Assessing the risk of venous thromboembolism in patients with haematological cancers using three prediction models

Retinal Vessel Analysis and Microvascular Abnormalities in Patients with Philadelphia-Negative Chronic Myeloproliferative Neoplasms

Background: Philadelphia-negative chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms are a group of clonal hematopoietic disorders including polycythemia vera, essential thrombocythemia, and primary myelofi-brosis. These neoplasms are characterized by an increased risk of thrombotic complications. Several studies have highlighted that the study of vessels of the retina offers the opportunity to visualize, in vivo, the damage to microcirculation that is common in various systemic pathologies. Methods: in our study, forty patients underwent an ophthalmological examination, using non-invasive imaging tech-niques, for analyses of their retinal vascularization. The objective was to correlate the findings ob-tained from this study of the retina with different markers of thrombotic risk, to demonstrate the usefulness of studying retinal vessels as a possible new prognostic biomarker of thrombotic risk in patients affected by Philadelphia-negative chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms. Results: retinal imaging demonstrated changes in the microcirculation, with a reduced vascular density of the deep and superficial capillary plexuses with respect to a normal group, and a correlation between retinal changes and blood parameters. Conclusions: additional research will allow us to determine whether retinal changes in individuals with chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms could be predictive of the development of thrombotic events in these subjects.

Novel Insights in Venous Thromboembolism Risk Assessment Methods in Ambulatory Cancer Patients: From the Guidelines to Clinical Practice

Many cancer patients will experience venous thromboembolism (VTE) at some stage, with the highest rate in the initial period following diagnosis. Novel cancer therapies may further enhance the risk. VTE in a cancer setting is associated with poor prognostic, a decreased quality of life, and high healthcare costs. If thromboprophylaxis in hospitalized cancer patients and perioperative settings is widely accepted in clinical practice and supported by the guidelines, it is not the same situation in ambulatory cancer patient settings. The guidelines do not recommend primary thromboprophylaxis, except in high-risk cases. However, nowadays, risk stratification is still challenging, although many tools have been developed. The Khrorana score remains the most used method, but it has many limits. This narrative review aims to present the current relevant knowledge of VTE risk assessment in ambulatory cancer patients, starting from the guideline recommendations and continuing with the specific risk assessment methods and machine learning models approaches. Biomarkers, genetic, and clinical features were tested alone or in groups. Old and new models used in VTE risk assessment are exposed, underlining their clinical utility. Imaging and biomolecular approaches to VTE screening of outpatients with cancer are also presented, which could help clinical decisions.