The current and future impact of genome-wide sequencing on fetal precision medicine

Embryo and fetal gene editing: Technical challenges and progress toward clinical applications

Gene modification therapies (GMTs) are slowly but steadily making progress toward clinical application. As the majority of rare diseases have an identified genetic cause, and as rare diseases collectively affect 5% of the global population, it is increasingly important to devise gene correction strategies to address the root causes of the most devastating of these diseases and to provide access to these novel therapies to the most affected populations. The main barriers to providing greater access to GMTs continue to be the prohibitive cost of developing these novel drugs at clinically relevant doses, subtherapeutic effects, and toxicity related to the specific agents or high doses required. In vivo strategy and treating younger patients at an earlier course of their disease could lower these barriers. Although currently regarded as niche specialties, prenatal and preconception GMTs offer a robust solution to some of these barriers. Indeed, treating either the fetus or embryo benefits from economy of scale, targeting pre-pathological tissues in the fetus prior to full pathogenesis, or increasing the likelihood of complete tissue targeting by correcting pluripotent embryonic cells. Here, we review advances in embryo and fetal GMTs and discuss requirements for clinical application.

Prenatal Diagnosis by Trio Clinical Exome Sequencing: Single Center Experience

Fetal anomalies, characterized by structural or functional abnormalities occurring during intrauterine life, pose a significant medical challenge, with a notable prevalence, affecting approximately 2-3% of live births and 20% of spontaneous miscarriages. This study aims to identify the genetic cause of ultrasound anomalies through clinical exome sequencing (CES) analysis. The focus is on utilizing CES analysis in a trio setting, involving the fetuses and both parents. To achieve this objective, prenatal trio clinical exome sequencing was conducted in 51 fetuseses exhibiting ultrasound anomalies with previously negative results from chromosomal microarray (CMA) analysis. The study revealed pathogenic variants in 24% of the analyzed cases (12 out of 51). It is worth noting that the findings include de novo variants in 50% of cases and the transmission of causative variants from asymptomatic parents in 50% of cases. Trio clinical exome sequencing stands out as a crucial tool in advancing prenatal diagnostics, surpassing the effectiveness of relying solely on chromosomal microarray analysis. This underscores its potential to become a routine diagnostic standard in prenatal care, particularly for cases involving ultrasound anomalies.

Precision medicine in complex diseases-Molecular subgrouping for improved prediction and treatment stratification

Complex diseases are caused by a combination of genetic, lifestyle, and environmental factors and comprise common noncommunicable diseases, including allergies, cardiovascular disease, and psychiatric and metabolic disorders. More than 25% of Europeans suffer from a complex disease, and together these diseases account for 70% of all deaths. The use of genomic, molecular, or imaging data to develop accurate diagnostic tools for treatment recommendations and preventive strategies, and for disease prognosis and prediction, is an important step toward precision medicine. However, for complex diseases, precision medicine is associated with several challenges. There is a significant heterogeneity between patients of a specific disease-both with regards to symptoms and underlying causal mechanisms-and the number of underlying genetic and nongenetic risk factors is often high. Here, we summarize precision medicine approaches for complex diseases and highlight the current breakthroughs as well as the challenges. We conclude that genomic-based precision medicine has been used mainly for patients with highly penetrant monogenic disease forms, such as cardiomyopathies. However, for most complex diseases-including psychiatric disorders and allergies-available polygenic risk scores are more probabilistic than deterministic and have not yet been validated for clinical utility. However, subclassifying patients of a specific disease into discrete homogenous subtypes based on molecular or phenotypic data is a promising strategy for improving diagnosis, prediction, treatment, prevention, and prognosis. The availability of high-throughput molecular technologies, together with large collections of health data and novel data-driven approaches, offers promise toward improved individual health through precision medicine.

When is the best time to screen and evaluate for treatable genetic disorders?: A lifespan perspective

This paper focuses on the question of, "When is the best time to identify an individual at risk for a treatable genetic condition?" In this review, we describe a framework for considering the optimal timing for pursuing genetic and genomic screening for treatable genetic conditions incorporating a lifespan approach. Utilizing the concept of a carousel that represents the four broad time periods when critical decisions might be made around genetic diagnoses during a person's lifetime, we describe genetic testing during the prenatal period, the newborn period, childhood, and adulthood. For each of these periods, we describe the objectives of genetic testing, the current status of screening or testing, the near-term vision for the future of genomic testing, the advantages and disadvantages of each approach, and the feasibility and ethical considerations of testing and treating. The notion of a "Genomics Passbook" is one where an early genomic screening evaluation could be performed on each individual through a public health program, with that data ultimately serving as a "living document" that could be queried and/or reanalyzed at prescribed times during the lifetime of that person, or in response to concerns about symptoms of a genetic disorder in that individual.

Heath policy guiding the identification, analysis and management of secondary findings for individuals undergoing genomic sequencing: a systematic review protocol

INTRODUCTION

Genomic sequencing is increasingly enabling precision care across medical specialties; however, the discovery of genomic 'secondary findings' (SFs) unrelated to the patient's primary indication remains a profuse, unintended consequence. Existing practices within the continuum of SF identification, analysis and management are numerous, inconsistent and sometimes contradictory across health conditions and regions. Final decisions are often at the discretion of the genomic sequencing laboratory, bioinformatician or treating physician. This difference in healthcare delivery causes inconsistent information, disclosure and downstream impacts required to manage SFs and patient outcomes. Improving our understanding of the SF health policy landscape can determine components of the SF policy continuum spanning generation through to management that are in conflict, limitations of current guidance and existing needs across clinical settings.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

We will carry out a systematic review to catalogue and appraise current guidance directing the identification, analysis and management of SFs for participants receiving genomic sequencing globally. We will conduct a comprehensive search of Medline (Medline R, Medline Epub Ahead of Print and Medline-In-Process & In-Data-Review Citations), Embase and Cochrane databases (n=5, inception to Feb 2022) and a grey literature search of international genomics websites (n=64; inception to May 2022). Key inclusion criteria include: guidance produced by health organisations, bioethics committees and professional associations, outlining recommendations for: (1) SF identification, (2) SF analysis or (3) SF management. Non-English language articles and conference abstracts will be excluded. Guidance will be critically appraised with the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation Instrument (AGREE) II tool. We will interpret our findings by process and across populations using a qualitative descriptive approach.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Our systematic review evaluates published data and does not require ethics review. Our findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations and workshops with precision medicine stakeholders.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42022316079.

Prenatal Genetic Testing and Screening: A Focused Review

Given the advancements in prenatal testing, child neurologists are becoming involved in earlier stages of patient care, often being consulted during the gestational stage rather than during the postnatal period. Thus, it is essential that pediatric neurologists understand the strengths and limitations of prenatal testing when counseling families. In this review we separate prenatal testing into screening and diagnostic testing. On the one hand, screening testing is noninvasive and does not have an increased risk for miscarriage. Diagnostic tests, on the other hand, are invasive and include chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis. Understanding that screening tests are not diagnostic is imperative, therefore, attention should be placed on the positive and negative predictive values when interpreting results within the clinical context. Given their invasive nature, prenatal diagnostic tests increase the risk for complications such as miscarriage. Diagnostic tests include biochemical marker testing, enzyme testing, karyotype, microarray, whole exome sequencing, and whole genome sequencing. With each test, pretest and post-test counseling is crucial for informed decision making, and the strengths and limitations should be discussed when obtaining consent. Prior to obtaining testing, clinicians must consider unexpected and unrelated findings of testing and must acknowledge that the patient always has the option to decline the test.

Controversies in Fetal Surgery: Prenatal Repair of Myelomeningocele in the Modern Era

Fetal surgery is a constantly evolving field that showed noticeable progress with the treatment of myelomeningocele (MMC) using prenatal repair. Despite this success, there are ongoing questions regarding the optimal approach for fetal myelomeningocele repair, as well as which patients are eligible. Expansion of the inclusion and exclusion criteria is an important ongoing area of study for myelomeningocele including the recent Management of Myelomeningocele Plus trial. The significant personal and financial burden required of families seeking treatment has likely limited its accessibility to the general population.

Trio exome sequencing is highly relevant in prenatal diagnostics

Objective

About 3% of newborns show malformations, with about 20% of the affected having genetic causes. Clarification of genetic diseases in postnatal diagnostics was significantly improved with high‐throughput sequencing, in particular through whole exome sequencing covering all protein‐coding regions. Here, we aim to extend the use of this technology to prenatal diagnostics.

Method

Between 07/2018 and 10/2020, 500 pregnancies with fetal ultrasound abnormalities were analyzed after genetic counseling as part of prenatal diagnostics using WES of the fetus and parents.

Results

Molecular genetic findings could explain ultrasound abnormalities in 38% of affected fetuses. In 47% of these, disease‐causing de novo variants were found. Pathogenic variants in genes with autosomal recessive or X‐linked inheritance were detected in more than one‐third (70/189 = 37%). The latter are associated with increased probability of recurrence, making their detection important for further pregnancies. Average time from sample receipt to report was 12 days in the recent cases.

Conclusion

Trio exome sequencing is a useful addition to prenatal diagnostics due to its high diagnostic yield and short processing time (comparable to chromosome analysis). It covers a wide spectrum of genetic changes. Comprehensive interdisciplinary counseling before and after diagnostics is indispensable.

What's already known about this topic?

It is known that about 20% of malformations in newborns can be associated with genetic causes.

Whole‐exome sequencing, and especially trio exome sequencing, is an established and successful method in postnatal genetic diagnostics. Diagnostic yield for trio exome sequencing is around 37%.

What does this study add?

We show that trio exome sequencing is a fast and comprehensive method in prenatal diagnostics with diagnostic yield similar to that of postnatal trio exome sequencing.

We provide case solution rates for different phenotypic observations from 19% for abnormalities of internal organs up to 52% for skeletal malformations.

Prenatal diagnosis of chromosome 18 long arm deletion syndrome by high-throughput sequencing: Two case reports

RATIONALE

Chromosome 18 long arm deletion syndrome is a group of clinical syndromes caused by partial or total genetic material deletion of the long arm of chromosome 18 (18q), whose clinical manifestations are related to presentation and developmental abnormalities in various aspects such as intelligence, face, and movement. Prenatal diagnosis of this syndrome is challenging because of its low incidence and uncharacteristic prenatal clinical performance. In this paper, 2 cases of partial deletion of 18q found in prenatal amniotic fluid examination by high-throughput sequencing were reported and analyzed.

PATIENT CONCERNS

In patient 1, non-invasive prenatal gene detection at 21 + 2 weeks of gestation suggests a risk of trisomy 18. In patient 2, ultrasound examination at 21 + 2 weeks of gestation revealed a single live fetus, but it was difficult to pinpoint whether the fetus had only 1 umbilical artery to supply blood.

DIAGNOSIS AND INTERVENTION

The 18q deletion syndrome was diagnosed by chromosome karyotype analysis and high-throughput sequencing.

OUTCOMES

The pregnancies were terminated due to the abnormal chromosome.

LESSON

This report adds novel variants to the genetic profile of 18q deletion, in order to enrich the genetic data of long arm deletion of 18 chromosomes and provide better services for pre-screening, diagnosis, and genetic counseling for this disease.

The fetus in the age of the genome

Due to a number of recent achievements, the field of prenatal medicine is now on the verge of a profound transformation into prenatal genomic medicine. This transformation is expected to not only substantially expand the spectrum of prenatal diagnostic and screening possibilities, but finally also to advance fetal care and the prenatal management of certain fetal diseases and malformations. It will come along with new and profound challenges for the normative framework and clinical care pathways in prenatal (and reproductive) medicine. To adequately address the potential ethically challenging aspects without discarding the obvious benefits, several agents are required to engage in different debates. The permissibility of the sequencing of the whole fetal exome or genome will have to be examined from a philosophical and legal point of view, in particular with regard to conflicts with potential rights of future children. A second requirement is a societal debate on the question of priority setting and justice in relation to prenatal genomic testing. Third, a professional-ethical debate and positioning on the goal of prenatal genomic testing and a consequential re-structuring of clinical care pathways seems to be important. In all these efforts, it might be helpful to envisage the unborn rather not as a fetus, not as a separate moral subject and a second "patient", but in its unique physical connection with the pregnant woman, and to accept the moral quandaries implicitly given in this situation.

Role of whole exome sequencing for unidentified genetic syndromes

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The current review seeks to provide a comprehensive update on the revolutionary technology of whole exome sequencing (WES) which has been used to interrogate abnormal foetal phenotypes since the last few years, and is changing the paradigms of prenatal diagnosis, facilitating accurate genetic diagnosis and optimal management of pregnancies affected with foetal abnormalities, as well enabling delineation of novel Mendelian disorders.

RECENT FINDINGS

WES has contributed to identification of more than 1000 Mendelian genes and made rapid strides into clinical diagnostics in recent years. Diagnostic yield of WES in postnatal cohorts has ranged from 25 to 50%, and this test is now a first tier investigation for various clinical presentations. Various abnormal perinatal phenotypes have also been investigated using WES since 2014, with diagnostic yields ranging from 8.5 to 80%. Studies in foetal phenotypes have been challenging and guidelines in this cohort are still evolving.

SUMMARY

WES has proven to be a disrupting technology, enabling genetic diagnosis for pregnancies complicated by previously unexplained foetal abnormalities, and revealing a significant contribution of single gene disorders in these, thereby changing clinical diagnostic paradigms. The application of this technology in perinatal cohorts is also providing interesting insights into single gene defects presenting as previously unknown genetic syndromes, hence contributing to expansion of Mendelian genetics to encompass various foetal phenotypes.

The Future of Blood Testing Is the Immunome

It is increasingly clear that an extraordinarily diverse range of clinically important conditions—including infections, vaccinations, autoimmune diseases, transplants, transfusion reactions, aging, and cancers—leave telltale signatures in the millions of V(D)J-rearranged antibody and T cell receptor [TR per the Human Genome Organization (HUGO) nomenclature but more commonly known as TCR] genes collectively expressed by a person’s B cells (antibodies) and T cells. We refer to these as the immunome. Because of its diversity and complexity, the immunome provides singular opportunities for advancing personalized medicine by serving as the substrate for a highly multiplexed, near-universal blood test. Here we discuss some of these opportunities, the current state of immunome-based diagnostics, and highlight some of the challenges involved. We conclude with a call to clinicians, researchers, and others to join efforts with the Adaptive Immune Receptor Repertoire Community (AIRR-C) to realize the diagnostic potential of the immunome.