, so that the novel microwave tool, dedicated to prevention bleeding during hepatic resection surgery, is mechanically integrated on the slave side, while the software interface is adapted in order to correctly control tool pose. Tool integration is validated through in-vitro and ex-vivo tests performed by expert surgeons, meanwhile the coagulative efficacy of the developed tool in a perfused liver model was proved in in-vivo tests.Results and conclusions: An innovative microwave tool for liver robotic resection has been realized and integrated into a surgical robot. The tool can be easily operated through the dVRK without limiting the intuitive and friendly use, and thus easily reaching the hemostasis of vessels.

Surgical resection versus radiofrequency ablation for Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer very early stage hepatocellular carcinoma: long-term results of a single-center study

BACKGROUND

We aimed to compare long-term outcomes of surgical resection (SR) and percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) very early stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODS

Total of 387 patients (SR group, 156; RFA group, 231) with well-preserved liver function (Child-Pugh A) diagnosed with a solitary HCC less than 2 cm were included. The overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates were compared.

RESULTS

The median follow-up period was 39 months. The overall tumor recurrence rate was 16.7% in the SR group and 27.7% in the RFA group. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates were 100%, 97.2%, and 93.4%, respectively, in the SR group, compared with 100%, 88.6%, and 73.5%, respectively, in the RFA group (P < 0.001). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year RFS rates were 94.6%, 84.1%, and 78.3%, respectively, in the SR group, and 87.7%, 62.1%, and 46.8%, respectively, in the RFA group (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical resection provides better OS and RFS compared with percutaneous RFA for patients with BCLC very early HCC in long-term follow-up.

The efficacy of microwave ablation versus liver resection in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma and liver metastases: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Microwave ablation (MWA) is an important method in the treatment of liver cancer. This systematic review compared MWA with liver resection (LR) for liver cancer treatment. In recent years, the MWA has been also reported to play an important role. Studies comparing MWA and LR are lacking. This study aims to compare the efficacy of MWA and LR in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODS

A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science up to April 1, 2019 was conducted for relevant studies that compared the efficacy of MWA and LR in the treatment of HCC. The primary outcomes were local tumor recurrence (LTR) and overall survival (OS) of patients. The secondary outcomes included disease free survival (DFS), extrahepatic metastasis, intrahepatic de novo lesions, length of stay, complications, intraoperative blood loss and operative time.

RESULTS

A total of 16 studies including 2622 patients were identified. Incidence of LTR was significantly higher in patients with MWA than LR, with a pooled OR of 2.69 (95% CI 1.33-5.41; P = 0.006). No significant difference in 1-year OS was found. However, patients with MWA experienced higher 3- and 5-year OS, with pooled ORs of 1.40 (95% CI 1.07-1.84; P = 0.01) and 1.41 (95% CI 1.10-1.80; P = 0.007) respectively. In secondary measures, the 1- and 3-year DFS were significantly higher in patients with MWA. However, no significant difference of 5-year DFS was observed. In addition, lower incidence of complications, less intraoperative blood loss and shorter operative time and shorter length of stay were observed in MWA.

CONCLUSIONS

Though MWA may lead to higher incidence of recurrence, it may be an effective and safe alternative in patients with HCC or liver metastases. MWA may have benefits in patients' survival and safety. Randomized studies should be performed to determine the target population that benefits most from MWA in the future.

The early evaluation of ultrasound-guided iodine-125 interstitial implants for high-risk hepatocellular carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

To evaluate the feasibility and safety of ultrasound-guided iodine-125 interstitial implants for high-risk hepatocellular carcinoma.

METHODS

From October, 2016, to August, 2018, 49 patients suffering from a total of 66 hepatocellular carcinoma lesions were treated with ultrasound-guided iodine-125 interstitial implantation. Treatment planning system was applied to make preoperative plan. The response evaluation criteria in solid tumors were used to evaluate the curative effect. The evaluated outcomes included postoperative complications and complete disease control rate, 6-month disease-free survival, and 6-month overall survival.

RESULTS

All 49 patients underwent iodine-125 seed implantation successfully. Patients were followed up for 5 to 27.5 months. No patients developed serious complications and only 2 (4.1%) patients had slight pain. The complete response was seen in 21 lesions (31.8%), partial response in 26 lesions (39.4%), stable disease in eight lesions (12.1%), and progressive disease in 11 lesions (16.7%). The overall disease control rate was reached to 83.3%. The 6-month disease-free survival rate was 46.4% with a median disease-free survival time of 5.0 months. The 6-month overall survival rate was 83.6% with a median overall survival time of 15.0 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Iodine-125 interstitial implantation is a kind of safe and feasible treatment for high-risk hepatocellular carcinoma.

Comparison of Hepatic Resection Combined with Intraoperative Radiofrequency Ablation, or Hepatic Resection Alone, for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients with Multifocal Tumors Meeting the University of California San Francisco (UCSF) Criteria: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

BACKGROUND

Whether hepatic resection (HR) combined with radiofrequency ablation (RFA) or HR alone is the treatment of choice for early or moderately advanced multifocal hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) is a matter of debate. This study compared the short- and long-term outcomes of patients with multifocal tumors meeting the University of California San Francisco (UCSF) criteria after HR plus intraoperative RFA or HR alone.

METHODS

A total of 261 consecutive patients with multifocal HCCs meeting the UCSF criteria from January 2010 to January 2018, who underwent combined treatment (n = 51) or HR (n = 210), were included. Propensity score matching was performed to adjust for baseline differences. Overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were calculated, and subgroup analysis, along with univariate and multivariate analyses, were performed.

RESULTS

The 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates after combined treatment or HR alone were 86.3%, 66.6%, and 34.2%, and 92.8%, 67.1%, and 37%, respectively (p = 0.423); combined treatment provided similar RFS rates as HR at 1, 3, and 5 years (78.4%, 35.8% and 20.9% vs. 82.6%, 50.4% and 24.5%, respectively; p = 0.076). The propensity matching model showed similar results. Subgroup analysis showed that HR was associated with better RFS than HR plus RFA for patients with two tumors or major tumors ≤ 3 cm. Multivariate analysis revealed that portal hypertension and three tumors are independent risk factors.

CONCLUSIONS

For multifocal HCC patients meeting the UCSF criteria, combined treatment may offer similar OS and RFS as HR; however, HR may be more suitable than combined treatment for patients with two tumors or major tumors ≤ 3 cm.

Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization combined with simultaneous DynaCT-guided microwave ablation in the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinoma

PURPOSE

To evaluate the method and effectiveness of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with simultaneous DynaCT-guided Microwave ablation (MWA) for the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinoma (SHCC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From June 2015 to May 2017, a total of 28 consecutive patients with SHCC received single treatment of TACE and 23 subjects received a combination treatment of TACE with simultaneous DynaCT-guided MWA. Following 1 month of treatment, the tumor response was assessed using the mRECIST criteria and the outcomes were analyzed including intervention-associated complications, changes in liver function, imaging response, and progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

The technical success rate was 100%. The rates of CR (65%) in the combined TACE and MWA group were higher than those of the TACE group (46%). The rate of common adverse events, such as liver abscess, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis and liver dysfunction, in the combined TACE and MWA group (56%) was comparable to the corresponding rate of the TACE group (P > 0.411). The median and mean PFS of the TACE group were significantly lower than those of the combined TACE and MWA group (19.00 months vs. 29.00 months, 21.076 months vs. 24.693 months, p = 0.019, log-rank test).

CONCLUSION

Stereotactic DynaCT-guided MWA is a safe and effective method for the treatment of SHCC, which usually provides an effective tumor puncture path, notably for lesions that cannot be detected following TACE. Overall, the data suggested that this treatment method could improve the clinical outcome of patients with SHCC.

Developments in predictive biomarkers for hepatocellular carcinoma therapy

Introduction: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary tumor of the liver and the third largest cause of cancer-relateddeaths worldwide. Potentially curative treatments (surgical resection, radiofrequency or liver transplantation) are only available for few patients, while transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) or systemic agents are the best treatments for intermediate and advanced stage disease. The identification of markers that allow us to choose the best treatment for the patient is urgent.Areas covered: In this review we summarize the potential biological markers to predict the efficacy of all treatment available in patients with HCC and discuss anew biomarker with ahigher potential of success in the next future.Expert opinion: HCC is aheterogeneous disease. Tumors are heterogeneous in terms of genetic alteration,with spatial heterogeneity in cellular density, necrosis and angiogenesis.This heterogeneity may affect prognosis and treatment. Tumor heterogeneity can be difficult to quantify with traditional imaging due to subjective assessment of images; the same for sampling biopsy, which evaluates only asmall part of the tumor. We think that combining multi-OMICSwith radiomics represents apromising strategy for evaluating tumor heterogenicity and for identifying biomarkers of response and prognosis.

Single Hepatocellular Carcinoma approached by curative-intent treatment: A propensity score analysis comparing radiofrequency ablation and liver resection

INTRODUCTION

Patients with a single small Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) may be definitively treated by Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) with a very low rate of peri-operative morbidity. However, results are still controversial comparing RFA to Liver Resection (LR).

METHODS

All consecutive patients treated by RFA or LR for a single untreated small HCC on liver cirrhosis between January 2006-December 2016 were enrolled. Patients were matched 1:1 basing on: age, MELD-score, platelet count, nodule's diameter, HCV status, α-fetoprotein level, and Albumin-Bilirubin score. First analysis compered LR to RFA. Second analysis compared Laparoscopic LR (LLR) to RFA.

RESULTS

Of 484 patients with single small HCC, 91 patients were selected for each group after a 1:1 propensity score matching (PS-M). The 5-years OS was 70% and 60% respectively for LR and RFA group (P = 0.666). The 5-year RFS was 36% and 21% respectively for LR and RFA group (P < 0.001). Patients treated by LR had a significantly longer hospital stay and higher complications rate. Comparing 50 cases of LLR and 50 of RFA, the 5-years OS was 79% and 56% respectively for LLR and RFA group (P = 0.22). The 5-year RFS was 54% and 19% respectively for LR and RFA group (P < 0.001). Post-operative complications were not significantly different.

CONCLUSIONS

LLR confers similar peri-operative complications rate compared to RFA. LLR should be considered as a first-line approach for the treatment of a single small HCC as it combines the effectiveness of open LR and the safety profile of RFA.

Microwave ablation compared with hepatic resection for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma and liver metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Hepatic resection (HR) is the gold standard liver cancer treatment, but few patients are eligible due to comorbidities or tumor location. Microwave ablation (MWA) is an important complementary liver cancer treatment to HR. This systematic review compared MWA with HR for liver cancer treatment.

Methods

A systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL was conducted for randomized and observational studies published from 2006 onwards. The primary outcome was local tumor recurrence (LTR), and a random effects model was used for meta-analyses.

Results

Of the 1845 studies identified, 1 randomized and 15 observational studies met the inclusion criteria. LTR was significantly increased with MWA versus HR (risk ratio (RR) = 2.49; P = 0.016). In secondary measures, HR provided significantly higher 3- and 5-year overall survival (RR = 0.94; P = 0.03 and RR = 0.88; P = 0.01, respectively) and 3-year disease-free survival (RR = 0.78; P = 0.009). MWA exhibited significantly shorter length of stay (weighted mean difference (WMD) = − 6.16 days; P < 0.001) and operative time (WMD = − 58.69 min; P < 0.001), less intraoperative blood loss (WMD = − 189.09 mL; P = 0.006), and fewer complications than HR (RR = 0.31; P < 0.001). When MWA was combined with HR and compared with either modality alone, complications and blood loss were significantly lower with the combination treatment; however, there were no differences in other outcomes. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were generally aligned with the main results.

Conclusions

MWA can be an effective and safe alternative to HR in patients/tumors that are not amenable to resection. More randomized and economic studies should be performed that compare the two treatments, especially to determine the target population that benefits most from MWA.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12957-019-1632-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Local treatment of oligometastatic disease: current role

The presence of distant metastases has long been a predictor of poor outcome in solid cancer. However, in an oncologic situation called oligometastatic disease (OMD), multiple studies have revealed a survival benefit with aggressive treatment of these metastases. Besides surgery and radiation therapy, local thermal therapies have developed into a treatment option for OMD. Most studies concerning local therapy of OMD are available for colorectal cancer, which is therefore the focus of this article. Furthermore, this review gives a basic overview of the most popular ablation techniques for treatment of OMD.

Surgical resection versus ablation for early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma: A retrospective cohort analysis

BACKGROUND

The most appropriate treatment for early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains unclear. This study compared the association of resection versus ablation with overall survival (OS) in patients with early-stage HCC.

METHODS

Using the National Cancer Database (NCDB), patients diagnosed with stage I/II HCC between 2004 and 2014 were identified. Cox analysis was used to determine predictors of OS.

RESULTS

We identified 53,161 patients, of whom 15.9% underwent ablation and 14.5% underwent resection. Patients with fewer comorbidities, larger tumors, and private insurance were more likely to undergo resection. Resection was associated with significantly improved OS compared to ablation (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.54-0.61, p < 0.001), at all tumor sizes (p < 0.05) and any degree of liver fibrosis (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Resection of HCC tumors of all sizes and any degree of underlying fibrosis was associated with significantly improved OS compared with ablation. There was pronounced variability in the use of ablation versus resection for early-stage HCC.

SUMMARY

This study found that patients with early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have improved overall survival (OS) after surgical resection, compared to ablation, at all tumor sizes and any extent of liver disease. There were also marked variations in treatment patterns for early-stage HCC.

A new scoring model predicting macroscopic vascular invasion of early-intermediate hepatocellular carcinoma

Macroscopic vascular invasion cannot be properly predicted in advance in hepatocellular carcinoma patients based on clinical characteristics and imaging features.To develop a predictive scoring model of macroscopic vascular invasion in hepatocellular carcinoma patients after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization combined with radiofrequency ablation based on specific laboratory and tumor indicators.A predictive scoring model, which estimates the incidence of macroscopic vascular invasion at 1-year follow-up, was constructed based on a derivation cohort of 324 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma; a validation cohort of 120 patients was prospectively included. The prognostic value of the scoring model was determined by concordance index, time-dependent receiver operating characteristics, and calibration curves.Cox multivariate analysis of the derivation cohort identified prothrombin time, aspartate aminotransferase, and Barcelona clinic liver cancer (BCLC) staging as independent predictive factors of macroscopic vascular invasion. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves of the predictive scoring model were 0.832 and 0.785 in the derivation and validation cohorts, respectively, and the calibration curves fitted well. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the incidence of macroscopic vascular invasion was significantly higher in the high-risk group (score 0-2) than in the low-risk group (score 3-4) in both the derivation and validation cohorts (P < .0001 and P = .0008, respectively).The predictive scoring model enables the accurate prediction of macroscopic vascular invasion incidence 1 year in advance in hepatocellular carcinoma patients who undergo transcatheter arterial chemoembolization combined with radiofrequency ablation.

Comparative efficacy and safety between ablative therapies or surgery for small hepatocellular carcinoma: a network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Major treatments for small hepatocellular carcinoma (SHCC) include percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI), percutaneous acetic acid injection (PAI), radiofrequency ablation (RFA), or surgical resection (SR). We aimed to compare these therapies concerning with effectiveness and safety.

METHODS

Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Embase were searched for randomized controlled studies (RCTs) from inception to 30 April 2017. Odds ratios (OR) for proportion dead (PD), local recurrence (LR) and adverse events (AEs).

RESULTS

Fourteen RCTs were identified. Compared with SR, PEI (OR 2.79, CrI 1.25, 6.45, p < 0.01) provided a significantly increased risk of PD. Similarly, PEI (OR 4.29, CrI 1.18, 18.35, p < 0.01) yielded more LR than SR. Also, SR significantly conferred more AEs than RFA (OR 0.10; CrI 0.02, 0.35, p < 0.01), PEI (OR 0.06; CrI 0.01, 0.31, p < 0.01). Besides, RFA conferred the highest efficacy for survival, time to recurrence, and new development of HCC.

CONCLUSIONS

SR was superior to PEI. Although SR achieved highest cumulative ranking probabilities in clinical efficacy, it obtained a low benefit-to-risk ratio for patients. RFA was superior to the other ablative therapies. For tumor sizes > 2 cm or ≤ 2 cm in diameter, SR conferred non-significant effects compared with other therapies for SHCC.

Radiofrequency Ablation Combined with Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization Therapy Versus Surgical Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma within the Milan Criteria: A Meta-Analysis

Objective

To meta-analytically compare combined transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) plus radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and surgical resection (SR) for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) within the Milan criteria.

Materials and Methods

PubMed, Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched for studies comparing these two therapies that were published between January 2006 and August 2017. Overall survival rate (OS), recurrence-free survival rate (RFS), major complications and the average length of hospital stay were compared between these two therapies. Meta-analytic pooled odds ratio (OR) was calculated using TACE plus RFA as the base category.

Results

Seven case-control studies and one randomized trial were identified. Meta-analytic results revealed that, compared with SR, TACE plus RFA had significantly higher 1-year OS (OR for survival = 0.50, p = 0.009) and lower major complications (OR = 1.88, p = 0.02) after therapy. Three studies reported on the length of hospital stay. The average length ± standard deviation reported in individual studies for SR and TACE plus RFA groups was 19.8 ± 8.4 days and 7.4 ± 2.2 days, respectively; 18.7 ± 4.9 days and 11.5 ± 6.9 days, respectively; and 16.6 ± 6.7 days and 8.5 ± 4.1 days, respectively (p < 0.0001 for all studies). Three or 5-year OS and 1-, 3-, or 5-year RFS did not significantly differ between the two therapies.

Conclusion

Combined TACE plus RFA may be an alternative to SR for the treatment of patients with HCC within Milan the criteria. Non-randomized design in most of the original studies was a limitation.

Radiofrequency ablation versus surgical resection for multiple HCCs meeting the Milan criteria: propensity score analyses of 10-year therapeutic outcomes

AIM

To assess the long-term therapeutic outcomes of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) versus surgical resection (SR) as a first-line treatment for patients meeting the Milan criteria with multiple hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board and the requirement for informed consent was waived. Between January 2004 and December 2009, among 3,441 patients with treatment-naive HCCs, 88 patients meeting the Milan criteria with multiple HCCs (Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer [BCLC] A stage) who underwent either RFA (n=62) or SR (n=26) were included. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were compared by using propensity score matching. In addition, multivariate analysis was performed for assess the prognostic factor.

RESULTS

Matching yielded 20 matched pairs of patients. In the two matched groups, the RFS rates were 30% and 30% at 5- and 10-years, respectively, in the RFA group and 60% and 48.6% in the SR group (p=0.054). The corresponding OS rates were 63.3% and 46.1% in the RFA group and 100% and 73.6% in the SR group, respectively (p=0.061). In multivariate analysis, treatment type was independently associated with RFS (hazard ratio [HR]=0.51; p=0.043) whereas it was not a statistically significant factor for OS (HR=0.50; p=0.088).

CONCLUSION

In patients meeting the Milan criteria with multiple HCCs (BCLC A stage), SR may provide better RFS compared to RFA.

Surgical Resection vs. Ablative Therapies Through a Laparoscopic Approach for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: a Comparative Study

BACKGROUND

When compatible with the liver functional reserve, laparoscopic hepatic resection remains the treatment of choice for hepatocellular carcinoma while laparoscopic ablation therapies appear as a promising less invasive alternative. The aim of the study is to compare two homogeneous groups of patients submitted to either hepatic resection or thermoablation for the treatment of single hepatocellular carcinoma (≤ 3 cm).

METHODS

We enrolled 264 cirrhotic patients out of 905 cases consecutively evaluated for hepatocellular carcinoma. We performed 59 hepatic resections and 205 thermoablations through a laparoscopic approach, and they were then followed for similar follow-up (41.7 ± 31.5 months for laparoscopic hepatic resection vs. 38.7±32.3 for laparoscopic ablation therapy). Outcomes included short- and long-term morbidities, tumoral recurrence, and overall survival.

RESULTS

Short-term morbidity was significantly higher in the resection group (but the two groups had similar rates for severe complications) while, during follow-up, recurrence was more frequent in patients treated with thermoablation, with a clear disadvantage in terms of survival. At multivariate analysis, only the type of surgical treatment was an independent predictor of disease recurrence, while plasmatic alpha-fetoprotein and Hb values, model for end-stage liver disease score, time to recurrence, and the type of surgical treatment were independent predictors of overall survival.

CONCLUSION

Our data ultimately support some therapeutic advantages for hepatic resection in patients with a single nodule and preserved liver function. However, thermoablation is an adequate alternative in patients with nodules that would require complex surgical resections or imply a poor prognosis that might therefore better tolerate a less invasive procedure.

Hepatocellular carcinoma treatment: hurdles, advances and prospects

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the major causes of cancer-related mortality and is particularly refractory to the available chemotherapeutic drugs. Among various etiologies of HCC, viral etiology is the most common, and, along with alcoholic liver disease and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, accounts for almost 90% of all HCC cases. HCC is a heterogeneous tumor associated with multiple signaling pathway alterations and its complex patho-physiology has made the treatment decision challenging. The potential curative treatment options are effective only in small group of patients, while palliative treatments are associated with improved survival and quality of life for intermediate/advanced stage HCC patients. This review article focuses on the currently available treatment strategies and hurdles encountered for HCC therapy. The curative treatment options discussed are surgical resection, liver transplantation, and local ablative therapies which are effective for early stage HCC patients. The palliative treatment options discussed are embolizing therapies, systemic therapies, and molecular targeted therapies. Besides, the review also focuses on hurdles to be conquered for successful treatment of HCC and specifies the future prospects for HCC treatment. It also discusses the multi-modal approach for HCC management which maximizes the chances of better clinical outcome after treatment and identifies that selection of a particular treatment regimen based on patients' disease stage, patients' ages, and other underlying factors will certainly lead to a better prognosis.

Radiofrequency ablation combined with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization therapy versus surgical resection for Barcelona-Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) A hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis

Purpose: The objective of our study was to compare the effectiveness of the combination of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) with that of surgical resection (SR) in Barcelona-Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) A hepatocellular carcinoma.

Materials and Methods: PubMed, Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched for comparisons of the two therapies from January 2006 to December 2017. Overall survival rate (OS), recurrence-free survival rate (RFS), complications, and the average length of hospital stay were compared and analyzed. Review Manager v. 5.2 from the Cochrane Collaboration was used for statistical analyses.

Results: Seven case-control studies and one randomized controlled trial were identified, of which 717 were treated with a combination of TACE and RFA and 785 were treated with SR. Meta-analysis data revealed that TACE plus RFA had significantly better effectiveness on 1.0-y OS (OR = 0.50, p = .009). The major complications (ORcomplications = 1.88, p = .02) after the combined therapy were significantly lower than those after SR. There were three studies that reported the average length of hospital stay. The hospital stay for the SR group vs the combined therapy group was 19.8 ± 8.4 d vs 7.4 ± 2.2 d, respectively (p < .0001); 18.7 ± 4.9 d vs 11.5 ± 6.9 d, respectively (p < .0001); and 16.6 ± 6.7 d vs 8.5 ± 4.1 d, respectively (p < .0001). There was no significant difference in 3.0- or 5.0-y OS and 1.0-, 3.0-, or 5.0-y RFS.

Conclusion: The combination of TACE and RFA has advantages in improving 1.0-y OS, reducing complications, and shortening the length of hospital stay over that of SR in the treatment of patients with BCLC A HCC.

Estimating survival time of patients with glioblastoma multiforme and characterization of the identified microRNA signatures

BACKGROUND

Though glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most frequently occurring brain malignancy in adults, clinical treatment still faces challenges due to poor prognoses and tumor relapses. Recently, microRNAs (miRNAs) have been extensively used with the aim of developing accurate molecular therapies, because of their emerging role in the regulation of cancer-related genes. This work aims to identify the miRNA signatures related to survival of GBM patients for developing molecular therapies.

RESULTS

This work proposes a support vector regression (SVR)-based estimator, called SVR-GBM, to estimate the survival time in patients with GBM using their miRNA expression profiles. SVR-GBM identified 24 out of 470 miRNAs that were significantly associated with survival of GBM patients. SVR-GBM had a mean absolute error of 0.63 years and a correlation coefficient of 0.76 between the real and predicted survival time. The 10 top-ranked miRNAs according to prediction contribution are as follows: hsa-miR-222, hsa-miR-345, hsa-miR-587, hsa-miR-526a, hsa-miR-335, hsa-miR-122, hsa-miR-24, hsa-miR-433, hsa-miR-574 and hsa-miR-320. Biological analysis using the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway on the identified miRNAs revealed their influence in GBM cancer.

CONCLUSION

The proposed SVR-GBM using an optimal feature selection algorithm and an optimized SVR to identify the 24 miRNA signatures associated with survival of GBM patients. These miRNA signatures are helpful to uncover the individual role of miRNAs in GBM prognosis and develop miRNA-based therapies.

Comparison of laparoscopic hepatectomy, percutaneous radiofrequency ablation and open hepatectomy in the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

Three mainstream techniques--laparoscopic hepatectomy (LH), percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (pRFA), and open hepatectomy (OH)--were compared in this study, in terms of their efficacies in the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODS

A comparative study was performed within a total of 94 patients diagnosed with small HCC in our hospital from 2005 to 2010, who underwent LH (28), RFA (33), or OH (33). They had either a single tumor lesion of less than or up to three nodules with diameters of less than each. Outcomes were carefully evaluated throughout a 3-year follow-up interval and statistically interpreted.

RESULTS

The pRFA group had a significantly lower disease-free survival rate compared with the two surgical groups (P=0.001) and significantly shorter overall survival (P=0.005), while the LH group and the OH group had no difference in survival results. For patients younger than 60 years old, surgical approaches offered a better long-term overall survival prognosis (P=0.008). There were no statistically significant differences among the three groups in overall survival for elderly patients (P=0.104).

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with small HCC, LH may provide better curative effects than pRFA without increasing complication rates. pRFA leads to faster recurrence than surgical resections. LH has similar therapeutic effects to OH and causes less trauma. For patients younger than 60 years old, LH may be the best curative treatment. Elderly patients may choose either surgery or pRFA.

Radiofrequency ablation versus stereotactic body radiotherapy for small hepatocellular carcinoma: a Markov model-based analysis

The aim of this study is to compare radiofrequency ablation (RFA) with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC) smaller than 3 cm. A Markov cohort model was developed to simulate a cohort of patients aged 60–65 years with small HCCs who had undergone either RFA or SBRT and were followed up over their remaining life expectancy. The inclusion criteria were: (1) HCC ≤3 cm in diameter with ≤ 3 nodules; (2) absence of extrahepatic metastasis or portal/hepatic vein invasion; (3) Child‐Pugh Class A or B. Twenty thousand virtual patients were randomly assigned to undergo RFA or SBRT. Predicted life expectancy was 6.452 and 6.371 years in the RFA and SBRT groups, respectively. The probability distributions of the expected overall survival were nearly identical. The 95% confidence intervals were 6.25–6.66 and 6.17–6.58 years for RFA and SBRT, respectively. The difference between RFA and SBRT was insignificant (P = 0.2884). Two‐way sensitivity analysis demonstrated that if the tumor is 2–3 cm, SBRT is the preferred treatment option. Our Markov model has shown that expected overall survival of SBRT is nearly identical to RFA in HCCs smaller than 3 cm, but SBRT may have an advantage for tumors 2 cm and larger. A randomized trial is required to confirm these findings.

Laparoscopic detection and resection of occult liver tumors of multiple cancer types using real-time near-infrared fluorescence guidance

BACKGROUND

Tumor recurrence after radical resection of hepatic tumors is not uncommon, suggesting that malignant lesions are missed during surgery. Intraoperative navigation using fluorescence guidance is an innovative technique enabling real-time identification of (sub)capsular liver tumors. The objective of the current study was to compare fluorescence imaging (FI) and conventional imaging modalities for laparoscopic detection of both primary and metastatic tumors in the liver.

METHODS

Patients undergoing laparoscopic resection of a malignant hepatic tumor were eligible for inclusion. Patients received standard of care, including preoperative CT and/or MRI. In addition, 10 mg indocyanine green was intravenously administered 1 day prior to surgery. After introduction of the laparoscope, inspection, FI, and laparoscopic ultrasonography (LUS) were performed. Histopathological examination of resected suspect tissue was considered the gold standard.

RESULTS

Twenty-two patients suspected of having hepatocellular carcinoma (n = 4), cholangiocarcinoma (n = 2) or liver metastases from colorectal carcinoma (n = 12), uveal melanoma (n = 2), and breast cancer (n = 2) were included. Two patients were excluded because their surgery was unexpectedly postponed several days. Twenty-six malignancies were resected in the remaining 20 patients. Sensitivity for various modalities was 80 % (CT), 84 % (MRI), 62 % (inspection), 86 % (LUS), and 92 % (FI), respectively. Three metastases (12 %) were identified solely by FI. All 26 malignancies could be detected by combining LUS and FI (100 % sensitivity).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates added value of FI during laparoscopic resections of several hepatic tumors. Although larger series will be needed to confirm long-term patient outcome, the technology already aids the surgeon by providing real-time fluorescence guidance.

Management of hepatocellular carcinoma: an overview of major findings from meta-analyses

This paper aims to systematically review the major findings from meta-analyses comparing different treatment options for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). A total of 153 relevant papers were searched via the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane library databases. They were classified according to the mainstay treatment modalities (i.e., liver transplantation, surgical resection, radiofrequency ablation, transarterial embolization or chemoembolization, sorafenib, and others). The primary outcome data, such as overall survival, diseases-free survival or recurrence-free survival, progression-free survival, and safety, were summarized. The recommendations and uncertainties regarding the treatment of HCC were also proposed.