Sensitivity and optimal clinicopathological features for mutation-targeted liquid biopsy in pN0M0 EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma

Detection of EGFR mutations in patients with suspected lung cancer using paired tissue-plasma testing: a prospective comparative study with plasma ddPCR assay

Detecting EGFR mutations in plasma using droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) assay offers a promising diagnostic tool for lung cancer patients. The performance of plasma-based ddPCR assay relative to traditional EGFR mutation testing in tissue biopsies among Asian patients with suspected lung cancer remains underexplored. Consecutive patients admitted for diagnostic workup for suspected lung cancer were recruited. Peripheral blood samples were collected on the same day of tissue biopsies. Tissue samples were subjected to EGFR mutation analysis via real-time PCR, whereas plasma samples were processed for ddPCR assay to evaluate for EGFR mutation status. The tissue re-biopsy rate was 43.8% while 0.7% of patients failed blood taking. Despite repeat biopsy, 15.2% of patients could not achieve histological diagnosis. Of the 202 patients newly diagnosed with lung cancer, EGFR mutations were detected in 13.4% of plasma samples, compared to 44.3% in tissue samples. Plasma ddPCR for EGFR mutations detection were barely detectable in stages I and II non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but the sensitivity was 25.0%, 56.3%, and 75.0% in stages III, IVA, and IVB NSCLC, respectively. Plasma EGFR mutations were highly specific among all stages of lung cancer. Concordance rates of plasma ddPCR assay also rose with more advanced stages, recorded at 41.9% for stages I and II, 71.9% for stage III, 86.3% for stage IV. In stage IV lung cancer, the false negative rate for the plasma ddPCR assay was 34.4%, whereas that for the tissue testing was 19.2% due to insufficient tissue samples. Plasma-based EGFR genotyping using ddPCR is a non-invasive method that offers early diagnosis and serves as a valuable adjunct to tissue-based testing for patients with advanced-stage lung cancer. However, its usefulness is limited in the context of early-stage lung cancer, indicating a need for further research to improve its accuracy in these patients.

Liquid biopsy in non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis of state-of-the-art and future perspectives

Introduction: To date, tissue biopsy represents the gold standard for characterizing non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), however, the complex architecture of the disease has introduced the need for new investigative approaches, such as liquid biopsy. Indeed, DNA analyzed in liquid biopsy is much more representative of tumour heterogeneity. Materials and methods: We performed a meta-analysis of 17 selected papers, to attest to the diagnostic performance of liquid biopsy in identifying EGFR mutations in NSCLC. Results: In the overall studies, we found a sensitivity of 0.59, specificity of 0.96 and diagnostic odds ratio of 24,69. Since we noticed a high heterogeneity among different papers, we also performed the meta-analysis in separate subsets of papers, divided by 1) stage of disease, 2) experimental design and 3) method of mutation detection. Liquid biopsy has the highest sensitivity/specificity in high-stage tumours, and prospective studies are more reliable than retrospective ones in terms of sensitivity and specificity, both NGS and PCR-based techniques can be used to detect tumour DNA in liquid biopsy. Discussion: Overall, liquid biopsy has the potential to help the management of NSCLC, but at present the non-homogeneous literature data, lack of optimal detection methods, together with relatively high costs make its applicability in routine diagnostics still challenging.

Potential clinical utility of liquid biopsy in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Liquid biopsy has been widely researched for early diagnosis, prognostication and disease monitoring in lung cancer, but there is a need to investigate its clinical utility for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

We performed a meta-analysis and systematic review to evaluate diagnostic and prognostic values of liquid biopsy for early-stage NSCLC, regarding the common biomarkers, circulating tumor cells, circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), methylation signatures, and microRNAs. Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE databases, ClinicalTrials.gov, and reference lists were searched for eligible studies since inception to 17 May 2022. Sensitivity, specificity and area under the curve (AUC) were assessed for diagnostic values. Hazard ratio (HR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) was extracted from the recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) plots for prognostic analysis. Also, potential predictive values and treatment response evaluation were further investigated.

RESULTS

In this meta-analysis, there were 34 studies eligible for diagnostic assessment and 21 for prognostic analysis. The estimated diagnostic values of biomarkers for early-stage NSCLC with AUCs ranged from 0.84 to 0.87. The factors TNM stage I, T1 stage, N0 stage, adenocarcinoma, young age, and nonsmoking contributed to a lower tumor burden, with a median cell-free DNA concentration of 8.64 ng/ml. For prognostic analysis, the presence of molecular residual disease (MRD) detection was a strong predictor of disease relapse (RFS, HR, 4.95; 95% CI, 3.06-8.02; p < 0.001) and inferior OS (HR, 3.93; 95% CI, 1.97-7.83; p < 0.001), with average lead time of 179 ± 74 days between molecular recurrence and radiographic progression. Predictive values analysis showed adjuvant therapy significantly benefited the RFS of MRD + patients (HR, 0.27; p < 0.001), while an opposite tendency was detected for MRD - patients (HR, 1.51; p = 0.19). For treatment response evaluation, a strong correlation between pathological response and ctDNA clearance was detected, and both were associated with longer survival after neoadjuvant therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, our study indicated liquid biopsy could reliably facilitate more precision and effective management of early-stage NSCLC. Improvement of liquid biopsy techniques and detection approaches and platforms is still needed, and higher-quality trials are required to provide more rigorous evidence prior to their routine clinical application.