The prognostic relevance of node metastases in optimally cytoreduced advanced ovarian cancer

Clinico-pathologic characteristics and prognostic factors of ovarian carcinoma with different histologic subtypes - A benchmark analysis of 482 cases

PURPOSE

Ovarian carcinomas (OCX) have traditionally been thought to arise from the ovarian surface epithelium. However, recent (immuno-) histopathological and molecular analyses suggest that OCX consist of morphological subtypes with different epidemiologic features and a varying prognosis.

METHODS

The data of 482 OCX from the Clinical Cancer Registry of Leipzig who were surgically treated between 2000 and 2019 and were evaluated regarding incidence, clinico-pathologic characteristics and prognostic factors. Cases were separated into high-grade and non-high-grade serous tumors. Both groups were analyzed regarding the tumor stage, lymph node involvement, site of origin and prognosis.

RESULTS

The overall incidence for OCX was 17.9. The most common histological subtype was high-grade serous OCX (57.9%; 279/482). Patients with high-grade were significantly older than those with a non-high-grade serous OCX (63.9 versus 58.5 years; p < 0.001), more frequently diagnosed at an advanced stage >pT3 (78.5% (219/279) versus 42.8% (87/203); p < 0.001) and showed a 2.4-fold higher frequency of lymph node metastases (53.4% vs. 21.2%; p < 0.02) with a 4.6-fold higher rate of > 1 cm metastatic deposits (pN1b) within the lymph nodes (14.8% vs. 4.6%; p < 0.02). Irrespective of tumor stage and morphological subtype, the 1- and 5-year overall survival (OAS) was 72.9% and 40.8%, respectively. Patients with high-grade serous OCX showed a shorter 5-year OAS compared to non-high-grade serous OCX (34.1% vs. 57.0%; p 0.001). This association was reproducible in patients with an advanced tumor stage irrespective of the histopathologic tumor type serous OCX (pT3: 32.4% vs. pT1: 75.1%; p 0.001) as well as within high-grade (pT3: 28.7% vs. pT1: 55.5%; p = 0.003) and non-high-grade serous OCX (pT3: 43.0% vs. 80.0%; p 0.001). There were no differences in OAS depending on the site of origin (fallopian tube, ovary, peritoneum) within the two histologic subgroups.

CONCLUSION

OCX cases from a single institution with uniform surgical treatment and a standardized histopathological workup were evaluated. The poor prognostic outcome of patients with high-grade serous compared non-high-grade serous OCX as well as an advanced stage of the disease was confirmed. This study demonstrates for the first time that the histopathological distinction into high-grade serous and non-high-grade serous tumors may be much more prognostically relevant than the site of origin.

The role of sentinel-node biopsy in ovarian cancer

Lymph node involvement is an important prognostic factor in early and advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). However, to date there is no reliable method of detecting lymph node involvement, apart from surgical staging. Thus, pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy (LNE) are still part of standard surgery of early ovarian cancer. There is conflicting evidence about the therapeutic value of systematic LNE in early EOC. Thus, the developmemt of a method to predict nodal status accurately, without extensive LNE, is the subject of ongoing research. Sentinel lymphadenectomy (SLN) has become a standard procedure in oncological surgery. However, SLN is not yet an established and widely accepted procedure for EOC. This review aimed at summarizing available evidence on its feasibility and reliability in EOC. Overall, evidence of SLN in early EOC is still scarce. So far, only small series of patients with a variety of tracers and injection sites were published. From the available literature, the most promising technique seems to be injection into the infundibulopelvic, as well as the proper ovarian ligament. Indocyanine green seems to be an excellent tracer for successful SLN of ovarian tumors, which can be used during laparoscopic or robotic surgery. The detection rates and true positive rates of studies support further investigation of the technique. Results from prospective studies, e.g. the ongoing SELLY trial, are necesssary to implement SLN into the standard treatment of early EOC.

Prognostic Significance of Lymph Node Ratio in Ovarian Cancer

Lymphadenectomy is critical in the clinical prognosis of ovarian cancer patients. Therefore, we assessed whether lymph node ratio (LNR) has predictive value on overall survival (OS) of patients with serous epithelial ovarian cancer (SEOC). A total of 7,815 eligible SEOC patients were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, who underwent surgical resection between 1973 and 2013. We used the time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and the area under curve to determine the optimal cut-off value of LNR. The predictive role of LNR was analyzed by Cox proportional hazards regression model. The effects of LNR and positive lymph nodes (PLN) on OS were evaluated by comparing the time-dependent ROC curves. The time-dependent ROC curves showed that the optimal LNR cut-off value was 42.0% for nodal-positive SEOC. As shown in Kaplan-Meier survival curves, survival was significantly poorer for all patients with LNR≥42.0% (log-rank test: P<0.0001), regardless of the stage. In the multivariate Cox analysis, LNR≥42.0% remained a significant and independent predictor of mortality risk for all patients [hazards ratio: 1.526, 95% confidence interval: 1.415-1.647; P<0.0001], compared with those LNR<42.0%. These results suggest that LNR, rather than the number of PLN or stage, could be regarded as a promising predictor of mortality risk, particularly in stage-III SEOC patients.

Impact of Radicality Versus Timing of Surgery in Patients with Advanced Ovarian Cancer (Stage III C) Undergoing CRS and HIPEC-a Retrospective Study by INDEPSO

HIPEC in addition to interval CRS has shown a survival benefit of 12 months compared to CRS alone. However, there are many controversial issues pertaining to CRS itself which should be addressed first. To compare NACT and primary CRS approaches when CRS is categorized according to the extent of resection. To evaluate the feasibility of performing HIPEC at these two time points. A retrospective analysis of patients with stage III C ovarian cancer undergoing primary and interval CRS + HIPEC was performed. The surgical approach for interval CRS was classified as (1) resection of sites of residual disease alone or (2) resection of sites involved before NACT. The morphological response was divided into different categories, and surgeons had to state what they consider residual disease and what they do not. From January 2013 to December 2017, 54 patients were included (18-primary; 36-interval). Median PCI 11 vs 6.5 (p = 0.07); CC-0 was obtained in 77.7%. Three surgeons resected previously involved sites; three sites of residual disease only. All surgeons resected areas of scarring. Twenty percent patients had residual disease in "normal-looking" peritoneum. Morbidity (p = 0.09), median OS (p = 0.71), and median DFS (p = 0.54) were similar in the two groups. Early recurrence occurred in 50% with resection of residual disease alone compared to 16.6% when previous disease sites were resected (p = 0.07). Interval CRS should be performed to resect sites involved prior to NACT and not just sites of residual disease. HIPEC can be performed in both primary/interval settings with acceptable morbidity.

Survival effect of different lymph node staging methods on ovarian cancer: An analysis of 10 878 patients

Background

To compare the survival impact of several lymph node staging methods and therapeutic role of lymphadenectomy in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer who had undergone lymphadenectomy.

Methods

Data were retrospectively collected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program between 1988 and 2013.

Results

An increasing number of resected lymph nodes (RLNs) was associated with a significant improvement in survival of FIGO stage II and III disease. However, for FIGO stage IV patients, better survival was not significantly associated with a more extensive lymphadenectomy. A higher lymph node ratio (LNR) and log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS) were associated with poorer survival regardless of stage. Nevertheless, four‐category classification of LODDS was more suitable for stage IV patients when three‐category classification was compatible with stage I‐III disease. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that LODDS and LNR were significant independent prognostic factors, but not RLN classification.

Conclusion

Sixteen to thirty RLNs are recommended for stage I disease. For stages II and III patients, the more lymph node excision, the better the prognosis. However, lymphadenectomy was nonessential for stage IV patients. Considering staging methods, for stages II and III patients, three‐category classification of LODDS was recommended to evaluate the prognosis. For stage I and IV, three‐category classification of positive LNR was idoneous.

Role of systematic lymphadenectomy as part of primary debulking surgery for optimally cytoreduced advanced ovarian cancer: Reappraisal in the era of radical surgery

The prognostic significance of pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy during primary debulking surgery for advanced-stage ovarian cancer remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the survival impact of lymph node dissection (LND) in patients treated with optimal cytoreduction for advanced ovarian cancer. Data from 158 consecutive patients with stage IIIC–IV disease who underwent optimal cytoreduction (<1 cm) were obtained via retrospective chart review. Patients were classified into two groups: (1) lymph node sampling (LNS), node count <20; and (2) LND, node count ≥20. Progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using the Kaplan–Meier method. Among the included patients, 96 and 62 patients underwent LND and LNS as primary debulking surgery, respectively. There were no differences in the extent of debulking surgical procedures, including extensive upper abdominal surgery, between the groups. Patients who underwent LND had a marginally significantly improved PFS (P = 0.059) and significantly improved OS (P < 0.001) compared with those who underwent LNS. In a subgroup with negative lymphadenopathy on preoperative computed tomography scans, revealed LND correlated with a better PFS and OS (P = 0.042, 0.001, respectively). Follow-ups of subsequent recurrences observed a significantly lower nodal recurrence rate among patients who underwent LND. A multivariate analysis identified LND as an independent prognostic factor for PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.629; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.400–0.989) and OS (HR, 0.250; 95% CI, 0.137–0.456). In conclusion, systematic LND might have therapeutic value and improve prognosis for patients with optimally cytoreduced advanced ovarian cancer.

Lymph node ratio may predict the benefit of postoperative radiotherapy in node-positive cervical cancer

The standard treatment for node-positive cervical cancer after radical hysterectomy is pelvic radiotherapy and concurrent chemotherapy. Given the potential toxicity of postoperative radiotherapy, we used the lymph node ratio (LNR) to assess the benefit of postoperative radiotherapy in lymph node-positive cervical cancer patients. Data from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results database (1988-2010) were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression proportional hazard analysis. A total of 2,269 eligible patients were identified (median follow-up, 78.0 months); 1,863 (82.1%) patients received postoperative radiotherapy. In both univariate and multivariate analysis multivariate analysis, a higher LNR was significantly associated with a poorer outcome. A LNR > 0.16 was associated with poorer cervical cancer-related survival (CCSS) (hazard Ratio [HR] 1.376, confidence interval [CI] 1.082-1.750; P < 0.001) and overall survival (OS) (HR 1.287, CI 1.056-1.569; P = 0.012). Postoperative radiotherapy was only associated with survival benefits in patients with a LNR > 0.16 (CCSS, P < 0.001; OS, P < 0.001) and not in patients with a LNR ≤ 0.16 (CCSS, P = 0.620; OS, P = 0.167); these trends were not affected by number of removed lymph nodes. A higher LNR is associated with a poorer survival in lymph node-positive cervical cancer. The survival benefits of postoperative radiotherapy appear to be limited to patients with a LNR > 0.16.

Prognostic value of lymph node ratio in stage IIIC epithelial ovarian cancer with node-positive in a SEER population-based study

To assess the prognostic value of the lymph node ratio (LNR) in patients with stage IIIC epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) with node-positive in a Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) population-based study. Data of patients were obtained from the SEER database from 1990 to 2012, and analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival methods and Cox regression proportional hazard model. The prognostic value of the LNR on cause-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated. A total of 5,926 patients were identified. Univariate analysis showed that the number of removed lymph nodes (RLNs), the number of positive lymph nodes, and the LNR were significantly associated with CSS and OS (P < 0.05 for all). Multivariate analysis indicated that a higher LNR was an independent prognostic factor for poorer CSS (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.896, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.709-2.104, P < 0.001) and OS (HR:1.679, 95% CI: 1.454-1.939, P < 0.001). Among patients with LNR ≤ 0.42 and those with LNR > 0.42, the 5-year CSS was 53.1% and 34.7%, respectively (P < 0.001), and the 5-year OS was 50.4% and 32.0%, respectively (P < 0.001). The prognostic value of the LNR persisted for patients after stratification by the numbers of RLNs, tumor histology, and tumor grade. LNR is a more accurate prognostic method for stage IIIC EOC patients. Patients with a higher LNR are associated with poorer survival in stage IIIC EOC.

Risk factors for lymph node metastasis in ovarian cancer: Implications for systematic lymphadenectomy

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to assess the risk factors associated with lymph node metastases and to evaluate the role of systematic lymphadenectomy in ovarian cancer.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed patients diagnosed with ovarian cancer between December 2004 and March 2012. Demographics, pathologic findings, and correlations with lymph node metastases were assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 256 patients were identified. The mean number of removed lymph nodes was 20.5 (range, 2-57), and 84 patients (32.8%) had nodal metastases. The mean number of positive lymph nodes was 3 (range, 1-40) in patients with lymph node metastases. Univariate analysis showed that serous histology, histological grade 2-3, and CA-125 level at diagnosis >740 U/mL were significant risk factors for lymph node metastases. Multivariate analysis showed that serous histology (odds ratio [OR], 2.728; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.072-6.945; p = 0.035), histological grade 2-3 (OR 1.897; 95% CI, 1.209-2.977; p = 0.005), and CA-125 level at diagnosis >740 U/mL (OR, 3.858; 95% CI 2.143-6.947; p < 0.001) remain the most important risk factors for lymph node metastases. The nodal metastasis rates for 0 to 1 risk factors were significantly lower than those of 2-3 risk factors (3.7% vs. 40.6%; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The current study suggests that the decision making of systematic lymphadenectomy in ovarian cancer patients should be referred to the histological type, grade, and CA-125 level at diagnosis.

Prognostic value of lymph node ratio in patients with small-cell carcinoma of the cervix based on data from a large national registry

Objective

To investigate the prognostic value of the lymph node ratio (LNR) in patients with small-cell carcinoma of the cervix (SCCC) after cancer-directed surgery using a population-based national registry (Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results [SEER]).

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the data of SCCC patients in the SEER database from 1980 to 2012. The prognostic impact of LNR with respect to cause-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) was analyzed.

Results

A total of 118 patients with SCCC were identified. The median follow-up was 30.5 months. All these patients were treated with cancer-directed surgery and lymphadenectomy. Sixty (50.8%) patients had nodal metastases. The median LNR was 0.16 in patients with positive lymph nodes. Univariate analysis showed that prognostic factors such as International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage, nodal status, LNR, and local treatment modalities affected CSS and OS (P<0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that LNR was an independent prognostic factor for CSS and OS. Patients with a higher LNR had worse CSS (hazard ratio [HR]: 8.832; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.762–20.738; P<0.001) and OS (HR: 8.462; 95% CI: 3.613–19.821; P<0.001). LNR was associated with CSS and OS by stage, especially in FIGO stage I–II patients.

Conclusion

LNR is an independent prognostic factor in SCCC patients and it may help to individualize adjuvant therapy.