1
|
Simon AL, Caulfield JC, Hammond-Kosack KE, Field LM, Aradottir GI. Identifying aphid resistance in the ancestral wheat Triticum monococcum under field conditions. Sci Rep 2021; 11:13495. [PMID: 34188110 PMCID: PMC8241983 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-92883-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2021] [Accepted: 06/02/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Wheat is an economically, socially, and nutritionally important crop, however, aphid infestation can often reduce wheat yield through feeding and virus transmission. Through field phenotyping, we investigated aphid resistance in ancestral wheat Triticum monococcum (L.). Aphid (Rhopalosiphum padi (L.), Sitobion avenae (F.) and Metopolophium dirhodum (Wlk.)) populations and natural enemy presence (parasitised mummified aphids, ladybird adults and larvae and lacewing eggs and larvae) on two naturally susceptible wheat varieties, Triticum aestivum (L.) var. Solstice and T. monococcum MDR037, and three potentially resistant genotypes T. monococcum MDR657, MDR045 and MDR049 were monitored across three years of field trials. Triticum monococcum MDR045 and MDR049 had smaller aphid populations, whereas MDR657 showed no resistance. Overall, natural enemy presence was positively correlated with aphid populations; however, MDR049 had similar natural enemy presence to MDR037 which is susceptible to aphid infestation. It is hypothesised that alongside reducing aphid population growth, MDR049 also confers indirect resistance by attracting natural enemies. The observed resistance to aphids in MDR045 and MDR049 has strong potential for introgression into commercial wheat varieties, which could have an important role in Integrated Pest Management strategies to reduce aphid populations and virus transmission.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amma L. Simon
- grid.418374.d0000 0001 2227 9389Department of Biointeractions and Crop Protection, Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, AL5 2JQ Hertfordshire UK ,grid.4563.40000 0004 1936 8868Division of Plant and Crop Sciences, School of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Loughborough, LE12 5RD Leicestershire UK
| | - John C. Caulfield
- grid.418374.d0000 0001 2227 9389Department of Biointeractions and Crop Protection, Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, AL5 2JQ Hertfordshire UK
| | - Kim E. Hammond-Kosack
- grid.418374.d0000 0001 2227 9389Department of Biointeractions and Crop Protection, Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, AL5 2JQ Hertfordshire UK
| | - Linda M. Field
- grid.418374.d0000 0001 2227 9389Department of Biointeractions and Crop Protection, Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, AL5 2JQ Hertfordshire UK
| | - Gudbjorg I. Aradottir
- grid.17595.3f0000 0004 0383 6532Department of Pathology, NIAB, Lawrence Weaver Road, Cambridge, CB3 0LE UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wooley SC, Smith DS, Lonsdorf EV, Brown SC, Whitham TG, Shuster SM, Lindroth RL. Local adaptation and rapid evolution of aphids in response to genetic interactions with their cottonwood hosts. Ecol Evol 2020; 10:10532-10542. [PMID: 33072278 PMCID: PMC7548174 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.6709] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2020] [Revised: 07/28/2020] [Accepted: 07/29/2020] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Several studies have demonstrated the ecological consequences of genetic variation within a single plant species. For example, these studies show that individual plant genotypes support unique composition of the plants' associated arthropod community. By contrast, fewer studies have explored how plant genetic variation may influence evolutionary dynamics in the plant's associated species. Here, we examine how aphids respond evolutionarily to genetic variation in their host plant. We conducted two experiments to examine local adaptation and rapid evolution of the free‐feeding aphid Chaitophorus populicola across genetic variants of its host plant, Populus angustifolia. To test for local adaptation, we collected tree cuttings and aphid colonies from three sites along an elevation/climate gradient and conducted a reciprocal transplant experiment. In general, home aphids (aphids transplanted onto trees from the same site) produced 1.7–3.4 times as many offspring as foreign aphids (aphids transplanted onto trees from different sites). To test for rapid evolution, we used 4 clonally replicated aphid genotypes and transplanted each onto 5 clonally replicated P. angustifolia genotypes. Each tree genotype started with the same aphid genotype composition. After 21 days (~two aphid generations), aphid genotype composition changed (i.e., aphids evolved) and some tree genotypes supported unique evolutionary trajectories of aphids. These results suggest that plant evolution in response to human perturbation, such as climate change and invasive species, will also result in evolutionary responses in strongly interacting species that could cascade to affect whole communities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stuart C. Wooley
- Department of Entomology University of Wisconsin‐Madison Madison Wisconsin USA
- Department of Biological Sciences California State University Turlock California USA
| | - David Solance Smith
- Department of Biological Sciences Northern Arizona University Flagstaff Arizona USA
- Biology Department California State University San Bernardino San Bernardino California USA
| | - Eric V. Lonsdorf
- Alexander Center for Population Biology Conservation and Science Lincoln Park Zoo Chicago Illinois USA
- Urban Wildlife Institute Conservation and Science Lincoln Park Zoo Chicago Illinois USA
| | - Sarah C. Brown
- Department of Entomology University of Wisconsin‐Madison Madison Wisconsin USA
| | - Thomas G. Whitham
- Department of Biological Sciences Northern Arizona University Flagstaff Arizona USA
- Center for Adaptable Western Landscapes Northern Arizona University Flagstaff Arizona USA
| | - Stephen M. Shuster
- Department of Biological Sciences Northern Arizona University Flagstaff Arizona USA
| | - Richard L. Lindroth
- Department of Entomology University of Wisconsin‐Madison Madison Wisconsin USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ware IM, Fitzpatrick CR, Senthilnathan A, Bayliss SLJ, Beals KK, Mueller LO, Summers JL, Wooliver RC, Van Nuland ME, Kinnison MT, Palkovacs EP, Schweitzer JA, Bailey JK. Feedbacks link ecosystem ecology and evolution across spatial and temporal scales: Empirical evidence and future directions. Funct Ecol 2019. [DOI: 10.1111/1365-2435.13267] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Ian M. Ware
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of Tennessee Knoxville Tennessee
| | | | | | - Shannon L. J. Bayliss
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of Tennessee Knoxville Tennessee
| | - Kendall K. Beals
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of Tennessee Knoxville Tennessee
| | - Liam O. Mueller
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of Tennessee Knoxville Tennessee
| | - Jennifer L. Summers
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of Tennessee Knoxville Tennessee
| | - Rachel C. Wooliver
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of Tennessee Knoxville Tennessee
| | | | | | - Eric P. Palkovacs
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of California Santa Cruz California
| | - Jennifer A. Schweitzer
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of Tennessee Knoxville Tennessee
| | - Joseph K. Bailey
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of Tennessee Knoxville Tennessee
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bonte D, Masier S, Mortier F. Eco-evolutionary feedbacks following changes in spatial connectedness. CURRENT OPINION IN INSECT SCIENCE 2018; 29:64-70. [PMID: 30551827 DOI: 10.1016/j.cois.2018.06.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2018] [Revised: 06/15/2018] [Accepted: 06/20/2018] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
Abstract
Humans are drastically changing the spatial configuration of habitats. The associated changes in habitat connectedness impose strong selection on dispersal, and dispersal related traits. Evolutionary responses do, however, strongly feedback on the metapopulation dynamics, by further constraining or improving connectivity and impacting local population and food web dynamics. Because these spatial eco-evolutionary interactions occur at contemporary time scales, unique evidence on its importance is especially emerging in the field of entomology as many insects have short generation times and a huge reproductive potential. We review the ecological feedbacks originating from the evolution of dispersal rate, dispersal syndromes and genetic diversity on metapopulation dynamics and range expansions. We thus close the eco-evolutionary loop for insect and arachnid spatial dynamics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dries Bonte
- Ghent University, Dept. of Biology, K.L. Ledeganckstraat 35, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium.
| | - Stefano Masier
- Ghent University, Dept. of Biology, K.L. Ledeganckstraat 35, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
| | - Frederik Mortier
- Ghent University, Dept. of Biology, K.L. Ledeganckstraat 35, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Simon AL, Wellham PAD, Aradottir GI, Gange AC. Unravelling mycorrhiza-induced wheat susceptibility to the English grain aphid Sitobion avenae. Sci Rep 2017; 7:46497. [PMID: 28406246 PMCID: PMC5390270 DOI: 10.1038/srep46497] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2016] [Accepted: 03/17/2017] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi are root symbionts that can increase or decrease aphid growth rates and reproduction, but the reason by which this happens is unknown. To investigate the underlying mechanisms of this interaction, we examined the effect of AM fungi on the English Grain aphid (Sitobion avenae) development, reproduction, attraction, settlement and feeding behaviour on two naturally susceptible varieties Triticum aestivum (L.) variety Solstice and T. monococcum MDR037, and two naturally resistant lines, T. monococcum MDR045 and MDR049. Mycorrhizal colonisation increased the attractiveness of T. aestivum var. Solstice to aphids, but there was no effect on aphid development on this variety. Using the Electrical Penetration Graph (EPG) technique, we found that mycorrhizal colonisation increased aphid phloem feeding on T. monococcum MDR037 and MDR045, colonisation also increased growth rate and reproductive success of S. avenae on these varieties. Mycorrhizas increased vascular bundle size, demonstrating that these fungi can influence plant anatomy. We discuss if and how this could be related to an enhanced success rate in phloem feeding in two varieties. Overall, we present and discuss how mycorrhizal fungi can affect the feeding behaviour of S. avenae in wheat, inducing susceptibility in a resistant variety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amma L. Simon
- Department of Biological Chemistry and Crop Protection, Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, Hertfordshire, AL5 2JQ, UK
- School of Biological Sciences, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham, Surrey, TW20 0EX, UK
| | | | - Gudbjorg I. Aradottir
- Department of Biological Chemistry and Crop Protection, Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, Hertfordshire, AL5 2JQ, UK
| | - Alan C. Gange
- School of Biological Sciences, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham, Surrey, TW20 0EX, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
Aphids are important herbivores of both wild and cultivated plants. Plants rely on unique mechanisms of recognition, signalling and defence to cope with the specialized mode of phloem feeding by aphids. Aspects of the molecular mechanisms underlying aphid-plant interactions are beginning to be understood. Recent advances include the identification of aphid salivary proteins involved in host plant manipulation, and plant receptors involved in aphid recognition. However, a complete picture of aphid-plant interactions requires consideration of the ecological outcome of these mechanisms in nature, and the evolutionary processes that shaped them. Here we identify general patterns of resistance, with a special focus on recognition, phytohormonal signalling, secondary metabolites and induction of plant resistance. We discuss how host specialization can enable aphids to co-opt both the phytohormonal responses and defensive compounds of plants for their own benefit at a local scale. In response, systemically induced resistance in plants is common and often involves targeted responses to specific aphid species or even genotypes. As co-evolutionary adaptation between plants and aphids is ongoing, the stealthy nature of aphid feeding makes both the mechanisms and outcomes of these interactions highly distinct from those of other herbivore-plant interactions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tobias Züst
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, USA
| | - Anurag A Agrawal
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Turcotte MM, Lochab AK, Turley NE, Johnson MTJ. Plant domestication slows pest evolution. Ecol Lett 2015; 18:907-15. [DOI: 10.1111/ele.12467] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2015] [Revised: 04/20/2015] [Accepted: 05/27/2015] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Martin M. Turcotte
- Department of Biology; University of Toronto at Mississauga; Mississauga ON L5L 1C6 Canada
- Institute of Integrative Biology; ETH Zürich; Universitätstrasse 16; Zürich 8092 Switzerland
| | - Amaneet K. Lochab
- Department of Biology; University of Toronto at Mississauga; Mississauga ON L5L 1C6 Canada
| | - Nash E. Turley
- Department of Biology; University of Toronto at Mississauga; Mississauga ON L5L 1C6 Canada
- Department of Plant Biology; Michigan State University; East Lansing MI 48824-1312 USA
| | - Marc T. J. Johnson
- Department of Biology; University of Toronto at Mississauga; Mississauga ON L5L 1C6 Canada
| |
Collapse
|