Stereotactic body radiotherapy for elderly patients (≥ 75 years) with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer

Survival analysis after stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for early stage non-small cell lung cancer: a single-institution cohort study

BACKGROUND

Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) is the standard treatment for medically inoperable early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (ES-NSCLC), but which patients benefit from stereotactic radiotherapy is unclear. The aim of this study was to analyze prognostic factors for early mortality.

METHODS

From August 2010 to 2022, 617 patients with medically inoperable, peripheral or central ES-NSCLC were treated with SABR at our institution. We retrospectively evaluated the data from 172 consecutive patients treated from 2018 to 2020 to analyze the prognostic factors associated with overall survival (OS). The biological effective dose was > 100 Gy10 in all patients, and 60 Gy was applied in 3-5 fractions for a gross tumor volume (GTV) + 3 mm margin when the tumor diameter was < 1 cm; 30-33 Gy was delivered in one fraction. Real-time tumor tracking or an internal target volume approach was applied in 96% and 4% of cases, respectively. In uni- and multivariate analysis, a Cox model was used for the following variables: ventilation parameter FEV1, histology, age, T stage, central vs. peripheral site, gender, pretreatment PET, biologically effective dose (BED), and age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index (AACCI).

RESULTS

The median OS was 35.3 months. In univariate analysis, no correlation was found between OS and ventilation parameters, histology, PET, or centrality. Tumor diameter, biological effective dose, gender, and AACCI met the criteria for inclusion in the multivariate analysis. The multivariate model showed that males (HR 1.51, 95% CI 1.01-2.28; p = 0.05) and AACCI > 5 (HR 1.56, 95% CI 1.06-2.31; p = 0.026) were significant negative prognostic factors of OS. However, the analysis of OS showed that the significant effect of AACCI > 5 was achieved only after 3 years (3-year OS 37% vs. 56%, p = 0.021), whereas the OS in one year was similar (1-year OS 83% vs. 86%, p = 0.58).

CONCLUSION

SABR of ES-NSCLC with precise image guidance is feasible for all medically inoperable patients with reasonable performance status. Early deaths were rare in our real-life cohort, and OS is clearly higher than would have been expected after best supportive care.

Clinical outcomes and lung toxicities after lung SABR using dynamic conformal arc therapy: a single-institution cohort study

BACKGROUND

Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) is a validated treatment for early stage lung cancer and pulmonary metastases. It provides a high local control rate with low symptomatic toxicities. Recently, Dynamic Conformal Arc Therapy (DCAT), a delivery option that differs from conventional DCA, has been implemented in the Monaco Treatment Planning System for SABR. The aim of the study was to report clinical outcomes and toxicities for patients treated for lung SABR with this new technique.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified adult patients treated for primary or secondary lung tumors with DCAT-SABR and reported their clinical, radiological, histological characteristics and dosimetric parameters. Total dose was delivered in 3 or 5 fractions for 95% of patients and prescribed on the 80% isodose line to the PTV periphery.

RESULTS

145 patients met inclusion criteria for a total of 152 lesions with a median follow up of 12 months. Local control for the irradiated site was 96.7% at 1 year. Overall survival was 93.1% at 1 year. Mean prescription dose in BED₁₀ was 110 Gy. 92% of patients had a prescribed dose superior to 100 Gy BED₁₀. Mean PTV coverage was 95.1%. There were 66 cases of grade 1 radiation pneumonitis (RP) (43%) and only 7 cases of symptomatic grade 2 RP (4.6%).

CONCLUSION

Lung SABR for primary or metastatic lung tumors using dynamic conformal arc therapy provides efficient results of local control and low lung toxicities, similar to other SABR techniques.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

SABR using DCAT is a safe technique to treat lung lesions, allowing intra-fraction motion limitation, potentially higher OARs protection and a shortened beam delivery.

Relationship between Dose Prescription Methods and Local Control Rate in Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Early Stage Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Variations in dose prescription methods in stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for early stage non-small-cell lung cancer (ES-NSCLC) make it difficult to properly compare the outcomes of published studies. We conducted a comprehensive search of the published literature to summarize the outcomes by discerning the relationship between local control (LC) and dose prescription sites. We systematically searched PubMed to identify observational studies reporting LC after SBRT for peripheral ES-NSCLC. The correlations between LC and four types of biologically effective doses (BED) were evaluated, which were calculated from nominal, central, and peripheral prescription points and, from those, the average BED. To evaluate information on SBRT for peripheral ES-NSCLC, 188 studies were analyzed. The number of relevant articles increased over time. The use of an inhomogeneity correction was mentioned in less than half of the articles, even among the most recent. To evaluate the relationship between the four BEDs and LC, 33 studies were analyzed. Univariate meta-regression revealed that only the central BED significantly correlated with the 3-year LC of SBRT for ES-NSCLC (p = 0.03). As a limitation, tumor volume, which might affect the results of this study, could not be considered due to a lack of data. In conclusion, the central dose prescription is appropriate for evaluating the correlation between the dose and LC of SBRT for ES-NSCLC. The standardization of SBRT dose prescriptions is desirable.

Initial treatment of early-stage small-sized non-small cell lung cancer for octogenarians: a population-based study

The objectives of this study is to figure out the appropriate initial treatment and criteria for clinical decision for early-stage small-sized non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) among octogenarians. Elderly patients (≥80 years) with stage I NSCLC (<3 cm) were identified between 2004 and 2015 in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Patients were divided into four cohorts regarding treatment modalities, and overall survival and cancer-specific survival were evaluated via Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazard model. The propensity score matching method was introduced in the subgroup analysis stratified by four clinical characteristics to identify the preferable treatment. A total of 7861 patients were included with a median overall survival of 43 months (range 1-155 months). In younger patients (80-85 years), lobectomy was superior in improving the survival (versus segmentectomy, HR = 0.68, 95%CI 0.55-0.84; versus wedge resection, HR = 0.77; 95%CI 0.67-0.88). While in those over 85 years, lobectomy was superior to wedge resection (HR = 0.72; 95%CI 0.53-0.98), and all other treatments were comparable. As stratified by T stage in those over 85 years, lobectomy was superior to wedge resection (P = 0.023) for T1 disease, and the four treatments were all comparable in overall survival for T2 disease. In conclusions, the favored treatment of early stage NSCLC for octogenarians may be evaluated by age and T stage. Lobectomy might be preferred in patients between 80 and 85 years whenever possible. Among those over 85 years, radiotherapy might lead to a comparable prognosis and could be recommended as the prior treatment, while should surgery be recommended, lobectomy might be preferred for T1 disease and wedge resection for T2 disease.

Analysis of the efficacy and safety of iodine-125 seeds implantation in the treatment of patients with inoperable early-stage non-small cell lung cancer

Purpose

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of iodine-125 (¹²⁵I) seeds implantation for inoperable early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Material and methods

PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, China Biology Medicine disc (CBM), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and Wanfang Data were searched from inception until April 2020. Data were collected concerning overall survival, short-term efficacy, and complications. Meta-analysis was performed using R software (version 3.6.3).

Results

Nine studies involving 308 patients were included. Meta-analysis showed that the 1-, 2-, and 3-year survival rates were 0.98% (95% CI: 0.95-0.99%), 0.83% (95% CI: 0.77-0.89%), and 0.65% (95% CI: 0.55-0.75%), respectively; short-term local control rate (LCR) and effective rates were 0.99% (95% CI: 0.98-1.00%) and 0.92% (95% CI: 0.83-0.98%), respectively; 1-, 2-, and 3-year LCRs were 0.96% (95% CI: 0.83-1.00%), 0.94% (95% CI: 0.85-0.99%), and 0.95% (95% CI: 0.76-1.00%), respectively. Sub-group analysis of the prescribed dose found that when the prescribed dose was > 120 Gy, short-term efficacy and 1-year LCR were increased significantly (p < 0.01). The incidence of bleeding, pneumothorax, and radiation lung injury was 0.14% (95% CI: 0.07-0.21%), 0.19% (95% CI: 0.11-0.28%), and 0.00% (95% CI: 0.00-0.03%), respectively. Two studies involving 106 patients compared ¹²⁵I seeds combined with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for NSCLC. Results showed that compared with chemotherapy alone, ¹²⁵I seeds combined with chemotherapy could improve short-term LCR (RR = 1.34, 95% CI: 1.09-1.65%, p = 0.005) and short-term effective rate (RR = 1.49, 95% CI: 1.14-1.96%, p = 0.004).

Conclusions

¹²⁵I seeds implantation is safe and effective approach for the treatment of inoperable early-stage NSCLC, but high-quality clinical research is still needed to further confirm the findings.

Lung stereotactic body radiation therapy for elderly patients aged ≥ 80 years with pathologically proven early-stage non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective cohort study

Background

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is an established therapy for medically inoperable early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Many elderly patients are medically inoperable owing to comorbidities. Therefore, SBRT may be a useful therapy for elderly patients. However, the application of SBRT for patients aged ≥ 80 years has not been completely elucidated. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the clinical utility of SBRT for elderly patients aged ≥ 80 years with pathologically proven early-stage NSCLC.

Methods

We retrospectively evaluated the data of patients aged ≥ 80 years with pathologically proven primary NSCLC who underwent SBRT at our institution between January 2009 and March 2020. Treatment outcomes and toxicities were analyzed. We used the Kaplan–Meier method to estimate survival curves and the log-rank test to compare the survival curves. We performed univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses. p-values < 0.05 were regarded significant.

Results

Sixty-four patients (65 lesions) were included, and the median follow-up period was 38.7 (range 3.5–95.7) months. The median age was 82.9 (range 80.0–94.8) years. Sixteen patients were medically operable, and 48 patients were medically inoperable. The prescribed dose of SBRT was either 48 Gy in four fractions or 60 Gy in 10 fractions. The median survival time was 60.0 months (95% confidence interval, 43.5–71.1). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year local control, cancer-specific survival, progression-free survival, and overall survival rates were 98.4%, 98.4%, 81.0%, and 88.9%; 90.1%, 93.7%, 58.9%, and 68.3%; and 87.4%, 83.5%, 38.2%, and 47.5%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that inoperability and solid nodules were the predictors of poor overall survival after SBRT in elderly patients. Two patients (3.1%) had grade 3 radiation pneumonitis, and one patient (1.6%) had grade 5 radiation pneumonitis.

Conclusions

SBRT was feasible in patients aged ≥ 80 years with NSCLC. It achieved good local control with minimal toxicity. SBRT may be beneficial in elderly patients with early-stage NSCLC.

[Retrospective study on the intensification of hypofractionated radiotherapy: The organizational change]

Objectif de l’étude

Le processus de réalisation de la radiothérapie externe est une chaine d’étapes dans laquelle chacune d’entre elles est réalisée seulement si la précédente a été complétée. Le développement des pratiques d’hypofractionnement ces dernières années a tendance à augmenter la charge de travail des étapes de préparation à une irradiation et à diminuer le nombre de séances par patient. Cette étude rétrospective vise à analyser l’évolution de ces pratiques dans un centre de lutte contre le cancer et d’en apprécier les enjeux organisationnels.

Matériel et méthodes

L’ensemble des données de gestion des dossiers de radiothérapie ont été extraites du système d’information de radiothérapie. Les séances de radiothérapie ont été identifiées par patient et par code CIM (Classification internationale des maladies). Le taux de remplissage des appareils de traitement a été calculé avec les données réelles du département de radiothérapie.

Résultats

De 2015 à 2019, une augmentation du nombre de scanographies (+16 %), du nombre de patients pris en charge (+11,6 %) et du volume d’heures disponibles pour les traitements (+12 %) ont été observées. Aussi, une diminution du nombre total de séances de radiothérapie (−5 %), de la moyenne de séances réalisées par séquence de traitement (−19 %), du taux de remplissage des appareils (−7 %) et de la moyenne de séances réalisées par patients traités des tumeurs malignes des bronches et du poumon (−38 %), des organes digestifs (−37 %), secondaires (−19 %) du sein (−15 %) et de la prostate (−15 %) ont été observées. Le nombre de séances administrées par séquence de traitement entre 2015 et 2019 a diminué significativement pour les patients des classes d’âge [20–69 ans] (p < 0,001) et [> 70 ans] (p < 0,001).

Conclusion

Un paradoxe apparait entre l’augmentation du nombre total de patients pris en charge et la diminution du taux de remplissage des appareils de traitement. Ce transfert de charge de travail a un impact sur la qualité et la sécurité des soins et sur les stratégies d’organisation et d’investissement. Il a également un impact économique lié au modèle de remboursement basé sur la tarification à la séance. Une réorganisation des services de radiothérapie s’avère inéluctable.