Treatment efficacy and safety of regorafenib plus drug-eluting beads-transarterial chemoembolization versus regorafenib monotherapy in colorectal cancer liver metastasis patients who fail standard treatment regimens

The second-line treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma with CalliSpheres drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization combined with regorafenib: A safety and efficacy analysis

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of CalliSpheres drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) combined with regorafenib in the second-line treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was made of 34 patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) that had progressed after first-line treatment in Linyi Tumor Hospital from October 2019 to June 2021. These patients were divided into observation group (n = 15) and control group (n = 19) based on their treatment plans, who were respectively treated with regorafenib alone and regorafenib combined with DEB-TACE. The objective response rate (ORR) and the disease control rate (DCR) were evaluated by the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST), and the progression-free survival (PFS) and the overall survival (OS) were calculated; the factors influencing PFS and OS of patients were analyzed by the Cox proportional hazards model; and the adverse reactions to the treatments were observed and recorded.

RESULTS

After 2 months of treatment, the ORR and the DCR of the observation group were 73.3% (11/15) and 86.7% (13/15) respectively, both higher than 10.5% (2/19) and 47.4% (9/19) of the control group. Their differences are statistically significant (P < 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in the incidences of regorafenib-related adverse reactions including hand-foot skin reactions, fatigue, hypertension, diarrhea, and proteinuria between the two groups (P > 0.05). In the observation group, the main adverse reactions to DEB-TACE such as fever, pain, nausea, and vomiting were relieved after symptomatic treatment, and no serious complications such as ectopic embolization of CalliSpheres drug-eluting beads occurred. As of July 31, 2022, the median follow-up time was 12.5 months, and the average was (14.00 ± 5.69) months. The median PFS was 9 months in the observation group, and 6 months in the control group, presenting a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05), and the median OS was 18 months in the observation group, and 12 months in the control group, also presenting a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05). The results of monofactor prognostic analysis showed that Child grade, AFP level, and treatment method had an influence on the PFS and the OS of liver cancer patients receiving regorafenib second-line treatment (P < 0.05), and the results of multifactor prognostic analysis showed that child grade and treatment method independently influenced the PFS of patients, while treatment method independently influenced the OS of patients (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

DEB-TACE combined with regorafenib is safe and feasible in the treatment of unresectable HCC, with good efficacy and mild adverse reactions.

Liver-Directed Therapy Combined with Systemic Therapy: Current Status and Future Directions

In the past several decades, major advances in both systemic and locoregional therapies have been made for many cancer patients. This has led to modern cancer treatment algorithms frequently calling for active interventions by multiple subspecialists at the same time. One of the areas where this can be clearly seen is the concomitant use of locoregional and systemic therapies in patients with primary or secondary cancers of the liver. These combined algorithms have gained favor over the last decade and are largely focused on the allure of the combined ability to control systemic disease while at the same time addressing refractory/resistant clonal populations. While the general concept has gained favor and is likely to only increase in popularity with the continued establishment of viable immunotherapy treatments, for many patients questions remain. Lingering concerns over the increase in toxicity when combining treatment methods, patient selection, and sequencing remain for multiple cancer patient populations. While further work remains, some of these questions have been addressed in the literature. This article reviews the available data on three commonly treated primary and secondary cancers of the liver, namely, hepatocellular carcinoma, cholangiocarcinoma, and metastatic colorectal cancer. Furthermore, strengths and weaknesses are reviewed and future directions are discussed.

Immunotherapy combined with local therapy in the late-line treatment of repair-proficient (pMMR)/microsatellite stable (MSS) metastatic colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common malignancies, and at the initial visit, most patients are diagnosed with metastatic CRC (mCRC). However, immunotherapy is only and highly effective in a very small proportion of patients with mCRC having mismatch repair defect (dMMR)/high microsatellite instability, and the majority of the patients with mCRC having mismatch repair proficient (pMMR)/microsatellite stability (MSS) cannot benefit from it. At present, many clinical studies of immunotherapy combined with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are trying to regulate the immune microenvironment of pMMR/MSS mCRC, transforming a "cold tumor" into a "hot tumor," which has not only surprising effects but also certain limitations, i.e., the response could not be specific to metastasis. Therefore, regarding the bottleneck encountered by immunotherapy in patients with patients pMMR/MSS mCRC, this study summarized current research and possible mechanisms of immunotherapy combined with local therapy for metastasis, including radiotherapy, ablation, and transcatheter arterial chemoembolization.

Efficacy and Safety of Drug-Eluting Bead TACE in the Treatment of Primary or Secondary Liver Cancer

Background

The drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) has already been used in hepatic malignancies. We aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of DEB-TACE in treating primary or secondary liver cancer.

Methods

We retrospectively evaluated 59 patients with hepatic malignancies, including 41 patients with primary liver cancer and 18 patients with secondary liver cancer, between September 2016 and February 2019. All patients were treated with DEB-TACE. Objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were evaluated by mRECIST. The pain was assessed using a numerical rating scale (NRS) where 0 represented no pain, and a score of ten was unbearable. Adverse reactions were assessed according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events 4.0 (CTCAE4.0).

Results

In the subgroup of primary liver cancer, 3 patients (7.32%) got complete response, 13 patients (31.71%) got partial response, 21 patients (51.22%) experienced stable disease, and 4 patients (9.76%) suffered progressive disease; ORR was 39.02% and DCR was 90.24%. In the subgroup of secondary liver cancer, 0 patients (0%) got complete response, 6 patients (33.33%) got partial response, 11 patients (61.11%) experienced stable disease, and 1 patient (5.56%) suffered progressive disease; ORR was 33.33% and DCR was 94.44%. We did not find any difference when comparing the efficacy between primary and secondary liver cancer (P=0.612). The one-year survival rate was 70.73% for primary liver cancer and 61.11% for secondary liver cancer. There was no significant difference between the two groups (P=0.52). For the patients with CR or PR, no factor could predict the efficacy of DEB-TACE. The most common treatment-related adverse reactions were short-term liver function disorders. The symptoms included fever (20.34%), abdomen pain (16.95%), and vomiting (5.08%), all patients with adverse reactions got remission after treatment.

Conclusions

DEB-TACE has a promising effect in the treatment of primary or secondary liver cancer. The treatment-related adverse reactions are tolerable.

Efficacy and Safety of TACE Combined with Regorafenib versus TACE in the Third-Line Treatment of Colorectal Liver Metastases

BACKGROUND

The liver is the most common site of metastasis in colorectal cancer. In patients with unresectable colorectal liver metastases, the 5-year survival rate is less than 5%. Many patients with colorectal liver metastases require effective subsequent therapy after the failure of standard first-line/second-line therapy. The purpose of this study is to investigate the efficacy and safety of TACE combined with Regorafenib versus TACE in the third-line treatment of patients with colorectal liver metastases.

METHOD

The clinical data of 132 patients with colorectal liver metastases were collected. There were two groups: TACE + Regorafenib group (N = 63); TACE group (N = 69). TACE uses CalliSpheres® drug-loaded microspheres (loaded with irinotecan). Regorafenib is administered at a dose of 120 mg once daily. If the patient is severely intolerable, the regorafenib dose is adjusted to 80 mg once daily. Primary study endpoints were (1) to evaluate the tumor response, ORR, and DCR and (2) to evaluate OS and PFS in the two groups. Secondary study endpoints were (1) to compare the performance status, CEA, CA19-9 after treatment between the two groups and (2) to compare the incidence of adverse events between the two groups.

RESULTS

There were significant differences in tumor response, ORR, DCR, OS, and PFS after treatment between the two groups. TACE combined with the Regorafenib group versus the TACE group: ORR (57.1% vs 33.3%), DCR (82.5% vs 68.1%), mOS (18.2 months vs 11.3 months), and mPFS (8.9 months vs 5.3 months). The performance status after treatment was better in the TACE + Regorafenib group than in the TACE group (P < 0.05). The CEA and CA19-9 negative rates after treatment were higher in the TACE + Regorafenib group than in the TACE group (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

For the third-line treatment of colorectal liver metastases, the combination of TACE + Regorafenib had better tumor response, OS, and PFS than TACE TACE + Regorafenib combination could be considered as salvage therapy for colorectal liver metastases who failed the first- and second-line standard therapy.

Gelatin sponge microparticles for transarterial chemoembolization combined with regorafenib in hepatocellular carcinoma: a single-center retrospective study

Background

The treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is challenging. The positive effect of gelatin sponge microparticles for transarterial chemoembolization (GSMs-TACE) in the treatment of Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage C and large HCC has been confirmed by previous studies. This study initially explored the efficacy and safety of GSMs-TACE combined with regorafenib in patients with unresectable HCC who failed first-line sorafenib and/or lenvatinib therapy.

Methods

This retrospective study collated the data of patients who presented at the Affiliated Zhongshan Hospital of Dalian University between December 2018 and June 2021. Patients were treated with GSMs-TACE, followed by regorafenib 1 week later. Follow-up was conducted every 3 to 5 weeks after combination therapy. If the treatment was changed due to disease progression, the patients were followed up every 3 months to obtain overall survival (OS) time. The OS, progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) was used to evaluate the efficacy of the treatment, while adverse events (AEs) was used to assess its safety.

Results

A total of 47 patients were included in the study. The age of patients was 64.4±6.8 years; There were 43 (91.5%) males and 4 (8.5%) females; the number of Child-Pugh grade A was 22 (46.8%) and B was 25 (53.2%); the longest tumor diameter was 5.1 cm [interquartile range (IQR), 3.8, 8.9 cm]; the number of BCLC grade B was 14 (29.8%) and grade C was 33 (70.2%). The median follow-up time was 11.6 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 10.8 to 14.0 months]. The median number of GSMS-TACE sessions was 3. The initial doses of regorafenib were 80 mg/d (n=17, 36.2%), 120 mg/d (n=23, 48.9%), and 160 mg/d (n=7, 14.9%). The median PFS was 6.0 months (95% CI: 4.5 to 7.5 months), and the median OS was 14.3 months (95% CI: 11.8 to 16.8 months). The ORR and DCR were 21.3% and 85.1%, respectively. The incidence of grade 3/4 AEs was 8 out of 47 patients (17.0%).

Conclusions

The study indicated that GSMs-TACE combined with regorafenib may be efficient and safe in patients with unresectable HCC. Future prospective large-scale studies should be conducted to verify these results.

Clinical strategy of conversion therapy and surgical treatment for liver metastases from colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer is one of the common malignant tumors of the digestive system in clinical practice. Due to the anatomical characteristics of the colorectum itself, colorectal cancer is prone to liver metastasis. Approximately 15%-25% of colorectal cancer cases are complicated with liver metastasis at diagnosis, 15%-25% are complicated with liver metastasis after radical resection of colorectal cancer, and 80%-90% with liver metastasis cannot undergo radical resection initially. The 5-year survival rate is less than 5%, and liver metastasis is the main cause of death in patients with colorectal cancer. In recent years, with the clinical application of effective chemotherapy and molecular targeted drugs, as well as the rapid development of surgical techniques, an individualized safe, efficient, fast, treatment plan can be formulated according to patients' age, primary colorectal tumor location, degree of differentiation, Ras and B-Raf gene status, tumor size, number and distribution of metastases in the liver. By shrinking the tumor volume in the liver and increasing the residual liver volume, liver metastatic tumors can undergo surgical resection or disease-free status can be achieved in patients with liver metastasis. As a result, patients with colorectal liver metastases can achieve a 5-year survival rate of 30%-57%, which greatly improves the prognosis after operation. According to the postoperative adverse factors, individualized preventive measures are worked out to reduce the impact of adverse factors and improve the prognosis of patients with colorectal liver metastases. In this paper, we systematically discuss the clinical strategy of conversion therapy and surgical treatment for unresectable colorectal cancer liver metastases by reviewing the relevant domestic and foreign literature, so as to provide a theoretical reference for the selection of clinical treatment and program for patients with unresectable colorectal cancer liver metastases.

Safety, Feasibility and Technical Considerations from a Prospective, Observational Study-CIREL: Irinotecan-TACE for CRLM in 152 Patients

CIREL, a prospective, Europe-wide, observational study aimed to assess the real-world feasibility and tolerability of irinotecan-based transarterial chemoembolization (LP-irinotecan TACE) for unresectable colorectal cancer liver metastases with regard to the treatment plan and adverse events (AEs). CIREL enrolled 152 eligible patients (≥18 years) with liver-only or dominant metastases treated with LP-irinotecan TACE following a multidisciplinary tumor board decision. Data were prospectively collected for baseline, the number of planned and performed sessions, and technical information and safety according to CTCAE 4.03/5.0. Results from 351 analyzed treatment sessions showed technical success for 99% of sessions, and 121 patients (79%) completed all planned sessions. Further, 60% of sessions were performed using opioids, 4% intra-arterial anesthetics, and 25% both. Additionally, 60% of patients experienced at least one peri-interventional AE of any grade; 8% of grade 3−4. Occurrence of AEs was related to larger liver-involvement (p < 0.001), bi-lobar disease (p = 0.002), and larger beads (p < 0.001). Using corticosteroids together with antiemetics showed reduced and lower grade vomiting (p = 0.01). LP-irinotecan TACE was tolerated well and had a high proportion of completed treatment plans. This minimally invasive locoregional treatment can be used together with concomitant systemic therapy or ablation.

Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy plus regorafenib in advanced colorectal cancer: a real-world retrospective study

Background

Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy delivers the drug directly to the liver. We aim to explore the benefits and tolerability of Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy plus regorafenib in advanced colorectal liver metastasis refractory to standard systemic chemotherapy.

Methods

This study analyzed 47 patients treated with hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy plus regorafenib after standard systemic oxaliplatin and/or irinotecan in combination with bevacizumab or cetuximab between Jan 2017 and Jun 2020. Regorafenib was given for only 3 weeks in a 4-week cycle.

Results

Among 47 patients, 32 (68%) were males. The median age was 61 (29–75). With a median follow-up of 22.2 months (3.7–50.7 months). Before Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy administration in combination with regorafenib, 34 (72.3%) patients previously received ≥ 2 prior lines of systemic therapy and 37 (78.7%)patients previously received targeted biological treatment (anti-VEGF or anti-EGFR, or both). The initial doses of regorafenib were 40 mg/d (n = 1, 2.13%), 80 mg/d (n = 11, 23.43%), 120 mg/d (n = 2, 4.26%), and 160 mg/d (n = 23, 48.94%), while for 24.6% (n = 14) dose was unknown. Median Overall Survival was 22.2 months. Median Progression-Free Survival was 10.8 (95% CI: 9.0–13.7) months. Common Adverse Events were hand-foot skin reaction (12.77%), fatigue (6.38%), vomiting (6.38%), and decreased appetite (6.38%). Only 2 patients discontinued regorafenib due to Adverse Events.

Conclusions

Regorafenib combined with Hepatic arterial infusion was effective and tolerable in patients with liver predominant metastasis of colorectal cancer. Hence, this therapy can be considered as an alternative for second- or subsequent lines of therapy in patients refractory to standard systemic chemotherapy.

Comparison of the safety and prognosis of sequential regorafenib after sorafenib and lenvatinib treatment failure in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective cohort study

Background

There is lack of studies on sequential regorafenib after sorafenib and lenvatinib treatment failure in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study was to explore the safety and prognosis of sequential regorafenib after sorafenib and lenvatinib failure in HCC patients.

Methods

This study was a retrospective, real-world study that included 50 HCC patients who received sequential regrafinib after sorafenib and lenvatinib failure. The safety and prognosis of two groups were compared.

Results

The incidence of all grade and III/IV adverse events were 68% and 24%. According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) 1.1 and modified (m) RECIST standards, the objective response rates (ORRs) after receiving regorafenib were 14.0% and 22.0%, respectively. The disease control rates (DCRs) were 62.0% and 60.0%, respectively. Based on different first-line targeted drugs, 50 patients were divided into sorafenib (n=22) and lenvatinib group (n=28). There was no differences between two groups except age and bilirubin. And there was no differences in other treatments before or after regorafenib. The baseline between two groups was basically same and had good comparability. There was no difference in incidence of all grade and III/IV adverse events, ORR and DCR between two groups (P>0.05). On long-term prognosis, total overall survival (TOS) in sorafenib and lenvatinib group were 23.0 (95% CI: 15.1-30.9) vs. 29.7 (95% CI: 21.4-38.1) months. The difference was statistically significant (P=0.041). Besides, regorafenib overall survival (ROS) in sorafenib and lenvatinib group were 11.7 (95% CI: 7.1-16.3) vs. 15.9 (95% CI: 8.3-23.5) months. The difference was statistically significant ( P=0.045). The regorafenib progression-free survival (RPFS) was 5.6 (95% CI: 1.9-9.2) vs. 8.0 (95% CI: 5.1-10.9) months in sorafenib and lenvatinib group, respectively, and difference was not statistically significant (P=0.380).

Conclusions

Regorafenib is an effective drug for second-line treatment of HCC, with fewer severe adverse events, ORR and DCR was 14-22% and 62-60%, respectively. Both TOS and ROS in lenvatinib group were better than those in sorafenib group. For HCC patients whose first-line targeted drug is lenvatinib, it is safe and effective to accept regorafenib after disease progresses.

Efficacy of Drug-Eluting Bead Transarterial Chemoembolization in the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastasis

We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) in the treatment of colorectal cancer liver metastasis. A total of 120 patients with colorectal cancer liver metastasis were divided into the TACE group (receiving TACE treatment, n = 60) and the DEB-TACE group (receiving DEB-TACE treatment, n = 60). At 1 month after treatment, the objective response rate (ORR) in the TACE group and DEB-TACE group were 65.0% (39/60) and 78.3% (47/60), respectively, and the disease control rate (DCR) was 78.3% (47/60) and 85.0% (51/60), respectively. Three months later, the ORRs in TACE and DEB-TACE groups were 63.3% (38/60) and 75.0% (45/60), and the DCRs were 76.7% (46/60) and 81.7% (49/60). We showed that the 1-year overall survival (OS) in TACE and DEB-TACE groups were 100% (60/60) and 88.3% (53/60), respectively, and the 2-year OS were 78.3% (47/60) and 61.7% (37/60). Further analysis indicated that the OS in the DEB-TACE group was significantly longer than that in the TACE group (P = 0.045). DEB-TACE is effective, safe, and feasible in the treatment of colorectal cancer liver metastasis, which can effectively improve the survival of patients.

The efficacy of drug-eluting bead or conventional transarterial chemoembolization plus apatinib for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus

Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with apatinib has been used for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and the efficacy is good. The study was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of drug-eluting bead TACE plus apatinib (D-TACE-A) with conventional TACE plus apatinib (C-TACE-A) in the treatment of HCC with portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT). A total of 130 continuous patients who received D-TACE-A or C-TACE-A were included in the study from January 2017 to June 2020. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to reduce potential selection bias. Before PSM, the median overall survival (mOS) (14 months) and median progression-free survival (mPFS) (7 months) in the C-TACE-A group were longer than the mOS (9 months; P = 0.001) and mPFS (4 months; P = 0.001) in the D-TACE-A group. After PSM, the mOS (14 months vs 9 months; P = 0.039) and mPFS (7 months vs 5 months; P = 0.009) in the C-TACE-A group were longer than those in the D-TACE-A group. In the multivariate regression analysis, C-TACE-A reduced the mortality rate and tumor progression rate compared with D-TACE-A. For the subgroup analysis, patients with VP1-2, without extrahepatic metastases, and with multiple TACE sessions who received C-TACE-A had a lower death risk and tumor progression risk than patients who received D-TACE-A. Before PSM, there was no statistically significant difference in any grade or grade III/IV adverse events (all P > 0.05). C-TACE-A could prolong mOS and mPFS in patients with PVTT, especially for patients with VP1-2 stage PVTT, no extrahepatic tumor metastases, and multiple TACE sessions.